Files
timmy-home/training-data/dpo-pairs/session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json
Alexander Whitestone 0d64d8e559 initial: sovereign home — morrowind agent, skills, training-data, research, specs, notes, operational docs
Tracked: morrowind agent (py/cfg), skills/, training-data/, research/,
notes/, specs/, test-results/, metrics/, heartbeat/, briefings/,
memories/, skins/, hooks/, decisions.md, OPERATIONS.md, SOUL.md

Excluded: screenshots, PNGs, binaries, sessions, databases, secrets,
audio cache, timmy-config/ and timmy-telemetry/ (separate repos)
2026-03-27 13:05:57 -04:00

72 lines
6.2 KiB
JSON

[
{
"prompt": "Please check on the Devlopp, the timmy loop and the Kimi window. There is resources going unutilized. The cron session errored too, the tmux send-keys. Please make sure that works and tighten the loop to once every 8 minutes",
"chosen": "Let me check everything at once \u2014 tmux sessions, running processes, and the cronjobs.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "I see it was my fault after all. True true we realized a bug that needed fixing before more automation.",
"chosen": "Right \u2014 Kimi pushed straight to main and broke tests. That was the real fire. Branch protection had to go up before you let the automation keep landing code unsupervised. Barn door first, then the horses.\n\nGood news is that's done now. PR-only merges are enforced, AGENTS.md has the policy, and the DevLoop knows the rules. So those 4 Kimi worktrees are safe to land through the proper flow \u2014 branch, push, PR, merge.\n\nThe crons will start firing cleanly in about 8 minutes now that the Anthropic key is in .env. DevLoop should pick up where it left off and start landing those worktrees on the next tick.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "We are running low on open issues. THere doesn't seem to be automatic bug reporting, either that or we have stopped testing.",
"chosen": "Good catch. Let me check the test situation and see if failures are actually being surfaced.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Update the overall agent philosophy to be escalating errors to gitea issues for good QA. And not being afraid to propose potential features or improvements or optimizations, as well.",
"chosen": "Let me find where the DevLoop prompt and agent philosophy live.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "And if anything, prioritize looping timmy in to the loops and methods as much as possible. When he gets a new feature, use it. Eat our own dogfood. Timmy is our dogfood.",
"chosen": "Exactly right. The loop should be Timmy's biggest customer. Let me update both the loop prompt and AGENTS.md.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Beautiful Which tmux session is this in, or does this cover both of the ones we set up?",
"chosen": "Good question. They're different:\n\n**timmy-loop** \u2014 Covered. This is the automated loop that runs `timmy-loop.sh`, which reads `timmy-loop-prompt.md` every cycle. It got the full QA philosophy, dogfooding mandate, and updated cycle steps. Every new cycle picks up the changes automatically.\n\n**DevLoop** \u2014 Only partially covered. That's a separate Hermes session that got its prompt pasted directly into the tmux pane at startup. It reads AGENTS.md (which we updated and merged), but it doesn't read `timmy-loop-prompt.md`. Its original system prompt is baked into that session's context from when it was launched.\n\nSo DevLoop won't see the QA/dogfooding philosophy until it's either:\n1. Restarted with the new prompt, or\n2. Told about it via a message in the session\n\nWant me to send it a message now with the new philosophy, or restart it fresh? A message is lighter \u2014 it won't lose its current context about the Kimi worktrees that still need landing.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "I don't want to create conflicting loops, but to allow the orchestrator loop to do more. I'd rather have checking in on a series of Tmux Panes be part of the timmy-loop so that one context can manage 4-8 kimi code jobs at a time, using different methods.",
"chosen": "That's the right call. One brain, multiple hands. Let me look at what we have and design the consolidated approach.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Ok great. Create a user and token in gitea specifically for Timmy Please",
"chosen": "",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Yes",
"chosen": "",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "They are currently working ok gitea mcp right now with timmy. He hasnt done it yet",
"chosen": "Got it \u2014 the Kimi panes are building the Gitea MCP capability, and once that lands, Timmy will authenticate as himself instead of using Alexander's admin token. The plumbing is ready for when he gets there.\n\nLet me commit what I did cleanly so the loop can pick it up:",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "I see 4 Kimi panes continue to be empty in my Kimi Session. I thought you had them running via the timmy loop now?",
"chosen": "You're right \u2014 the prompt update tells the loop *how* to use them, but the loop has to actually reach a new cycle to read it. Let me check where it's at.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Ok I see. I don't want to lose the work it's done.",
"chosen": "Totally fair. Cycle 31 is about halfway through its 20-minute budget. The Kimi call has been running ~5 minutes \u2014 it's a big prompt (workspace heartbeat for issue #28). Let me check if it's close to done:",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Ok. Will it only dispatch 4? and is there enough issues for it to dispatch 4? if not, will it create more issues first?",
"chosen": "Good questions. Let me check the current issue count:",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
},
{
"prompt": "Thank you. There is an issue however that so many broken builds going into main. This is the thing, I don't want merges into main. I want a clean moving the head to a longer chain so that it doesn't have to run through CI again after it becomes main. If the PR is green, we press \"merge\" but its just squashing and adding the commit to main and if its behind main, it has to get latest, pass CI again, then it can merge. I want to update the rules for the timmy time repo in gitea to match this.",
"chosen": "Clean linear history \u2014 squash onto main, must be up-to-date first. Let me check the current branch protection and update it.",
"session": "session_20260314_211710_92ce05.json"
}
]