Files
the-beacon/docs/issue-16-verification.md
Alexander Whitestone 3a0c4e6dfb
Some checks failed
Accessibility Checks / a11y-audit (pull_request) Successful in 5s
Smoke Test / smoke (pull_request) Failing after 7s
docs: verify #16 already implemented on main
2026-04-18 15:05:50 -04:00

2.2 KiB

Issue #16 Verification

Status: ALREADY IMPLEMENTED ON MAIN

Issue #16 asked for the Paperclips-style dismantle endgame: The Unbuilding. That implementation is already present on main in a fresh clone of the-beacon.

Mainline evidence

Repo artifacts already present on main:

  • js/dismantle.js
  • tests/dismantle.test.cjs
  • supporting integration points in js/engine.js, js/render.js, and js/data.js

What the current implementation already covers:

  • an explicit Unbuilding offer path (Dismantle.offerChoice() / renderChoice())
  • staged panel removal over time
  • stage-five resource-card dissolution sequence
  • final beacon-only moment with the line: That is enough.
  • save/load persistence for active dismantle progress
  • defer / cooldown handling so the sequence can be postponed and later resumed
  • render-loop protection so alignment UI does not wipe the Unbuilding prompt

Verification run from fresh clone

Commands executed:

  • node --test tests/dismantle.test.cjs

Observed result:

  • the full dismantle regression suite passes on fresh main
  • verified behaviors include:
    • offering The Unbuilding instead of ending immediately
    • preserving the prompt across renderAlignment()
    • suppressing pending drift UI during active dismantle
    • completing the stage-five resource dissolve sequence
    • save/load restoration of partial progress
    • defer cooldown persistence across reload

Historical trail

The issue accumulated many closed unmerged attempts while the implementation was hardened across repeated passes. Representative prior PR trail:

  • PR #116
  • PR #118
  • PR #120
  • PR #121
  • PR #123
  • PR #124
  • PR #135
  • PR #138
  • PR #139
  • PR #145

Those PRs show the long hardening history, but the important truth today is simpler: the dismantle sequence is already implemented on main and the tests pass.

Why this should close the issue

Issue #16 is an atomic implementation issue, not a broad parent epic. The requested feature exists on main, passes targeted verification, and does not need to be re-implemented again.

Recommendation

Close issue #16 as already implemented on main. This verification PR exists only to preserve a clean evidence trail and stop further duplicate implementation attempts.