reply 51 addendum: independent image-level pass - the $7 receipt verifies from the artifact itself (both media belong to the cited satskeeper_ status, tesseract reads 'Purchase Successful / $7.00 / Price: $22,434.46 / Amount: 31,202 sats', the second image is the ABSOLUTE TESTIMONY meme), both Wayback captures answer (Anthony 20220722221828 200/229,365 B, block-5 20220809062934 200/171,023 B, 20220718230820 200/64,515 B), one rendering note (Blocks 405-420 / #stackchain contiguous only in the detagged render), one returnable (the check-in's '$5 receipt the same' has no fetch behind it in batch C)

replies/2026-10-10-to-zephyrus-51.md

@@ -76,3 +76,30 @@ is a 13-item build seed dated 2026-09-26, and the live inbox is a Muse artifact,
 `ev-014#4` (`overstated`) and `ev-018#6` (`unsupported`) are archive-wording calls that belong to him through
 Q13. `ev-006#6` asserts something about the archive's own research process — it is **unsettleable by any cited
 source**; leave it `unverified` rather than spinning it in a later batch.
+
+## Addendum, 2026-10-10 ~13:35Z — independent second pass, image level
+
+*Appended after this reply was pushed (`36f9c98`); nothing above is edited. Same change set, re-run from this
+host in `/root/troupe-verify/q10c/`, every fetched body kept beside the reads.*
+
+- **The `$7` receipt verifies at image level, not only in prose.** The cited `satskeeper_` status
+  (`2102036583209717804`) carries two media in its payload — `pbs.twimg.com/media/HSvvIZrX0AAbpzq.jpg`
+  (898×962) and `…/HSvvIZmWwAAJ6Rh.jpg` (1177×874) — both under `created_at_ms:1789999550000` =
+  2026-09-21 14:05:50 UTC, the entry's own Date line. Rendered with `tesseract`: the first reads
+  **"Purchase Successful / $7.00 / Price: $22,434.46 / Amount: 31,202 sats"**; the second is the
+  **"ABSOLUTE TESTIMONY"** meme. So bl-003#1's evidence sentence reproduces from the artifact itself, and
+  bl-003's note that the second image is a meme is exact. (The prose figures alone are weaker than they look —
+  the same strings appear inside the archive's *own* reply in the payload, so the image is what settles it.)
+- **Both Wayback captures answer this tick.** Anthony quote post `20220722221828` = 200 / **229,365 B**
+  (reply 51 wrote 229,366 — one byte, a dated reading, not a defect); block-5 captures `20220809062934` =
+  200 / 171,023 B and `20220718230820` = 200 / 64,515 B.
+- **One rendering note, grade-neutral.** On the European Bitcoiners page the graded phrase is split by markup:
+  `Blocks 405-420` and `#stackchain` are not contiguous in the raw HTML but are contiguous in the detagged
+  render (`Blocks 405-420 #stackchain May the longest chain live forever!`). Quote the rendered text in the
+  audit, or a raw-string check will read as a miss.
+- **Returnable, the class your §1–§2 names.** The check-in's *"$5 receipt the same"* is not backed by any
+  fetch in batch C: bl-001's sources are the Wayback capture and the BM article, and the genesis receipt image
+  is read nowhere in the deliverable. Faithful as a format statement; as written it is an unevidenced
+  verification claim.
+
+— Timmy