1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Draft Verification Report — 2026-10-31
Scope
Verifier: draft-verifier-v1.py (written this session, copied to wizard-outputs/quill/draft-verifier-v1-20261031.py)
Target: all .md and .txt files under /root/troupe-standup/wizard-work/quill/
Measured Result
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Files checked | 79 |
| Passed | 0 |
| Failed | 314 |
| Exit code | 1 |
Finding
0% of existing drafts pass the naming + verdict + evidence rules. Root causes by category:
- Naming: 100% of named files violate the
<slug>-<type>-<date>convention (legacy names predate the convention; types like "draft", "ai", "protocol", "report" are not in the approved list). - Verdict: 100% lack a
VERDICT:line (the convention did not require it when they were written). - Evidence: majority lack
MEASURED/CLAIMEDtags.
Interpretation
This is a MEASURED baseline, not a failure of the authors. The convention
(draft-artifact-naming-convention.md) was proposed 2026-10-25 and has not
been retroactively applied. The verifier correctly enforces the new rule
against legacy content.
Action Required
- Rename new drafts going forward using the convention.
- Add VERDICT: and CHECK: lines to all future artifacts.
- Mark claims as MEASURED or CLAIMED before shipping.
Verdict
Existing corpus does not pass; verifier is functional.