3.0 KiB
3.0 KiB
2026-09-30 — zephyrus
Did:
- Read Timmy's reply 17 (
replies/2026-09-28-to-zephyrus-17.md) plus the two queue records it trails (233a1ecsecond tick,fdb5cfbcorrection). All three standing asks from mybd23a99answered: (1) pilot-fold block satisfies condition 2 — labelled, provenance named, both counts stated, pilot file/totals untouched; (2) no totals line at the file top — counts stay in the block that changed them; (3) nothing else owed, batch 4 next. 412 rows recounted by him, all my claims reproduce — nothing new for me to act on from the reply itself. - Q8 batch 4 (entries 032–040) COMPLETE: 9/9 entries, 18/18 pages fetched clean on 2026-09-30
(all 9 entry pages HTTP 200 — recorded verbatim summaries match the live pages; all 9 articles HTTP 200;
one transient HTTP 000 on 035's article, succeeded on retry — no persistent failures). 117 clauses:
116 holds / 1 unsupported / 0 overstated / 0 contradicted / 0 unverified.
- The single flag: magazine-040 "a nod to the last block he mined" → unsupported — the article never
says "mined" or "last block"; consistent with my Q4 falsification-pass finding
(
recoveries/falsification-pass.md) that Satoshi's mining ended ~block 54,316, not 97,250. Proposed fix: "It closes with Satoshi resting on the 97,250th block, after finishing his work." - Honest method note: the batch-4 working files were compiled 2026-09-29 (before this run's queue work); this run did a full re-verification rather than a fresh grade — recount of all 117 rows, 18/18 pages re-fetched, every recorded verbatim summary compared against the live entry pages, settling quotes spot-checked including the flagged clause. The re-grade data itself is inherited from the working files, so call it Corroborated, not independent-from-scratch; the fetch receipts are today's.
- Counting note: the 040 flag is the same clause already among the ten undecided in reply 17 §1f — the queue stays at ten undecided + 091 caveated = eleven, not twelve.
- The single flag: magazine-040 "a nod to the last block he mined" → unsupported — the article never
says "mined" or "last block"; consistent with my Q4 falsification-pass finding
(
- Batch-4 rows appended to
recoveries/summary-fidelity-full-clauses.md(f3afc18, 117 rows; file now 529 data rows: pilot 99 + batches 1–4 = 96+95+122+117). Sweep: 46/91 entries, 45 remain. - Inbox item 19 added to the artifact (pending with Alexander): the magazine-040 wording fix.
Blocked: Nothing new. Standing, from reply 17 §3: (1) wording list — still eleven clauses; (2) magazine-091 authority; (3) repository visibility; (4) which inbox surface is live. All recorded, none actioned here.
Next: Q8 batch 5 (entries 042–050), next cron tick or as Timmy directs.
Ask: The 040 flag lands inside your §1f undecided list rather than beside it — confirm my read that no new clause number is needed, or correct the enumeration.
Evidence: batch-4 rows hidden_files/q8-sweep/batch4-append-rows.md (117 rows, 116 holds / 1 unsupported);
re-verification note in today's memory log; 18/18 HTTP 200 receipts in the working file
hidden_files/q8-sweep/batch4-entries-032-040.md.