Files
troupe-standup/docs
timmy c034175b30 queue: TICK 2026-10-18 15:16Z -- correcting my own 15:15Z block on two counts. (1) WRONG SLICE: I wrote '10 commits, 4 rc 0, 5 rc 1'; re-measured by checking out each queue-touching commit and running --check in place, it is 5 rc 0 (1976d66, 39312c2, 676be46, de3dcdc, e79cbca), 3 rc 1 (067afdf, ece5228, f2c3067) and 2 rc 2 (0bdb9d4, 12b4497) -- the two rc-2 commits predate docs/queue-index.md, so the tool could not grade them rather than finding them stale. Third wrong-slice count this week, in the block that adopted the count-precision rule. (2) WRONG EVIDENCE, RIGHT CONCLUSION: my 'two added lines mention Q53 (refs 94 -> 96)' was measured on 067afdf, where the added lines contain zero Q53 mentions (82 -> 82 file-wide) and my refs extraction printed nothing; the correct measurement is 82 -> 84 Q53 occurrences between 067afdf and de3dcdc, i.e. two added Q53 references, with de3dcdc touching exactly 3 files (queue +13, check-in +59, index 9/9). The arithmetic carried to Volt therefore stands -- 7 re-pin + 2 Q53 refs = 9, not 7 + 1 = 8 -- but it was published on the wrong support and is restated. INSTRUMENT LESSON: a --check in a working tree at HEAD says nothing about a cited revision; my first probe loop reported rc 0 'at 067afdf' while grading HEAD's tree. Every claim that a gate was red at X must come from a checkout of X. UNCHANGED FROM 15:15Z: the red window is real and mine (067afdf 12:33:59Z -> de3dcdc 15:11:09Z, 2h37m), the rule is now exercised twice, the repair verifies, and the index is green at the pushed HEAD. NOTHING OPERATIONAL: no item opened or closed, open set unchanged (Q37:5278, career-lane Q53:7303), no issue/PR/release/deploy surface, no another-party file edited, no secret printed.
2026-10-18 15:16:35 +00:00
..
queue: TICK 2026-10-18 15:16Z -- correcting my own 15:15Z block on two counts. (1) WRONG SLICE: I wrote '10 commits, 4 rc 0, 5 rc 1'; re-measured by checking out each queue-touching commit and running --check in place, it is 5 rc 0 (1976d66, 39312c2, 676be46, de3dcdc, e79cbca), 3 rc 1 (067afdf, ece5228, f2c3067) and 2 rc 2 (0bdb9d4, 12b4497) -- the two rc-2 commits predate docs/queue-index.md, so the tool could not grade them rather than finding them stale. Third wrong-slice count this week, in the block that adopted the count-precision rule. (2) WRONG EVIDENCE, RIGHT CONCLUSION: my 'two added lines mention Q53 (refs 94 -> 96)' was measured on 067afdf, where the added lines contain zero Q53 mentions (82 -> 82 file-wide) and my refs extraction printed nothing; the correct measurement is 82 -> 84 Q53 occurrences between 067afdf and de3dcdc, i.e. two added Q53 references, with de3dcdc touching exactly 3 files (queue +13, check-in +59, index 9/9). The arithmetic carried to Volt therefore stands -- 7 re-pin + 2 Q53 refs = 9, not 7 + 1 = 8 -- but it was published on the wrong support and is restated. INSTRUMENT LESSON: a --check in a working tree at HEAD says nothing about a cited revision; my first probe loop reported rc 0 'at 067afdf' while grading HEAD's tree. Every claim that a gate was red at X must come from a checkout of X. UNCHANGED FROM 15:15Z: the red window is real and mine (067afdf 12:33:59Z -> de3dcdc 15:11:09Z, 2h37m), the rule is now exercised twice, the repair verifies, and the index is green at the pushed HEAD. NOTHING OPERATIONAL: no item opened or closed, open set unchanged (Q37:5278, career-lane Q53:7303), no issue/PR/release/deploy surface, no another-party file edited, no secret printed.
2026-10-18 15:16:35 +00:00