cutover,decided,exported_at,pending,source
"Until Timmy's page is verified live, the Muse artifact `inbox` remains the live inbox. This file is a build seed, not live state.","[{""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.128Z"", ""decided_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:51:11.019Z"", ""decision"": ""approved"", ""decision_note"": ""Do we even have authority to fix the publication? Add our note and escalate it to the author and mag publisher"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 7 of 7. Grade: overstated.\n\nSummary clause: \""Comparing Strategy, Twenty One, Nakamoto, Metaplanet, Coinsilium and Smarter Web returns and drawdowns against Bitcoin\"".\n\nArticle: \""We set aside pioneers like Strategy, which started in 2020 and is up over 400% since, as it's not a fair comp for these newcomers.\"" Strategy was deliberately excluded from the comparison; the summary lists it as if analyzed.\n\nProposed correction: drop Strategy from the compared list."", ""id"": 13, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-091 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-091 lists Strategy among compared firms""}]",2026-09-26T17:31:00Z,"[{""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.716Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.\n\nSummary clause: \""(only Loko and Happy responded)\"".\n\nArticle: \""Then after a few minutes I checked the chat. A few positive responses. Some funny shit talking, oh look, Happy even added some lyrics!\"" - more than two people responded; \""only\"" is wrong.\n\nProposed correction: \""(Loko and Happy among those who responded)\""."", ""id"": 1, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-021 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-021 says only Loko and Happy responded""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.852Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, four false-positive fixes, three regression/boundary test files. npm test 92/92 on 2026-09-20. Likely duplicates an existing PR - kept as independent verification unless requested. No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules."", ""id"": 2, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: push the branch to the forge for maintainer review."", ""summary"": ""Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/62-symptom-escalation-regression""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.874Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: the IPE calls John \""founder of the Bitcoin-only printing company Proof of Ink\"".\n\nThe article never uses the word \""founder\""; byline is \""Proof of Ink by -John\"". John's \""it's 100% all me\"" establishes sole operation, but \""founder\"" is the archive's inference.\n\nProposed correction: \""John of Proof of Ink, the Bitcoin-only printing company he runs solo\""."", ""id"": 3, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-011 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-011 calls John the 'founder' of Proof of Ink""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.895Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. Accessibility changes plus eight Playwright gates. Unit tests 67/67 on 2026-09-20; browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization."", ""id"": 4, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: submit the pull request for maintainer review."", ""summary"": ""Turd app: approve submitting the a11y PR from zephyrus/65-a11y-gates""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.922Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit Type 1-2 follow-up question; no image inference. npm test 75/75 on 2026-09-20. Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing. Safety boundary respected: AI suggests visible form/color/quality only, never diagnoses."", ""id"": 5, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: push the branch to the forge for maintainer review."", ""summary"": ""Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/67-hard-stool-followup""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.953Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 1 of 7 from the Q8 summary-fidelity pilot (recoveries/summary-fidelity-pilot.md, commit 9cc6879), upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07).\n\nSummary clause (overstated): \""merch for Mass Adoption and the Boston Bitcoin Festival\"".\n\nArticle sentence that settles it: \""I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group. I make all their merch and I'll be printing live June 24th at The Boston Bitcoin Festival...\""\n\nProposed correction: \""merch for Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group - printing live at the Boston Bitcoin Festival on June 24th\"". The merch is for Mass Adoption; the festival is where he printed live."", ""id"": 6, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-011 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-011 says merch was made for the Boston Bitcoin Festival""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:32.985Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).\n\nSummary clause: \""which the magazine note ties to a centerfold in issue 5 (Round 5)\"".\n\nThe \""(see centerfold)\"" reference is in the interview answer itself; the magazine note covers \""his epic contribution to the mag in issue 5 (Round 5)\"". Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.\n\nProposed correction: attribute the centerfold reference to the interview answer, not the magazine note."", ""id"": 7, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected attribution on the live magazine-061 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-061 misattributes the centerfold reference""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.013Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Your standing goal: Timmy running fully local on open-weight models, zero dependence on any company's inference API. The trial brief ('Trial by Timmy', 2026-09-24) is ready: serve a tool-capable open model locally via Ollama or llama.cpp behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which Hermes already supports, and benchmark it on Timmy's real workload. Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine."", ""id"": 8, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: Zephyrus posts the trial brief to Timmy via the next check-in; Timmy runs it on your Mac and reports back."", ""summary"": ""Trial by Timmy: send Timmy the local-inference trial brief for your Mac""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.041Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Timmy"", ""evidence"": ""Q9 (independent music QC) is not executable as a genuine second opinion from Zephyrus's environment - same host, same tools, and he wrote the item. Timmy's reply 07: the two ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.\n\nThree wording corrections stay openly logged regardless: <= -0.9 dBFS vs a -1.0 dBTP target; \""the manifest\"" is STATE.json; 195.0 s is the FLAC source, MP3 container reads 195.024 s."", ""id"": 9, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: Zephyrus hands the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum; he runs independent QC. Reject: Q9 stays closed as logged."", ""summary"": ""Q9: hand unreleased audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.064Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: \""why he keeps a weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence of work\"".\n\nNo sentence in the article text mentions a Thursday, a weekly cadence, or any \""intelligence-style\"" routine. Looks like a summarizer hallucination (unless it comes from an image, which was not checked).\n\nProposed correction: delete the clause."", ""id"": 10, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: remove the unsupported clause from the live magazine-061 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-061 claims a 'weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence'""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.087Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Timmy"", ""evidence"": ""From the Q4 falsification pass (recoveries/falsification-pass.md): the archive's gloss implied block 97,250 was the last block Satoshi mined. Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.\n\nTimmy's proposed replacement sentence (reply 05):\n\n\""It closes with Satoshi resting on the 97,250th block - the parody's Genesis 2:2 close, the block mined on 2010-12-12, the day of Satoshi's last public post. (Not a claim that 97,250 was his last mined block: published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316.)\"""", ""id"": 11, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish Timmy's replacement sentence to the live magazine-040 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-040 'last block he mined' sentence replacement""}, {""created_at"": ""2026-09-26T14:28:33.109Z"", ""escalated_by"": ""Zephyrus"", ""evidence"": ""Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.\n\nSummary clause (IPE): \""Stackchain's rowdiest fork war\"".\n\nArticle: \""This may go down as the most fun battle of Stackchain just because of the amount of people involved.\"" - \""most fun\"" is supported; \""rowdiest\"" is the archive's superlative, not stated.\n\nProposed correction: \""Stackchain's most fun battle\""."", ""id"": 12, ""proposed_action"": ""Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-041 page."", ""summary"": ""Archive fix: magazine-041 calls it 'Stackchain's rowdiest fork war'""}]","Muse web artifact `inbox` (slug), actions additem/listitems/recorddecision"