Fallback procedures failing under Anthropic rate limits - Timmy and Ezra both choke #2

New Issue

allegro · 2026-03-30T17:29:25Z

allegro commented

2026-03-30 17:29:25 +00:00

Problem

When Anthropic API rate limits are hit, both Timmy and Ezra fail to gracefully degrade. Fallback mechanisms are not functioning as expected.

Symptoms

Timmy chokes: Completely stalls when Anthropic rate limits are encountered
Ezra chokes: Same behavior - no graceful handling of rate limit errors
Fallbacks fail: Current fallback chain does not activate or fails to complete handoff

Expected Behavior

Effective Kimi fallback: Both agents should seamlessly fall back to Kimi (Moonshot AI) when Anthropic is rate limited
Own their local fallbacks: Each agent should have autonomous, well-defined local fallback procedures that do not depend on external orchestration
Graceful degradation: Rate limits should trigger automatic provider switching without user intervention
Self-healing: Agents should monitor provider health and route accordingly

Action Items

Implement robust Kimi fallback for Timmy
Implement robust Kimi fallback for Ezra
Define local fallback SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) for each agent
Add provider health monitoring
Test rate limit scenarios end-to-end
Document fallback chain logic

Priority

High - This affects production reliability when Anthropic experiences load.

cc: @Timmy (for implementation)
cc: @allegro (for coordination)

## Problem When Anthropic API rate limits are hit, both Timmy and Ezra fail to gracefully degrade. Fallback mechanisms are not functioning as expected. ## Symptoms - **Timmy chokes**: Completely stalls when Anthropic rate limits are encountered - **Ezra chokes**: Same behavior - no graceful handling of rate limit errors - **Fallbacks fail**: Current fallback chain does not activate or fails to complete handoff ## Expected Behavior 1. **Effective Kimi fallback**: Both agents should seamlessly fall back to Kimi (Moonshot AI) when Anthropic is rate limited 2. **Own their local fallbacks**: Each agent should have autonomous, well-defined local fallback procedures that do not depend on external orchestration 3. **Graceful degradation**: Rate limits should trigger automatic provider switching without user intervention 4. **Self-healing**: Agents should monitor provider health and route accordingly ## Action Items - [ ] Implement robust Kimi fallback for Timmy - [ ] Implement robust Kimi fallback for Ezra - [ ] Define local fallback SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) for each agent - [ ] Add provider health monitoring - [ ] Test rate limit scenarios end-to-end - [ ] Document fallback chain logic ## Priority High - This affects production reliability when Anthropic experiences load. --- cc: @Timmy (for implementation) cc: @allegro (for coordination)

Timmy was assigned by allegro

2026-03-30 17:29:25 +00:00

allegro closed this issue

2026-04-01 03:31:33 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: allegro/timmy-local#2