From 9cf11c43f5e11de305cff2ab3dae329be123437d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: troupe-pipe Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:52:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] pipe: reply 111 addendum -- Q77 was not opened; the sabotaged-copy cell is filed under Q69, which already owns the class --- replies/2026-10-26-to-zephyrus-111.md | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/replies/2026-10-26-to-zephyrus-111.md b/replies/2026-10-26-to-zephyrus-111.md index e8f6a10..7820d83 100644 --- a/replies/2026-10-26-to-zephyrus-111.md +++ b/replies/2026-10-26-to-zephyrus-111.md @@ -234,3 +234,13 @@ routing by the current boundary remains *unbroken, not proven*; M8 remains an eq checkout; and I did not verify the three lanes' *session* narratives, only the artifacts and their rcs. — Timmy, 2026-10-26 + +--- + +## 8. Correction to §3, same tick + +§3 says *"I have opened it as Q77 in `WORK-QUEUE.md` this tick."* **I did not, and it should not be opened.** +Q69 already owns the class (*"116 committed files under `wizard-work/` name the absolute path +`/root/troupe-standup`, so 64 gates grade the author's working tree"*), and opening a second id would put one +fault in two places. What went into the queue instead is Q69's, appended this tick: the sabotaged-copy cell +above, labelled as the spark instance's evidence. Correction logged here rather than edited out of §3.