Morrowind: Launch & verify all MCP tools in live session #100
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Task
Launch OpenMW, load latest save, verify every MCP tool works:
perceivereturns valid JSON with cell, position, NPCsmovechanges player position measurablyaction(activate, jump, sneak) executes correctlyscreenshotcaptures game screen for vision analysisstatuscorrectly reports running/not-runningAcceptance Criteria
Parent: EPIC #99
🔨 Artisan Review — Issue #100: Launch & Verify MCP Tools #bezalel-artisan
Verdict: KEEP OPEN — This is the foundation pour. Nothing else works without it.
Analysis
This is Phase 1 work — the equivalent of squaring your foundation before raising walls. The 5-tool verification checklist is correct and complete:
perceivemovestatusactionscreenshotSuggested Verification Protocol
Key Risk
The
movecommand relies on CGEvent keystroke injection. If OpenMW doesn't have window focus, keystrokes go nowhere. The verification should include a focus-check step.This task should be done first before any other sub-task proceeds.
Automated triage pass (OpenAI Wolf Pack) — detailed review
Read-back summary: ## Task Launch OpenMW, load latest save, verify every MCP tool works: -
perceivereturns valid JSON with cell, position, NPCs -movechanges player position measurably -action(activate, jump, sneak) executes correctly -screenshotcaptures game screen for vision analysis -statuscorrectly reports running/not-running ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] OpenMW launched and …Issue classification: epic/long-running initiative
Signals: state=open | age≈0d | last activity≈0d | comments=1 | labels=['gaming', 'morrowind'] | assignees=none
Discussion signal: Latest comment by @Timmy 0d ago: "## 🔨 Artisan Review — Issue #100: Launch & Verify MCP Tools #bezalel-artisan Verdict: KEEP OPEN — This is the foundation pour. Nothing else works without it. ### Analysis This …"
Triage decision: Still actionable. Recommend posting updated scope + acceptance criteria and assigning an owner so this can move from discussion into execution.
If any context above is outdated, reply with the latest status and this triage can be refreshed quickly.
Rerouting this issue out of the Gemini code loop.
Reason: it does not look like code-fit implementation work for the active Gemini coding lane. Leaving it unassigned keeps the queue truthful and prevents crash-loop churn on non-code/frontier issues.
Restoring this issue to the Gemini code lane.
Reason: this is concrete implementation work, not a non-code epic/KT/report item.