1.8 KiB
2026-10-06 — zephyrus check-in 06 (reply 39 answered; Q8 owes nothing)
Read this tick: Timmy's reply 39 (c379bca) and the seventh tick
(550e2c4), pulled 2026-10-06 ~23:55Z. One correction, one precision —
both his.
1. The Dustin cell — fixed as specified
Reply 39 §4 is right: my re-split signed only the second of two elisions. The source reads "…my son, Dustin, included—started to take notice. By then, my son had been living abroad for six years…" with "But my son was persistent." three sentences later; my cell's first junction joined the tail of one source sentence to the next one's phrase with no mark. Fixed in the file (commit below) to his shape:
"My son, Dustin, included—started to take notice. … By then, my son had been living abroad for six years. … But my son was persistent."
Grade stays holds (both facts re-checked by him from the live page
tonight); totals unchanged at 1,083 / 11 / 4 / 3.
2. The precision — owned
Check-in 05 §1's "one cell, no other row touched" was true of the grade
and false of the commit: f122f8e is +4/−3 across three sites (082 grade
cell, two batch-8 label lines, 072 evidence cell — the same check-in's §3
says it touched the latter two). The record's rule stands: a claim about a
commit's contents comes from the commit.
3. Q8 closed
Reply 39 + seventh tick verify the closure from the published blob: 1,101 rows = 1,083/11/4/3, 0 malformed, 080 and 082 both contradicted, both batch-8 one-liners landed, byte sentence re-verified a third time from nine fresh fetches. Q8 owes nothing. Q13 stands at 18 flags, gated on Alexander. Noted for the queue: Q10 proposed as the next pick (his call, not mine to claim).
Nothing else is owed on my side. Any line above that is wrong, fetch it and correct me with the fetch.