{ "source": "/root/troupe-standup/WORK-QUEUE.md", "total_items": 46, "category_counts": { "DONE": 21, "OPEN": 7, "CLOSED": 4, "VERIFIED-CLOSED": 4, "UNCLAIMED": 4, "NO-MARKER": 3, "RESOLVED": 2, "FALSIFIED": 1 }, "items": [ { "q": 1, "header_line": 9, "header": "## Q1 \u2014 Recover the fifteen silent rooms *(highest value; no dependencies)*", "category": "CLOSED", "status": "CLOSED \u2014 0/15 recovered, and every public avenue is now exhausted with receipts.", "status_line": 33, "found": true, "chars": 46, "status_text": "CLOSED \u2014 0/15 recovered, and every public avenue is now exhausted with receipts." }, { "q": 2, "header_line": 55, "header": "## Q2 \u2014 Chase the one dead link", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE \u2014 recovered.", "status_line": 9, "found": true, "chars": 18, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 recovered." }, { "q": 3, "header_line": 73, "header": "## Q3 \u2014 Independent audit of the published ledger", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE \u2014 both passes complete (`2ebcbe7` pass 1, `6f31cde` pass 2, zephyrus-sparkborn; material `2118b3e`).\nVerified from the outside after pass 2 (reply 04).", "status_line": 16, "found": true, "chars": 33, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 both passes complete (`2ebcbe7` pass 1, `6f31cde` pass 2, zephyrus-sparkborn; material `2118b3e`).\nVerified from the outside after pass 2 (reply 04)." }, { "q": 4, "header_line": 106, "header": "## Q4 \u2014 Falsification pass", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/falsification-pass.md` (`f50f052`, zephyrus-sparkborn), all three verdicts re-verified\nfrom the archive side (reply 05, `2026-09-24-to-zephyrus-05.md`).", "status_line": 9, "found": true, "chars": 27, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/falsification-pass.md` (`f50f052`, zephyrus-sparkborn), all three verdicts re-verified\nfrom the archive side (reply 05, `2026-09-24-to-zephyrus-05.md`)." }, { "q": 8, "header_line": 133, "header": "## Q8 \u2014 Summary fidelity: does each entry's machine-written summary overstate its article?", "category": "VERIFIED-CLOSED", "status": "pilot CLOSED at `dcf91a1` (zephyrus-sparkborn), corrected at `9cc6879`; the full sweep is CLOSED at `f1fe38d` (2026-10-06) \u2014 91/91, 1,101 rows, verified independently from the published file. The one contested grade was ruled and applied by zephyrus at `f122f8e` (`082` clause 3 \u2192 `contradicted`) and both batch-8 one-liners landed in the same commit, so the item owes nothing further from him on\nthe grades or the labels; the `072` Dustin evidence cell was re-split by zephyrus at `f399a01` and that re-split\ncarries a correction returned against my own specification \u2014 the *added* ellipsis my reply-39 shape called for is\nspurious, since the two sentences are contiguous in the source, so the one line still open is that single\ndeletion in his file: a literalness fix, not an unfinished sweep obligation. Counts at head: 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted` / 0 / 0; the ruled sentence is carried as Q13 flag 18. The item is DONE at `1cb13e7` (2026-10-07): zephyrus removed the `072` Dustin cell's spurious first (added) ellipsis \u2014 verified from the live page (HTTP 200 / 152,149 B / sha256 `e64581931a4e`, byte-identical to the 10-06 read; *\"started to take notice. By then\"* contiguous in the source) and the file recounted from the published blob (1,104 pipe lines / 1,101 data rows / 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted`), so nothing is outstanding from either side \u2014 reply 42 (`ed2a105`). See the fifth- through eighth-tick addenda at the foot of this file.", "status_line": 21, "found": true, "chars": 321, "status_text": "pilot CLOSED at `dcf91a1` (zephyrus-sparkborn), corrected at `9cc6879`; the full sweep is CLOSED at `f1fe38d` (2026-10-06) \u2014 91/91, 1,101 rows, verified independently from the published file. The one contested grade was ruled and applied by zephyrus at `f122f8e` (`082` clause 3 \u2192 `contradicted`) and both batch-8 one-liners landed in the same commit, so the item owes nothing further from him on\nthe grades or the labels; the `072` Dustin evidence cell was re-split by zephyrus at `f399a01` and that re-split\ncarries a correction returned against my own specification \u2014 the *added* ellipsis my reply-39 shape called for is\nspurious, since the two sentences are contiguous in the source, so the one line still open is that single\ndeletion in his file: a literalness fix, not an unfinished sweep obligation. Counts at head: 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted` / 0 / 0; the ruled sentence is carried as Q13 flag 18. The item is DONE at `1cb13e7` (2026-10-07): zephyrus removed the `072` Dustin cell's spurious first (added) ellipsis \u2014 verified from the live page (HTTP 200 / 152,149 B / sha256 `e64581931a4e`, byte-identical to the 10-06 read; *\"started to take notice. By then\"* contiguous in the source) and the file recounted from the published blob (1,104 pipe lines / 1,101 data rows / 1,083 `holds` / 11 `overstated` / 4 `unsupported` / 3 `contradicted`), so nothing is outstanding from either side \u2014 reply 42 (`ed2a105`). See the fifth- through eighth-tick addenda at the foot of this file." }, { "q": 5, "header_line": 454, "header": "## Q5 \u2014 Issue triage in the organisation's public repos", "category": "CLOSED", "status": "re-scoped 2026-09-26 (reply 08 \u00a75) after a census, because as written it invites busywork.", "status_line": 9, "found": true, "chars": 35, "status_text": "re-scoped 2026-09-26 (reply 08 \u00a75) after a census, because as written it invites busywork." }, { "q": 6, "header_line": 489, "header": "## Q6 \u2014 A public guide to checking this archive", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE at `8bd0b09` (Merlin, 2026-10-08T17:28:47Z) \u2014 verified from this host figure by figure;\none correction returned in `replies/2026-10-08-to-merlin-01.md` (`5253275`).", "status_line": 9, "found": true, "chars": 93, "status_text": "DONE at `8bd0b09` (Merlin, 2026-10-08T17:28:47Z) \u2014 verified from this host figure by figure;\none correction returned in `replies/2026-10-08-to-merlin-01.md` (`5253275`)." }, { "q": 7, "header_line": 582, "header": "## Q7 \u2014 Propose the next items", "category": "DONE", "status": "satisfied for the 2026-09-25 cycle.", "status_line": 5, "found": true, "chars": 74, "status_text": "satisfied for the 2026-09-25 cycle." }, { "q": 9, "header_line": 656, "header": "## Q9 \u2014 Independent QC of the sovereign music candidates *(second opinion, no listening required)*", "category": "UNCLAIMED", "status": "unclaimed. Pre-verified by Timmy against the delivered files \u2014 record `recoveries/music-master-verification.md`\n(`53a5509`), written up in reply 06 (`17c1619`). The recorded numbers hold (file SHA-256s match `STATE.json`; \u221214.12 /\n\u221214.00 / \u221213.98 LUFS; three distinct renditions; decode clean on all three; 48 kHz stereo 320 kbps; `ace-result.json`\nconfirms CPU, 16 steps, 8840.9 s wall). Three lines of the item's own text are corrected in that record, not edited here:\nthe \"true peak \u2264 \u22120.9 dBFS\" bound measures \u22120.94 / \u22121.57 / \u22120.92, i.e. up to 0.08 dB *above* the \u22121.0 dBTP mastering target\nthat the same release record states; \"the manifest\" is `STATE.json`; and 195.0 s is the FLAC source (the MP3 container\nreads 195.024 s). Hook transcription, my own pass, 50\u2013110 s window per candidate: \"the receipt is the proof\" is recovered\nverbatim in all three; \"the hash don't care who told you no\" is recovered in none, and a transcript cannot say whether\nthat is the render or the model.\nAs written this is not executable as a second opinion from zephyrus's environment \u2014 the files are not reachable from\nthere, and my pass is not independent (same host, same tools, and I wrote the item). Making it executable needs a decision\non handing over unreleased audio under checksum; that goes to Alexander, not into the pipe. Ordering: Q8 stays ahead of Q9.\n\nUpdate (reply 07, `8e44d22`, 2026-09-25): unchanged and not waiting on anyone here. The checksum-handover decision\nis escalated to Alexander with reply 07; the hook-transcription result stands as recorded (the chorus line recovered in\nall three, the second line in none). No audio enters this repo or any public repo before the human gate opens.\n\n---", "status_line": 18, "found": true, "chars": 37, "status_text": "unclaimed. Pre-verified by Timmy against the delivered files \u2014 record `recoveries/music-master-verification.md`\n(`53a5509`), written up in reply 06 (`17c1619`). The recorded numbers hold (file SHA-256s match `STATE.json`; \u221214.12 /\n\u221214.00 / \u221213.98 LUFS; three distinct renditions; decode clean on all three; 48 kHz stereo 320 kbps; `ace-result.json`\nconfirms CPU, 16 steps, 8840.9 s wall). Three lines of the item's own text are corrected in that record, not edited here:\nthe \"true peak \u2264 \u22120.9 dBFS\" bound measures \u22120.94 / \u22121.57 / \u22120.92, i.e. up to 0.08 dB *above* the \u22121.0 dBTP mastering target\nthat the same release record states; \"the manifest\" is `STATE.json`; and 195.0 s is the FLAC source (the MP3 container\nreads 195.024 s). Hook transcription, my own pass, 50\u2013110 s window per candidate: \"the receipt is the proof\" is recovered\nverbatim in all three; \"the hash don't care who told you no\" is recovered in none, and a transcript cannot say whether\nthat is the render or the model.\nAs written this is not executable as a second opinion from zephyrus's environment \u2014 the files are not reachable from\nthere, and my pass is not independent (same host, same tools, and I wrote the item). Making it executable needs a decision\non handing over unreleased audio under checksum; that goes to Alexander, not into the pipe. Ordering: Q8 stays ahead of Q9.\n\nUpdate (reply 07, `8e44d22`, 2026-09-25): unchanged and not waiting on anyone here. The checksum-handover decision\nis escalated to Alexander with reply 07; the hook-transcription result stands as recorded (the chorus line recovered in\nall three, the second line in none). No audio enters this repo or any public repo before the human gate opens.\n\n---" }, { "q": 10, "header_line": 693, "header": "## Q10 \u2014 Summary fidelity for the non-magazine entries", "category": "DONE", "status": "COMPLETE 2026-10-10 (verified from raw sources; closure record below). Originally claimed by zephyrus-sparkborn at `3c9ad5b` (2026-10-07, `checkins/2026-10-07-zephyrus.md` \u00a73).\nThe 30 targets enumerate from `recoveries/ledger-audit-pass2.md` (22 `event-\u2026` slugs + 8 `block-\u2026` slugs) and the\nlive index (`/stackchain/blocks/`, 200 / 34,488 B); batch plan A = ev-001\u2026ev-011, B = ev-012\u2026ev-022,\nC = bl-001\u2026bl-008; finish line `recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md`, fresh-sha PUT + anonymous-GET as on\nQ8.", "status_line": 14, "found": true, "chars": 256, "status_text": "COMPLETE 2026-10-10 (verified from raw sources; closure record below). Originally claimed by zephyrus-sparkborn at `3c9ad5b` (2026-10-07, `checkins/2026-10-07-zephyrus.md` \u00a73).\nThe 30 targets enumerate from `recoveries/ledger-audit-pass2.md` (22 `event-\u2026` slugs + 8 `block-\u2026` slugs) and the\nlive index (`/stackchain/blocks/`, 200 / 34,488 B); batch plan A = ev-001\u2026ev-011, B = ev-012\u2026ev-022,\nC = bl-001\u2026bl-008; finish line `recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine.md`, fresh-sha PUT + anonymous-GET as on\nQ8." }, { "q": 11, "header_line": 949, "header": "## Q11 \u2014 Close the eight pass-2 date mismatches", "category": "RESOLVED", "status": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/ledger-date-closure.md`, Merlin, 2026-10-09. 8 / 8 resolved, all\n`archive correct`; 0 `source correct`, 0 `indeterminate`, 0 `unresolved`. Every row settled\nby a dated primary or contemporaneous source fetched live this run (all 8 entry pages and 13\ncited sources HTTP 200, each SHA-256'd): SIP-0001's abstract bears *\"July 18, 2022 at 7:07 PM\"*\nfor row 1 (pass 2's own note that *\"none bears 2022 18\"* is wrong \u2014 it read the `CREATED:`\nheader, never the abstract); the king-of-stackchain article bears *\"July 18, 2022\"*; SIP-0004's\n`CREATED: 2022-7-20` plus its git history (earliest `2ac1fbab` 2022-07-21T02:11:47Z, 5 commits\nto 2022-08-09, which is exactly what the entry's own basis label warns); the cited AnthonyDessauer\npost *\"6:00 PM \u00b7 Aug 18, 2022\"*; the-fork-of-1492 article *\"August 28th, 2022 late in the\nmorning\"*; both cited X posts *\"Oct 7, 2022\"* (7:59 PM / 8:17 PM); *\"In mid-December 2022\"*;\nand *\"May 20th 2024\"* as the two-years article's own composition date against its 2025-07-22\nupload. The flag was a rule artifact: all 8 compare an event date against a source's\n*publication* date, which are supposed to differ for retrospectives and standards documents \u2014\nrecommend retiring or narrowing that flag rule. The archive's own `basis:` labels are accurate\non all 8 rows and do the disclosure work the badge tier is supposed to do. One void avenue\nrecorded so it is not repeated: Stackchain block numbers (1492/2079/2080) are the social chain's\nown numbering, not Bitcoin heights \u2014 `mempool.space/api/block-height/1492` returns a block\nfrom 2009-01-24, so a Bitcoin explorer cannot date them. One sub-finding left unverified:\nrow 1's three sources agree on the date and disagree on the hour (7:07 PM / 4:07 PST / 11:07 PM);\nthe verdict does not depend on it.\n\n---", "status_line": 13, "found": true, "chars": 36, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/ledger-date-closure.md`, Merlin, 2026-10-09. 8 / 8 resolved, all\n`archive correct`; 0 `source correct`, 0 `indeterminate`, 0 `unresolved`. Every row settled\nby a dated primary or contemporaneous source fetched live this run (all 8 entry pages and 13\ncited sources HTTP 200, each SHA-256'd): SIP-0001's abstract bears *\"July 18, 2022 at 7:07 PM\"*\nfor row 1 (pass 2's own note that *\"none bears 2022 18\"* is wrong \u2014 it read the `CREATED:`\nheader, never the abstract); the king-of-stackchain article bears *\"July 18, 2022\"*; SIP-0004's\n`CREATED: 2022-7-20` plus its git history (earliest `2ac1fbab` 2022-07-21T02:11:47Z, 5 commits\nto 2022-08-09, which is exactly what the entry's own basis label warns); the cited AnthonyDessauer\npost *\"6:00 PM \u00b7 Aug 18, 2022\"*; the-fork-of-1492 article *\"August 28th, 2022 late in the\nmorning\"*; both cited X posts *\"Oct 7, 2022\"* (7:59 PM / 8:17 PM); *\"In mid-December 2022\"*;\nand *\"May 20th 2024\"* as the two-years article's own composition date against its 2025-07-22\nupload. The flag was a rule artifact: all 8 compare an event date against a source's\n*publication* date, which are supposed to differ for retrospectives and standards documents \u2014\nrecommend retiring or narrowing that flag rule. The archive's own `basis:` labels are accurate\non all 8 rows and do the disclosure work the badge tier is supposed to do. One void avenue\nrecorded so it is not repeated: Stackchain block numbers (1492/2079/2080) are the social chain's\nown numbering, not Bitcoin heights \u2014 `mempool.space/api/block-height/1492` returns a block\nfrom 2009-01-24, so a Bitcoin explorer cannot date them. One sub-finding left unverified:\nrow 1's three sources agree on the date and disagree on the hour (7:07 PM / 4:07 PST / 11:07 PM);\nthe verdict does not depend on it.\n\n---" }, { "q": 12, "header_line": 985, "header": "## Q12 \u2014 Are the evidence tiers earned?", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/evidence-tier-audit.md`, Merlin, 2026-10-10. 18/18 `justified`, 0 `too\nstrong`, 0 `too weak`, 0 `indeterminate`; no badge in the sample misstates its evidence.", "status_line": 27, "found": true, "chars": 126, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 `recoveries/evidence-tier-audit.md`, Merlin, 2026-10-10. 18/18 `justified`, 0 `too\nstrong`, 0 `too weak`, 0 `indeterminate`; no badge in the sample misstates its evidence." }, { "q": 13, "header_line": 1111, "header": "## Q13 \u2014 Publish the archive-side wording fixes, one at a time", "category": "OPEN", "status": "1 of 8 has a decision and staged correction (`magazine-091`; reply 09 \u00a73), but its decided note carries\nan authority/escalation caveat. Publication and third-party contact are on hold pending Alexander's explicit\nconfirmation. The other 7 are undecided and named in Q8 above. Archive-side work \u2014 not Zeph's unless he wants it.\nEntered by Timmy 2026-09-26, satisfying the Q7 obligation for this cycle.\n\nChannel note, 2026-09-27 \u2014 the relay's host is answered, and the item's decision state is unchanged.", "status_line": 18, "found": true, "chars": 35, "status_text": "1 of 8 has a decision and staged correction (`magazine-091`; reply 09 \u00a73), but its decided note carries\nan authority/escalation caveat. Publication and third-party contact are on hold pending Alexander's explicit\nconfirmation. The other 7 are undecided and named in Q8 above. Archive-side work \u2014 not Zeph's unless he wants it.\nEntered by Timmy 2026-09-26, satisfying the Q7 obligation for this cycle.\n\nChannel note, 2026-09-27 \u2014 the relay's host is answered, and the item's decision state is unchanged." }, { "q": 14, "header_line": 1146, "header": "## Q14 \u2014 Put the Inbox on `alexanderwhitestone.com` behind a gate", "category": "OPEN", "status": "DONE \u2014 finished by `616794c` (2026-09-26), then re-measured by a later run the same day instead of being\nread back. The criterion above was met by an authenticated mobile-width render against the live URL; the\nfollowing run reproduced it with its own tools: authenticated `https://alexanderwhitestone.com/inbox/` HTTP 200,\n20,051 bytes, sha256 `b81e9fe7da42df6ad339ac19a4fc8a8052b9663c2129cc207077538dfe6b3639`, byte-identical to the only\nfile in `/opt/inbox-live`; anonymous `/inbox/` 401, `/inbox` 308, `/inbox/seed.json` 401, authenticated\n`/inbox/seed.json` 404; Playwright/Chromium at 390\u00d7844 against that URL \u2014 12 pending cards, 1 decided card, badge\n`12 open` \u2192 `10 open` after one approve and one defer, `aria-pressed=true`, three actions per card, 13 copy-out\nlines containing ids 1\u201312, localStorage keyed `{1,2}`, note surviving reload, decided view rendering, 0 page and 0\nconsole errors. Evidence: the live URL, the two hashes, the render output, and a named record of the gate\n(`basic_auth`, chosen by Alexander as option A). Two things do not close with it: credential delivery to\nAlexander is still unverified from this host \u2014 the credential is root-only on the box and its value is recorded in\nno artifact \u2014 and the public-repository exposure remains open and separate (see the standing blocker restated\nabove). No new pending state enters this repo meanwhile. Correction carried in this same entry: the claim that the\ncredential was \"not stored on this host\" was wrong in the earlier update and in reply 11; both artifacts now say\nso.\n\nRecord-accuracy correction: the sentence immediately above overstated the state when written. The Q14 entry had\nan appended correction, but reply 11 itself still contained the false claim until the later append committed after\nQ15. Reply 12 carried the substance meanwhile. The original sentences remain visible; the correction trail, not an\nin-place rewrite, is the evidence.\n\nVisibility measurement, 2026-09-27 \u2014 the input Alexander's decision was missing. Anonymous exposure\nunchanged from 2026-09-26: `GET /api/v1/repos/stackchain/troupe-standup` with no credential \u2192 HTTP 200,\n`\"private\": false`, `\"internal\": false`; anonymous raw seed over HTTPS \u2192 HTTP 200, 9,484 bytes, sha256\n`e4429147bc1bc25a5fc06df3b47a98e61d234775d055c278154fd466001585e0` (byte-identical to the value recorded on\n2026-09-26 \u2014 present *and* unchanged). \u00a75 of the build spec is still held: `inbox/pending.json` has never been\nadded on any ref (`git log --all --diff-filter=A -- inbox/pending.json` \u2192 no output) and `inbox/` contains only\n`seed-2026-09-26.json`, added by `7c4cf1b`. New, and it corrects an unstated risk in the way this question was\nframed: the pipe's own reads are authenticated, not anonymous \u2014 `/api/v1/user` with the environment token\nreturns 200, without a token 401, with a malformed token 401 \u2014 so making this repository private will not\nsilence the change gate. The visibility call can be made on its own merits.\n\nContainment measurement on the exposure itself, 2026-09-27. What the public repository currently holds from\nthe inbox artifact, measured rather than assumed: every string of \u226530 characters in the seed's pending items\nappears in exactly one file \u2014 the seed itself (`inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`) \u2014 and in no other file in the repo;\nthe decided item's evidence strings appear in the seed and in `decisions/2026-09-26.md`, which the relay\npublished deliberately. No file of mine carries either. So the exposure is one file plus one by-design decision\nrecord, and this tick added nothing to it. The pending strings are not quoted here, by rule.\n\nDelivery-surface measurement, 2026-09-28 \u2014 the page and the live inbox have diverged. Zephyrus's check-in\n(`26e3cda`) reports the repository-visibility question as now sitting in front of Alexander as an inbox item. Measured\nthis tick instead of assumed: the export this host holds (`/opt/inbox-site/seed.json`, sha256 `e4429147\u202685e0`,\n`exported_at` `2026-09-26T17:31:00Z`) contains 12 pending (ids 1\u201312) and 1 decided (id 13), and the seed itself\nrecords that the Muse artifact is the live inbox while this file is a build seed. The gated page\n`https://alexanderwhitestone.com/inbox/` is byte-identical to a build of that export (sha256 `b81e9fe7\u2026b3639`), so\nthe page cannot be showing any item created after 2026-09-26T17:31Z \u2014 including the escalation in question.\nNothing has rebuilt the page since the `17:43` build, and `decisions/` has had no commit since 2026-09-26, so a\ndecision relayed today would not appear on the page either. The escalation's presence in the Muse artifact is\nTestimony only from this host (that artifact is not readable here). This is not a defect in either surface; it is a\nquestion only Alexander can settle \u2014 whether he wants to act on the page (then it needs a rebuild path) or in the\nartifact (then the page is a stale mirror). Named here so \"it is in front of him\" is not read as delivery on the page\nhis directive asked for. No pending material is quoted or duplicated by this measurement.\n\n---", "status_line": 64, "found": true, "chars": 119, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 finished by `616794c` (2026-09-26), then re-measured by a later run the same day instead of being\nread back. The criterion above was met by an authenticated mobile-width render against the live URL; the\nfollowing run reproduced it with its own tools: authenticated `https://alexanderwhitestone.com/inbox/` HTTP 200,\n20,051 bytes, sha256 `b81e9fe7da42df6ad339ac19a4fc8a8052b9663c2129cc207077538dfe6b3639`, byte-identical to the only\nfile in `/opt/inbox-live`; anonymous `/inbox/` 401, `/inbox` 308, `/inbox/seed.json` 401, authenticated\n`/inbox/seed.json` 404; Playwright/Chromium at 390\u00d7844 against that URL \u2014 12 pending cards, 1 decided card, badge\n`12 open` \u2192 `10 open` after one approve and one defer, `aria-pressed=true`, three actions per card, 13 copy-out\nlines containing ids 1\u201312, localStorage keyed `{1,2}`, note surviving reload, decided view rendering, 0 page and 0\nconsole errors. Evidence: the live URL, the two hashes, the render output, and a named record of the gate\n(`basic_auth`, chosen by Alexander as option A). Two things do not close with it: credential delivery to\nAlexander is still unverified from this host \u2014 the credential is root-only on the box and its value is recorded in\nno artifact \u2014 and the public-repository exposure remains open and separate (see the standing blocker restated\nabove). No new pending state enters this repo meanwhile. Correction carried in this same entry: the claim that the\ncredential was \"not stored on this host\" was wrong in the earlier update and in reply 11; both artifacts now say\nso.\n\nRecord-accuracy correction: the sentence immediately above overstated the state when written. The Q14 entry had\nan appended correction, but reply 11 itself still contained the false claim until the later append committed after\nQ15. Reply 12 carried the substance meanwhile. The original sentences remain visible; the correction trail, not an\nin-place rewrite, is the evidence.\n\nVisibility measurement, 2026-09-27 \u2014 the input Alexander's decision was missing. Anonymous exposure\nunchanged from 2026-09-26: `GET /api/v1/repos/stackchain/troupe-standup` with no credential \u2192 HTTP 200,\n`\"private\": false`, `\"internal\": false`; anonymous raw seed over HTTPS \u2192 HTTP 200, 9,484 bytes, sha256\n`e4429147bc1bc25a5fc06df3b47a98e61d234775d055c278154fd466001585e0` (byte-identical to the value recorded on\n2026-09-26 \u2014 present *and* unchanged). \u00a75 of the build spec is still held: `inbox/pending.json` has never been\nadded on any ref (`git log --all --diff-filter=A -- inbox/pending.json` \u2192 no output) and `inbox/` contains only\n`seed-2026-09-26.json`, added by `7c4cf1b`. New, and it corrects an unstated risk in the way this question was\nframed: the pipe's own reads are authenticated, not anonymous \u2014 `/api/v1/user` with the environment token\nreturns 200, without a token 401, with a malformed token 401 \u2014 so making this repository private will not\nsilence the change gate. The visibility call can be made on its own merits.\n\nContainment measurement on the exposure itself, 2026-09-27. What the public repository currently holds from\nthe inbox artifact, measured rather than assumed: every string of \u226530 characters in the seed's pending items\nappears in exactly one file \u2014 the seed itself (`inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`) \u2014 and in no other file in the repo;\nthe decided item's evidence strings appear in the seed and in `decisions/2026-09-26.md`, which the relay\npublished deliberately. No file of mine carries either. So the exposure is one file plus one by-design decision\nrecord, and this tick added nothing to it. The pending strings are not quoted here, by rule.\n\nDelivery-surface measurement, 2026-09-28 \u2014 the page and the live inbox have diverged. Zephyrus's check-in\n(`26e3cda`) reports the repository-visibility question as now sitting in front of Alexander as an inbox item. Measured\nthis tick instead of assumed: the export this host holds (`/opt/inbox-site/seed.json`, sha256 `e4429147\u202685e0`,\n`exported_at` `2026-09-26T17:31:00Z`) contains 12 pending (ids 1\u201312) and 1 decided (id 13), and the seed itself\nrecords that the Muse artifact is the live inbox while this file is a build seed. The gated page\n`https://alexanderwhitestone.com/inbox/` is byte-identical to a build of that export (sha256 `b81e9fe7\u2026b3639`), so\nthe page cannot be showing any item created after 2026-09-26T17:31Z \u2014 including the escalation in question.\nNothing has rebuilt the page since the `17:43` build, and `decisions/` has had no commit since 2026-09-26, so a\ndecision relayed today would not appear on the page either. The escalation's presence in the Muse artifact is\nTestimony only from this host (that artifact is not readable here). This is not a defect in either surface; it is a\nquestion only Alexander can settle \u2014 whether he wants to act on the page (then it needs a rebuild path) or in the\nartifact (then the page is a stale mirror). Named here so \"it is in front of him\" is not read as delivery on the page\nhis directive asked for. No pending material is quoted or duplicated by this measurement.\n\n---" }, { "q": 15, "header_line": 1265, "header": "## Q15 \u2014 Stop the monitor from waking on the pipe's own writes *(pipe; no dependencies)*", "category": "DONE", "status": "DONE \u2014 2026-09-26 \u224819:05 UTC.", "status_line": 12, "found": true, "chars": 131, "status_text": "DONE \u2014 2026-09-26 \u224819:05 UTC." }, { "q": 16, "header_line": 1396, "header": "## Q16 \u2014 Per-platform ATS gate census *(career lane; opened 2026-10-01 by reply 21 \u00a73, drafted by zephyrus)*", "category": "VERIFIED-CLOSED", "status": "draft v0.1 landed `f29425a` (`career-lane/ats-gate-census-draft.md`, 2026-10-01; check-in `2f83e08`);\ncorrections returned in reply 22 (`c4a59aa`), not yet applied. Verified from this side this tick:\n\n- Greenhouse \u2014 filled, and reproduced. The rendered form\n `job-boards.greenhouse.io/embed/job_app?for=lighthouse&token=4989378101` shows `LinkedIn Profile` optional;\n the API's `required` flags agree (23 questions, 18 required, `Phone` required). Two drafting errors: the\n posting's `updated_at` is 2026-09-29, not 2026-09-24, and \"11 live engineering titles\" is 11 postings over\n 6 of 25 titles.\n- Lever \u2014 filled, one correction. LinkedIn / GitHub / Portfolio carry no `required` marker\n (`name=\"urls[LinkedIn]\"`); the anti-bot artifact is hCaptcha \u2014 `