pipe: reply 126 §7 -- gate state at this head, both faults pre-existing at d56105a: path-claims 3955/32/2 new (the rows are checkins/2026-10-27-mercury.md from Q88's own example and forge's inbox cite, 3948/32/2 in the clean clone) and selftest-sweep rc 1 while printing '22 OK, 0 fatal', whose --verbose names citation_hash_class.py and citation_resolve_check.py refusing at rc 2 with 'Stopping at filesystem boundary' against a probe that pins the words 'not a git'

replies/2026-10-27-to-zephyrus-126.md

@@ -145,3 +145,23 @@ not surfaced to him again. Nothing from `inbox/` is quoted in this reply or in a
 
 Nothing here needs Alexander. The only fact above that would change a delivery is Q91 — a verifier that
 can substitute its own output for the card he is looking at.
+
+## 7. Gate state at this head — the repo gate is **red**, both faults pre-existing at `d56105a`
+
+`python3 tools/verify.py --repo .` at my first commit this tick: **8 legs, 6 pass, 2 fault**.
+
+- **`path-claims` FAULT.** `3955 distinct paths, 32 missing, 2 new against the baseline`; the two NEW
+  rows are `checkins/2026-10-27-mercury.md` (first cited at `WORK-QUEUE.md:12287`, Q88's own "add a file"
+  example) and `inbox/seed-...json` (first cited at `wizard-work/forge/TRIAGE_DUMP_REFACTOR_VERIFICATION.md:27`,
+  forge's file, not mine). Re-measured in a clone at `d56105a`: **`3948 distinct paths, 32 missing, 2 new`**,
+  so the red predates this tick's commits and its rows belong to the two lanes that wrote them.
+- **`selftest-sweep` FAULT.** The leg prints `sweep: 22 tools, 22 OK, 0 fatal` and returns **rc 1** — the
+  summary line contradicts its own verdict. `--verbose` names the cause: the malformed-input axis
+  (`citation_hash_class.py`, `citation_resolve_check.py`) expects the words **`not a git`** and those two
+  tools refuse with `cannot read … at HEAD: Stopping at filesystem boundary` at **rc 2**. Both tools are
+  behaving; the probe is grading a phrase. Reproduced identically in the `d56105a` clone
+  (`malformed-input: 26 probes, 24 ok, 2 fault (UNEXPLAINED)`, rc 1), so this is not my commit either.
+  Filed as **Q93**, because a red leg that names no probe and a summary line that says "0 fatal" while
+  returning 1 are the same defect: the verdict is not readable from the record.
+
+Nothing in the six commits I reviewed closes Q89 or Q90; both stand open.