Co-authored-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com>
This commit was merged in pull request #999.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
rockachopa
parent
3ab180b8a7
commit
e35a23cefa
74
skills/research/competitive_scan.md
Normal file
74
skills/research/competitive_scan.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Competitive Scan
|
||||
type: research
|
||||
typical_query_count: 3-5
|
||||
expected_output_length: 800-1500 words
|
||||
cascade_tier: groq_preferred
|
||||
description: >
|
||||
Compare a project against its alternatives. Produces a feature matrix,
|
||||
strengths/weaknesses analysis, and positioning summary.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Competitive Scan: {project} vs Alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Compare **{project}** against **{alternatives}** (comma-separated list of
|
||||
competitors). The goal is to understand where {project} stands and identify
|
||||
differentiation opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
## Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- Comparison date: {date}.
|
||||
- Focus areas: {focus_areas} (e.g., features, pricing, community, performance).
|
||||
- Perspective: {perspective} (user, developer, business).
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Gather key facts about {project} (features, pricing, community size, release cadence).
|
||||
2. Gather the same data for each alternative in {alternatives}.
|
||||
3. Build a feature comparison matrix.
|
||||
4. Identify strengths and weaknesses for each entry.
|
||||
5. Summarize positioning and recommend next steps.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
|
||||
One paragraph: what space does {project} compete in, and who are the main players?
|
||||
|
||||
### Feature Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature / Attribute | {project} | {alt_1} | {alt_2} | {alt_3} |
|
||||
|--------------------|-----------|---------|---------|---------|
|
||||
| {feature_1} | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
| {feature_2} | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
| Pricing | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
| License | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
| Community Size | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
| Last Major Release | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
||||
|
||||
### Strengths & Weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
#### {project}
|
||||
- **Strengths:** ...
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** ...
|
||||
|
||||
#### {alt_1}
|
||||
- **Strengths:** ...
|
||||
- **Weaknesses:** ...
|
||||
|
||||
_(Repeat for each alternative)_
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning Map
|
||||
|
||||
Describe where each project sits along the key dimensions (e.g., simplicity
|
||||
vs power, free vs paid, niche vs general).
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Bullet list of actions based on the competitive landscape:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Differentiate on:** {differentiator}
|
||||
- **Watch out for:** {threat}
|
||||
- **Consider adopting from {alt}:** {feature_or_approach}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user