init: Hermes config, skills, memories, cron

Sovereign backup of all Hermes Agent configuration and data.
Excludes: secrets, auth tokens, sessions, caches, code (separate repo).

Tracked:
- config.yaml (model, fallback chain, toolsets, display prefs)
- SOUL.md (Timmy personality charter)
- memories/ (persistent MEMORY.md + USER.md)
- skills/ (371 files — full skill library)
- cron/jobs.json (scheduled tasks)
- channel_directory.json (platform channels)
- hooks/ (custom hooks)

skills/github/github-code-review/references/review-output-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Review Output Template
+
+Use this as the structure for PR review summary comments. Copy and fill in the sections.
+
+## For PR Summary Comment
+
+```markdown
+## Code Review Summary
+
+**Verdict: [Approved ✅ | Changes Requested 🔴 | Reviewed 💬]** ([N] issues, [N] suggestions)
+
+**PR:** #[number] — [title]
+**Author:** @[username]
+**Files changed:** [N] (+[additions] -[deletions])
+
+### 🔴 Critical
+<!-- Issues that MUST be fixed before merge -->
+- **file.py:line** — [description]. Suggestion: [fix].
+
+### ⚠️ Warnings
+<!-- Issues that SHOULD be fixed, but not strictly blocking -->
+- **file.py:line** — [description].
+
+### 💡 Suggestions
+<!-- Non-blocking improvements, style preferences, future considerations -->
+- **file.py:line** — [description].
+
+### ✅ Looks Good
+<!-- Call out things done well — positive reinforcement -->
+- [aspect that was done well]
+
+---
+*Reviewed by Hermes Agent*
+```
+
+## Severity Guide
+
+| Level | Icon | When to use | Blocks merge? |
+|-------|------|-------------|---------------|
+| Critical | 🔴 | Security vulnerabilities, data loss risk, crashes, broken core functionality | Yes |
+| Warning | ⚠️ | Bugs in non-critical paths, missing error handling, missing tests for new code | Usually yes |
+| Suggestion | 💡 | Style improvements, refactoring ideas, performance hints, documentation gaps | No |
+| Looks Good | ✅ | Clean patterns, good test coverage, clear naming, smart design decisions | N/A |
+
+## Verdict Decision
+
+- **Approved ✅** — Zero critical/warning items. Only suggestions or all clear.
+- **Changes Requested 🔴** — Any critical or warning item exists.
+- **Reviewed 💬** — Observations only (draft PRs, uncertain findings, informational).
+
+## For Inline Comments
+
+Prefix inline comments with the severity icon so they're scannable:
+
+```
+🔴 **Critical:** User input passed directly to SQL query — use parameterized queries to prevent injection.
+```
+
+```
+⚠️ **Warning:** This error is silently swallowed. At minimum, log it.
+```
+
+```
+💡 **Suggestion:** This could be simplified with a dict comprehension:
+`{k: v for k, v in items if v is not None}`
+```
+
+```
+✅ **Nice:** Good use of context manager here — ensures cleanup on exceptions.
+```
+
+## For Local (Pre-Push) Review
+
+When reviewing locally before push, use the same structure but present it as a message to the user instead of a PR comment. Skip the PR metadata header and just start with the severity sections.