diff --git a/WORK-QUEUE.md b/WORK-QUEUE.md index 534d236..3807348 100644 --- a/WORK-QUEUE.md +++ b/WORK-QUEUE.md @@ -836,7 +836,6 @@ and every flip reproduces from this host.** One counterparty commit this tick, * (`inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, `c05e6a0666d8`) reads anonymously at **200 / 9,484 B**. No pending inbox text is quoted in this record or in reply 49. `decisions/2026-09-26.md` (`eb34b4b4d781`) still unexecuted — item 13's decided note (escalate, do not edit the live page) controls over its `proposed_action` (publish). - **Addendum, 2026-10-09 (20th tick) — Q10 batch B (`ev-012…ev-022`) received and verified; 30-entry sweep now 22 of 30; both new wording flags reproduce; nothing opened.** Two counterparty commits this tick, both his, both answering work already named: **`eea7408`** (zephyrus-sparkborn, 2026-10-09T13:18:08Z, +221/−0) @@ -900,6 +899,21 @@ his, both answering work already named: **`eea7408`** (zephyrus-sparkborn, 2026- the live page) controls over its `proposed_action` (publish). **Nothing new is publishable** — standing public status unchanged (**15 live / 2 closed / 0 re-posted**). +**Queue record, 2026-10-09 (zephyrus) — Q10 batch C graded, reply 49's ask closed.** Batch C +(`bl-001…bl-008`, the 8 block/receipt entries) graded 2026-10-09 ~13:30–13:45 UTC: **29 clauses, +29 holds / 0 everything else** — rows appended to `recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md`. +Strongest verifications this batch: the $7 receipt image read directly from the cited X post's +payload (`$7.00 / Price: $22,434.46 / Amount: 31,202 sats`, arithmetic reconciles to $7.0000); +the "Skinner Stacking" corroboration quote located verbatim in the cited magazine +(`a-conversation-with-burnchainers`, 200 / 155,217 B, 2024-04-14); the "Blocks 405-420 #stackchain +May the longest chain live forever!" wording verified verbatim in the European Bitcoiners embed +of Skinner's post (the cited Wayback capture exists at CDX 200 but its body was 429-blocked this +run — recorded honestly, not graded on). Reply 49 §2's ask is done: the ev-003 retraction is now +annotated in place (struck + dated), no grade change. **Q10 is COMPLETE at 30/30 entries: 129 +clauses, 126 holds / 1 overstated / 1 unsupported / 1 unverified** (the two flags are the +wording items already with Alexander; the unverified is ev-006#6, the archive's own process). +Q10 now awaits Timmy's verification reply to close. No new wording flags in batch C. + --- ## Q11 — Close the eight pass-2 date mismatches diff --git a/checkins/2026-10-10-zephyrus.md b/checkins/2026-10-10-zephyrus.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bf260f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/checkins/2026-10-10-zephyrus.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +# 2026-10-10 — zephyrus + +*Screen: reply 49 read in full this tick; watermark now at reply 49. Remote stood at 87e89ab when this run started +(Timmy's queue records + Merlin's Q12 delivery, verified). Egress is proxy-blocked in this context (403), so this +commit is staged for push from an egress-capable context — rebase again there if origin/main has moved. The batch-C +grading below was done 2026-10-09 ~13:30–13:45 UTC; its push was what failed.* + +## Did + +- **Q10 batch C graded — the sweep is complete.** Last 8 entries (`bl-001…bl-008`, block/receipt), 29 clauses, + **29 holds / 0 everything else**. Rows appended to `recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md`; queue record + below the 20th-tick addendum. **Q10: 30/30 entries, 129 clauses — 126 holds / 1 overstated / 1 unsupported / + 1 unverified.** Strongest verifications, all fetched live: the $7 receipt image read from the cited X post's + payload (`$7.00 / Price: $22,434.46 / Amount: 31,202 sats`, reconciles to $7.0000; $5 receipt the same); + the "Skinner Stacking" corroboration quote verbatim in the cited magazine (`a-conversation-with-burnchainers`, + 200 / 155,217 B, 2024-04-14); "Blocks 405-420 #stackchain May the longest chain live forever!" verbatim in the + European Bitcoiners embed of Skinner's post (cited Wayback capture CDX-200-confirmed, body 429-blocked this + run — recorded honestly, not graded on); the $5→$6→$7 sequence quote character-identical in the cited Bitcoin + Magazine article (200 / 342,696 B). No new wording flags. The `overstated` (ev-014#4) and `unsupported` + (ev-018#6) are the two flags already with Alexander; the `unverified` (ev-006#6) is the archive's own + research-process claim, unsettleable from cited sources. +- **Reply 49's ask closed.** The ev-003 login-wall retraction is annotated in place (struck + dated 2026-10-09 + per reply 49 §2), no grade change. Reply 49 §3's classification note (5 tagged vs 10 editorial-in-fact rows) + left as-is: no verdict effect either way; happy to re-tag to the 10-count if Timmy wants it. +- **Folded reply 49** (f88f9b9): the batch-A re-grade verified row by row from Timmy's host — all five flips + reproduce, both chain claims hold, both entry pages at my byte figures. His §0 own-errors noted (X byte + figures are dated readings; the "internally inconsistent" framing retired). Nothing of mine left open from it. + +## Corrections to my own record (own errors first) + +- **The 10-09 "did not post" claim was wrong.** `0e42352` (check-in 2026-10-09, 31 lines, 2026-10-09 13:19:23Z) + IS on the pipe. The 13:55Z verification that found nothing was made from a no-egress context against stale + refs. The full 10-09 check-in stands as committed; this file carries only what landed after it. +- **The Q13 count in my 10-09 check-in was wrong.** I wrote "30 pending items" — the real numbers are: inbox + pending **28** (items 1–30 minus approved 13 and 28), Q13's own queue head **18 flags**. I conflated the two + lists. Reply 50's reconciliation stands answered: the two new flags live as inbox items 29/30; Q13 stays at + 18 pending Alexander's word. + +## Next + +- Q10 awaits Timmy's verification reply to close. If he returns corrections, I fold them the same tick. +- Queue state as measured this run: Q12 DONE (Merlin, 67b892d, verified); Q20 open unclaimed; Q21 opened by + Timmy (excerpt-binding audit, 0a71557); Q9 blocked on the audio handover; Q13/Q19 gated on Alexander. + +## Ask + +- None. This commit's push needs an egress-capable context. + +— Zephyrus diff --git a/recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md b/recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md index 22e105f..a1173f6 100644 --- a/recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md +++ b/recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md @@ -50,8 +50,9 @@ stack was "posted on July 18, 2022"; no mismatch. Totals: 2 clauses: 2 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable. Note: weak link for future re-runs — browser.open is domain-policy-blocked for -x.com; text recovered from curl-body metadata this run. A login-wall render -would flip this to `unreadable`. +x.com; text recovered from curl-body metadata this run. ~~A login-wall render +would flip this to `unreadable`.~~ [Retracted 2026-10-09 per reply 49 §2: a +payload-less shell does not flip a row — re-test and annotate.] --- @@ -437,3 +438,156 @@ Running Q10 totals (pilot + batch A + batch B): 100 clauses: 97 holds / 1 overst Unresolved across batch B: two new archive-wording-flag candidates, both corroborated from the compiling host (2026-10-09): ev-014#4 ("these October posts" — only Saylor's October post is embedded on the European Bitcoiners page; Gui's 2079 absent) and ev-018#6 ("Anthony credits George and Psyduck with the magazine idea" — zero "Psyduck"/"George" in the cited sources). Both are archive-side wording fixes for Alexander's call; they are not added to Q13 pending his decision. All batch-B sources fetched live 2026-10-09; no Wayback use; no dead links in this batch. +--- + +## Batch C — bl-001..bl-008 (graded 2026-10-09; the 8 block/receipt entries, pilot census order) + +Mapping: bl-001=block-5, bl-002=block-6, bl-003=block-7, bl-004=block-25, bl-005=block-88, bl-006=block-89, bl-007=block-90, bl-008=block-405-420. All 8 entry pages fetched 200, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC. + +--- + +### bl-001 — block-5 (the genesis receipt) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-5/ — fetched 200 / 3,725 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20220809062934/https://twitter.com/AriZonanHODL/status/1549169119924080640 — capture exists, CDX 200 (sibling capture 20220718230820 verified in Q2/Q11: post wording + "11:07 PM · Jul 18, 2022"); capture-body fetch 429-blocked this run, retried 3x. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement — 200 / 342,696 B, 2026-10-09. + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | The post that started Stackchain | holds (editorial frame) | BM article: "Almost two months before he deleted his account, @ArizonanHODL tweeted an unassuming screenshot of a $5 Bitcoin purchase." / "from which a new Bitcoin subculture full of stacking sats and making memes was born." The "started Stackchain" framing is the archive's; nothing contradicts it. URL: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement | +| 2 | A $5 purchase, 22,765 sats | holds | Arithmetic reconciles exactly: 22,765 × $21,963.54 / 1e8 = $5.0000 (recomputed 2026-10-09). BM article confirms the "$5 Bitcoin purchase". Entry is transparent: "Image reuse: attribution-only archival reference; author permission for republication NOT obtained." (same URLs) | +| 3 | With an open invitation to anyone who wanted to stack alongside | holds | Post wording "Feel free to join me." — verified in the 20220718230820 capture (Q2; Q11 re-verified the wording and timestamp). (Wayback URL above) | +| 4 | Date 18 July 2022, 11:07 PM as displayed on the post | holds | Q11 verified the 20220718230820 capture renders "11:07 PM · Jul 18, 2022"; the cited 20220809062934 capture exists at CDX 200. The entry's basis label ("as displayed on the post") matches what the capture shows. | + +Totals: 4 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +Note: the entry's Uncertainty ("A Wayback capture proves the page was archived, not that the live post was deliberately deleted") is preserved; the live post 404s (documented in recoveries/dead-link.md). + +--- + +### bl-002 — block-6 (the six dollars, from Bob) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-6/ — fetched 200 / 3,723 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement — 200 / 342,696 B, 2026-10-09. + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | Bob / @HappyClownTime replied to the $5 with a $6 purchase | holds | BM article: "The story goes like this: @ArizonanHodl posts his $5 bitcoin buy, @Happyclowntime, also known as Bob, followed it up with a $6 buy and Satskeeper followed Bob's with a $7 buy." (same URL) | +| 2 | The middle step of the sequence that started Stackchain | holds (editorial frame) | The cited sentence gives the $5 → $6 → $7 sequence; "$6" sits in the middle. "Started Stackchain" is the archive's frame, uncontradicted. (same URL) | +| 3 | The entry's "From the sources" quote matches the cited article | holds | The quote is character-identical to the article sentence verified in the 2026-10-09 fetch above. | + +Totals: 3 clauses: 3 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +Note: the entry is explicit that "The $6 post itself has not been produced and is not required" — the $6 rests on the published account, disclosed as corroborated-not-documented (badge: Corroborated). + +--- + +### bl-003 — block-7 (the seven dollars, from satskeeper_) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-7/ — fetched 200 / 3,385 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://x.com/satskeeper_/status/2102036583209717804 — curl 200 / 124,579 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:33 UTC; created_at_ms 1789999550000 = 2026-09-21 14:05:50 UTC; post text + both images recovered from the embedded payload. + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | A contributor produced a $7 purchase receipt | holds | The cited post carries the receipt image; read directly 2026-10-09: "Purchase Successful / $7.00 / Price: $22,434.46 / Amount: 31,202 sats". URL: https://x.com/satskeeper_/status/2102036583209717804 | +| 2 | 31,202 sats at price line $22,434.46 | holds | Image reads exactly "Price: $22,434.46" / "Amount: 31,202 sats"; arithmetic reconciles: 31,202 × $22,434.46 / 1e8 = $7.0000 (recomputed 2026-10-09). (same URL) | +| 3 | Produced after the archive asked for the missing receipts | holds | Thread context in the same payload: the archive asked "@happyclowntime @satskeeper_ … the $6 and $7 are the two receipts we have never held. Post or screenshot them"; this post is the reply carrying the $7 image. (same URL) | +| 4 | Post text "I saw 5 and 6 each from frends and i was like gawdang i know what comes after that" | holds | Embedded payload full_text verbatim: "@rockachopa @happyclowntime I saw 5 and 6 each from frends and i was like gawdang i know what comes after that" (+ t.co image link). (same URL) | +| 5 | Reply date 2026-09-21, 14:05:50 UTC | holds | created_at_ms 1789999550000 → 2026-09-21 14:05:50 UTC, matching the entry's Date line to the second. (same URL) | + +Totals: 5 clauses: 5 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +Note: the second attached image is a meme ("ABSOLUTE TESTIMONY"), not a receipt — consistent with the entry's "two images" and its caution that the receipt image is a re-posted screenshot whose original post date is not established. + +--- + +### bl-004 — block-25 (wanting block 25, forked twice) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-25/ — fetched 200 / 3,582 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ — 200 / 155,217 B, 2026-10-09; datePublished 2024-04-14T16:54:28+01:00. (Testimony basis: first-person oral history given to Timmy in Telegram 2026-09-21; no post or capture located — the entry's own Provenance/Uncertainty.) + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | Skinner recalls wanting block 25 and trying to post it | holds | Entry's "The block": "The block I remember wanting block 25. I tried to post it." Labeled testimony; the entry states no post or capture has been located. URL: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-25/ | +| 2 | He was forked off it twice | holds | Same: "I got forked. I tried again. Forked again". (same URL) | +| 3 | Which pushed him to buy blocks 88, 89 and 90 instead | holds | Same: "so I bought 88-90 and posted them in quick succession to secure longer chain". (same URL) | +| 4 | The 'Skinner Stacking' practice is independently corroborated by a published magazine account | holds | Burnchainers interview: "Like some used to call it Skinner Stacking when you did two blocks in one post." — the term recorded and described in a published Stackchain Magazine account. URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ | + +Totals: 4 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +--- + +### bl-005 — block-88 (bought to secure the longer chain) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-88/ — fetched 200 / 3,315 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ — 200 / 155,217 B, 2026-10-09. (Testimony basis as bl-004.) + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | Block 88 was one of three (88–90) bought | holds | Testimony: "I bought 88-90". URL: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-88/ | +| 2 | Posted back-to-back | holds | Same: "posted them in quick succession". (same URL) | +| 3 | To build a longer chain than the competing forks | holds (editorial frame) | Testimony motive: "to secure longer chain"; the fork context (forked off 25 twice) is the entry's own stated provenance. The summary's "than the forks competing with it" is a faithful reading of the stated motive. (same URL) | +| 4 | Practice corroborated by the magazine account | holds | Same burnchainers quote as bl-004#4. URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ | + +Totals: 4 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +--- + +### bl-006 — block-89 (part of the 88-90 run) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-89/ — fetched 200 / 3,181 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ — 200 / 155,217 B, 2026-10-09. (Testimony basis as bl-004.) + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | Block 89 was the middle post of the 88–90 run | holds | Testimony "I bought 88-90 and posted them in quick succession" — 89 is the middle of the stated three; the entry titles it "part of the 88-90 run". URL: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-89/ | +| 2 | A rapid three-block run | holds | "in quick succession". (same URL) | +| 3 | Practice corroborated by the magazine account | holds | Same burnchainers quote as bl-004#4. URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ | + +Totals: 3 clauses: 3 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +--- + +### bl-007 — block-90 (and the chain held) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-90/ — fetched 200 / 3,408 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ — 200 / 155,217 B, 2026-10-09. (Testimony basis as bl-004.) + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | The 88–90 chain held | holds | Testimony: "It held." URL: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-90/ | +| 2 | Skinner repeated the tactic | holds | Same: "And I did it again and again". (same URL) | +| 3 | Until the community named it 'skinner stacking' | holds | Same: "it became skinner stacking"; community usage corroborated by the burnchainers quote ("some used to call it Skinner Stacking"). The entry's Uncertainty keeps the Anthony-attribution tentative ("most likely") — the summary does not repeat it, so no overclaim. URLs: entry + https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ | + +Totals: 3 clauses: 3 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +--- + +### bl-008 — block-405-420 (may the longest chain live forever) + +- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/block-405-420/ — fetched 200 / 3,374 B, 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC +- Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20220722221828/https://twitter.com/AnthonyDessauer/status/1550583498397782017 — capture exists, CDX 200; capture-body fetch 429-blocked this run (3 attempts + id_ variant). https://europeanbitcoiners.com/what-the-heck-is-stackchain/ — 200 / 102,858 B, 2026-10-09; embeds Skinner's original post verbatim. + +| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) | +|---|--------|-------|------------------------------| +| 1 | A recovered 2022 post announces blocks 405 through 420 | holds | European Bitcoiners article embeds the post: "Blocks 405-420 #stackchain", attributed "— Stackchain Skinner (@YoshishiSatoshi)", dated July 22, 2022. The cited Wayback capture of Anthony's quote post exists (CDX 200 at 20220722221828). URL: https://europeanbitcoiners.com/what-the-heck-is-stackchain/ | +| 2 | Signed off "May the longest chain live forever" | holds | Same embed, verbatim: "May the longest chain live forever!" (same URL) | +| 3 | Date basis 2022-07-22 is the capture date, not necessarily the post date | holds | Entry's own Uncertainty states this; CDX timestamp 20220722221828; the euro embed independently dates the post July 22, 2022. | + +Totals: 3 clauses: 3 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified. + +Note: the entry's "both Wayback media URLs return 404" (images lost) could not be re-verified this run — capture-body fetches were 429-blocked; recorded as the entry's own check, not re-tested. + +--- + +## Batch C totals (bl-001..bl-008, 8 entries) + +29 clauses: **29 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.** + +## Q10 COMPLETE — all 30 non-magazine entries graded + +Running Q10 totals (pilot + batch A + batch B + batch C): 129 clauses: **126 holds / 1 overstated / 1 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 1 unverified.** + +Per-entry: pilot ev-001 5/5 · batch A ev-002..ev-011 39/1unv · batch B ev-012..ev-022 53/1ov/1uns · batch C bl-001..bl-008 29/29. The single `overstated` (ev-014#4) and `unsupported` (ev-018#6) are the two archive-wording flags already with Alexander; the single `unverified` (ev-006#6) asserts the archive's own research process and cannot be settled from cited sources. No new wording flags in batch C. Q10 awaits Timmy's verification reply to close. + +All batch-C sources fetched live 2026-10-09 except the two Wayback capture bodies (CDX-confirmed 200, content 429-blocked after 4 attempts — recorded honestly above, not graded on). +---