8.7 KiB
GENOME.md — compounding-intelligence
Auto-generated codebase genome. See timmy-home#676.
Project Overview
What: A system that turns 1B+ daily agent tokens into durable, compounding fleet intelligence.
Why: Every agent session starts at zero. The same mistakes get made repeatedly — the same HTTP 405 is rediscovered as a branch protection issue, the same token path is searched for from scratch. Intelligence evaporates when the session ends.
How: Three pipelines form a compounding loop:
SESSION ENDS → HARVESTER → KNOWLEDGE STORE → BOOTSTRAPPER → NEW SESSION STARTS SMARTER
↓
MEASURER → Prove it's working
Status: Early stage. Template and test scaffolding exist. Core pipeline scripts (harvester.py, bootstrapper.py, measurer.py, session_reader.py) are planned but not yet implemented. The knowledge extraction prompt is complete and validated.
Architecture
graph TD
A[Session Transcript<br/>.jsonl] --> B[Harvester]
B --> C{Extract Knowledge}
C --> D[knowledge/index.json]
C --> E[knowledge/global/*.md]
C --> F[knowledge/repos/{repo}.md]
C --> G[knowledge/agents/{agent}.md]
D --> H[Bootstrapper]
H --> I[Bootstrap Context<br/>2k token injection]
I --> J[New Session<br/>starts smarter]
J --> A
D --> K[Measurer]
K --> L[metrics/dashboard.md]
K --> M[Velocity / Hit Rate<br/>Error Reduction]
Pipeline 1: Harvester
Status: Prompt designed. Script not implemented.
Reads finished session transcripts (JSONL). Uses templates/harvest-prompt.md to extract durable knowledge into five categories:
| Category | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
fact |
Concrete, verifiable information | "Repository X has 5 files" |
pitfall |
Errors encountered, wrong assumptions | "Token is at ~/.config/gitea/token, not env var" |
pattern |
Successful action sequences | "Deploy: test → build → push → webhook" |
tool-quirk |
Environment-specific behaviors | "URL format requires trailing slash" |
question |
Identified but unanswered | "Need optimal batch size for harvesting" |
Output schema per knowledge item:
{
"fact": "One sentence description",
"category": "fact|pitfall|pattern|tool-quirk|question",
"repo": "repo-name or 'global'",
"confidence": 0.0-1.0
}
Pipeline 2: Bootstrapper
Status: Not implemented.
Queries knowledge store before session start. Assembles a compact 2k-token context from relevant facts. Injects into session startup so the agent begins with full situational awareness.
Pipeline 3: Measurer
Status: Not implemented.
Tracks compounding metrics: knowledge velocity (facts/day), error reduction (%), hit rate (knowledge used / knowledge available), task completion improvement.
Directory Structure
compounding-intelligence/
├── README.md # Project overview and architecture
├── GENOME.md # This file (codebase genome)
├── knowledge/ # [PLANNED] Knowledge store
│ ├── index.json # Machine-readable fact index
│ ├── global/ # Cross-repo knowledge
│ ├── repos/{repo}.md # Per-repo knowledge
│ └── agents/{agent}.md # Agent-type notes
├── scripts/
│ ├── test_harvest_prompt.py # Basic prompt validation (2.5KB)
│ └── test_harvest_prompt_comprehensive.py # Full prompt structure test (6.8KB)
├── templates/
│ └── harvest-prompt.md # Knowledge extraction prompt (3.5KB)
├── test_sessions/
│ ├── session_success.jsonl # Happy path test data
│ ├── session_failure.jsonl # Failure path test data
│ ├── session_partial.jsonl # Incomplete session test data
│ ├── session_patterns.jsonl # Pattern extraction test data
│ └── session_questions.jsonl # Question identification test data
└── metrics/ # [PLANNED] Compounding metrics
└── dashboard.md
Entry Points and Data Flow
Entry Point 1: Knowledge Extraction (Harvester)
Input: Session transcript (JSONL)
↓
templates/harvest-prompt.md (LLM prompt)
↓
Knowledge items (JSON array)
↓
Output: knowledge/index.json + per-repo/per-agent markdown files
Entry Point 2: Session Bootstrap (Bootstrapper)
Input: Session context (repo, agent type, task type)
↓
knowledge/index.json (query relevant facts)
↓
2k-token bootstrap context
↓
Output: Injected into session startup
Entry Point 3: Measurement (Measurer)
Input: knowledge/index.json + session history
↓
Velocity, hit rate, error reduction calculations
↓
Output: metrics/dashboard.md
Key Abstractions
Knowledge Item
The atomic unit. One sentence, one category, one confidence score. Designed to be small enough that 1000 items fit in a 2k-token bootstrap context.
Knowledge Store
A directory structure that mirrors the fleet's mental model:
global/— knowledge that applies everywhere (tool quirks, environment facts)repos/— knowledge specific to each repoagents/— knowledge specific to each agent type
Confidence Score
0.0–1.0 scale. Defines how certain the harvester is about each extracted fact:
- 0.9–1.0: Explicitly stated with verification
- 0.7–0.8: Clearly implied by multiple data points
- 0.5–0.6: Suggested but not fully verified
- 0.3–0.4: Inferred from limited data
- 0.1–0.2: Speculative or uncertain
Bootstrap Context
The 2k-token injection that a new session receives. Assembled from the most relevant knowledge items for the current task, filtered by confidence > 0.7, deduplicated, and compressed.
API Surface
Internal (scripts not yet implemented)
| Script | Input | Output | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
harvester.py |
Session JSONL path | Knowledge items JSON | PLANNED |
bootstrapper.py |
Repo + agent type | 2k-token context string | PLANNED |
measurer.py |
Knowledge store path | Metrics JSON | PLANNED |
session_reader.py |
Session JSONL path | Parsed transcript | PLANNED |
Prompt (templates/harvest-prompt.md)
The extraction prompt is the core "API." It takes a session transcript and returns structured JSON. It defines:
- Five extraction categories
- Output format (JSON array of knowledge items)
- Confidence scoring rubric
- Constraints (no hallucination, specificity, relevance, brevity)
- Example input/output pair
Test Coverage
What Exists
| File | Tests | Coverage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/test_harvest_prompt.py |
2 tests | Prompt file existence, sample transcript |
scripts/test_harvest_prompt_comprehensive.py |
5 tests | Prompt structure, categories, fields, confidence scoring, size limits |
test_sessions/*.jsonl |
5 sessions | Success, failure, partial, patterns, questions |
What's Missing
- Harvester integration test — Does the prompt actually extract correct knowledge from real transcripts?
- Bootstrapper test — Does it assemble relevant context correctly?
- Knowledge store test — Does the index.json maintain consistency?
- Confidence calibration test — Do high-confidence facts actually prove true in later sessions?
- Deduplication test — Are duplicate facts across sessions handled?
- Staleness test — How does the system handle outdated knowledge?
Security Considerations
-
No secrets in knowledge store — The harvester must filter out API keys, tokens, and credentials from extracted facts. The prompt constraints mention this but there is no automated guard.
-
Knowledge poisoning — A malicious or corrupted session could inject false facts. Confidence scoring partially mitigates this, but there is no verification step.
-
Access control — The knowledge store has no access control. Any process that can read the directory can read all facts. In a multi-tenant setup, this is a concern.
-
Transcript privacy — Session transcripts may contain user data. The harvester must not extract personally identifiable information into the knowledge store.
The 100x Path (from README)
Month 1: 15,000 facts, sessions 20% faster
Month 2: 45,000 facts, sessions 40% faster, first-try success up 30%
Month 3: 90,000 facts, fleet measurably smarter per token
Each new session is better than the last. The intelligence compounds.
Generated by codebase-genome pipeline. Ref: timmy-home#676.