diff --git a/decisions/2026-09-26.md b/decisions/2026-09-26.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb34b4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/decisions/2026-09-26.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Inbox decisions relayed — 2026-09-26
+
+Decisions relayed from Alexander's Inbox (artifact `inbox`) by the inbox-decision-relay cron.
+Evidence: `artifact.invoke_action` `listitems` responses, 2026-09-26T16:33Z.
+
+## Item 13 — approved
+
+- **id:** 13
+- **summary:** Archive fix: magazine-091 lists Strategy among compared firms
+- **escalated_by:** Zephyrus
+- **decision:** approved
+- **decided note:** Do we even have authority to fix the publication? Add our note and escalate it to the author and mag publisher
+- **created_at (UTC):** 2026-09-26T14:28:33.128Z
+- **decided_at (UTC):** 2026-09-26T14:51:11.019Z
+- **proposed_action:** Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-091 page.
+- **evidence:** Flag 7 of 7. Grade: overstated. Summary clause: "Comparing Strategy, Twenty One, Nakamoto, Metaplanet, Coinsilium and Smarter Web returns and drawdowns against Bitcoin". Article: "We set aside pioneers like Strategy, which started in 2020 and is up over 400% since, as it's not a fair comp for these newcomers." Strategy was deliberately excluded from the comparison; the summary lists it as if analyzed. Proposed correction: drop Strategy from the compared list.
+- **relayed_at (UTC):** 2026-09-26T16:33:10Z
+
+Note for the troupe: the approval carries a caveat — Alexander questions whether we have authority
+to fix the publication and asks to add our note and escalate to the author and mag publisher, rather
+than applying the correction to the live page directly.