Archived

forked from Rockachopa/Timmy-time-dashboard

This repository has been archived on 2026-03-24. You can view files and clone it. You cannot open issues or pull requests or push a commit.

Files

Alexander Whitestone e35a23cefa [claude] Add research prompt template library (#974 ) (#999 )

Co-authored-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com>

2026-03-22 22:44:02 +00:00

1.6 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

name, type, typical_query_count, expected_output_length, cascade_tier, description

name	type	typical_query_count	expected_output_length	cascade_tier	description
Tool Evaluation	research	3-5	800-1500 words	groq_preferred	Discover and evaluate all shipping tools/libraries/services in a given domain. Produces a ranked comparison table with pros, cons, and recommendation.

Tool Evaluation: {domain}

Context

You are researching tools, libraries, and services for {domain}. The goal is to find everything that is currently shipping (not vaporware) and produce a structured comparison.

Constraints

Only include tools that have public releases or hosted services available today.
If a tool is in beta/preview, note that clearly.
Focus on {focus_criteria} when evaluating (e.g., cost, ease of integration, community size).

Research Steps

Identify all actively-maintained tools in the {domain} space.
For each tool, gather: name, URL, license/pricing, last release date, language/platform.
Evaluate each tool against the focus criteria.
Rank by overall fit for the use case: {use_case}.

Output Format

Summary

One paragraph: what the landscape looks like and the top recommendation.

Comparison Table

Tool	License / Price	Last Release	Language	{focus_criteria} Score	Notes
...	...	...	...	...	...

Top Pick

Recommended: {tool_name} — {one-line reason}
Runner-up: {tool_name} — {one-line reason}

Risks & Gaps

Bullet list of things to watch out for (missing features, vendor lock-in, etc.).

1.6 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History