[
  {
    "prompt": "Find and extract the full text of Corpus Hermeticum, Tract X \u2014 \"The Key\" (also known as \"The Key of Hermes Trismegistus\" or \"The Key of Thoth\"). This is the G.R.S. Mead translation from \"Thrice-Greatest Hermes\" (1906). \n\nSearch for it at these sources:\n1. gnosis.org/library/ (try various URL patterns like hermes10.htm, hermet10.htm)\n2. sacred-texts.com/chr/th2/ (the Mead translation - try th210.htm or similar)\n3. Any other source hosting the Mead translation of Corpus Hermeticum Tract X\n4. Try Wikisource or Project Gutenberg for Mead's \"Thrice-Greatest Hermes\"\n\nI need the actual text of the tract, not just a summary. Extract as much of the primary source text as possible, including key passages about: the hierarchy of mind/body/soul, the role of knowledge, the relationship between the Key and understanding, and any dialogue between Hermes and Tat.\n\nReturn the full extracted text with the source URL.",
    "chosen": "<tool_call>\n{\"name\": \"browser\", \"arguments\": {\"action\": \"navigate\", \"url\": \"https://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/th2/th210.htm\"}}\n</tool_call>\n<tool_result>\nPage loaded: Corpus Hermeticum, X (XI). The Key\n</tool_result>\n\n<tool_call>\n{\"name\": \"browser\", \"arguments\": {\"action\": \"getText\"}}\n</tool_call>\n<tool_result>\nSacred Texts Christianity Encyclopedic Encyclopedic Encyclopedic Encyclopedic Encyclopedic Encyclopedic\n\nThrice-Greatest Hermes, Vol. 2, by G.R.S. Mead, [1906], at sacred-texts.com\n\np. 147\n\nX (XI). THE KEY\n\n(Title from Patrizzi (p. 30b) without prefix, giving simply \"The Key\";\nso also Reitzenstein. Text: Stob., Phys., xli. 3, under heading: \"Of\nHermes from the [Sermon] to Tat called 'The Key'\"; G. pp. 135-156;\nM. i. 117-132; W. i. 160-184. M\u00e9nard: Book X., pp. 97-120--\"The\nKey.\")\n\n1. [Hermes.] My yesterday's discourse (logos) I dedicated unto thee,\nAsclepius, and so 'tis [only] right I should to-day's to Tat\n[now] dedicate; and this the more because 'tis the abridgment of the\nGeneral Sermons (Logoi) which he has had addressed to him.\n\n\"God, Father and the Good,\" then, Tat, hath the same nature, or more\nexactly, the same energy.\n\n2. For nature is a predicate of growth, and this is used of things that\nchange, both mobile and immobile, that is to say, both human and\ndivine, each one of which He willeth forth.\n\nBut energy consists in something else, as we have shown in treating of\nthe rest [of things], both things divine and human things; which\n[fact] we ought to have in mind when treating of the Good.\n\n3. God's energy is then His Will; further His essence is to will the\nbeing of all things. For what is \"God and Father and the Good\" but\nthe \"to be\" of all that are not yet? Nay, subsistence self of\neverything that is; this, then, is God, this Father, this the Good;\nto Him is added naught of all the rest.\n\nAnd though the Cosmos, that is to say the Sun, is also sire himself to\nthem that share in him; yet so far is he not the cause of good unto the\nlives, he is not ev",
    "session": "session_20260316_175018_159933.json"
  }
]