e35a23cefa
Co-authored-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com>
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
name, type, typical_query_count, expected_output_length, cascade_tier, description
| name | type | typical_query_count | expected_output_length | cascade_tier | description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Evaluation | research | 3-5 | 800-1500 words | groq_preferred | Discover and evaluate all shipping tools/libraries/services in a given domain. Produces a ranked comparison table with pros, cons, and recommendation. |
Tool Evaluation: {domain}
Context
You are researching tools, libraries, and services for {domain}. The goal is to find everything that is currently shipping (not vaporware) and produce a structured comparison.
Constraints
- Only include tools that have public releases or hosted services available today.
- If a tool is in beta/preview, note that clearly.
- Focus on {focus_criteria} when evaluating (e.g., cost, ease of integration, community size).
Research Steps
- Identify all actively-maintained tools in the {domain} space.
- For each tool, gather: name, URL, license/pricing, last release date, language/platform.
- Evaluate each tool against the focus criteria.
- Rank by overall fit for the use case: {use_case}.
Output Format
Summary
One paragraph: what the landscape looks like and the top recommendation.
Comparison Table
| Tool | License / Price | Last Release | Language | {focus_criteria} Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Top Pick
- Recommended: {tool_name} — {one-line reason}
- Runner-up: {tool_name} — {one-line reason}
Risks & Gaps
Bullet list of things to watch out for (missing features, vendor lock-in, etc.).