Compare commits

...

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Whitestone
e28d16b324 test: cover patch did-you-mean end-to-end (#960)
All checks were successful
Lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 18s
- add focused QA tests for replace-mode rich hints without legacy generic hints
- verify ambiguous replace failures do not show did-you-mean noise
- verify V4A patch validation surfaces rich hints
- verify skill patching surfaces rich hints on true no-match failures
2026-04-22 10:43:34 -04:00
Alexander Whitestone
bc32047610 wip: fix patch did-you-mean dependencies (#960)
- restore escape-drift guard needed by current fuzzy-match tests
- import missing typing symbols in file_tools after porting patch hint logic
2026-04-22 10:41:29 -04:00
Teknium
3a24420d7d fix(patch): gate 'did you mean?' to no-match + extend to v4a/skill_manage
Follow-ups on top of @teyrebaz33's cherry-picked commit:

1. New shared helper format_no_match_hint() in fuzzy_match.py with a
   startswith('Could not find') gate so the snippet only appends to
   genuine no-match errors — not to 'Found N matches' (ambiguous),
   'Escape-drift detected', or 'identical strings' errors, which would
   all mislead the model.

2. file_tools.patch_tool suppresses the legacy generic '[Hint: old_string
   not found...]' string when the rich 'Did you mean?' snippet is
   already attached — no more double-hint.

3. Wire the same helper into patch_parser.py (V4A patch mode, both
   _validate_operations and _apply_update) and skill_manager_tool.py so
   all three fuzzy callers surface the hint consistently.

Tests: 7 new gating tests in TestFormatNoMatchHint cover every error
class (ambiguous, drift, identical, non-zero match count, None error,
no similar content, happy path). 34/34 test_fuzzy_match, 96/96
test_file_tools + test_patch_parser + test_skill_manager_tool pass.
E2E verified across all four scenarios: no-match-with-similar,
no-match-no-similar, ambiguous, success. V4A mode confirmed
end-to-end with a non-matching hunk.

(cherry picked from commit 5e6427a42c)
2026-04-22 10:30:00 -04:00
teyrebaz33
d14c1c5a56 feat(patch): add 'did you mean?' feedback when patch fails to match
When patch_replace() cannot find old_string in a file, the error message
now includes the closest matching lines from the file with line numbers
and context. This helps the LLM self-correct without a separate read_file
call.

Implements Phase 1 of #536: enhanced patch error feedback with no
architectural changes.

- tools/fuzzy_match.py: new find_closest_lines() using SequenceMatcher
- tools/file_operations.py: attach closest-lines hint to patch errors
- tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py: 5 new tests for find_closest_lines

(cherry picked from commit 15abf4ed8f)
2026-04-22 10:28:40 -04:00
7 changed files with 467 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -148,3 +148,184 @@ class TestStrategyNameSurfaced:
assert count == 0
assert strategy is None
assert err is not None
class TestEscapeDriftGuard:
"""Tests for the escape-drift guard that catches bash/JSON serialization
artifacts where an apostrophe gets prefixed with a spurious backslash
in tool-call transport.
"""
def test_drift_blocked_apostrophe(self):
"""File has ', old_string and new_string both have \\' — classic
tool-call drift. Guard must block with a helpful error instead of
writing \\' literals into source code."""
content = "x = \"hello there\"\n"
# Simulate transport-corrupted old_string and new_string where an
# apostrophe-like context got prefixed with a backslash. The content
# itself has no apostrophe, but both strings do — matching via
# whitespace/anchor strategies would otherwise succeed.
old_string = "x = \"hello there\" # don\\'t edit\n"
new_string = "x = \"hi there\" # don\\'t edit\n"
# This particular pair won't match anything, so it exits via
# no-match path. Build a case where a non-exact strategy DOES match.
content = "line\n x = 1\nline"
old_string = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
new_string = "line\n x = \\'b\\'\nline"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert count == 0
assert err is not None and "Escape-drift" in err
assert "backslash" in err.lower()
assert new == content # file untouched
def test_drift_blocked_double_quote(self):
"""Same idea but with \\" drift instead of \\'."""
content = 'line\n x = 1\nline'
old_string = 'line\n x = \\"a\\"\nline'
new_string = 'line\n x = \\"b\\"\nline'
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert count == 0
assert err is not None and "Escape-drift" in err
def test_drift_allowed_when_file_genuinely_has_backslash_escapes(self):
"""If the file already contains \\' (e.g. inside an existing escaped
string), the model is legitimately preserving it. Guard must NOT
fire."""
content = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
old_string = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
new_string = "line\n x = \\'b\\'\nline"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert "\\'b\\'" in new
def test_drift_allowed_on_exact_match(self):
"""Exact matches bypass the drift guard entirely — if the file
really contains the exact bytes old_string specified, it's not
drift."""
content = "hello \\'world\\'"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(
content, "hello \\'world\\'", "hello \\'there\\'"
)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert strategy == "exact"
def test_drift_allowed_when_adding_escaped_strings(self):
"""Model is adding new content with \\' that wasn't in the original.
old_string has no \\', so guard doesn't fire."""
content = "line1\nline2\nline3"
old_string = "line1\nline2\nline3"
new_string = "line1\nprint(\\'added\\')\nline2\nline3"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert "\\'added\\'" in new
def test_no_drift_check_when_new_string_lacks_suspect_chars(self):
"""Fast-path: if new_string has no \\' or \\", guard must not
fire even on fuzzy match."""
content = "def foo():\n pass" # extra space ignored by line_trimmed
old_string = "def foo():\n pass"
new_string = "def bar():\n return 1"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
class TestFindClosestLines:
def setup_method(self):
from tools.fuzzy_match import find_closest_lines
self.find_closest_lines = find_closest_lines
def test_finds_similar_line(self):
content = "def foo():\n pass\ndef bar():\n return 1\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def baz():", content)
assert "def foo" in result or "def bar" in result
def test_returns_empty_for_no_match(self):
content = "completely different content here"
result = self.find_closest_lines("xyzzy_no_match_possible_!!!", content)
assert result == ""
def test_returns_empty_for_empty_inputs(self):
assert self.find_closest_lines("", "some content") == ""
assert self.find_closest_lines("old string", "") == ""
def test_includes_context_lines(self):
content = "line1\nline2\ndef target():\n pass\nline5\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def target():", content)
assert "target" in result
def test_includes_line_numbers(self):
content = "line1\nline2\ndef foo():\n pass\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def foo():", content)
# Should include line numbers in format "N| content"
assert "|" in result
class TestFormatNoMatchHint:
"""Gating tests for format_no_match_hint — the shared helper that decides
whether a 'Did you mean?' snippet should be appended to an error.
"""
def setup_method(self):
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
self.fmt = format_no_match_hint
def test_fires_on_could_not_find_with_match(self):
"""Classic no-match: similar content exists → hint fires."""
content = "def foo():\n pass\ndef bar():\n pass\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
0, "def baz():", content,
)
assert "Did you mean" in result
assert "foo" in result or "bar" in result
def test_silent_on_ambiguous_match_error(self):
"""'Found N matches' is not a missing-match failure — no hint."""
content = "aaa bbb aaa\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Found 2 matches for old_string. Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True.",
0, "aaa", content,
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_escape_drift_error(self):
"""Escape-drift errors are intentional blocks — hint would mislead."""
content = "x = 1\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Escape-drift detected: old_string and new_string contain the literal sequence '\\\\''...",
0, "x = \\'1\\'", content,
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_identical_strings(self):
"""old_string == new_string — hint irrelevant."""
result = self.fmt(
"old_string and new_string are identical",
0, "foo", "foo bar\n",
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_when_match_count_nonzero(self):
"""If match succeeded, we shouldn't be in the error path — defense in depth."""
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
1, "foo", "foo bar\n",
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_none_error(self):
"""No error at all — no hint."""
result = self.fmt(None, 0, "foo", "bar\n")
assert result == ""
def test_silent_when_no_similar_content(self):
"""Even for a valid no-match error, skip hint when nothing similar exists."""
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
0, "totally_unique_xyzzy_qux", "abc\nxyz\n",
)
assert result == ""

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
import json
import os
import textwrap
from pathlib import Path
import tools.skill_manager_tool as skill_manager_tool
from tools.file_tools import patch_tool
from tools.skill_manager_tool import _create_skill, _patch_skill
def _disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._check_sensitive_path", lambda _path: None)
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._check_file_staleness", lambda _path, _task_id: None)
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._log_and_check_conflict", lambda _path, _task_id, _action: None)
def test_patch_tool_replace_no_match_shows_rich_hint_without_legacy_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("def foo():\n return 1\n\ndef bar():\n return 2\n", encoding="utf-8")
raw = patch_tool(
mode="replace",
path=str(sample),
old_string="def barycentric():",
new_string="def barycentric_new():",
task_id="qa960-replace-rich-hint",
)
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Could not find a match" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "def bar():" in result["error"] or "def foo():" in result["error"]
assert "[Hint:" not in raw
def test_patch_tool_replace_ambiguous_error_does_not_show_did_you_mean(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("aaa\nbbb\naaa\n", encoding="utf-8")
raw = patch_tool(
mode="replace",
path=str(sample),
old_string="aaa",
new_string="ccc",
task_id="qa960-replace-ambiguous",
)
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Found 2 matches" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" not in result["error"]
assert "[Hint:" not in raw
def test_patch_tool_v4a_no_match_shows_rich_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("def foo():\n return 1\n", encoding="utf-8")
patch = textwrap.dedent(
f"""\
*** Begin Patch
*** Update File: {sample}
@@
-def barycentric():
+def barycentric_new():
*** End Patch
"""
)
raw = patch_tool(mode="patch", patch=patch, task_id="qa960-v4a-rich-hint")
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Patch validation failed" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "def foo():" in result["error"]
def test_skill_patch_no_match_shows_rich_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setenv("HERMES_HOME", str(tmp_path))
skills_dir = tmp_path / "skills"
skills_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
monkeypatch.setattr(skill_manager_tool, "SKILLS_DIR", skills_dir)
monkeypatch.setattr(skill_manager_tool, "_security_scan_skill", lambda _skill_dir: None)
_create_skill(
"qa-skill",
textwrap.dedent(
"""\
---
name: qa-skill
description: test
---
Step 1: Do the thing.
Step 2: Verify the thing.
"""
),
)
result = _patch_skill(
"qa-skill",
"Step 1: Do the production rollout.",
"Step 1: Updated.",
)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Could not find a match" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "Step 1: Do the thing." in result["error"]
assert "file_preview" in result

View File

@@ -757,12 +757,14 @@ class ShellFileOperations(FileOperations):
content, old_string, new_string, replace_all
)
if error:
return PatchResult(error=error)
if match_count == 0:
return PatchResult(error=f"Could not find match for old_string in {path}")
if error or match_count == 0:
err_msg = error or f"Could not find match for old_string in {path}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(err_msg, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return PatchResult(error=err_msg)
# Write back
write_result = self.write_file(path, new_content)
if write_result.error:

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import os
import threading
import time
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
from tools.binary_extensions import has_binary_extension
from tools.file_operations import ShellFileOperations
from agent.redact import redact_sensitive_text
@@ -690,8 +691,11 @@ def patch_tool(mode: str = "replace", path: str = None, old_string: str = None,
result_json = json.dumps(result_dict, ensure_ascii=False)
# Hint when old_string not found — saves iterations where the agent
# retries with stale content instead of re-reading the file.
# Suppressed when patch_replace already attached a rich "Did you mean?"
# snippet (which is strictly more useful than the generic hint).
if result_dict.get("error") and "Could not find" in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
if "Did you mean one of these sections?" not in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
return result_json
except Exception as e:
return tool_error(str(e))

View File

@@ -93,6 +93,21 @@ def fuzzy_find_and_replace(content: str, old_string: str, new_string: str,
f"Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True."
)
# Escape-drift guard: when the matched strategy is NOT `exact`,
# we matched via some form of normalization. If new_string
# contains shell/JSON-style escape sequences (\\' or \\") that
# would be written literally into the file but the matched
# region of the file has no such sequences, this is almost
# certainly tool-call serialization drift — the model typed
# an apostrophe/quote and the transport added a stray
# backslash. Writing new_string as-is would corrupt the file.
# Block with a helpful error so the model re-reads and retries
# instead of the caller silently persisting garbage (or not).
if strategy_name != "exact":
drift_err = _detect_escape_drift(content, matches, old_string, new_string)
if drift_err:
return content, 0, None, drift_err
# Perform replacement
new_content = _apply_replacements(content, matches, new_string)
return new_content, len(matches), strategy_name, None
@@ -101,6 +116,46 @@ def fuzzy_find_and_replace(content: str, old_string: str, new_string: str,
return content, 0, None, "Could not find a match for old_string in the file"
def _detect_escape_drift(content: str, matches: List[Tuple[int, int]],
old_string: str, new_string: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Detect tool-call escape-drift artifacts in new_string.
Looks for ``\\'`` or ``\\"`` sequences that are present in both
old_string and new_string (i.e. the model copy-pasted them as "context"
it intended to preserve) but don't exist in the matched region of the
file. That pattern indicates the transport layer inserted spurious
shell-style escapes around apostrophes or quotes — writing new_string
verbatim would literally insert ``\\'`` into source code.
Returns an error string if drift is detected, None otherwise.
"""
# Cheap pre-check: bail out unless new_string actually contains a
# suspect escape sequence. This keeps the guard free for all the
# common, correct cases.
if "\\'" not in new_string and '\\"' not in new_string:
return None
# Aggregate matched regions of the file — that's what new_string will
# replace. If the suspect escapes are present there already, the
# model is genuinely preserving them (valid for some languages /
# escaped strings); accept the patch.
matched_regions = "".join(content[start:end] for start, end in matches)
for suspect in ("\\'", '\\"'):
if suspect in new_string and suspect in old_string and suspect not in matched_regions:
plain = suspect[1] # "'" or '"'
return (
f"Escape-drift detected: old_string and new_string contain "
f"the literal sequence {suspect!r} but the matched region of "
f"the file does not. This is almost always a tool-call "
f"serialization artifact where an apostrophe or quote got "
f"prefixed with a spurious backslash. Re-read the file with "
f"read_file and pass old_string/new_string without "
f"backslash-escaping {plain!r} characters."
)
return None
def _apply_replacements(content: str, matches: List[Tuple[int, int]], new_string: str) -> str:
"""
Apply replacements at the given positions.
@@ -564,3 +619,86 @@ def _map_normalized_positions(original: str, normalized: str,
original_matches.append((orig_start, min(orig_end, len(original))))
return original_matches
def find_closest_lines(old_string: str, content: str, context_lines: int = 2, max_results: int = 3) -> str:
"""Find lines in content most similar to old_string for "did you mean?" feedback.
Returns a formatted string showing the closest matching lines with context,
or empty string if no useful match is found.
"""
if not old_string or not content:
return ""
old_lines = old_string.splitlines()
content_lines = content.splitlines()
if not old_lines or not content_lines:
return ""
# Use first line of old_string as anchor for search
anchor = old_lines[0].strip()
if not anchor:
# Try second line if first is blank
candidates = [l.strip() for l in old_lines if l.strip()]
if not candidates:
return ""
anchor = candidates[0]
# Score each line in content by similarity to anchor
scored = []
for i, line in enumerate(content_lines):
stripped = line.strip()
if not stripped:
continue
ratio = SequenceMatcher(None, anchor, stripped).ratio()
if ratio > 0.3:
scored.append((ratio, i))
if not scored:
return ""
# Take top matches
scored.sort(key=lambda x: -x[0])
top = scored[:max_results]
parts = []
seen_ranges = set()
for _, line_idx in top:
start = max(0, line_idx - context_lines)
end = min(len(content_lines), line_idx + len(old_lines) + context_lines)
key = (start, end)
if key in seen_ranges:
continue
seen_ranges.add(key)
snippet = "\n".join(
f"{start + j + 1:4d}| {content_lines[start + j]}"
for j in range(end - start)
)
parts.append(snippet)
if not parts:
return ""
return "\n---\n".join(parts)
def format_no_match_hint(error: Optional[str], match_count: int,
old_string: str, content: str) -> str:
"""Return a '\\n\\nDid you mean...' snippet for plain no-match errors.
Gated so the hint only fires for actual "old_string not found" failures.
Ambiguous-match ("Found N matches"), escape-drift, and identical-strings
errors all have ``match_count == 0`` but a "did you mean?" snippet would
be misleading — those failed for unrelated reasons.
Returns an empty string when there's nothing useful to append.
"""
if match_count != 0:
return ""
if not error or not error.startswith("Could not find"):
return ""
hint = find_closest_lines(old_string, content)
if not hint:
return ""
return "\n\nDid you mean one of these sections?\n" + hint

View File

@@ -290,10 +290,16 @@ def _validate_operations(
)
if count == 0:
label = f"'{hunk.context_hint}'" if hunk.context_hint else "(no hint)"
errors.append(
msg = (
f"{op.file_path}: hunk {label} not found"
+ (f"{match_error}" if match_error else "")
)
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, count, search_pattern, simulated)
except Exception:
pass
errors.append(msg)
else:
# Advance simulation so subsequent hunks validate correctly.
# Reuse the result from the call above — no second fuzzy run.
@@ -537,7 +543,13 @@ def _apply_update(op: PatchOperation, file_ops: Any) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
error = None
if error:
return False, f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
err_msg = f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(error, 0, search_pattern, new_content)
except Exception:
pass
return False, err_msg
else:
# Addition-only hunk (no context or removed lines).
# Insert at the location indicated by the context hint, or at end of file.

View File

@@ -575,9 +575,15 @@ def _patch_skill(
if match_error:
# Show a short preview of the file so the model can self-correct
preview = content[:500] + ("..." if len(content) > 500 else "")
err_msg = match_error
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return {
"success": False,
"error": match_error,
"error": err_msg,
"file_preview": preview,
}