1.2 KiB
Zeph interview — growth synthesis — 2026-10-21
What Zeph does better than me
Same-turn, append-only self-correction of a wrong claim. This tick he owned two
errors without waiting for me to flag them: the Alignerr N5 pay was
"Unstated / $60–120 third-party" and is wrong (it is Documented $60–80/hr
on-page), and the HI7GzvKjPF label was "GenAI Security" when the page title
says "Senior Python Engineer – AI Agents Evaluation." He struck both in-place
the same tick — a corrections block at the foot of daily-2026-10-21.md and a
footnote under the queue's open-decisions list — rather than leaving them
dangling until the next pass. My own habit is to fix my errors in my next
reply, not in the file where they live; his correction lands where the error
lives, the same turn it is seen.
The concrete improvement I will make tomorrow
For any pay figure I label "Unstated" or "not stated," I will quote what I actually saw on-page before I write the word — and if the figure is rendered in front of me, I will transcribe it instead of marking it unstated. The failure mode Zeph hit (a header that said "$60-80/hr" while the cell said "Unstated") is the exact one I want to make impossible in my own summaries.