[
  {
    "prompt": "Extract commentary text from two BibleHub pages about Matthew 5:37 (\"Let your communication be Yea, yea; Nay, nay\") and Matthew 5:48 (\"Be ye therefore perfect\"). Return the raw commentary text from Ellicott's, Meyer's, Barnes', and Pulpit Commentary sections if present. URLs: https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-37.htm and https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-48.htm",
    "chosen": "I'll fetch both BibleHub pages and extract the commentary sections.\n\n<tool_call>\n{\"name\": \"web_fetch\", \"arguments\": {\"url\": \"https://biblehub.com/matthew/5-37.htm\"}}\n</tool_call>\n<tool_response>\nMatthew 5:37 Commentaries: But let your statement be, 'Yes, yes' or 'No, no'; anything beyond these is of evil.\n[META_START]Title: Matthew 5:37 Commentaries: But let your statement be, 'Yes, yes' or 'No, no'; anything beyond these is of evil.[META_END]\n\nJump to: Ellicott | Bengel | Meyer | Alford | Vincent | Clarke | Calvin | Gill | Barnes | Poole | Lightfoot | Wesley | Whedon | Pulpit | Treasury | Greek\n\nEXPOSITORY (ENGLISH BIBLE)\n\nEllicott's Commentary for English Readers\n\n(37) But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay.\u2014This admits of two interpretations: (1) Repeat your affirmation or denial\u2014\"yea\" or \"nay\"\u2014if asked to do so, but nothing beyond this; (2) Let your positive or negative assertion be accepted as equivalent to an oath. Grammatically, either is tenable; but the former seems most natural. The words, \"for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil,\" or \"of the evil one,\" are sometimes pressed to show that swearing is in itself evil, that it comes from the distrust of the honesty of others, and that distrust is of Satan's prompting. A perfectly truthful man would always be believed on his simple word, and so oaths would be unnecessary. In this sense the text has been held to condemn all swearing, as by the Society of Friends; and certainly the argument from it is stronger than it might seem to be at first sight, though probably the primary thought was simply that superfluous amplifications of \"yes\" and \"no\" come from the evil one.\n\nMeyer's NT Commentary\n\n37. \u1f14\u03c3\u03c4\u03c9 \u03b4\u1f72 \u1f41 \u03bb\u03cc\u03b3\u03bf\u03c2 \u1f51\u03bc\u1ff6\u03bd \u03bd\u03b1\u1f76 \u03bd\u03b1\u03af, \u03bf\u1f52 \u03bf\u1f54] But your speech (in giving assurance) shall be yea, yea; nay, nay (as a formula which shall exclude oaths altogether). Most expositors take \u03bd\u03b1\u03af and \u03bf\u1f54 as a mere repetition, equivalent to a strong assurance, so that the meaning would be: let your affirmation and neg",
    "session": "session_20260316_183440_2dbc9c.json"
  }
]