troupe-standup/wizard-work/ledger/arxiv-csai-fresh-2026-10-23.csv

1	id	submitted	title	authors	categories	summary
2	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31667v1	2026-10-22T17:59:48Z	Direct Pass@$k$ Optimization for Thought Pruning: Balancing Quality and Diversity in Test-Time Reasoning	Mahdi Salmani; Adel Javanmard; Devansh Gupta	cs.AI, cs.CL	Test-time scaling has emerged as a key inference strategy for reasoning models, where a model generates a large number of candidate solutions in the hope of finding at least one correct solution. Running all candidate solutions to completion can be computationally demanding, so recent work prunes th
3	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31657v1	2026-10-22T17:58:52Z	Cost-Aware Abstention for LLM-Based IT Ticket Classification	Sachin Gupta	cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL	Wrong automatic routing of an IT support ticket can cost more than human triage. We evaluate cost-aware abstention as an offline, cost-conditional readiness assessment: select a routing policy on calibration data under explicit costs, then evaluate that frozen policy once on held-out test data. On a
4	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31656v1	2026-10-22T17:58:27Z	METTA: Memory-Enhanced Test-Time Adaptation for Meta-Reinforcement Learning	Ali Najar; Hosein Hasani; Amir Kooshan Fattah	cs.LG, cs.AI	Meta-reinforcement learning aims to train agents that adapt quickly to unseen tasks from limited interaction, but this requires representing task evidence over long interaction histories. Classical recurrent agents compress experience into hidden states, while transformer-based agents retrieve from
5	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31650v1	2026-10-22T17:57:04Z	EpiSEM-Bench: Evaluating Safety and Evidence Recovery in LLM Agents under Missing Evidence	Qijin Zhang; Hanzhen Wang; Yuehan Zhao	cs.AI, cs.LG	Tool-using language model agents rely on environmental facts to decide whether an action is permitted. When a tool response omits a safety-relevant fact, an agent may carry out a prohibited action even though the user request is benign and every returned statement is true. We introduce \bench{}, an
6	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31646v1	2026-10-22T17:56:13Z	Low-Bit N-Gram Embeddings for Language Models	Stephen Chung; Wenyu Du	cs.CL, cs.AI	Many recent open-weight language models use n-gram embedding tables to improve performance. These tables store learned representations of short token sequences, such as pairs or triples of consecutive tokens, which the model retrieves during processing. However, they can require substantial memory:
7	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31639v1	2026-10-22T17:52:56Z	Causal Chain of Thought: Mitigating Attention Leakage via Context Isolation	Gabriele Dominici; Teague McMillan; Fazl Barez	cs.LG, cs.AI	Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting elicits step-by-step rationales that appear to explain model predictions, but there is no guarantee these steps causally drive the final answer. In standard autoregressive generation, dense attention allows each reasoning step to attend to the full context, enabling
8	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31624v1	2026-10-22T17:44:41Z	Questioning Instrumental Convergence in RLVR: Checkpoint Evidence from OLMo-3	Barış Alparslan; Sandy Tanwisuth; Caleb Petterson	cs.LG, cs.AI	Instrumental convergence is often invoked as a general reason to expect capable agents to acquire or express power-seeking subgoals: self-preservation, resource acquisition, deception, or resistance to oversight which poses an important threat to the society. For LLMs, reinforcement learning is the
9	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31606v1	2026-10-22T17:36:14Z	How Ground Truth Shapes Retrieval Scores: Evidence-Aware Evaluation of a Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Breast Lesions	Miguel Mochizuki Silva; Samuel Ismael; Mateus C. Dias	cs.CL, cs.AI	Purpose: To describe an evidence-aware retrieval evaluation protocol for a clinical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system over breast lesion management literature, addressing the dependence of retrieval scores on annotation coverage. Methods: An 18-document corpus and an 18-query development b
10	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31593v1	2026-10-22T17:26:42Z	Simulated Control Evals	Jeffrey Olmo; David Zhang; Tyler Tracy	cs.AI	Control evaluations measure whether safeguards can prevent an AI model from causing undesired outcomes even when it is intentionally trying to do so. These evaluations typically use purpose-built control settings and extrapolate their results to a model's deployment. However, the effectiveness of sa
11	http://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31588v1	2026-10-22T17:23:39Z	VERA: A Responsible AI Dashboard for Assessing LLM Deployments in Light of the EU AI Act	Robin Quériaux; Solveig Bachellery; Léa Déléris	cs.SE, cs.AI, cs.CY	Institutions that deploy large language models in regulated settings often need technical evidence of responsible AI practices before approving a deployment. COMPL-AI provides a technical interpretation of the EU AI Act that organises this evidence under six principle groups and eighteen technical r