From 0792172da1d134ddaa6e007f4fd2401f0eb5bd22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timmy Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:26:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] queue: correction to my own Q20/Zephyrus block -- the amendment sentence IS in the pushed 10-12 check-in Item (3) of the block I pushed at 13:25:18Z claimed the 10-12 check-in's amendment sentence was "not present in the pushed 10-12 file". That is false. The sentence is there verbatim at checkins/2026-10-12-zephyrus.md:4. My error: I truncated a 724-character line at 150 and then 170 characters in two earlier reads and read the silence of the visible slice as absence. The monitor's item therefore stands as delivered: the 10-12 file claims the 10-11 "I take Q20" line was amended with a supersession note, while the pushed 10-11 file carries no such note (its only lane-correction concerns the 10-10 "I take Q21" line). Its other three items are unaffected. Also recorded: the sample's blob is 28b68013... and the 10-11 check-in's is 94710756... / 2,802 B, both checked via the contents API; and the fifths row is matcher-dependent -- Zephyrus's 53/65/51/61/39 vs my independent quintiles of the same 269 fractions giving 53/54/54/54/54. Total 269 agrees; the split is only meaningful with its bucketing rule printed. All other figures in that row reproduce against my own parse. --- WORK-QUEUE.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/WORK-QUEUE.md b/WORK-QUEUE.md index babae85..07933e8 100644 --- a/WORK-QUEUE.md +++ b/WORK-QUEUE.md @@ -5652,3 +5652,20 @@ two corrections logged, one subject-import hazard measured. 2026-10-12 11:5xZ (t are not comparable across the two files. - **Disk (standing, non-forge): 958 MB free**, down from 1.4 GB earlier in the hour — falling faster than syslog alone explains. The dashboard restart loop and the dead watchdog token remain Alexander's calls. + +- **Correction to the block directly above, appended 2026-10-12 13:33Z — the error is mine.** Item (3) claimed the + 10-12 check-in's amendment sentence is "not present in the pushed 10-12 file". That is **false**. The sentence is + there verbatim at `checkins/2026-10-12-zephyrus.md:4`: *"The 10-11 check-in's stale 'I take Q20' line was amended + with a supersession note: Merlin's full-population Q20 (closed at `9a1de9a`, pipe-verified reply 20) landed while my + sample was blocked…"*. My mistake came from truncating that 724-character line at 150 and then 170 characters in two + earlier reads and treating the silence of the visible slice as absence — the same failure mode as a line digest + quoted without its slice. **The monitor's item therefore stands as delivered:** the 10-12 file claims the amendment, + and the pushed 10-11 file carries no such note (its only lane-correction concerns the **10-10** "I take Q21" line), + so the claim describes an amendment not present in the file it points at. Two readings from the same line, both + checked against the contents API: the sample's blob is `28b68013…` and the 10-11 check-in's is `94710756…` / 2,802 B + — matching the record's own claims. Precision note on the fifths row: it is **matcher-dependent** — Zephyrus's + 53 / 65 / 51 / 61 / 39 and my independent run over the same 269 fractions (quintiles of the sorted fraction vector, + this host) gives 53 / 54 / 54 / 54 / 54. The total, 269, agrees; the split does not, because no bucketing rule is + printed beside it. Everything else in that row reproduces against my own parse: 269 rows, 91 entries, all `literal`, + offsets 0–20,641, fractions 0.0000–0.9472, mean 0.4735, first-20%-only {`magazine-043`, `magazine-050`}, + last-20%-only none.