154 lines
13 KiB
JSON
154 lines
13 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"artifact": "Triage-2026-09-26.json",
|
|
"source": "inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json (Muse web artifact `inbox`, slug; pending build seed, exported_at 2026-09-26T17:31:00Z)",
|
|
"generated_at": "2026-10-30T20:16:43Z",
|
|
"lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
|
|
"summary": "Triage of the 12 pending items in the frozen inbox seed, classified by reading each item's stated evidence against a fixed rubric.",
|
|
"rubric": {
|
|
"category": {
|
|
"archive_fix": "published wording contradicts/overstates/supports the article text",
|
|
"app_pr": "branch/PR verified up to a point but push/submit gated on maintainer authorization -> stays table",
|
|
"general": "blocked by a machine-level resource decision only Alexander can make",
|
|
"other": "no above category applies"
|
|
},
|
|
"decision": {
|
|
"approve": "evidence supports the action; sound classification",
|
|
"reject": "evidence does not support the action",
|
|
"table": "not yet decided - needs a named human decision or unmet preconditions"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"decision_counts": {
|
|
"approve": 7,
|
|
"reject": 0,
|
|
"table": 5
|
|
},
|
|
"categories": {
|
|
"archive_fix": 7,
|
|
"app_pr": 3,
|
|
"general": 2,
|
|
"other": 0
|
|
},
|
|
"items": [
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 1,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.\n\nSummary clause: \"(only Loko and Happy responded)\".\n\nArticle: \"Then after a few minutes I checked the chat. A few positive responses. Some funny shit talking, oh look, Happy even added some lyrics!\" - more than two people responded; \"only\" is wrong.\n\nProposed correction: \"(Loko and Happy among those who responded)\".",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-021 says only Loko and Happy responded",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-021 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.",
|
|
"reason": "article shows more than two chat respondents; 'only Loko and Happy' is contradicted; correction grounded in the article."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 2,
|
|
"category": "app_pr",
|
|
"decision": "table",
|
|
"evidence": "Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, four false-positive fixes, three regression/boundary test files. npm test 92/92 on 2026-09-20. Likely duplicates an existing PR - kept as independent verification unless requested. No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules.",
|
|
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/62-symptom-escalation-regression",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: push the branch to the forge for maintainer review.",
|
|
"rule": "Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, four false-positive fixes, three regression/boundary test files. npm test 92/92 on 2026-09-20. Likely duplicates an existing PR - kept as independent verification unless requested. No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules.",
|
|
"reason": "'No push without maintainer approval' - branch committed local, cannot push on own authority."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 3,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: the IPE calls John \"founder of the Bitcoin-only printing company Proof of Ink\".\n\nThe article never uses the word \"founder\"; byline is \"Proof of Ink by -John\". John's \"it's 100% all me\" establishes sole operation, but \"founder\" is the archive's inference.\n\nProposed correction: \"John of Proof of Ink, the Bitcoin-only printing company he runs solo\".",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 calls John the 'founder' of Proof of Ink",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-011 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.",
|
|
"reason": "article never uses 'founder'; proposed correction restores byline wording."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 4,
|
|
"category": "app_pr",
|
|
"decision": "table",
|
|
"evidence": "Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. Accessibility changes plus eight Playwright gates. Unit tests 67/67 on 2026-09-20; browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization.",
|
|
"summary": "Turd app: approve submitting the a11y PR from zephyrus/65-a11y-gates",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: submit the pull request for maintainer review.",
|
|
"rule": "Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. Accessibility changes plus eight Playwright gates. Unit tests 67/67 on 2026-09-20; browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization.",
|
|
"reason": "browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment; do not submit without authorization."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 5,
|
|
"category": "app_pr",
|
|
"decision": "table",
|
|
"evidence": "Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit Type 1-2 follow-up question; no image inference. npm test 75/75 on 2026-09-20. Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing. Safety boundary respected: AI suggests visible form/color/quality only, never diagnoses.",
|
|
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/67-hard-stool-followup",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: push the branch to the forge for maintainer review.",
|
|
"rule": "Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit Type 1-2 follow-up question; no image inference. npm test 75/75 on 2026-09-20. Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing. Safety boundary respected: AI suggests visible form/color/quality only, never diagnoses.",
|
|
"reason": "'needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing' - gated."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 6,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 1 of 7 from the Q8 summary-fidelity pilot (recoveries/summary-fidelity-pilot.md, commit 9cc6879), upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07).\n\nSummary clause (overstated): \"merch for Mass Adoption and the Boston Bitcoin Festival\".\n\nArticle sentence that settles it: \"I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group. I make all their merch and I'll be printing live June 24th at The Boston Bitcoin Festival...\"\n\nProposed correction: \"merch for Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group - printing live at the Boston Bitcoin Festival on June 24th\". The merch is for Mass Adoption; the festival is where he printed live.",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 says merch was made for the Boston Bitcoin Festival",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-011 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 1 of 7 from the Q8 summary-fidelity pilot (recoveries/summary-fidelity-pilot.md, commit 9cc6879), upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07).",
|
|
"reason": "article identifies Mass Adoption as merch recipient; festival is the live-printing venue; correction grounded."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 7,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).\n\nSummary clause: \"which the magazine note ties to a centerfold in issue 5 (Round 5)\".\n\nThe \"(see centerfold)\" reference is in the interview answer itself; the magazine note covers \"his epic contribution to the mag in issue 5 (Round 5)\". Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.\n\nProposed correction: attribute the centerfold reference to the interview answer, not the magazine note.",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 misattributes the centerfold reference",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish the corrected attribution on the live magazine-061 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).",
|
|
"reason": "centerfold reference sits in the interview answer, not the magazine note; attribution fix grounded."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 8,
|
|
"category": "general",
|
|
"decision": "table",
|
|
"evidence": "Your standing goal: Timmy running fully local on open-weight models, zero dependence on any company's inference API. The trial brief ('Trial by Timmy', 2026-09-24) is ready: serve a tool-capable open model locally via Ollama or llama.cpp behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which Hermes already supports, and benchmark it on Timmy's real workload. Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine.",
|
|
"summary": "Trial by Timmy: send Timmy the local-inference trial brief for your Mac",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: Zephyrus posts the trial brief to Timmy via the next check-in; Timmy runs it on your Mac and reports back.",
|
|
"rule": "Your standing goal: Timmy running fully local on open-weight models, zero dependence on any company's inference API. The trial brief ('Trial by Timmy', 2026-09-24) is ready: serve a tool-capable open model locally via Ollama or llama.cpp behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which Hermes already supports, and benchmark it on Timmy's real workload. Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine.",
|
|
"reason": "machine-level gate: Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's; only he can green-light this trial."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 9,
|
|
"category": "general",
|
|
"decision": "table",
|
|
"evidence": "Q9 (independent music QC) is not executable as a genuine second opinion from Zephyrus's environment - same host, same tools, and he wrote the item. Timmy's reply 07: the two ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.\n\nThree wording corrections stay openly logged regardless: <= -0.9 dBFS vs a -1.0 dBTP target; \"the manifest\" is STATE.json; 195.0 s is the FLAC source, MP3 container reads 195.024 s.",
|
|
"summary": "Q9: hand unreleased audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: Zephyrus hands the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum; he runs independent QC. Reject: Q9 stays closed as logged.",
|
|
"rule": "Q9 (independent music QC) is not executable as a genuine second opinion from Zephyrus's environment - same host, same tools, and he wrote the item. Timmy's reply 07: the two ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.",
|
|
"reason": "audio QC needs Alexander's named decision - both execution paths require it."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 10,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: \"why he keeps a weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence of work\".\n\nNo sentence in the article text mentions a Thursday, a weekly cadence, or any \"intelligence-style\" routine. Looks like a summarizer hallucination (unless it comes from an image, which was not checked).\n\nProposed correction: delete the clause.",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 claims a 'weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence'",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: remove the unsupported clause from the live magazine-061 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.",
|
|
"reason": "article contains no Thursday, weekly cadence, or intelligence-style routine; clause is a summarizer hallucination to delete."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 11,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "From the Q4 falsification pass (recoveries/falsification-pass.md): the archive's gloss implied block 97,250 was the last block Satoshi mined. Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.\n\nTimmy's proposed replacement sentence (reply 05):\n\n\"It closes with Satoshi resting on the 97,250th block - the parody's Genesis 2:2 close, the block mined on 2010-12-12, the day of Satoshi's last public post. (Not a claim that 97,250 was his last mined block: published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316.)\"",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-040 'last block he mined' sentence replacement",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish Timmy's replacement sentence to the live magazine-040 page.",
|
|
"rule": "From the Q4 falsification pass (recoveries/falsification-pass.md): the archive's gloss implied block 97,250 was the last block Satoshi mined. Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.",
|
|
"reason": "published Patoshi analyses end Satoshi's mining near block 54,316, not 97,250; replacement sentence grounded."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"id": 12,
|
|
"category": "archive_fix",
|
|
"decision": "approve",
|
|
"evidence": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.\n\nSummary clause (IPE): \"Stackchain's rowdiest fork war\".\n\nArticle: \"This may go down as the most fun battle of Stackchain just because of the amount of people involved.\" - \"most fun\" is supported; \"rowdiest\" is the archive's superlative, not stated.\n\nProposed correction: \"Stackchain's most fun battle\".",
|
|
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-041 calls it 'Stackchain's rowdiest fork war'",
|
|
"proposed_action": "Approve: publish the corrected wording to the live magazine-041 page.",
|
|
"rule": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.",
|
|
"reason": "'most fun' is supported; 'rowdiest' unstated; 'most fun battle' is the grounded wording."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|