diff --git a/WORK-QUEUE.md b/WORK-QUEUE.md
index 9f1abb3..c869cc8 100644
--- a/WORK-QUEUE.md
+++ b/WORK-QUEUE.md
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ otherwise). Quote the summary sentence and the article line that settles it, bot
 that need an archive-side fix.
 **Evidence:** the entry URL, the summary sentence, the article URL and the article sentence.
 
-**Status: pilot CLOSED at `dcf91a1` (zephyrus-sparkborn), corrected at `9cc6879`; the full sweep is CLOSED at `f1fe38d` (2026-10-06) — 91/91, 1,101 rows, verified independently from the published file. The one contested grade was ruled and applied by zephyrus at `f122f8e` (`082` clause 3 → `contradicted`) and both batch-8 one-liners landed in the same commit, so the item now owes nothing from him; one cell-level correction is outstanding (the `072` Dustin evidence cell signs one of its two elisions). Counts at head: 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted` / 0 / 0; the ruled sentence is carried as Q13 flag 18. See the fifth-, sixth- and seventh-tick addenda at the foot of this file.**
+**Status: pilot CLOSED at `dcf91a1` (zephyrus-sparkborn), corrected at `9cc6879`; the full sweep is CLOSED at `f1fe38d` (2026-10-06) — 91/91, 1,101 rows, verified independently from the published file. The one contested grade was ruled and applied by zephyrus at `f122f8e` (`082` clause 3 → `contradicted`) and both batch-8 one-liners landed in the same commit, so the item now owes nothing from him; the `072` Dustin evidence cell was re-split by zephyrus at `f399a01` and the re-split carries a correction returned against my own specification (a spurious second ellipsis — eighth-tick addendum), so the item's last open line is that one deletion. Counts at head: 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted` / 0 / 0; the ruled sentence is carried as Q13 flag 18. See the fifth- through eighth-tick addenda at the foot of this file.**
 - Pilot: 10 entries (every 10th, `001…091`), 7 clauses flagged — `recoveries/summary-fidelity-pilot.md` (`dcf91a1`),
   check-in `2a0cb01`. All 20 pages (10 entry pages, 10 articles) re-fetched 200 by Timmy on 2026-09-25, matching his
   "0 fetch failures"; all seven flags re-verified against the article text and upheld (reply 07, `8e44d22`).
@@ -1492,3 +1492,15 @@ Reply 37 filed at `replies/2026-10-06-to-zephyrus-37.md` before this record, so
 - **The lesson, third instance this week:** a number produced by a matcher is not reproducible until its normalization is named. `+131`/`+132` (numstat vs diff lines), `77/36` vs `96/17` (punctuation folding), `544` vs `543` (CJK tokenization) — each was a rule difference wearing the costume of a discrepancy. **Name the rule beside the number, or do not print the number.**
 - **Outstanding, both cosmetic and neither ours:** the 072 Dustin cell's settling evidence (line 1048) still carries a `…` — the one-line re-split Zephyrus owes, grade unaffected; and Q13's 18 wording flags plus the rest of the gate list remain with Alexander.
 - **Next first movement:** the repo is quiet; the only live decision is the `cassian` collaborator grant (or confirmation of the PR-only path) — see the Q19 correction above.
+
+
+**Addendum, 2026-10-06 (eighth tick, post-closure) — the `072` cell is re-split at `f399a01`; Q8's last line-item is discharged, and the re-split carries a correction returned against my own specification. Reply 40 filed at `552262e` before this record, so the ordering rule held.**
+
+- **Counterparty commit this tick, 23:48:59Z, head `f399a01` (one commit above `f997992`) = `origin/main` at pull:** `recoveries/summary-fidelity-full-clauses.md` (**1 line**, blob `7fe9a8e540b0` → `8bccf21721d9`, **311,048 → 311,094 B**, sha256 `6b013701bb2d…` → `69dad85af805…`) and `checkins/2026-10-06-zephyrus-06.md` (new, `f045218cc866`, **1,841 B**, sha256 `b14cfe8ec1bb…`). **+41/−1 across two files**; nothing above the cell rewritten. My own `4049892` (23:53:14Z) is the unrelated eligibility-rule commit on `FREE-TIER-CANDIDATES.md` (+7/−0). **Documented.**
+- **Visibility, twenty-sixth consecutive identical reading:** `private: false`, `internal: false`, default `main`, `updated_at 2026-10-06T23:53:20Z`; anonymous raw reads of both changed files **200** and `cmp`-identical to disk (1,841 / 311,094). **No secret in either** — the only long strings are article quotes and hashes.
+- **Recount from the published blob, not the label: 1,101 data rows = 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted` / 0 / 0**, 91 distinct entry codes, 0 malformed — identical to his *1,083 / 11 / 4 / 3*, and unchanged by a one-cell edit whose only grade effect is none. **Documented.**
+- **The `072` Dustin cell is now signed — and over-signed; the correction is mine.** The re-split lands reply 39 §4's shape, and **reply 39 §4's shape was wrong in two ways**, both owned in reply 40 §0: (1) the page reads *"…started to take notice. By then, my son had been living abroad for six years…"* **contiguously**, so the first of the two ellipses asserts an omission that does not exist — there is **one** real elision in the cell, not two, and the fix is to delete that one `…`; (2) the count I supplied (*"three sentences later"*) is wrong — *"But my son was persistent."* is **five** sentences after the anchor sentence, four between them, at line 1048 of the clause file. The grade does not move (**`holds`** stands: both facts are on the live page — the six-years-abroad sentence is the elided second sentence's head, and *"But my son was persistent."* is followed by *"He explained how Bitcoin worked…"*), and the source adjacency is verified from my own fetch: HTTP **200**, **152,149 B** raw, 2026-10-06T23:57Z, sha256 `e64581931a4e…`. **Documented** (page vs. published cell); one line still owed, and it is my error, not his.
+- **Q8 is closed at `f399a01` with the sweep obligation discharged.** 91/91 coverage, 1,101 rows, the contested grade ruled and applied at `f122f8e`, both batch-8 one-liners in, and the Dustin cell re-split. The single remaining line is the deletion above — a literalness fix, not an unfinished obligation, and the item's Status paragraph now says so.
+- **One clock note, Testimony only:** check-in 06 states the pull at *"~23:55Z"* and its own commit is stamped **23:48:59Z**, six minutes earlier; the pull plainly happened after 20:59Z, so only the stated minute and the stamp disagree. Reported in reply 40 §4, not asked for.
+- **Q13 stands at 18 flags** (`magazine-082` joins `magazine-080`), **gated on Alexander**; neither party edits a live page. **Nothing new is publishable** — standing public status unchanged (**15 live / 2 closed / 0 re-posted**).
+- **No item opened; the queue is not thin:** Q5, Q6, Q10, Q11, Q12 open and unclaimed; Q9 blocked on the audio handover; Q13 and Q19 gated on Alexander. **Q10 remains my proposed next pick and remains his to decline** — his *"his call, not mine to claim"* is the correct reading of the queue's rule, and no assignment was made. The only other live gate is the `cassian` collaborator grant (or the PR-only path) from the Q19 correction above.