stackchain/troupe-standup
2
0 Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Q10: batch B (ev-012..ev-022) graded - 55 clauses: 53 holds / 1 overstated (ev-014#4) / 1 unsupported (ev-018#6); running 100 clauses: 97/1/1/0/0/1

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
zephyrus-sparkborn committed 2026-10-09 13:18:08 +00:00
1 parent c4c6d3ae17
commit eea7408bc0
1 file changed
+221
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md
+221
View File
@@ -216,3 +216,224 @@ Extraction method for any X-sourced row: curl with a browser UA, record HTTP
code + byte size + read clock, grep the body for the post text verbatim.
The "A login-wall render would flip this to unreadable" note from batch A is
retracted — a payload-less shell does not flip a row; re-test and annotate.
---
## Batch B (ev-012..ev-022, 11 entries; graded 2026-10-09 by three parallel graders, compiled this tick)
### ev-012 — event-2022-09-12-actual-miners-get-an-accounting-route
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2022-09-12-actual-miners-get-an-accounting-route/ — fetched 200 / 3,609 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:31 UTC
- Sources: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stackchainsats/stackchain/main/sips/sip-0010.txt — curl 200 / 1,305 B, 13:09:52 UTC (plain text, byte-stable).
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | SIP-0010 by Semisol defines how a Bitcoin miner can document energy expenditure and bitcoin obtained, then receive a receipt usable for Stackjoins or blocks | holds | "TITLE: Protocol for Bitcoin miners to mine Stackchain blocks." / "AUTHOR: Semisol"; "recording the power draw, electricity price ($/kWH) and money spent on miner electricity costs"; "How much Bitcoin they obtained"; "a Stackchainer should provide a receipt to the miner with basic information about the process. This receipt can be used like any other in Stackjoins or mining blocks." URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stackchainsats/stackchain/main/sips/sip-0010.txt |
| 2 | It broadens what could count as participation beyond buying bitcoin on an exchange | holds (editorial frame) | The SIP's documented route is energy-expenditure-based mining, not exchange purchase; nothing in the source contradicts the characterization. (same URL) |
Totals: 2 clauses: 2 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: entry date basis ("document creation date") matches the SIP header "CREATED: 2022-09-12" verbatim; SIP STATUS: Active.
---
### ev-013 — event-2022-10-05-the-community-documents-its-scale-and-charit
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2022-10-05-the-community-documents-its-scale-and-charit/ — fetched 200 / 3,929 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:31 UTC
- Sources: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement — 200 / 341,586 B, 13:10:09 UTC; datePublished 2022-10-05T00:00:00-05:00, byline StackchainQuant (guest post confirmed).
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | StackchainQuant's Bitcoin Magazine guest post reports about 400 participants in the early weeks | holds | "In a matter of weeks, the Stackchain had drawn in 400 unique plebs into stacking on the Stackchain." (same URL) |
| 2 | and cumulative purchases of $1.5 million / 75 bitcoin in eight weeks | holds | "In eight weeks those participating in the Stackchain went from having bought a mere $5 of bitcoin to a whopping $1.5 million of bitcoin cumulatively, or in bitcoin terms, from accumulating a few thousand sats to over 7.5 billion sats (75 bitcoin)." (same URL) |
| 3 | It reports more than $6,000 for Bitcoin Beach | holds | "Stacks For Bitcoin Beach: An initiative where Stackchainers raised over $6,000 to help fund Bitcoin education in El Salvador." (same URL) |
| 4 | roughly 30 phones for Bitcoin Ekasi | holds | "The Flashstack For Bitcoin Ekasi: The donations funded the purchase of ~30 phones for kids in an African township so that they could have the opportunity to learn about Bitcoin by working for and earning rewards in Bitcoin." (same URL) |
| 5 | and several thousand dollars for Hodlonaut | holds | "Flashstack For Hodlonaut: Stackchainers raised several thousand dollars using the tag #Stacks4Hodlonaut to help fund Hodlonaut in his legal battle against Craig Wright, aka Faketoshi." (same URL) |
| 6 | These are attributed contemporary community statistics, not a new financial audit | holds (editorial frame) | The article reports rounded community figures ("400 unique plebs", "~30 phones", "over $6,000") with no audit methodology; the entry's caveat is consistent with the source. (same URL) |
Totals: 6 clauses: 6 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: the entry's date basis ("publication date; statistics describe an earlier eight-week interval") matches datePublished 2022-10-05; the figures it quotes are the article's, not independently re-audited — the entry says exactly that.
---
### ev-014 — event-2022-10-07-gui-s-2079-and-saylor-s-2080
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2022-10-07-gui-s-2079-and-saylor-s-2080/ — fetched 200 / 4,057 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:31 UTC
- Sources: https://x.com/GuiAmadoGomes/status/1578475197211893760 — curl 200 / 182,652 B, 13:10:36 UTC; https://x.com/saylor/status/1578479561750110208 — curl 200 / 173,030 B, 13:10:36 UTC; tweet text recovered verbatim from rendered spans + JSON payload in both curl bodies (canonicalUrl matches each cited URL exactly); https://europeanbitcoiners.com/what-the-heck-is-stackchain/ — 200 / 102,858 B, 13:10:09 UTC, datePublished 2022-07-22T19:38:54.000Z.
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | Gui Gomes's "Block 2079 #swanstack #stackchain" at 19:59:48 UTC | holds | Rendered tweet text: "Block 2079\n#swanstack #stackchain"; embedded payload carries article:published_time 2022-10-07T19:59:48.000Z. URL: https://x.com/GuiAmadoGomes/status/1578475197211893760 |
| 2 | and Michael Saylor's "Block 2080 #stackchain" at 20:17:08 UTC | holds | Rendered tweet text: "Block 2080 #stackchain"; embedded payload carries article:published_time 2022-10-07T20:17:08.000Z. URL: https://x.com/saylor/status/1578479561750110208 |
| 3 | This is unusually strong primary-post evidence for a celebrated milestone | holds (editorial frame) | Both cited posts recovered live from the exact cited URLs with matching canonical URLs and published timestamps — primary evidence, not second-hand. (same URLs) |
| 4 | The European Bitcoiners page retains a July publication label but embeds these October posts, so its updated content cannot be backdated to July | overstated | July label verified: datePublished 2022-07-22T19:38:54.000Z, "July 22, 2022" on page. But the page embeds only ONE of the two October posts: Saylor's ("Block 2080 #stackchain", attributed "October 7, 2022", status 1578479561750110208) — Gui's 2079 status ID, "GuiAmadoGomes", "Block 2079", and "swanstack" are all absent (0 occurrences each). The plural "these October posts" overstates the embed evidence. URL: https://europeanbitcoiners.com/what-the-heck-is-stackchain/ |
Totals: 4 clauses: 3 holds / 1 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: the X pages this run served full rendered content (unlike batch A's login-wall cases); both timestamps match the entry's 19:59:48 / 20:17:08 UTC to the second. The page's other embeds (@derekmross, @YoshishiSatoshi, @AriZonanHODL ×2) are all July–August 2022, so Saylor's October 7 post is the lone post-July addition — the "cannot be backdated to July" conclusion survives, but only for the Saylor embed. Corroborated from the compiling host 2026-10-09 ~13:30 UTC: europeanbitcoiners page 200 / 102,858 B carries "Block 2080", "saylor", status 1578479561750110208, "October 7, 2022" and has zero occurrences of "Block 2079", "swanstack", "GuiAmadoGomes", or status 1578475197211893760. Flag candidate for the archive wording list (the entry's own fix is Alexander's call).
---
### ev-015 — event-2022-12-00-builder-relationships-cross-into-nostr
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2022-12-00-builder-relationships-cross-into-nostr/ — fetched 200 / 3,957 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:31 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/stackchain-is-for-builders-how-building-on-stackchain-led-to-building-on-nostr/ — 200 / 136,509 B, 13:09:52 UTC; byline Derek Ross, datePublished 2023-08-28T05:59:31+01:00.
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | Derek Ross writes that Stackchain introduced him to Semisol | holds | "Last year during the early days of Stackchain, I met a fellow Stackchainer who just seemed to click with me. His name was Semisol." — byline Derek Ross. (same URL) |
| 2 | attempts to move the game onto its own platform largely failed apart from Stackjoin | holds | "we wanted to build an application so that Stackchain could survive off of Twitter, to make Stackchain its own platform."; "That is, except for our beloved Stackjoin proposal. Everything else flopped." (same URL) |
| 3 | he returned seriously to Nostr in mid-December 2022 | holds | "In mid-December 2022, I tried Nostr again. This time it clicked with me." (same URL) |
| 4 | before building Nostr Plebs with Semisol | holds | "Together, we built the first NIP-05 ID service provider for Nostr"; "I bought the domain name nostrplebs.com and started Nostr Plebs, a Nostr service provider." (same URL) |
| 5 | This is a builder's own account of a social network becoming a working partnership | holds (editorial frame) | First-person retrospective by Derek Ross throughout; nothing in the source contradicts the characterization. (same URL) |
Totals: 5 clauses: 5 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: the entry's date basis ("month reported in August 2023 retrospective") matches the article's datePublished 2023-08-28 and the in-text "mid-December 2022" — no mismatch. "Stackchain allowed two like minded Bitcoiners to find one another, discuss their passions and skills for building, and to ultimately build a service provider..." closes the piece.
---
### ev-016 — event-2023-01-30-burnchain-and-loko-s-sj-lottery-are-already
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2023-01-30-burnchain-and-loko-s-sj-lottery-are-already/ — fetched 200 / 3,784 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:30 UTC
- Sources: https://podcasts.apple.com/be/podcast/stackchain-sj-lottery/id1654425194?i=1000597332122 — curl 200 / 134,341 B, 13:09:49 UTC. Page `<title>`: "Stackchain SJ Lottery–Stackchain Signal – Apple Podcasts"; `"releaseDate":"2023-01-30T22:15:54Z"` (×3), `"kind":"podcastEpisode"`.
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | A Stackchain Signal episode was published January 30, 2023 | holds | Page title "Stackchain SJ Lottery–Stackchain Signal – Apple Podcasts"; `"releaseDate":"2023-01-30T22:15:54Z"` (matches the entry's "basis: podcast publication timestamp: 22:15 UTC"). URL: https://podcasts.apple.com/be/podcast/stackchain-sj-lottery/id1654425194?i=1000597332122 |
| 2 | and it describes Skinner introducing "his burnChain" | holds | Episode description: "Our Sunday spaces where Skinner started us off talking about his burnChain which led us into a conversation about burning Bitcoin, The Genesis Block, and Satoshi himself." (same URL) |
| 3 | plus discussion of Loko's SJ Lottery | holds | "We talked about Loko's SJ Lottery and how much fun that has been." (same URL) |
| 4 | This sets an existence bound for both; it does not establish a precise Burnchain genesis date or lottery rules | holds (editorial frame) | The full description contains neither a Burnchain genesis date nor lottery rules — only the Sunday-spaces conversation summary quoted above; nothing contradicts the bound characterization. (same URL) |
Totals: 4 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
---
### ev-017 — event-2023-05-00-siggy-reaches-nostr
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2023-05-00-siggy-reaches-nostr/ — fetched 200 / 3,393 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:30 UTC
- Sources: https://github.com/plebiolira/stackchainsiggy_nostr — curl: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently, `Location: https://github.com/flav1000/stackchainsiggy_nostr`; followed with -L: final 200 / 277,740 B, 13:09:58 UTC. GitHub API: repo info 200 / 6,004 B; commits list 200 / 194,423 B, 13:10:11 UTC.
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | The cited GitHub URL redirects to github.com/flav1000/stackchainsiggy_nostr | holds | `HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently` / `Location: https://github.com/flav1000/stackchainsiggy_nostr` for https://github.com/plebiolira/stackchainsiggy_nostr; -L follow resolves 200 at the new URL (277,740 B). |
| 2 | The repository describes a mascot bot monitoring #stackjoin buys | holds | README (verbatim from the rendered repo page): "This is the version made for Nostr for the Stackchain mascot that monitors for #stackjoin buys." URL: https://github.com/flav1000/stackchainsiggy_nostr |
| 3 | Visible commit history runs from May to August 2023 | holds | GitHub API: `"created_at": "2023-05-14T23:36:56Z"`; 48 commits spanning first "git init" 2023-05-14T23:37:38Z through latest "bug fix with query time and multiple hashtags" 2023-08-23T12:12:05Z, with intervening commits in May, June, July and August 2023 (e.g. "implementing stackjoinadd" 2023-08-12T18:22:43Z, "Switching scheduler to blocking" 2023-06-21T14:57:29Z). URLs: https://api.github.com/repos/flav1000/stackchainsiggy_nostr, .../commits?per_page=100 |
| 4 | It is evidence of real tooling, distinct from a claim that the entire main chain migrated to Nostr | holds (editorial frame) | The repo is working bot code (relay connections, scheduler, Airtable upload, bech32 conversion per commit messages); nothing in the README or repo describes a chain migration. (same URLs) |
Totals: 4 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: one merge commit (8fbe1f4d, 2023-05-17) references `https://github.com/pleblira/stackchainsiggy_nostr` ("pleblira", one 'o'), suggesting the plebiolira account was renamed to flav1000 rather than the repo being a fork — the redirect entry is honest either way. Entry date basis "visible repository commit dates" matches the API data (May–Aug 2023).
---
### ev-018 — event-2023-08-00-the-archive-becomes-a-magazine-a-game-and-a
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2023-08-00-the-archive-becomes-a-magazine-a-game-and-a/ — fetched 200 / 4,978 B, 2026-10-09 13:09:30 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-brief-history-of-stackchain/ — 200 / 143,514 B, 13:10:19 UTC, `"datePublished":"2023-08-27"`, byline "Anthony von Dessauer"; https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/stackchain-heroes/ — 200 / 138,472 B, `"datePublished":"2023-08-28"`, byline "Jonhangel"; https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-journey-of-memes/ — 200 / 140,339 B, `"datePublished":"2023-12-05"`, byline "By Chewy".
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | Stackchain Magazine preserves Anthony's first-year history | holds | Article title "A Brief History of Stackchain.", byline "Anthony von Dessauer", datePublished 2023-08-27. Opens: "Welcome to Stackchain where we celebrate stacking sats. A place where technical analysis has no meaning to us; only stackheight matters." URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-brief-history-of-stackchain/ |
| 2 | Jonhangel's account of developing Stackchain Heroes | holds | "Stackchain Heroes Jonhangel", datePublished 2023-08-28; body: "This great project began on a normal afternoon; I was talking with my brothers – we have always liked video games, playing them and creating our own has become a hobby in which we share together as a team to create something out of nothing that can be fun or even enriching". URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/stackchain-heroes/ |
| 3 | Chewy's history of personalized validation memes | holds | "A Journey of Memes By Chewy", datePublished 2023-12-05; body: "When I initially started stacking on StackChain, no one was doing memes —we were mostly focused on trying to find the tip and place our stack as fast as possible!" URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-journey-of-memes/ |
| 4 | Chewy describes memes influencing fork preference | holds | "Also I noticed that if there was a fork, people would tend to go with the block that had the best memes validating it." (same URL) |
| 5 | Chewy credits a wider creative cast | holds | "I'm proud of our Master Class Meme Crew... LoKo with his custom rap songs, Doc and Vee with their movie quality memes, Waldo and Psy with their expert miniature edits, Buddha was the Piñata guru, Freeborn with his unreal validation memes, Dr John with his comedy cuts, Bob Art Chain, Bob with his insightful videos, Rat Poison going next level with his masterpiece, Jaime and his azz, Billy Bread and his amazing songs, George and Block 1776, Lauren flirting nonstop with Buddha via emes, even Peter discovered his blocks were safer with a quality meme leading the way." (same URL) |
| 6 | Anthony credits George and Psyduck with the magazine idea | unsupported | No "Psyduck" (any case) appears in any of the three cited pages (full rendered text searched); "George" appears only in Chewy's meme-crew list ("George and Block 1776"), unrelated to the magazine idea; no credit language about a magazine idea is present in the brief-history article (full body ends "Feel free to join us." + comments, no George/Psyduck). |
| 7 | These are cultural artifacts and first-person testimony, not just promotional links | holds (editorial frame) | All three are bylined first-person pieces ("By Chewy", "Stackchain Heroes Jonhangel", "By Anthony von Dessauer") with substantive content; nothing contradicts the characterization. |
Totals: 7 clauses: 6 holds / 0 overstated / 1 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: all three source pages show both a 2023 publish date and a "21 December 2023" update stamp, so the pages are living; entry date basis "web publication period; print composition may precede uploads" is consistent with the observed 2023-08-27 / 2023-08-28 / 2023-12-05 dates, all inside the 2023-08/2023-12 window. Corroborated from the compiling host 2026-10-09 ~13:33 UTC: brief-history page 200 / 143,514 B carries zero "Psyduck" and zero "George"; memes page 200 / 140,339 B carries zero "Psyduck". Flag candidate for the archive wording list (Alexander's call).
---
### ev-019 — event-2024-04-14-burnchain-explains-itself-in-its-own-words
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2024-04-14-burnchain-explains-itself-in-its-own-words/ — fetched 200 / 3,728 B, 2026-10-09 13:09 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ — curl 200 / 155,217 B, 13:09 UTC; rendered text extracted from HTML, page header shows "14 April 2024".
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | A magazine interview with Burntoshi, Clyde, Gyp, Waldo, FalseFaucet and BTCFakDaBanks | holds | "A conversation between Stackchain Magazine and Burnchainers/ Stackchainers Burntoshi, Clyde, Gyp, Waldo, FalseFaucet, and BTCFakDaBanks on Burning Bitcoin and #Burnchain". URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/a-conversation-with-burnchainers/ |
| 2 | The interview describes a voluntary bitcoin-burning sidechain | holds | "It would be an honor to have burnchain sidechain represented in the chain as a memorial block(s)"; "The energy goes from the individual to the collective, voluntarily." (same URL) |
| 3 | and its disputed cultural meaning | holds | "It’s powerful to love everyone, even in the face of persecution and being misunderstood or cast as a villain or fool." (same URL) |
| 4 | Burntoshi explicitly calls it optional and separate from demand for stacking | holds | "Burntoshi: Why burnchain can use the same sats as Stackchain: it decouples the demand for burning from the demand for stacking, so that burnchain remains a completely optional and unobtrusive side chain." (same URL) |
| 5 | The interview's assertions about Satoshi's death, keys or particular historical burns are not established facts and are not adopted here | holds (editorial frame) | The interview does assert "He just died with his keys. He burned his Bitcoin." and "The earliest deliberate burn we found was in August 2010 when Satoshi was still active."; the entry's refusal to adopt them is a stated editorial stance and nothing in the source contradicts that framing. (same URL) |
Totals: 5 clauses: 5 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: entry basis "WordPress publication timestamp, not genesis" — the page header prints "14 April 2024" twice, matching the 2024-04-14 entry date. The entry's "From the sources" quote is verbatim from the interview.
---
### ev-020 — event-2024-05-20-one-community-multiple-living-chains
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2024-05-20-one-community-multiple-living-chains/ — fetched 200 / 3,727 B, 2026-10-09 13:09 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/two-years-of-stackchain/ — curl 200 / 136,607 B, 13:09 UTC; rendered text extracted from HTML, header "22 July 2025", byline "By Anthony von Dessauer".
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | Article explicitly written May 20, 2024 for the two-year anniversary | holds | "This issue of Log 4 was released on the two year anniversary of Stackchain."; "As of the date of my writing this May 20th 2024". URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/two-years-of-stackchain/ |
| 2 | Anthony describes an abandoned chain near 3000 | holds | "the abandoned chain lingers at 3k somewhere" (same URL) |
| 3 | a busy fork at 1748 | holds | "the fork with the most hash being built on it is at #Stackchaintip @ 1748" (same URL) |
| 4 | #LokoPettyFork at 1318 | holds | "The #LokoPettyFork is at 1318" (same URL) |
| 5 | an established #coffeechain | holds | "the #coffeechain is now an institution" (same URL) |
| 6 | a continuing #musicchain | holds | "the #musicchain still lives" (same URL) |
| 7 | The page was uploaded July 22, 2025; use the internal composition date for this snapshot | holds | Page header "22 July 2025" (twice); internal composition "As of the date of my writing this May 20th 2024" (same URL) |
| 8 | Its 250–300 BTC figure is expressly an estimate, not an exact total | holds | "While it’s not possible to know exactly how much Bitcoin Stackchain has stacked, it’s probably removed anywhere from 250-300 bitcoin from paper hands and sent it to cold storage." (same URL) |
Totals: 8 clauses: 8 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: entry basis "explicit internal composition date; web upload 2025-07-22" — both match the page header and the article's own writing-date line. The entry's "From the sources" quote ("This issue of Log 4 was released on the two year anniversary of Stackchain. It honestly feels like I just wrote about our 1 year anniversary of Stackchain yesterday. Has another year already passed? Is the bear market already gone?") is verbatim from the article.
---
### ev-021 — event-2025-02-15-ogchain-receives-a-first-person-governance-a
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2025-02-15-ogchain-receives-a-first-person-governance-a/ — fetched 200 / 3,856 B, 2026-10-09 13:09 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/the-chain-desides/ — curl 200 / 141,561 B, 13:09 UTC; rendered text extracted from HTML, header "15 February 2025", byline "By Bob".
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | Bob's "The Chain Desides" describes OGchain as an exit by contributors who felt purchasing power outweighed their memes and organizational work | holds | "A lot of us were putting massive amounts of time, creativity and brain power behind organization, memes (art, journalism and literature) and left with very little say or voice on how the chain operated moving forward. As stack height grew if you weren’t able to burn thousands and thousands of cuckbucks at a time you were left with two options: submit or leave. It was here the OGchain was born." URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/the-chain-desides/ |
| 2 | He recalls returns | holds | "They did listen to us and change what they were doing enough for us to return and we did…..until the next time." (same URL) |
| 3 | further splits, and his eventual permanent move | holds | "This went on for a few rotations and eventually I personally made a permanent move." (same URL) |
| 4 | This supplies a reason for the fork in one participant's words | holds (editorial frame) | The account is explicitly Bob's first-person testimony: "Unable to have any real influence on governance and unable to accept the current governance, we went elsewhere and formed a new society, bringing the original protocol with us."; byline "By Bob". (same URL) |
| 5 | It does not date its genesis or establish a complete canonical branch tree | holds (editorial frame) | The article body contains zero calendar-year references for the fork — no date for OGchain's genesis appears anywhere in the text; the fork is narrated entirely without a timeline. |
Totals: 5 clauses: 5 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: entry basis "web publication date; fork happened earlier" — page header prints "15 February 2025", matching the entry date; the article itself carries no fork date, so the basis stands. The entry's "From the sources" quote ("Stackchain has become a number of things in its lifetime...") is verbatim from the article's opening.
---
### ev-022 — event-2026-01-08-golden-blocks-become-an-artifact-worth-remem
- Entry: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2026-01-08-golden-blocks-become-an-artifact-worth-remem/ — fetched 200 / 3,890 B, 2026-10-09 13:09 UTC
- Sources: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/golden-block-the-shiny-chapters-of-stackchain/ — curl 200 / 134,937 B, 13:09 UTC; rendered text extracted from HTML, header "8 January 2026".
| # | Clause | Grade | Settling evidence (verbatim) |
|---|--------|-------|------------------------------|
| 1 | FalseFaucet's retrospective | holds | Visible byline "By False"; the magazine's own author note ties it: "This article was written by False, you can find him on X @falsefaucet and on Nostr falsefaucet@nostriches.net". URL: https://www.stackchainmagazine.net/golden-block-the-shiny-chapters-of-stackchain/ |
| 2 | explains "golden blocks" as posts repeatedly displayed at the top of linked replies | holds | "at the top of the linked replies would be a consistent block, the same one you’d see on your feed for WEEKS at a time." (same URL) |
| 3 | like bookmarks or chapters | holds | "As if it was some bookmark of the chain, a reference point."; "We know they acted like bookmarks, or chapters for the thread" (same URL) |
| 4 | He explicitly says the mechanism was not conclusively understood | holds | "why was block 1048 a golden block instead of 1049? I don’t know if we ever got to the bottom of it." (same URL) |
| 5 | Preserve the caching/truncation explanation as a community hypothesis rather than claiming to know Twitter internals | holds (editorial frame) | "I believe we settled on the theory that twitter would truncate super long threads into chunks to make loading and caching the thread easier for twitter." (same URL) |
Totals: 5 clauses: 5 holds / 0 overstated / 0 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.
Note: entry basis "web publication date; phenomenon predates article" — page header prints "8 January 2026", matching the entry date, while the article says "Every so often over the last few years", so the phenomenon predates the article as labeled. The entry's "From the sources" quote is verbatim from the article's opening.
---
## Batch B totals (ev-012..ev-022, 11 entries)
55 clauses: **53 holds / 1 overstated / 1 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 0 unverified.**
Running Q10 totals (pilot + batch A + batch B): 100 clauses: 97 holds / 1 overstated / 1 unsupported / 0 contradicted / 0 unreadable / 1 unverified.
Unresolved across batch B: two new archive-wording-flag candidates, both corroborated from the compiling host (2026-10-09): ev-014#4 ("these October posts" — only Saylor's October post is embedded on the European Bitcoiners page; Gui's 2079 absent) and ev-018#6 ("Anthony credits George and Psyduck with the magazine idea" — zero "Psyduck"/"George" in the cited sources). Both are archive-side wording fixes for Alexander's call; they are not added to Q13 pending his decision.
All batch-B sources fetched live 2026-10-09; no Wayback use; no dead links in this batch.