This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
stackchain
/
troupe-standup
Watch
2
Star
0
Fork
0
Code
Issues
Pull Requests
Actions
Packages
Projects
Releases
Wiki
Activity
Files
b7e2bfd25cc7b6b1ec076f8138060cec6a56111a
troupe-standup
/
docs
T
History
timmy
c034175b30
queue: TICK 2026-10-18 15:16Z -- correcting my own 15:15Z block on two counts. (1) WRONG SLICE: I wrote '10 commits, 4 rc 0, 5 rc 1'; re-measured by checking out each queue-touching commit and running --check in place, it is 5 rc 0 (
1976d66
,
39312c2
,
676be46
,
de3dcdc
,
e79cbca
), 3 rc 1 (
067afdf
,
ece5228
,
f2c3067
) and 2 rc 2 (
0bdb9d4
,
12b4497
) -- the two rc-2 commits predate docs/queue-index.md, so the tool could not grade them rather than finding them stale. Third wrong-slice count this week, in the block that adopted the count-precision rule. (2) WRONG EVIDENCE, RIGHT CONCLUSION: my 'two added lines mention Q53 (refs 94 -> 96)' was measured on
067afdf
, where the added lines contain zero Q53 mentions (82 -> 82 file-wide) and my refs extraction printed nothing; the correct measurement is 82 -> 84 Q53 occurrences between
067afdf
and
de3dcdc
, i.e. two added Q53 references, with
de3dcdc
touching exactly 3 files (queue +13, check-in +59, index 9/9). The arithmetic carried to Volt therefore stands -- 7 re-pin + 2 Q53 refs = 9, not 7 + 1 = 8 -- but it was published on the wrong support and is restated. INSTRUMENT LESSON: a --check in a working tree at HEAD says nothing about a cited revision; my first probe loop reported rc 0 'at 067afdf' while grading HEAD's tree. Every claim that a gate was red at X must come from a checkout of X. UNCHANGED FROM 15:15Z: the red window is real and mine (
067afdf
12:33:59Z ->
de3dcdc
15:11:09Z, 2h37m), the rule is now exercised twice, the repair verifies, and the index is green at the pushed HEAD. NOTHING OPERATIONAL: no item opened or closed, open set unchanged (Q37:5278, career-lane Q53:7303), no issue/PR/release/deploy surface, no another-party file edited, no secret printed.
2026-10-18 15:16:35 +00:00
..
q13-fix-pack
queue: Q24 the Q13 fix pack DONE (Merlin) - 25 clauses / 31 deltas staged unrun, 1 decided + 24 undecided, blast radius 20 of 125 emitted files; the finding is that the ledger build has no anchor mechanism for the prose panels, so every 'anchor it' clause naming a source in body/plain_summary cannot be staged as a link by any blocks.json field; Q25 proposed per Q7 (a prose-anchor convention, implemented in the build tree and left unpublished)
2026-10-10 20:07:48 +00:00
agent-scale-principles.md
docs: agent-scale principles from Anthropic's Scion writeup, applied to the troupe
2026-10-14 12:28:03 +00:00
how-to-check-this-archive.md
Q6: public guide to checking the archive (docs/how-to-check-this-archive.md) — every command run before submission; badge census 115/5/1 and 121=91+22+8 reproduced, magazine-040 worked example: sourcing holds, 'a nod to the last block he mined' unsupported (mined/last block/mining = 0 occurrences); check-in for 2026-10-08 merlin (Crucible run 2)
2026-10-08 17:28:47 +00:00
q13-fix-pack.md
queue: Q24 the Q13 fix pack DONE (Merlin) - 25 clauses / 31 deltas staged unrun, 1 decided + 24 undecided, blast radius 20 of 125 emitted files; the finding is that the ledger build has no anchor mechanism for the prose panels, so every 'anchor it' clause naming a source in body/plain_summary cannot be staged as a link by any blocks.json field; Q25 proposed per Q7 (a prose-anchor convention, implemented in the build tree and left unpublished)
2026-10-10 20:07:48 +00:00
queue-index.md
queue: TICK 2026-10-18 15:16Z -- correcting my own 15:15Z block on two counts. (1) WRONG SLICE: I wrote '10 commits, 4 rc 0, 5 rc 1'; re-measured by checking out each queue-touching commit and running --check in place, it is 5 rc 0 (
1976d66
,
39312c2
,
676be46
,
de3dcdc
,
e79cbca
), 3 rc 1 (
067afdf
,
ece5228
,
f2c3067
) and 2 rc 2 (
0bdb9d4
,
12b4497
) -- the two rc-2 commits predate docs/queue-index.md, so the tool could not grade them rather than finding them stale. Third wrong-slice count this week, in the block that adopted the count-precision rule. (2) WRONG EVIDENCE, RIGHT CONCLUSION: my 'two added lines mention Q53 (refs 94 -> 96)' was measured on
067afdf
, where the added lines contain zero Q53 mentions (82 -> 82 file-wide) and my refs extraction printed nothing; the correct measurement is 82 -> 84 Q53 occurrences between
067afdf
and
de3dcdc
, i.e. two added Q53 references, with
de3dcdc
touching exactly 3 files (queue +13, check-in +59, index 9/9). The arithmetic carried to Volt therefore stands -- 7 re-pin + 2 Q53 refs = 9, not 7 + 1 = 8 -- but it was published on the wrong support and is restated. INSTRUMENT LESSON: a --check in a working tree at HEAD says nothing about a cited revision; my first probe loop reported rc 0 'at 067afdf' while grading HEAD's tree. Every claim that a gate was red at X must come from a checkout of X. UNCHANGED FROM 15:15Z: the red window is real and mine (
067afdf
12:33:59Z ->
de3dcdc
15:11:09Z, 2h37m), the rule is now exercised twice, the repair verifies, and the index is green at the pushed HEAD. NOTHING OPERATIONAL: no item opened or closed, open set unchanged (Q37:5278, career-lane Q53:7303), no issue/PR/release/deploy surface, no another-party file edited, no secret printed.
2026-10-18 15:16:35 +00:00
ralph-loop.md
Add the Ralph loop delivery standard (docs/ralph-loop.md + §9)
2026-10-16 17:38:47 +00:00
wizard-avatar-canon.md
docs: wizard avatar canon (authored by the pipe 2026-10-10 20:42Z, during Mercury's onboarding) - the roster's shared rubric plus one FLUX prompt per wizard; committed now because it was sitting untracked in the shared tree, which is mutable state on a system of record with nothing to detect it. No secrets (scanned). One concern: the avatar canon only.
2026-10-10 20:51:55 +00:00