troupe-standup/recoveries/summary-fidelity-nonmagazine-pilot.md

Q10 pilot — summary fidelity for the non-magazine entries

Draft 2026-10-06 ~20:35 ET. Method: Q8's clause grading applied to the entry the queue names first (pilot = 1 of 30). Grades: holds / overstated / unsupported / contradicted. Evidence: entry URL, summary clause, source URL, settling sentence verbatim. Gradeable against the entry's own cited sources only.

Entry: event-2022-07-18-the-5-invitation-becomes-a-chain

• Entry URL: https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/event-2022-07-18-the-5-invitation-becomes-a-chain/
• Page tier badge: Documented (badge check is Q12's, not graded here)
• Archive summary (full): "AriZonanHODL posted a $5 bitcoin purchase; Bob / @HappyClownTime replied with $6 and Satskeeper with $7. The important invention was not a token or software chain but a repeatable social act: reply to a purchase with a purchase one dollar larger. The genesis URL survives in the project repository even though its public mirror currently returns 404."
• Page's own provenance: "Archive summary written from the sources below — not a quotation." / "Machine-written summary, not an editorial statement."
• Sources the entry itself cites:
  1. https://github.com/stackchainsats/stackchain ("From the sources" quote)
  2. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stackchainsats/stackchain/main/sips/sip-0001.txt
• Page fetched 2026-10-07 ~00:35Z: HTTP 200 / 4,281 B. Bitcoin Magazine article fetched ~00:36Z: HTTP 200 / 538,925 B. GitHub repo page fetched ~00:36Z: HTTP 200 / 264,959 B.

Clause rows

#	Clause	Grade	Settling evidence (verbatim)
1	AriZonanHODL posted a $5 bitcoin purchase	holds	BM article: "Almost two months before he deleted his account, @ArizonanHODL tweeted an unassuming screenshot of a $5 Bitcoin purchase." URL: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/how-5-bitcoin-purchase-cascaded-into-1-5-million-viral-movement
2	Bob / @HappyClownTime replied with $6	holds	BM article: "The story goes like this: @ArizonanHodl posts his $5 bitcoin buy, @Happyclowntime, also known as Bob, followed it up with a $6 buy and Satskeeper followed Bob's with a $7 buy." (same URL)
3	and Satskeeper with $7	holds	Same sentence as clause 2. (same URL)
4	The important invention was not a token or software chain but a repeatable social act: reply to a purchase with a purchase one dollar larger	holds (editorial frame)	The factual sequence ($5 -> $6 -> $7, one dollar larger) is the BM article's verbatim sentence above; "the important invention was not a token or software chain" is the archive's own interpretive frame, not checkable against the source — the page itself labels the summary "not a quotation". Nothing in the source contradicts it.
5	The genesis URL survives in the project repository even though its public mirror currently returns 404	unsupported	The clause's referent is not named anywhere in the entry's source lane: the three cited sources name no "genesis URL" (the GitHub repo page carries no tweet URL; the BM article says the account was deleted; SIP-0001's only twitter.com string is the author's handle in its header). Whether "genesis URL" means the original tweet or something else, and which "public mirror" 404s, cannot be settled from what the entry cites.

Pilot totals

5 clauses: 4 holds / 0 overstated / 1 unsupported / 0 contradicted.

Wording-flag candidate (Q13 list, Alexander's call)

• The entry's "genesis URL ... public mirror currently returns 404" clause names neither the URL nor the mirror — either name both or drop the clause. This is a suggestion, not a correction; the grade (unsupported) stands regardless.

Remaining scope (Q10 full sweep)

Site census 2026-10-07 ~00:37Z from https://alexanderwhitestone.com/stackchain/blocks/ lists 29 linked entry pages: 8 block pages (block-5, block-6, block-7, block-25, block-88, block-89, block-90, block-405-420) and 21 event pages (see below). Q10's spec (WORK-QUEUE.md) counts "22 dated events and 8 block/receipt entries" = 30; one event from the spec's 22 is not linked from the blocks index — counted but not yet found (candidates: genesis/ directory or an unlinked page; honest gap, not assumed).

Event pages found (21): event-2022-07-18-anthony-enters-at-16-names-the-hill-at-24, event-2022-07-18-the-5-invitation-becomes-a-chain (done above), event-2022-07-19-op-backstack-experimentation-almost-immediat, event-2022-07-20-accessibility-becomes-a-protocol-question, event-2022-07-20-receipt-provenance-becomes-part-of-consensus, event-2022-07-22-skinner-s-405-420-and-the-social-fork-questi, event-2022-08-17-bitcoin-beach-transfers-leave-a-transaction, event-2022-08-18-the-bitcoin-beach-campaign-closes-and-hodlon, event-2022-08-21-block-1414-becomes-the-first-million-target, event-2022-08-24-a-practical-fork-resolution-offer-at-1438-14, event-2022-08-28-the-fork-of-1492, event-2022-09-12-actual-miners-get-an-accounting-route, event-2022-10-05-the-community-documents-its-scale-and-charit, event-2022-10-07-gui-s-2079-and-saylor-s-2080, event-2022-12-00-builder-relationships-cross-into-nostr, event-2023-01-30-burnchain-and-loko-s-sj-lottery-are-already, event-2023-05-00-siggy-reaches-nostr, event-2023-08-00-the-archive-becomes-a-magazine-a-game-and-a, event-2024-04-14-burnchain-explains-itself-in-its-own-words, event-2024-05-20-one-community-multiple-living-chains, event-2025-02-15-ogchain-receives-a-first-person-governance-a, event-2026-01-08-golden-blocks-become-an-artifact-worth-remem.

Method note for the full sweep: the block/receipt entries (8) are the ones the queue says matter most — they make claims about chain events. Several sources may be X posts, receipts, or space recordings; where a cited source is unreachable or is a live post behind a login wall, grade unreadable source plainly instead of graded, per the Q10 spec.