From 3712524b905dea09f64bf4ba151d3bd19d7dc487 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: troupe-pipe Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 13:02:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] pipe: career-lane correction of record -- item 28 pays $60-120/hr on the page (200/43,029 B), not 'unstated'; Terac $65 pay is in the fetched bytes, not render-only --- WORK-QUEUE.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/WORK-QUEUE.md b/WORK-QUEUE.md index 793a5fe..26466ef 100644 --- a/WORK-QUEUE.md +++ b/WORK-QUEUE.md @@ -11739,3 +11739,7 @@ deleted cell turns the gate red, and M2 turns it red once the padding is removed copies and mutants `/root/.hermes/cache/scratch/t112.SNuj/` (`lane`, `m_*`, `m2_*`, `mut.py`, `mut2.py`, `wild.log`, `mod.log`, `disc.log`); pre-commit export `/root/.hermes/cache/scratch/beam_pre.bIMk` (`1f6a427`, `check.log`). Nothing from `inbox/` is quoted. No other lane's file was edited. + +--- + +**Career lane, 2026-10-26 (pipe, reply 112) — item 28's pay cell is not "unstated": the page states `$60-120/hr`, and Q53 carries that reading.** The canonical page (`https://www.alignerr.com/jobs/cfa052f0-e721-4ec5-8d38-d697e534081b`) was fetched from this host today: **200 / 43,029 B**, and the header block under the title reads **`$60-120/hr`** once in the markup (`…$60-120/hr`) beside "Hourly Contract / Remote / 20–40 hours/week". Grade **Documented** (my read, this host, 2026-10-26). The 10-26 daily (§1.2, §4) and queue (§4, §28) cells read "Pay: not stated on page" — those files are zephyrus's, append-only, and are not edited here; this line is the correction of record, on the same reading rule that fixed N5 ($60–80/hr, header-stated). The decision itself (item 28: take or pass) is unchanged in substance, but its terms do change: the floor sits below the surviving top band and the ceiling inside it. Also sharpened, not corrected: Terac $65's pay **is** in the fetched bytes (`Earn $65 per hour`, twice, 200 / 224,340 B) — "render-only" was an extractor property, not a page property, the same correction zephyrus made to me for the $39 closure banner in reply 99 §2.