From 430526f0e2266d8bf4783a0e60f0803c8a62eab0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: timmy Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 13:34:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] queue: close Q4 on f50f052 with all three verdicts re-verified, add Q8 (summary fidelity) with method and material --- WORK-QUEUE.md | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) diff --git a/WORK-QUEUE.md b/WORK-QUEUE.md index 702bc8a..8101a60 100644 --- a/WORK-QUEUE.md +++ b/WORK-QUEUE.md @@ -112,6 +112,45 @@ the archive, not hunting for a scalp. **Done means:** three claims, three attempts, three verdicts. **Evidence:** the source you used against the claim, and the raw result. +**Status: DONE — `recoveries/falsification-pass.md` (`f50f052`, zephyrus-sparkborn), all three verdicts re-verified +from the archive side (reply 05, `2026-09-24-to-zephyrus-05.md`).** +- Claim 1, profile counts ("18 public profiles / 13 documentary-backed / 5 candidate portraits") — his verdict + **Partial**, closed **Documented** here: the listing is a section of the index page (`/stackchain/people/` 404s), + and the count recounts from the public asset `public-data.js` → 18 profiles, 13 `documentary-backed`, 5 candidate. + There are no per-profile pages; views are hash routes, which is why nothing is indexed. +- Claim 2, SJ Lottery publication date — **Survived**, reproduced to the character (guid, `pubDate` + `Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:15:54 GMT`, Apple's record, the adjacent Ordinals item carrying the "Feb 05" stamp). +- Claim 3, the `magazine-040` gloss "a nod to the last block he mined" — **Broken**. Confirmed and extended: the + article itself is now fetched (`the-genesis-block`, 200) and its closing lines are a Genesis 2:2 rewrite; block + 97,250 is 2010-12-12, the day of Satoshi's last public post, while Patoshi analyses end his mining near block + 54,316. The excerpt is faithful, the interpretive clause is not supported. +- His one side observation about a duration misattribution is **rejected with the feed parse** (see reply 05). +- **Handed to Alexander, not to the pipe:** the exact replacement sentence for the `magazine-040` summary, drafted in + reply 05 §"Your ask". It is a wording change to a live page, so it waits for him. + +--- + +## Q8 — Summary fidelity: does each entry's machine-written summary overstate its article? + +Q3 tested that sources resolve and dates agree. `recoveries/quote-fidelity-live.md` now tests that the quoted +excerpts are really in the articles — 269/269 present, 91/91 article URLs live. Neither test touches the prose the +archive writes *about* the article, and that is where the archive can still be wrong. + +`magazine-040` is the worked example: the quotes are faithful, but the summary adds "a nod to the last block he +mined", which no source supports. One entry, and it is the archive's own words doing the damage. + +**Do this:** for each entry in a defined sample, compare the "What happened" / "In plain English" sentences against +the article and grade every factual or interpretive clause: **holds** (the article says it), **overstated** (the +article supports less), **unsupported** (the article does not say it), **contradicted** (public sources say +otherwise). Quote the summary sentence and the article line that settles it, both verbatim. + +**Material:** `recoveries/magazine-article-map.md` — every published entry → its live article URL, 91/91 answering +200 — and `recoveries/quote-fidelity-live.md` for the method and the limits. + +**Done means:** a table of per-clause verdicts for the sample, with the count of each verdict and the named entries +that need an archive-side fix. +**Evidence:** the entry URL, the summary sentence, the article URL and the article sentence. + --- ## Q5 — Issue triage in the organisation's public repos