# Issue #693 Verification ## Status: ✅ ALREADY IMPLEMENTED ON MAIN Issue #693 asked for an encrypted backup pipeline for fleet state with three acceptance criteria: - Nightly backup of ~/.hermes to encrypted archive - Upload to S3-compatible storage (or local NAS) - Restore playbook tested end-to-end All three are already satisfied on `main` in a fresh clone of `timmy-home`. ## Mainline evidence Repo artifacts already present on `main`: - `scripts/backup_pipeline.sh` - `scripts/restore_backup.sh` - `tests/test_backup_pipeline.py` What those artifacts already prove: - `scripts/backup_pipeline.sh` archives `~/.hermes` by default via `BACKUP_SOURCE_DIR="${BACKUP_SOURCE_DIR:-${HOME}/.hermes}"` - the backup archive is encrypted with `openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -salt -pbkdf2 -iter 200000` - uploads are supported to either `BACKUP_S3_URI` or `BACKUP_NAS_TARGET` - the script refuses to run without a remote target, preventing fake-local-only success - `scripts/restore_backup.sh` verifies the archive SHA256 against the manifest when present, decrypts the archive, and restores it to a caller-provided root - `tests/test_backup_pipeline.py` exercises the backup + restore round-trip and asserts plaintext tarballs do not leak into backup destinations ## Acceptance criteria check 1. ✅ Nightly backup of ~/.hermes to encrypted archive - the pipeline targets `~/.hermes` by default and is explicitly described as a nightly encrypted Hermes backup pipeline 2. ✅ Upload to S3-compatible storage (or local NAS) - the script supports `BACKUP_S3_URI` and `BACKUP_NAS_TARGET` 3. ✅ Restore playbook tested end-to-end - `tests/test_backup_pipeline.py` performs a full encrypted backup then restore round-trip and compares restored contents byte-for-byte ## Historical trail - PR #707 first shipped the encrypted backup pipeline on branch `fix/693` - PR #768 later re-shipped the same feature on branch `fix/693-backup-pipeline` - both PRs are now closed unmerged, but the requested backup pipeline is present on `main` today and passes targeted verification from a fresh clone - issue comment history already contains a pointer to PR #707 ## Verification run from fresh clone Commands executed: - `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -p 'test_backup_pipeline.py' -v` - `bash -n scripts/backup_pipeline.sh scripts/restore_backup.sh` Observed result: - both backup pipeline unit/integration tests pass - both shell scripts parse cleanly - the repo already contains the encrypted backup pipeline, restore script, and tested round-trip coverage requested by issue #693 ## Recommendation Close issue #693 as already implemented on `main`. This verification PR exists only to preserve the evidence trail cleanly and close the stale issue without rebuilding the backup pipeline again.