--- name: Competitive Scan type: research typical_query_count: 3-5 expected_output_length: 800-1500 words cascade_tier: groq_preferred description: > Compare a project against its alternatives. Produces a feature matrix, strengths/weaknesses analysis, and positioning summary. --- # Competitive Scan: {project} vs Alternatives ## Context Compare **{project}** against **{alternatives}** (comma-separated list of competitors). The goal is to understand where {project} stands and identify differentiation opportunities. ## Constraints - Comparison date: {date}. - Focus areas: {focus_areas} (e.g., features, pricing, community, performance). - Perspective: {perspective} (user, developer, business). ## Research Steps 1. Gather key facts about {project} (features, pricing, community size, release cadence). 2. Gather the same data for each alternative in {alternatives}. 3. Build a feature comparison matrix. 4. Identify strengths and weaknesses for each entry. 5. Summarize positioning and recommend next steps. ## Output Format ### Overview One paragraph: what space does {project} compete in, and who are the main players? ### Feature Matrix | Feature / Attribute | {project} | {alt_1} | {alt_2} | {alt_3} | |--------------------|-----------|---------|---------|---------| | {feature_1} | ... | ... | ... | ... | | {feature_2} | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Pricing | ... | ... | ... | ... | | License | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Community Size | ... | ... | ... | ... | | Last Major Release | ... | ... | ... | ... | ### Strengths & Weaknesses #### {project} - **Strengths:** ... - **Weaknesses:** ... #### {alt_1} - **Strengths:** ... - **Weaknesses:** ... _(Repeat for each alternative)_ ### Positioning Map Describe where each project sits along the key dimensions (e.g., simplicity vs power, free vs paid, niche vs general). ### Recommendations Bullet list of actions based on the competitive landscape: - **Differentiate on:** {differentiator} - **Watch out for:** {threat} - **Consider adopting from {alt}:** {feature_or_approach}