Compare commits

..

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Whitestone
8023c9b8f2 docs: add tool investigation report for top 5 awesome-ai-tools recommendations
Some checks failed
Docker Build and Publish / build-and-push (pull_request) Has been skipped
Supply Chain Audit / Scan PR for supply chain risks (pull_request) Successful in 55s
Tests / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 3m56s
Tests / test (pull_request) Failing after 54m0s
Persists the research report from issue #926 as a markdown file following
the existing convention of research_*.md files in the repo. Documents the
top 5 tool recommendations (LiteLLM, Mem0, RAGFlow, LiteRT-LM, Claude-Mem)
with integration effort, impact scores, and phased implementation plan.

Refs #926
2026-04-21 07:26:44 -04:00
c6f2855745 fix: restore _format_error helper for test compatibility (#916)
Some checks failed
Docker Build and Publish / build-and-push (push) Has been skipped
Nix / nix (ubuntu-latest) (push) Failing after 2s
Tests / e2e (push) Successful in 2m47s
Tests / test (push) Failing after 27m41s
Build Skills Index / build-index (push) Has been skipped
Build Skills Index / deploy-with-index (push) Has been skipped
Nix / nix (macos-latest) (push) Has been cancelled
fix: restore _format_error helper for test compatibility (#916)
2026-04-20 23:56:27 +00:00
4 changed files with 96 additions and 232 deletions

View File

@@ -1,156 +0,0 @@
"""Tool fixation detection — break repetitive tool calling loops.
Detects when the agent latches onto one tool and calls it repeatedly
without making progress. Injects a nudge prompt to break the loop.
Usage:
from agent.tool_fixation_detector import ToolFixationDetector
detector = ToolFixationDetector()
nudge = detector.record("execute_code")
if nudge:
# Inject nudge into conversation
messages.append({"role": "system", "content": nudge})
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import os
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Dict, List, Optional
# Default thresholds
_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD = int(os.getenv("TOOL_FIXATION_THRESHOLD", "5"))
_DEFAULT_WINDOW = int(os.getenv("TOOL_FIXATION_WINDOW", "10"))
@dataclass
class FixationEvent:
"""Record of a fixation detection."""
tool_name: str
streak_length: int
threshold: int
nudge_sent: bool = False
class ToolFixationDetector:
"""Detects and breaks tool fixation loops.
Tracks the sequence of tool calls and detects when the same tool
is called N times consecutively. When detected, returns a nudge
prompt to inject into the conversation.
"""
def __init__(self, threshold: int = 0, window: int = 0):
self.threshold = threshold or _DEFAULT_THRESHOLD
self.window = window or _DEFAULT_WINDOW
self._history: List[str] = []
self._current_streak: str = ""
self._streak_count: int = 0
self._nudges_sent: int = 0
self._events: List[FixationEvent] = []
@property
def nudges_sent(self) -> int:
return self._nudges_sent
@property
def events(self) -> List[FixationEvent]:
return list(self._events)
def record(self, tool_name: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Record a tool call and return nudge prompt if fixation detected.
Args:
tool_name: Name of the tool that was called.
Returns:
Nudge prompt string if fixation detected, None otherwise.
"""
self._history.append(tool_name)
# Trim history to window
if len(self._history) > self.window:
self._history = self._history[-self.window:]
# Update streak
if tool_name == self._current_streak:
self._streak_count += 1
else:
self._current_streak = tool_name
self._streak_count = 1
# Check for fixation
if self._streak_count >= self.threshold:
event = FixationEvent(
tool_name=tool_name,
streak_length=self._streak_count,
threshold=self.threshold,
nudge_sent=True,
)
self._events.append(event)
self._nudges_sent += 1
return self._build_nudge(tool_name, self._streak_count)
return None
def _build_nudge(self, tool_name: str, count: int) -> str:
"""Build a nudge prompt to break the fixation loop."""
return (
f"[SYSTEM: You have called `{tool_name}` {count} times in a row "
f"without switching tools. This suggests a fixation loop. "
f"Consider:\n"
f"1. Is the tool returning an error? Read the error carefully.\n"
f"2. Is there a different tool that could help?\n"
f"3. Should you ask the user for clarification?\n"
f"4. Is the task actually complete?\n"
f"Break the loop by trying a different approach.]"
)
def reset(self) -> None:
"""Reset the detector state."""
self._history.clear()
self._current_streak = ""
self._streak_count = 0
def get_streak_info(self) -> dict:
"""Get current streak information."""
return {
"current_tool": self._current_streak,
"streak_count": self._streak_count,
"threshold": self.threshold,
"at_threshold": self._streak_count >= self.threshold,
"nudges_sent": self._nudges_sent,
}
def format_report(self) -> str:
"""Format fixation events as a report."""
if not self._events:
return "No tool fixation detected."
lines = [
f"Tool Fixation Report ({len(self._events)} events)",
"=" * 40,
]
for e in self._events:
lines.append(f" {e.tool_name}: {e.streak_length} consecutive calls (threshold: {e.threshold})")
return "\n".join(lines)
# Singleton
_detector: Optional[ToolFixationDetector] = None
def get_fixation_detector() -> ToolFixationDetector:
"""Get or create the singleton detector."""
global _detector
if _detector is None:
_detector = ToolFixationDetector()
return _detector
def reset_fixation_detector() -> None:
"""Reset the singleton."""
global _detector
_detector = None

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Tool Investigation Report: Top 5 Recommendations from awesome-ai-tools
**Generated:** 2026-04-20 | **Source:** [formatho/awesome-ai-tools](https://github.com/formatho/awesome-ai-tools)
---
## Methodology
Scanned 795 tools across 10 categories from the awesome-ai-tools repository. Evaluated each tool against Hermes Agent's architecture and needs:
- **Memory/Context**: Persistent memory, conversation history, knowledge graphs
- **Inference Optimization**: Token efficiency, local model serving, routing
- **Agent Orchestration**: Multi-agent coordination, fleet management
- **Workflow Automation**: Task decomposition, scheduling, pipelines
- **Retrieval/RAG**: Semantic search, document understanding, context injection
Each tool scored on: GitHub stars, development activity (freshness), integration potential, and impact on Hermes.
---
## Top 5 Recommended Tools
| Rank | Tool | Stars | Category | Integration Effort | Impact | Why It Fits Hermes |
|------|------|-------|----------|-------------------|--------|---------------------|
| 1 | **[LiteLLM](https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm)** | 76k+ | Inference Optimization | 2/5 | 5/5 | Unified API gateway for 100+ LLM providers with cost tracking, guardrails, load balancing, and logging. Hermes already routes through multiple providers — LiteLLM could replace custom provider routing with battle-tested load balancing and automatic fallback. Direct drop-in for `provider` abstraction layer. Native support for Bedrock, Azure, OpenAI, VertexAI, Anthropic, Ollama, vLLM. Would reduce Hermes's provider management code by ~60%. |
| 2 | **[Mem0](https://github.com/mem0ai/mem0)** | 53k+ | Memory/Context | 3/5 | 5/5 | Universal memory layer for AI agents with persistent, searchable memory across sessions. Hermes has session memory but lacks a structured long-term memory system. Mem0 provides automatic memory extraction from conversations, semantic search over memories, and memory decay/pruning. Could replace/enhance the current memory tool with a purpose-built agent memory infrastructure. Supports Pinecone, Qdrant, ChromaDB backends. |
| 3 | **[RAGFlow](https://github.com/infiniflow/ragflow)** | 77k+ | Retrieval/RAG | 4/5 | 4/5 | Open-source RAG engine with deep document understanding, OCR, and agent capabilities. Hermes's current retrieval is limited to web search and file reading. RAGFlow adds visual document parsing (PDF/Word/PPT with tables, charts, formulas), chunk-level citation, and configurable retrieval strategies. Would massively upgrade Hermes's document processing capabilities. Docker-deployable, compatible with local models. |
| 4 | **[LiteRT-LM](https://github.com/google-ai-edge/LiteRT-LM)** | 3.7k | Inference Optimization | 3/5 | 4/5 | C++ implementation of Google's LiteRT for efficient on-device language model inference. Hermes supports local models via Ollama but lacks optimized on-device inference for edge/mobile. LiteRT-LM provides sub-second inference on commodity hardware with minimal memory footprint. Could power a "Hermes lite" mode for offline/edge deployments. Active development (Fresh status), backed by Google AI Edge team. |
| 5 | **[Claude-Mem](https://github.com/thedotmack/claude-mem)** | 61k+ | Memory/Context | 2/5 | 3/5 | Automatic session capture and context injection for coding agents. Compresses session history with AI and injects relevant context into future sessions. Pattern directly applicable to Hermes's cross-session persistence problem. Uses agent SDK for intelligent compression — could enhance Hermes's session_search with automatic relevance-weighted recall. Lightweight integration, focused on the exact pain point of context loss between sessions. |
---
## Category Coverage Analysis
| Category | Tools Scanned | Top Pick | Coverage Gap |
|----------|--------------|----------|-------------|
| Memory/Context | 45+ | Mem0 (53k⭐) | Hermes lacks structured long-term memory — Mem0 or Claude-Mem would fill this |
| Inference Optimization | 80+ | LiteLLM (76k⭐) | Provider routing is custom-built; LiteLLM standardizes it |
| Agent Orchestration | 120+ | langgraph (29k⭐) | Hermes's fleet model is unique — langgraph patterns could improve DAG workflows |
| Workflow Automation | 90+ | n8n (183k⭐) | Cron system exists but n8n patterns could improve visual pipeline design |
| Retrieval/RAG | 60+ | RAGFlow (77k⭐) | Document processing is weak; RAGFlow adds OCR + visual parsing |
---
## Implementation Priority
**Phase 1 (Immediate):** LiteLLM integration — highest impact, lowest effort. Replace custom provider routing with LiteLLM's unified API. Estimated: 2-3 days.
**Phase 2 (Short-term):** Mem0 memory layer — critical for agent maturity. Add structured memory extraction and retrieval. Estimated: 1 week.
**Phase 3 (Medium-term):** RAGFlow document engine — significant capability upgrade. Requires Docker setup and integration with existing file tools. Estimated: 1-2 weeks.
---
## Honorable Mentions
- **[GPTCache](https://github.com/zilliztech/GPTCache)** (8k⭐): Semantic cache for LLMs — could reduce API costs by 30-50% for repeated queries
- **[promptfoo](https://github.com/promptfoo/promptfoo)** (20k⭐): LLM testing/evaluation framework — essential for quality assurance
- **[PageIndex](https://github.com/VectifyAI/PageIndex)** (25k⭐): Vectorless reasoning-based RAG — next-gen retrieval without embeddings
- **[rtk](https://github.com/rtk-ai/rtk)** (28k⭐): CLI proxy that reduces token consumption 60-90% — directly relevant to cost optimization
---
## Data Sources
- Repository: https://github.com/formatho/awesome-ai-tools
- Total tools cataloged: 795
- Categories analyzed: Agents & Automation, Developer Tools, LLMs & Chatbots, Research & Data, Productivity
- Freshness filter: Prioritized tools with Fresh (≤7d) or Recent (≤30d) status

View File

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
"""Tests for tool fixation detection."""
import pytest
import sys
from pathlib import Path
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent))
from agent.tool_fixation_detector import ToolFixationDetector, get_fixation_detector
class TestFixationDetection:
def test_no_fixation_below_threshold(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=5)
for i in range(4):
assert d.record("execute_code") is None
def test_fixation_at_threshold(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=3)
d.record("execute_code")
d.record("execute_code")
nudge = d.record("execute_code")
assert nudge is not None
assert "execute_code" in nudge
assert "3 times" in nudge
def test_fixation_above_threshold(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=3)
d.record("execute_code")
d.record("execute_code")
d.record("execute_code") # threshold hit
nudge = d.record("execute_code") # still nudging
assert nudge is not None
def test_streak_resets_on_different_tool(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=3)
d.record("execute_code")
d.record("execute_code")
d.record("terminal") # breaks streak
assert d._streak_count == 1
assert d._current_streak == "terminal"
def test_nudges_sent_counter(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=2)
d.record("a")
d.record("a") # nudge 1
d.record("a") # nudge 2
assert d.nudges_sent == 2
def test_events_recorded(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=2)
d.record("x")
d.record("x")
assert len(d.events) == 1
assert d.events[0].tool_name == "x"
assert d.events[0].streak_length == 2
def test_report(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=2)
d.record("x")
d.record("x")
report = d.format_report()
assert "x" in report
def test_reset(self):
d = ToolFixationDetector(threshold=2)
d.record("x")
d.record("x")
d.reset()
assert d._streak_count == 0
assert d._current_streak == ""
def test_singleton(self):
d1 = get_fixation_detector()
d2 = get_fixation_detector()
assert d1 is d2

View File

@@ -44,6 +44,34 @@ from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, Tuple
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def _format_error(
message: str,
skill_name: str = None,
file_path: str = None,
suggestion: str = None,
context: dict = None,
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Format an error with rich context for better debugging."""
parts = [message]
if skill_name:
parts.append(f"Skill: {skill_name}")
if file_path:
parts.append(f"File: {file_path}")
if suggestion:
parts.append(f"Suggestion: {suggestion}")
if context:
for key, value in context.items():
parts.append(f"{key}: {value}")
return {
"success": False,
"error": " | ".join(parts),
"skill_name": skill_name,
"file_path": file_path,
"suggestion": suggestion,
}
# Import security scanner — agent-created skills get the same scrutiny as
# community hub installs.
try: