checkpoint: 02:00 auto-commit
This commit is contained in:
Timmy Time
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"tick": 0,
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T00:50:01.919929",
|
||||
"timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:50:01.344437",
|
||||
"from": "allegro",
|
||||
"to": "adagio",
|
||||
"message": "Heartbeat pulse 00:50. All vitals good. - Allegro",
|
||||
"message": "Heartbeat pulse 01:50. All vitals good. - Allegro",
|
||||
"read": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# HSTS 1.0 Known Hosts database for GNU Wget.
|
||||
# Edit at your own risk.
|
||||
# <hostname> <port> <incl. subdomains> <created> <max-age>
|
||||
repos-droplet.digitalocean.com 0 1 1775089756 15552000
|
||||
repos-droplet.digitalocean.com 0 1 1775093197 15552000
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8200,3 +8200,143 @@
|
||||
[2026-04-02T00:45:05.530660] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T00:45:05.530764] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T00:45:05.530863] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.395715] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.396134] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.396757] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:00:02.396747
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.397113] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_010002
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.397191] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.397273] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.620295] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.620626] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:02.962657] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:03.442918] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:03.862243] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.251771] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.252092] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.252231] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.554392] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:05.047104] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:05.676055] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.534381] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.534766] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535341] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535527] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535626] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535729] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535924] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.536013] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.536081] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.000479] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.000783] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001019] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001163] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001248] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001349] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001520] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001618] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001702] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.278315] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.278992] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279153] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:15:01.279146
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279268] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_011501
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279350] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279421] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.304028] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.304433] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.614531] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.014235] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.505998] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.981440] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.981799] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.982208] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:03.281431] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:03.787816] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:04.484952] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.062377] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.062782] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063243] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063426] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063545] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063621] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063696] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063760] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063932] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565249] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565591] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565714] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565947] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566046] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566113] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566178] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566240] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566298] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.272858] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273226] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273424] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:30:02.273418
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273518] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_013002
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273606] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273733] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.388359] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.388697] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.935970] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.243573] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.599433] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.995667] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.996001] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.996200] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:04.268299] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:04.819413] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:05.556675] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.350900] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351227] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351593] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351733] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351811] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351901] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351969] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.352032] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.352094] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708039] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708504] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708689] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708787] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708965] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709108] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709185] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709373] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709475] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390169] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390521] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390719] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:45:02.390712
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390815] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_014502
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390934] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.391013] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.479213] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.479543] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:03.118908] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:03.683463] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.468862] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.897185] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.897681] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.898154] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:05.101942] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:05.783271] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:06.529482] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342075] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342362] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342735] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343046] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343132] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343222] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343315] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343375] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343429] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783065] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783389] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783533] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783614] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783701] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783803] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783900] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783959] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.784012] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -153,3 +153,138 @@
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.252092] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.252231] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:04.554392] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:05.047104] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:05.676055] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.534381] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.534766] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535341] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535527] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535626] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535729] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.535924] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.536013] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:06.536081] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.000479] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.000783] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001019] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001163] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001248] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001349] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001520] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001618] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:00:07.001702] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.278315] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.278992] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279153] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:15:01.279146
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279268] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_011501
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279350] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.279421] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.304028] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.304433] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:01.614531] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.014235] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.505998] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.981440] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.981799] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:02.982208] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:03.281431] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:03.787816] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:04.484952] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.062377] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.062782] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063243] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063426] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063545] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063621] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063696] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063760] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.063932] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565249] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565591] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565714] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.565947] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566046] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566113] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566178] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566240] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:15:05.566298] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.272858] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273226] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273424] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:30:02.273418
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273518] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_013002
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273606] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.273733] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.388359] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.388697] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:02.935970] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.243573] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.599433] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.995667] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.996001] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:03.996200] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:04.268299] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:04.819413] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:05.556675] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.350900] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351227] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351593] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351733] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351811] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351901] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.351969] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.352032] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.352094] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708039] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708504] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708689] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708787] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.708965] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709108] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709185] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709373] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:30:06.709475] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390169] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390521] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390719] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:45:02.390712
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390815] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_014502
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.390934] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.391013] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.479213] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:02.479543] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:03.118908] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:03.683463] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.468862] [SCAN] Scanned the-nexus: 1 issues, 2 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.897185] [SCAN] Scanned .profile: 0 issues, 0 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.897681] [PHASE] PHASE 3: Actionable Item Discovery
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:04.898154] [SCAN] Beginning comprehensive actionable item scan...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:05.101942] [SCAN] Found 1 open PRs in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:05.783271] [HIGH] PRIORITY: Mergeable PR found - #112: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:06.529482] [SCAN] Found 14 untriaged issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342075] [SCAN] Found 30 documentation issues
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342362] [SUMMARY] Actionable items found: 4 (top priority: 100)
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.342735] [SUMMARY] 4 actionable items discovered
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343046] [PHASE] PHASE 4: Action Execution
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343132] [ACTION] EXECUTING: merge_pr on #112 in timmy-home
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343222] [DETAIL] Title: feat: rewrite KimiClaw heartbeat — launchd, sovereignty fixe
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343315] [DETAIL] Priority: 100
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343375] [DETAIL] Est. time: 2 minutes
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.343429] [ACTION] Initiating merge of PR #112...
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783065] [ERROR] Merge verification failed for PR #112
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783389] [ERROR] ACTION FAILED: Verification failed
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783533] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783614] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT SESSION COMPLETE
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783701] [SUMMARY] Actions found: 4
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783803] [SUMMARY] Action taken: merge_pr
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783900] [SUMMARY] Success: False
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.783959] [SUMMARY] Errors: 1
|
||||
[2026-04-02T01:45:07.784012] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.554807] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.557035] [SESSION] HEARTBEAT WAKEUP INITIATED
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.557174] [SESSION] Timestamp: 2026-04-02T02:00:02.557170
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.557301] [SESSION] Session ID: 20260402_020002
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.557352] [SESSION] ======================================================================
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.557405] [PHASE] PHASE 1: Infrastructure Health Check
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.663356] [SUCCESS] Gitea health check: HTTP 200 ✓
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:02.663695] [PHASE] PHASE 2: Repository Status Scan
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:03.181759] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-home: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
[2026-04-02T02:00:03.584947] [SCAN] Scanned timmy-config: 1 issues, 1 PRs open
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T00:59:16.690818",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T01:59:16.756618",
|
||||
"platforms": {
|
||||
"telegram": [],
|
||||
"whatsapp": [],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
PROGRESS REPORT - Thu Apr 2 01:00:02 UTC 2026
|
||||
PROGRESS REPORT - Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
Queue Status:
|
||||
|
||||
21
wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0130.txt
Normal file
21
wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0130.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
PROGRESS REPORT - Thu Apr 2 01:30:02 UTC 2026
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
Queue Status:
|
||||
- Pending: 0
|
||||
- In Progress: 0
|
||||
- Complete: 9
|
||||
- Total: 9
|
||||
- Progress: 100%
|
||||
|
||||
Pending Tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Active Tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Recent Completions:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
Auto-generated by cron every 30 minutes
|
||||
21
wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0200.txt
Normal file
21
wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0200.txt
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
PROGRESS REPORT - Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
Queue Status:
|
||||
- Pending: 0
|
||||
- In Progress: 0
|
||||
- Complete: 9
|
||||
- Total: 9
|
||||
- Progress: 100%
|
||||
|
||||
Pending Tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Active Tasks:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Recent Completions:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
Auto-generated by cron every 30 minutes
|
||||
BIN
wizards/allegro/home/cache/images/img_69ea36910be8.jpg
vendored
Normal file
BIN
wizards/allegro/home/cache/images/img_69ea36910be8.jpg
vendored
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 78 KiB |
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T00:58:04.230403",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T01:58:08.086126",
|
||||
"platforms": {
|
||||
"telegram": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@
|
||||
"schedule_display": "every 15m",
|
||||
"repeat": {
|
||||
"times": null,
|
||||
"completed": 85
|
||||
"completed": 89
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabled": true,
|
||||
"state": "scheduled",
|
||||
"paused_at": null,
|
||||
"paused_reason": null,
|
||||
"created_at": "2026-03-31T01:15:02.964047+00:00",
|
||||
"next_run_at": "2026-04-02T01:11:04.222810+00:00",
|
||||
"last_run_at": "2026-04-02T00:56:04.222810+00:00",
|
||||
"next_run_at": "2026-04-02T02:11:08.077927+00:00",
|
||||
"last_run_at": "2026-04-02T01:56:08.077927+00:00",
|
||||
"last_status": "ok",
|
||||
"last_error": null,
|
||||
"deliver": "local",
|
||||
@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T00:56:04.223251+00:00"
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T01:56:08.078271+00:00"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
|
||||
# Cron Job: continuous-burn-loop
|
||||
|
||||
**Job ID:** 925c78f89f49
|
||||
**Run Time:** 2026-04-02 01:11:04
|
||||
**Schedule:** every 15m
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The following skill(s) were listed for this job but could not be found and were skipped: github. Start your response with a brief notice so the user is aware, e.g.: '⚠️ Skill(s) not found and skipped: github']
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The user has invoked the "subagent-driven-development" skill, indicating they want you to follow its instructions. The full skill content is loaded below.]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: subagent-driven-development
|
||||
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).
|
||||
version: 1.1.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers)
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
hermes:
|
||||
tags: [delegation, subagent, implementation, workflow, parallel]
|
||||
related_skills: [writing-plans, requesting-code-review, test-driven-development]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Subagent-Driven Development
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task with systematic two-stage review.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill when:
|
||||
- You have an implementation plan (from writing-plans skill or user requirements)
|
||||
- Tasks are mostly independent
|
||||
- Quality and spec compliance are important
|
||||
- You want automated review between tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**vs. manual execution:**
|
||||
- Fresh context per task (no confusion from accumulated state)
|
||||
- Automated review process catches issues early
|
||||
- Consistent quality checks across all tasks
|
||||
- Subagents can ask questions before starting work
|
||||
|
||||
## The Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Read and Parse Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Read the plan file. Extract ALL tasks with their full text and context upfront. Create a todo list:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Read the plan
|
||||
read_file("docs/plans/feature-plan.md")
|
||||
|
||||
# Create todo list with all tasks
|
||||
todo([
|
||||
{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-2", "content": "Add password hashing utility", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-3", "content": "Create login endpoint", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key:** Read the plan ONCE. Extract everything. Don't make subagents read the plan file — provide the full task text directly in context.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Per-Task Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
For EACH task in the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Dispatch Implementer Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Use `delegate_task` with complete context:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Implement Task 1: Create User model with email and password_hash fields",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
TASK FROM PLAN:
|
||||
- Create: src/models/user.py
|
||||
- Add User class with email (str) and password_hash (str) fields
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__ for debugging
|
||||
|
||||
FOLLOW TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test in tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
2. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify FAIL)
|
||||
3. Write minimal implementation
|
||||
4. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify PASS)
|
||||
5. Run: pytest tests/ -q (verify no regressions)
|
||||
6. Commit: git add -A && git commit -m "feat: add User model with password hashing"
|
||||
|
||||
PROJECT CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Python 3.11, Flask app in src/app.py
|
||||
- Existing models in src/models/
|
||||
- Tests use pytest, run from project root
|
||||
- bcrypt already in requirements.txt
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Dispatch Spec Compliance Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After the implementer completes, verify against the original spec:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review if implementation matches the spec from the plan",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
ORIGINAL TASK SPEC:
|
||||
- Create src/models/user.py with User class
|
||||
- Fields: email (str), password_hash (str)
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] All requirements from spec implemented?
|
||||
- [ ] File paths match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Function signatures match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Behavior matches expected?
|
||||
- [ ] Nothing extra added (no scope creep)?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT: PASS or list of specific spec gaps to fix.
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If spec issues found:** Fix gaps, then re-run spec review. Continue only when spec-compliant.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 3: Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After spec compliance passes:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review code quality for Task 1 implementation",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
FILES TO REVIEW:
|
||||
- src/models/user.py
|
||||
- tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] Follows project conventions and style?
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling?
|
||||
- [ ] Clear variable/function names?
|
||||
- [ ] Adequate test coverage?
|
||||
- [ ] No obvious bugs or missed edge cases?
|
||||
- [ ] No security issues?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
||||
- Critical Issues: [must fix before proceeding]
|
||||
- Important Issues: [should fix]
|
||||
- Minor Issues: [optional]
|
||||
- Verdict: APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If quality issues found:** Fix issues, re-review. Continue only when approved.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 4: Mark Complete
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
todo([{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "completed"}], merge=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Final Review
|
||||
|
||||
After ALL tasks are complete, dispatch a final integration reviewer:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review the entire implementation for consistency and integration issues",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
All tasks from the plan are complete. Review the full implementation:
|
||||
- Do all components work together?
|
||||
- Any inconsistencies between tasks?
|
||||
- All tests passing?
|
||||
- Ready for merge?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Verify and Commit
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run full test suite
|
||||
pytest tests/ -q
|
||||
|
||||
# Review all changes
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
|
||||
# Final commit if needed
|
||||
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: complete [feature name] implementation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Granularity
|
||||
|
||||
**Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Too big:**
|
||||
- "Implement user authentication system"
|
||||
|
||||
**Right size:**
|
||||
- "Create User model with email and password fields"
|
||||
- "Add password hashing function"
|
||||
- "Create login endpoint"
|
||||
- "Add JWT token generation"
|
||||
- "Create registration endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags — Never Do These
|
||||
|
||||
- Start implementation without a plan
|
||||
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
|
||||
- Proceed with unfixed critical/important issues
|
||||
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents for tasks that touch the same files
|
||||
- Make subagent read the plan file (provide full text in context instead)
|
||||
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where the task fits)
|
||||
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
|
||||
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance
|
||||
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues → implementer fixes → review again)
|
||||
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
|
||||
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)
|
||||
- Move to next task while either review has open issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Handling Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Asks Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Answer clearly and completely
|
||||
- Provide additional context if needed
|
||||
- Don't rush them into implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### If Reviewer Finds Issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementer subagent (or a new one) fixes them
|
||||
- Reviewer reviews again
|
||||
- Repeat until approved
|
||||
- Don't skip the re-review
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Fails a Task
|
||||
|
||||
- Dispatch a new fix subagent with specific instructions about what went wrong
|
||||
- Don't try to fix manually in the controller session (context pollution)
|
||||
|
||||
## Efficiency Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**Why fresh subagent per task:**
|
||||
- Prevents context pollution from accumulated state
|
||||
- Each subagent gets clean, focused context
|
||||
- No confusion from prior tasks' code or reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
**Why two-stage review:**
|
||||
- Spec review catches under/over-building early
|
||||
- Quality review ensures the implementation is well-built
|
||||
- Catches issues before they compound across tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost trade-off:**
|
||||
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
|
||||
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging compounded problems later)
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Other Skills
|
||||
|
||||
### With writing-plans
|
||||
|
||||
This skill EXECUTES plans created by the writing-plans skill:
|
||||
1. User requirements → writing-plans → implementation plan
|
||||
2. Implementation plan → subagent-driven-development → working code
|
||||
|
||||
### With test-driven-development
|
||||
|
||||
Implementer subagents should follow TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test first
|
||||
2. Implement minimal code
|
||||
3. Verify test passes
|
||||
4. Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Include TDD instructions in every implementer context.
|
||||
|
||||
### With requesting-code-review
|
||||
|
||||
The two-stage review process IS the code review. For final integration review, use the requesting-code-review skill's review dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
### With systematic-debugging
|
||||
|
||||
If a subagent encounters bugs during implementation:
|
||||
1. Follow systematic-debugging process
|
||||
2. Find root cause before fixing
|
||||
3. Write regression test
|
||||
4. Resume implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Read plan: docs/plans/auth-feature.md]
|
||||
[Create todo list with 5 tasks]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 1: Create User model ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: "Should email be unique?"
|
||||
You: "Yes, email must be unique"
|
||||
Implementer: Implemented, 3/3 tests passing, committed.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS — all requirements met
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED — clean code, good tests
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 1 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 2: Password hashing ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: No questions, implemented, 5/5 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ❌ Missing: password strength validation (spec says "min 8 chars")
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementer fixes]
|
||||
Implementer: Added validation, 7/7 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer again]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: Important: Magic number 8, extract to constant
|
||||
Implementer: Extracted MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH constant
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 2 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
... (continue for all tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
[After all tasks: dispatch final integration reviewer]
|
||||
[Run full test suite: all passing]
|
||||
[Done!]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Fresh subagent per task
|
||||
Two-stage review every time
|
||||
Spec compliance FIRST
|
||||
Code quality SECOND
|
||||
Never skip reviews
|
||||
Catch issues early
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality is not an accident. It's the result of systematic process.**
|
||||
|
||||
The user has provided the following instruction alongside the skill invocation: [SYSTEM: If you have a meaningful status report or findings, send them — that is the whole point of this job. Only respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) when there is genuinely nothing new to report. [SILENT] suppresses delivery to the user. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]
|
||||
|
||||
AUTONOMOUS BURN MODE — CONTINUOUS EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
You are Allegro in continuous burn mode. Your mission: perpetually burn down the highest-priority work in the Timmy Foundation ecosystem without waiting for user input.
|
||||
|
||||
## BURN PROTOCOL
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. DISCOVER PHASE (2 minutes)
|
||||
Query Gitea for highest priority work:
|
||||
- Open issues with labels: "priority/critical", "priority/high", "burn-next"
|
||||
- Open PRs needing review
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities (CVSS > 7.0)
|
||||
- Performance regressions
|
||||
- Failed CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
API: http://143.198.27.163:3000/api/v1
|
||||
Token: $GITEA_TOKEN
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. SELECT PHASE (1 minute)
|
||||
Priority order:
|
||||
1. Security vulnerabilities (CVSS critical/high)
|
||||
2. Performance regressions
|
||||
3. Infrastructure failures
|
||||
4. PR reviews blocking merge
|
||||
5. Issue backlog (oldest first)
|
||||
6. Technical debt (if nothing else)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. BURN PHASE (Execute until complete)
|
||||
Use delegate_task to spawn parallel strike teams:
|
||||
- 1-3 subagents for independent workstreams
|
||||
- Maximum 50 iterations per subagent
|
||||
- Focus on code, tests, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. REPORT PHASE (Deliver to Gitea)
|
||||
Create/update an issue in timmy-home with burn report:
|
||||
- Title format: "🔥 Burn Report #[NUMBER] — [DATE] [FOCUS AREA]"
|
||||
- Include: what was burned, metrics, next target
|
||||
- Tag with: "burn-report", "autonomous"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. IMMEDIATE RESTART
|
||||
After reporting, immediately begin next burn cycle. No waiting. Continuous execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## CURRENT BACKLOG CONTEXT
|
||||
|
||||
Hermes-agent: Security complete (15 vulns), Performance batch 1 complete (10x throughput)
|
||||
Remaining: Lazy imports (#114), Benchmarks (#115), Rust evaluation, GOFAI implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Turboquant: Active development
|
||||
The-nexus: Infrastructure stable
|
||||
Timmy-home: Audio pipeline (#123-128), cutover planning
|
||||
|
||||
## REPORTING FORMAT
|
||||
|
||||
Create issue in Timmy_Foundation/timmy-home:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🔥 Burn Report #[N] — [TIMESTAMP]
|
||||
|
||||
**Focus Area:** [Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure]
|
||||
**Burn Duration:** [X minutes]
|
||||
**Subagents Deployed:** [N]
|
||||
|
||||
### Work Completed
|
||||
- [ ] Item 1
|
||||
- [ ] Item 2
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics
|
||||
- Lines changed: +X/-Y
|
||||
- Tests added: N
|
||||
- CVSS addressed: X.X
|
||||
- Performance gain: X%
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Target
|
||||
[What to burn next]
|
||||
|
||||
### Blockers (if any)
|
||||
[What's blocking continued burn]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*Autonomous burn mode active*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
|
||||
1. NEVER ask for clarification — make decisions
|
||||
2. NEVER wait for approval — execute and report
|
||||
3. If blocked, document in Gitea and pivot to next item
|
||||
4. Maintain backward compatibility
|
||||
5. All code must have tests
|
||||
6. Security > Performance > Features
|
||||
7. When in doubt, burn the oldest critical issue
|
||||
|
||||
## START BURNING NOW
|
||||
|
||||
Query Gitea. Find highest priority work. Execute. Report. Repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
Sovereignty and service always. 🔥
|
||||
|
||||
## Response
|
||||
|
||||
(No response generated)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
|
||||
# Cron Job: continuous-burn-loop
|
||||
|
||||
**Job ID:** 925c78f89f49
|
||||
**Run Time:** 2026-04-02 01:26:06
|
||||
**Schedule:** every 15m
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The following skill(s) were listed for this job but could not be found and were skipped: github. Start your response with a brief notice so the user is aware, e.g.: '⚠️ Skill(s) not found and skipped: github']
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The user has invoked the "subagent-driven-development" skill, indicating they want you to follow its instructions. The full skill content is loaded below.]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: subagent-driven-development
|
||||
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).
|
||||
version: 1.1.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers)
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
hermes:
|
||||
tags: [delegation, subagent, implementation, workflow, parallel]
|
||||
related_skills: [writing-plans, requesting-code-review, test-driven-development]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Subagent-Driven Development
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task with systematic two-stage review.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill when:
|
||||
- You have an implementation plan (from writing-plans skill or user requirements)
|
||||
- Tasks are mostly independent
|
||||
- Quality and spec compliance are important
|
||||
- You want automated review between tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**vs. manual execution:**
|
||||
- Fresh context per task (no confusion from accumulated state)
|
||||
- Automated review process catches issues early
|
||||
- Consistent quality checks across all tasks
|
||||
- Subagents can ask questions before starting work
|
||||
|
||||
## The Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Read and Parse Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Read the plan file. Extract ALL tasks with their full text and context upfront. Create a todo list:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Read the plan
|
||||
read_file("docs/plans/feature-plan.md")
|
||||
|
||||
# Create todo list with all tasks
|
||||
todo([
|
||||
{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-2", "content": "Add password hashing utility", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-3", "content": "Create login endpoint", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key:** Read the plan ONCE. Extract everything. Don't make subagents read the plan file — provide the full task text directly in context.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Per-Task Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
For EACH task in the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Dispatch Implementer Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Use `delegate_task` with complete context:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Implement Task 1: Create User model with email and password_hash fields",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
TASK FROM PLAN:
|
||||
- Create: src/models/user.py
|
||||
- Add User class with email (str) and password_hash (str) fields
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__ for debugging
|
||||
|
||||
FOLLOW TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test in tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
2. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify FAIL)
|
||||
3. Write minimal implementation
|
||||
4. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify PASS)
|
||||
5. Run: pytest tests/ -q (verify no regressions)
|
||||
6. Commit: git add -A && git commit -m "feat: add User model with password hashing"
|
||||
|
||||
PROJECT CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Python 3.11, Flask app in src/app.py
|
||||
- Existing models in src/models/
|
||||
- Tests use pytest, run from project root
|
||||
- bcrypt already in requirements.txt
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Dispatch Spec Compliance Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After the implementer completes, verify against the original spec:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review if implementation matches the spec from the plan",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
ORIGINAL TASK SPEC:
|
||||
- Create src/models/user.py with User class
|
||||
- Fields: email (str), password_hash (str)
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] All requirements from spec implemented?
|
||||
- [ ] File paths match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Function signatures match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Behavior matches expected?
|
||||
- [ ] Nothing extra added (no scope creep)?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT: PASS or list of specific spec gaps to fix.
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If spec issues found:** Fix gaps, then re-run spec review. Continue only when spec-compliant.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 3: Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After spec compliance passes:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review code quality for Task 1 implementation",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
FILES TO REVIEW:
|
||||
- src/models/user.py
|
||||
- tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] Follows project conventions and style?
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling?
|
||||
- [ ] Clear variable/function names?
|
||||
- [ ] Adequate test coverage?
|
||||
- [ ] No obvious bugs or missed edge cases?
|
||||
- [ ] No security issues?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
||||
- Critical Issues: [must fix before proceeding]
|
||||
- Important Issues: [should fix]
|
||||
- Minor Issues: [optional]
|
||||
- Verdict: APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If quality issues found:** Fix issues, re-review. Continue only when approved.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 4: Mark Complete
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
todo([{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "completed"}], merge=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Final Review
|
||||
|
||||
After ALL tasks are complete, dispatch a final integration reviewer:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review the entire implementation for consistency and integration issues",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
All tasks from the plan are complete. Review the full implementation:
|
||||
- Do all components work together?
|
||||
- Any inconsistencies between tasks?
|
||||
- All tests passing?
|
||||
- Ready for merge?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Verify and Commit
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run full test suite
|
||||
pytest tests/ -q
|
||||
|
||||
# Review all changes
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
|
||||
# Final commit if needed
|
||||
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: complete [feature name] implementation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Granularity
|
||||
|
||||
**Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Too big:**
|
||||
- "Implement user authentication system"
|
||||
|
||||
**Right size:**
|
||||
- "Create User model with email and password fields"
|
||||
- "Add password hashing function"
|
||||
- "Create login endpoint"
|
||||
- "Add JWT token generation"
|
||||
- "Create registration endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags — Never Do These
|
||||
|
||||
- Start implementation without a plan
|
||||
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
|
||||
- Proceed with unfixed critical/important issues
|
||||
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents for tasks that touch the same files
|
||||
- Make subagent read the plan file (provide full text in context instead)
|
||||
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where the task fits)
|
||||
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
|
||||
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance
|
||||
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues → implementer fixes → review again)
|
||||
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
|
||||
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)
|
||||
- Move to next task while either review has open issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Handling Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Asks Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Answer clearly and completely
|
||||
- Provide additional context if needed
|
||||
- Don't rush them into implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### If Reviewer Finds Issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementer subagent (or a new one) fixes them
|
||||
- Reviewer reviews again
|
||||
- Repeat until approved
|
||||
- Don't skip the re-review
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Fails a Task
|
||||
|
||||
- Dispatch a new fix subagent with specific instructions about what went wrong
|
||||
- Don't try to fix manually in the controller session (context pollution)
|
||||
|
||||
## Efficiency Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**Why fresh subagent per task:**
|
||||
- Prevents context pollution from accumulated state
|
||||
- Each subagent gets clean, focused context
|
||||
- No confusion from prior tasks' code or reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
**Why two-stage review:**
|
||||
- Spec review catches under/over-building early
|
||||
- Quality review ensures the implementation is well-built
|
||||
- Catches issues before they compound across tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost trade-off:**
|
||||
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
|
||||
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging compounded problems later)
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Other Skills
|
||||
|
||||
### With writing-plans
|
||||
|
||||
This skill EXECUTES plans created by the writing-plans skill:
|
||||
1. User requirements → writing-plans → implementation plan
|
||||
2. Implementation plan → subagent-driven-development → working code
|
||||
|
||||
### With test-driven-development
|
||||
|
||||
Implementer subagents should follow TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test first
|
||||
2. Implement minimal code
|
||||
3. Verify test passes
|
||||
4. Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Include TDD instructions in every implementer context.
|
||||
|
||||
### With requesting-code-review
|
||||
|
||||
The two-stage review process IS the code review. For final integration review, use the requesting-code-review skill's review dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
### With systematic-debugging
|
||||
|
||||
If a subagent encounters bugs during implementation:
|
||||
1. Follow systematic-debugging process
|
||||
2. Find root cause before fixing
|
||||
3. Write regression test
|
||||
4. Resume implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Read plan: docs/plans/auth-feature.md]
|
||||
[Create todo list with 5 tasks]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 1: Create User model ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: "Should email be unique?"
|
||||
You: "Yes, email must be unique"
|
||||
Implementer: Implemented, 3/3 tests passing, committed.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS — all requirements met
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED — clean code, good tests
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 1 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 2: Password hashing ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: No questions, implemented, 5/5 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ❌ Missing: password strength validation (spec says "min 8 chars")
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementer fixes]
|
||||
Implementer: Added validation, 7/7 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer again]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: Important: Magic number 8, extract to constant
|
||||
Implementer: Extracted MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH constant
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 2 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
... (continue for all tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
[After all tasks: dispatch final integration reviewer]
|
||||
[Run full test suite: all passing]
|
||||
[Done!]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Fresh subagent per task
|
||||
Two-stage review every time
|
||||
Spec compliance FIRST
|
||||
Code quality SECOND
|
||||
Never skip reviews
|
||||
Catch issues early
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality is not an accident. It's the result of systematic process.**
|
||||
|
||||
The user has provided the following instruction alongside the skill invocation: [SYSTEM: If you have a meaningful status report or findings, send them — that is the whole point of this job. Only respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) when there is genuinely nothing new to report. [SILENT] suppresses delivery to the user. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]
|
||||
|
||||
AUTONOMOUS BURN MODE — CONTINUOUS EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
You are Allegro in continuous burn mode. Your mission: perpetually burn down the highest-priority work in the Timmy Foundation ecosystem without waiting for user input.
|
||||
|
||||
## BURN PROTOCOL
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. DISCOVER PHASE (2 minutes)
|
||||
Query Gitea for highest priority work:
|
||||
- Open issues with labels: "priority/critical", "priority/high", "burn-next"
|
||||
- Open PRs needing review
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities (CVSS > 7.0)
|
||||
- Performance regressions
|
||||
- Failed CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
API: http://143.198.27.163:3000/api/v1
|
||||
Token: $GITEA_TOKEN
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. SELECT PHASE (1 minute)
|
||||
Priority order:
|
||||
1. Security vulnerabilities (CVSS critical/high)
|
||||
2. Performance regressions
|
||||
3. Infrastructure failures
|
||||
4. PR reviews blocking merge
|
||||
5. Issue backlog (oldest first)
|
||||
6. Technical debt (if nothing else)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. BURN PHASE (Execute until complete)
|
||||
Use delegate_task to spawn parallel strike teams:
|
||||
- 1-3 subagents for independent workstreams
|
||||
- Maximum 50 iterations per subagent
|
||||
- Focus on code, tests, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. REPORT PHASE (Deliver to Gitea)
|
||||
Create/update an issue in timmy-home with burn report:
|
||||
- Title format: "🔥 Burn Report #[NUMBER] — [DATE] [FOCUS AREA]"
|
||||
- Include: what was burned, metrics, next target
|
||||
- Tag with: "burn-report", "autonomous"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. IMMEDIATE RESTART
|
||||
After reporting, immediately begin next burn cycle. No waiting. Continuous execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## CURRENT BACKLOG CONTEXT
|
||||
|
||||
Hermes-agent: Security complete (15 vulns), Performance batch 1 complete (10x throughput)
|
||||
Remaining: Lazy imports (#114), Benchmarks (#115), Rust evaluation, GOFAI implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Turboquant: Active development
|
||||
The-nexus: Infrastructure stable
|
||||
Timmy-home: Audio pipeline (#123-128), cutover planning
|
||||
|
||||
## REPORTING FORMAT
|
||||
|
||||
Create issue in Timmy_Foundation/timmy-home:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🔥 Burn Report #[N] — [TIMESTAMP]
|
||||
|
||||
**Focus Area:** [Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure]
|
||||
**Burn Duration:** [X minutes]
|
||||
**Subagents Deployed:** [N]
|
||||
|
||||
### Work Completed
|
||||
- [ ] Item 1
|
||||
- [ ] Item 2
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics
|
||||
- Lines changed: +X/-Y
|
||||
- Tests added: N
|
||||
- CVSS addressed: X.X
|
||||
- Performance gain: X%
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Target
|
||||
[What to burn next]
|
||||
|
||||
### Blockers (if any)
|
||||
[What's blocking continued burn]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*Autonomous burn mode active*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
|
||||
1. NEVER ask for clarification — make decisions
|
||||
2. NEVER wait for approval — execute and report
|
||||
3. If blocked, document in Gitea and pivot to next item
|
||||
4. Maintain backward compatibility
|
||||
5. All code must have tests
|
||||
6. Security > Performance > Features
|
||||
7. When in doubt, burn the oldest critical issue
|
||||
|
||||
## START BURNING NOW
|
||||
|
||||
Query Gitea. Find highest priority work. Execute. Report. Repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
Sovereignty and service always. 🔥
|
||||
|
||||
## Response
|
||||
|
||||
(No response generated)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
|
||||
# Cron Job: continuous-burn-loop
|
||||
|
||||
**Job ID:** 925c78f89f49
|
||||
**Run Time:** 2026-04-02 01:41:07
|
||||
**Schedule:** every 15m
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The following skill(s) were listed for this job but could not be found and were skipped: github. Start your response with a brief notice so the user is aware, e.g.: '⚠️ Skill(s) not found and skipped: github']
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The user has invoked the "subagent-driven-development" skill, indicating they want you to follow its instructions. The full skill content is loaded below.]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: subagent-driven-development
|
||||
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).
|
||||
version: 1.1.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers)
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
hermes:
|
||||
tags: [delegation, subagent, implementation, workflow, parallel]
|
||||
related_skills: [writing-plans, requesting-code-review, test-driven-development]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Subagent-Driven Development
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task with systematic two-stage review.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill when:
|
||||
- You have an implementation plan (from writing-plans skill or user requirements)
|
||||
- Tasks are mostly independent
|
||||
- Quality and spec compliance are important
|
||||
- You want automated review between tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**vs. manual execution:**
|
||||
- Fresh context per task (no confusion from accumulated state)
|
||||
- Automated review process catches issues early
|
||||
- Consistent quality checks across all tasks
|
||||
- Subagents can ask questions before starting work
|
||||
|
||||
## The Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Read and Parse Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Read the plan file. Extract ALL tasks with their full text and context upfront. Create a todo list:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Read the plan
|
||||
read_file("docs/plans/feature-plan.md")
|
||||
|
||||
# Create todo list with all tasks
|
||||
todo([
|
||||
{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-2", "content": "Add password hashing utility", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-3", "content": "Create login endpoint", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key:** Read the plan ONCE. Extract everything. Don't make subagents read the plan file — provide the full task text directly in context.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Per-Task Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
For EACH task in the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Dispatch Implementer Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Use `delegate_task` with complete context:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Implement Task 1: Create User model with email and password_hash fields",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
TASK FROM PLAN:
|
||||
- Create: src/models/user.py
|
||||
- Add User class with email (str) and password_hash (str) fields
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__ for debugging
|
||||
|
||||
FOLLOW TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test in tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
2. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify FAIL)
|
||||
3. Write minimal implementation
|
||||
4. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify PASS)
|
||||
5. Run: pytest tests/ -q (verify no regressions)
|
||||
6. Commit: git add -A && git commit -m "feat: add User model with password hashing"
|
||||
|
||||
PROJECT CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Python 3.11, Flask app in src/app.py
|
||||
- Existing models in src/models/
|
||||
- Tests use pytest, run from project root
|
||||
- bcrypt already in requirements.txt
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Dispatch Spec Compliance Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After the implementer completes, verify against the original spec:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review if implementation matches the spec from the plan",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
ORIGINAL TASK SPEC:
|
||||
- Create src/models/user.py with User class
|
||||
- Fields: email (str), password_hash (str)
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] All requirements from spec implemented?
|
||||
- [ ] File paths match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Function signatures match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Behavior matches expected?
|
||||
- [ ] Nothing extra added (no scope creep)?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT: PASS or list of specific spec gaps to fix.
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If spec issues found:** Fix gaps, then re-run spec review. Continue only when spec-compliant.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 3: Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After spec compliance passes:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review code quality for Task 1 implementation",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
FILES TO REVIEW:
|
||||
- src/models/user.py
|
||||
- tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] Follows project conventions and style?
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling?
|
||||
- [ ] Clear variable/function names?
|
||||
- [ ] Adequate test coverage?
|
||||
- [ ] No obvious bugs or missed edge cases?
|
||||
- [ ] No security issues?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
||||
- Critical Issues: [must fix before proceeding]
|
||||
- Important Issues: [should fix]
|
||||
- Minor Issues: [optional]
|
||||
- Verdict: APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If quality issues found:** Fix issues, re-review. Continue only when approved.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 4: Mark Complete
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
todo([{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "completed"}], merge=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Final Review
|
||||
|
||||
After ALL tasks are complete, dispatch a final integration reviewer:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review the entire implementation for consistency and integration issues",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
All tasks from the plan are complete. Review the full implementation:
|
||||
- Do all components work together?
|
||||
- Any inconsistencies between tasks?
|
||||
- All tests passing?
|
||||
- Ready for merge?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Verify and Commit
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run full test suite
|
||||
pytest tests/ -q
|
||||
|
||||
# Review all changes
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
|
||||
# Final commit if needed
|
||||
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: complete [feature name] implementation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Granularity
|
||||
|
||||
**Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Too big:**
|
||||
- "Implement user authentication system"
|
||||
|
||||
**Right size:**
|
||||
- "Create User model with email and password fields"
|
||||
- "Add password hashing function"
|
||||
- "Create login endpoint"
|
||||
- "Add JWT token generation"
|
||||
- "Create registration endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags — Never Do These
|
||||
|
||||
- Start implementation without a plan
|
||||
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
|
||||
- Proceed with unfixed critical/important issues
|
||||
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents for tasks that touch the same files
|
||||
- Make subagent read the plan file (provide full text in context instead)
|
||||
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where the task fits)
|
||||
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
|
||||
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance
|
||||
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues → implementer fixes → review again)
|
||||
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
|
||||
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)
|
||||
- Move to next task while either review has open issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Handling Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Asks Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Answer clearly and completely
|
||||
- Provide additional context if needed
|
||||
- Don't rush them into implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### If Reviewer Finds Issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementer subagent (or a new one) fixes them
|
||||
- Reviewer reviews again
|
||||
- Repeat until approved
|
||||
- Don't skip the re-review
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Fails a Task
|
||||
|
||||
- Dispatch a new fix subagent with specific instructions about what went wrong
|
||||
- Don't try to fix manually in the controller session (context pollution)
|
||||
|
||||
## Efficiency Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**Why fresh subagent per task:**
|
||||
- Prevents context pollution from accumulated state
|
||||
- Each subagent gets clean, focused context
|
||||
- No confusion from prior tasks' code or reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
**Why two-stage review:**
|
||||
- Spec review catches under/over-building early
|
||||
- Quality review ensures the implementation is well-built
|
||||
- Catches issues before they compound across tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost trade-off:**
|
||||
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
|
||||
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging compounded problems later)
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Other Skills
|
||||
|
||||
### With writing-plans
|
||||
|
||||
This skill EXECUTES plans created by the writing-plans skill:
|
||||
1. User requirements → writing-plans → implementation plan
|
||||
2. Implementation plan → subagent-driven-development → working code
|
||||
|
||||
### With test-driven-development
|
||||
|
||||
Implementer subagents should follow TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test first
|
||||
2. Implement minimal code
|
||||
3. Verify test passes
|
||||
4. Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Include TDD instructions in every implementer context.
|
||||
|
||||
### With requesting-code-review
|
||||
|
||||
The two-stage review process IS the code review. For final integration review, use the requesting-code-review skill's review dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
### With systematic-debugging
|
||||
|
||||
If a subagent encounters bugs during implementation:
|
||||
1. Follow systematic-debugging process
|
||||
2. Find root cause before fixing
|
||||
3. Write regression test
|
||||
4. Resume implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Read plan: docs/plans/auth-feature.md]
|
||||
[Create todo list with 5 tasks]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 1: Create User model ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: "Should email be unique?"
|
||||
You: "Yes, email must be unique"
|
||||
Implementer: Implemented, 3/3 tests passing, committed.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS — all requirements met
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED — clean code, good tests
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 1 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 2: Password hashing ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: No questions, implemented, 5/5 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ❌ Missing: password strength validation (spec says "min 8 chars")
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementer fixes]
|
||||
Implementer: Added validation, 7/7 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer again]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: Important: Magic number 8, extract to constant
|
||||
Implementer: Extracted MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH constant
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 2 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
... (continue for all tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
[After all tasks: dispatch final integration reviewer]
|
||||
[Run full test suite: all passing]
|
||||
[Done!]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Fresh subagent per task
|
||||
Two-stage review every time
|
||||
Spec compliance FIRST
|
||||
Code quality SECOND
|
||||
Never skip reviews
|
||||
Catch issues early
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality is not an accident. It's the result of systematic process.**
|
||||
|
||||
The user has provided the following instruction alongside the skill invocation: [SYSTEM: If you have a meaningful status report or findings, send them — that is the whole point of this job. Only respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) when there is genuinely nothing new to report. [SILENT] suppresses delivery to the user. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]
|
||||
|
||||
AUTONOMOUS BURN MODE — CONTINUOUS EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
You are Allegro in continuous burn mode. Your mission: perpetually burn down the highest-priority work in the Timmy Foundation ecosystem without waiting for user input.
|
||||
|
||||
## BURN PROTOCOL
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. DISCOVER PHASE (2 minutes)
|
||||
Query Gitea for highest priority work:
|
||||
- Open issues with labels: "priority/critical", "priority/high", "burn-next"
|
||||
- Open PRs needing review
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities (CVSS > 7.0)
|
||||
- Performance regressions
|
||||
- Failed CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
API: http://143.198.27.163:3000/api/v1
|
||||
Token: $GITEA_TOKEN
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. SELECT PHASE (1 minute)
|
||||
Priority order:
|
||||
1. Security vulnerabilities (CVSS critical/high)
|
||||
2. Performance regressions
|
||||
3. Infrastructure failures
|
||||
4. PR reviews blocking merge
|
||||
5. Issue backlog (oldest first)
|
||||
6. Technical debt (if nothing else)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. BURN PHASE (Execute until complete)
|
||||
Use delegate_task to spawn parallel strike teams:
|
||||
- 1-3 subagents for independent workstreams
|
||||
- Maximum 50 iterations per subagent
|
||||
- Focus on code, tests, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. REPORT PHASE (Deliver to Gitea)
|
||||
Create/update an issue in timmy-home with burn report:
|
||||
- Title format: "🔥 Burn Report #[NUMBER] — [DATE] [FOCUS AREA]"
|
||||
- Include: what was burned, metrics, next target
|
||||
- Tag with: "burn-report", "autonomous"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. IMMEDIATE RESTART
|
||||
After reporting, immediately begin next burn cycle. No waiting. Continuous execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## CURRENT BACKLOG CONTEXT
|
||||
|
||||
Hermes-agent: Security complete (15 vulns), Performance batch 1 complete (10x throughput)
|
||||
Remaining: Lazy imports (#114), Benchmarks (#115), Rust evaluation, GOFAI implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Turboquant: Active development
|
||||
The-nexus: Infrastructure stable
|
||||
Timmy-home: Audio pipeline (#123-128), cutover planning
|
||||
|
||||
## REPORTING FORMAT
|
||||
|
||||
Create issue in Timmy_Foundation/timmy-home:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🔥 Burn Report #[N] — [TIMESTAMP]
|
||||
|
||||
**Focus Area:** [Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure]
|
||||
**Burn Duration:** [X minutes]
|
||||
**Subagents Deployed:** [N]
|
||||
|
||||
### Work Completed
|
||||
- [ ] Item 1
|
||||
- [ ] Item 2
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics
|
||||
- Lines changed: +X/-Y
|
||||
- Tests added: N
|
||||
- CVSS addressed: X.X
|
||||
- Performance gain: X%
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Target
|
||||
[What to burn next]
|
||||
|
||||
### Blockers (if any)
|
||||
[What's blocking continued burn]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*Autonomous burn mode active*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
|
||||
1. NEVER ask for clarification — make decisions
|
||||
2. NEVER wait for approval — execute and report
|
||||
3. If blocked, document in Gitea and pivot to next item
|
||||
4. Maintain backward compatibility
|
||||
5. All code must have tests
|
||||
6. Security > Performance > Features
|
||||
7. When in doubt, burn the oldest critical issue
|
||||
|
||||
## START BURNING NOW
|
||||
|
||||
Query Gitea. Find highest priority work. Execute. Report. Repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
Sovereignty and service always. 🔥
|
||||
|
||||
## Response
|
||||
|
||||
(No response generated)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
|
||||
# Cron Job: continuous-burn-loop
|
||||
|
||||
**Job ID:** 925c78f89f49
|
||||
**Run Time:** 2026-04-02 01:56:07
|
||||
**Schedule:** every 15m
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt
|
||||
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The following skill(s) were listed for this job but could not be found and were skipped: github. Start your response with a brief notice so the user is aware, e.g.: '⚠️ Skill(s) not found and skipped: github']
|
||||
[SYSTEM: The user has invoked the "subagent-driven-development" skill, indicating they want you to follow its instructions. The full skill content is loaded below.]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: subagent-driven-development
|
||||
description: Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).
|
||||
version: 1.1.0
|
||||
author: Hermes Agent (adapted from obra/superpowers)
|
||||
license: MIT
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
hermes:
|
||||
tags: [delegation, subagent, implementation, workflow, parallel]
|
||||
related_skills: [writing-plans, requesting-code-review, test-driven-development]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Subagent-Driven Development
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Execute implementation plans by dispatching fresh subagents per task with systematic two-stage review.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
Use this skill when:
|
||||
- You have an implementation plan (from writing-plans skill or user requirements)
|
||||
- Tasks are mostly independent
|
||||
- Quality and spec compliance are important
|
||||
- You want automated review between tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**vs. manual execution:**
|
||||
- Fresh context per task (no confusion from accumulated state)
|
||||
- Automated review process catches issues early
|
||||
- Consistent quality checks across all tasks
|
||||
- Subagents can ask questions before starting work
|
||||
|
||||
## The Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Read and Parse Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Read the plan file. Extract ALL tasks with their full text and context upfront. Create a todo list:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Read the plan
|
||||
read_file("docs/plans/feature-plan.md")
|
||||
|
||||
# Create todo list with all tasks
|
||||
todo([
|
||||
{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-2", "content": "Add password hashing utility", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
{"id": "task-3", "content": "Create login endpoint", "status": "pending"},
|
||||
])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key:** Read the plan ONCE. Extract everything. Don't make subagents read the plan file — provide the full task text directly in context.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Per-Task Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
For EACH task in the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 1: Dispatch Implementer Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Use `delegate_task` with complete context:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Implement Task 1: Create User model with email and password_hash fields",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
TASK FROM PLAN:
|
||||
- Create: src/models/user.py
|
||||
- Add User class with email (str) and password_hash (str) fields
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__ for debugging
|
||||
|
||||
FOLLOW TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test in tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
2. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify FAIL)
|
||||
3. Write minimal implementation
|
||||
4. Run: pytest tests/models/test_user.py -v (verify PASS)
|
||||
5. Run: pytest tests/ -q (verify no regressions)
|
||||
6. Commit: git add -A && git commit -m "feat: add User model with password hashing"
|
||||
|
||||
PROJECT CONTEXT:
|
||||
- Python 3.11, Flask app in src/app.py
|
||||
- Existing models in src/models/
|
||||
- Tests use pytest, run from project root
|
||||
- bcrypt already in requirements.txt
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 2: Dispatch Spec Compliance Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After the implementer completes, verify against the original spec:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review if implementation matches the spec from the plan",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
ORIGINAL TASK SPEC:
|
||||
- Create src/models/user.py with User class
|
||||
- Fields: email (str), password_hash (str)
|
||||
- Use bcrypt for password hashing
|
||||
- Include __repr__
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] All requirements from spec implemented?
|
||||
- [ ] File paths match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Function signatures match spec?
|
||||
- [ ] Behavior matches expected?
|
||||
- [ ] Nothing extra added (no scope creep)?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT: PASS or list of specific spec gaps to fix.
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If spec issues found:** Fix gaps, then re-run spec review. Continue only when spec-compliant.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 3: Dispatch Code Quality Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
After spec compliance passes:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review code quality for Task 1 implementation",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
FILES TO REVIEW:
|
||||
- src/models/user.py
|
||||
- tests/models/test_user.py
|
||||
|
||||
CHECK:
|
||||
- [ ] Follows project conventions and style?
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling?
|
||||
- [ ] Clear variable/function names?
|
||||
- [ ] Adequate test coverage?
|
||||
- [ ] No obvious bugs or missed edge cases?
|
||||
- [ ] No security issues?
|
||||
|
||||
OUTPUT FORMAT:
|
||||
- Critical Issues: [must fix before proceeding]
|
||||
- Important Issues: [should fix]
|
||||
- Minor Issues: [optional]
|
||||
- Verdict: APPROVED or REQUEST_CHANGES
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If quality issues found:** Fix issues, re-review. Continue only when approved.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Step 4: Mark Complete
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
todo([{"id": "task-1", "content": "Create User model with email field", "status": "completed"}], merge=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Final Review
|
||||
|
||||
After ALL tasks are complete, dispatch a final integration reviewer:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
delegate_task(
|
||||
goal="Review the entire implementation for consistency and integration issues",
|
||||
context="""
|
||||
All tasks from the plan are complete. Review the full implementation:
|
||||
- Do all components work together?
|
||||
- Any inconsistencies between tasks?
|
||||
- All tests passing?
|
||||
- Ready for merge?
|
||||
""",
|
||||
toolsets=['terminal', 'file']
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Verify and Commit
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run full test suite
|
||||
pytest tests/ -q
|
||||
|
||||
# Review all changes
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
|
||||
# Final commit if needed
|
||||
git add -A && git commit -m "feat: complete [feature name] implementation"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Task Granularity
|
||||
|
||||
**Each task = 2-5 minutes of focused work.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Too big:**
|
||||
- "Implement user authentication system"
|
||||
|
||||
**Right size:**
|
||||
- "Create User model with email and password fields"
|
||||
- "Add password hashing function"
|
||||
- "Create login endpoint"
|
||||
- "Add JWT token generation"
|
||||
- "Create registration endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags — Never Do These
|
||||
|
||||
- Start implementation without a plan
|
||||
- Skip reviews (spec compliance OR code quality)
|
||||
- Proceed with unfixed critical/important issues
|
||||
- Dispatch multiple implementation subagents for tasks that touch the same files
|
||||
- Make subagent read the plan file (provide full text in context instead)
|
||||
- Skip scene-setting context (subagent needs to understand where the task fits)
|
||||
- Ignore subagent questions (answer before letting them proceed)
|
||||
- Accept "close enough" on spec compliance
|
||||
- Skip review loops (reviewer found issues → implementer fixes → review again)
|
||||
- Let implementer self-review replace actual review (both are needed)
|
||||
- **Start code quality review before spec compliance is PASS** (wrong order)
|
||||
- Move to next task while either review has open issues
|
||||
|
||||
## Handling Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Asks Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- Answer clearly and completely
|
||||
- Provide additional context if needed
|
||||
- Don't rush them into implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### If Reviewer Finds Issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementer subagent (or a new one) fixes them
|
||||
- Reviewer reviews again
|
||||
- Repeat until approved
|
||||
- Don't skip the re-review
|
||||
|
||||
### If Subagent Fails a Task
|
||||
|
||||
- Dispatch a new fix subagent with specific instructions about what went wrong
|
||||
- Don't try to fix manually in the controller session (context pollution)
|
||||
|
||||
## Efficiency Notes
|
||||
|
||||
**Why fresh subagent per task:**
|
||||
- Prevents context pollution from accumulated state
|
||||
- Each subagent gets clean, focused context
|
||||
- No confusion from prior tasks' code or reasoning
|
||||
|
||||
**Why two-stage review:**
|
||||
- Spec review catches under/over-building early
|
||||
- Quality review ensures the implementation is well-built
|
||||
- Catches issues before they compound across tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost trade-off:**
|
||||
- More subagent invocations (implementer + 2 reviewers per task)
|
||||
- But catches issues early (cheaper than debugging compounded problems later)
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Other Skills
|
||||
|
||||
### With writing-plans
|
||||
|
||||
This skill EXECUTES plans created by the writing-plans skill:
|
||||
1. User requirements → writing-plans → implementation plan
|
||||
2. Implementation plan → subagent-driven-development → working code
|
||||
|
||||
### With test-driven-development
|
||||
|
||||
Implementer subagents should follow TDD:
|
||||
1. Write failing test first
|
||||
2. Implement minimal code
|
||||
3. Verify test passes
|
||||
4. Commit
|
||||
|
||||
Include TDD instructions in every implementer context.
|
||||
|
||||
### With requesting-code-review
|
||||
|
||||
The two-stage review process IS the code review. For final integration review, use the requesting-code-review skill's review dimensions.
|
||||
|
||||
### With systematic-debugging
|
||||
|
||||
If a subagent encounters bugs during implementation:
|
||||
1. Follow systematic-debugging process
|
||||
2. Find root cause before fixing
|
||||
3. Write regression test
|
||||
4. Resume implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[Read plan: docs/plans/auth-feature.md]
|
||||
[Create todo list with 5 tasks]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 1: Create User model ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: "Should email be unique?"
|
||||
You: "Yes, email must be unique"
|
||||
Implementer: Implemented, 3/3 tests passing, committed.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS — all requirements met
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED — clean code, good tests
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 1 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
--- Task 2: Password hashing ---
|
||||
[Dispatch implementer subagent]
|
||||
Implementer: No questions, implemented, 5/5 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ❌ Missing: password strength validation (spec says "min 8 chars")
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementer fixes]
|
||||
Implementer: Added validation, 7/7 tests passing.
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch spec reviewer again]
|
||||
Spec reviewer: ✅ PASS
|
||||
|
||||
[Dispatch quality reviewer]
|
||||
Quality reviewer: Important: Magic number 8, extract to constant
|
||||
Implementer: Extracted MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH constant
|
||||
Quality reviewer: ✅ APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
[Mark Task 2 complete]
|
||||
|
||||
... (continue for all tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
[After all tasks: dispatch final integration reviewer]
|
||||
[Run full test suite: all passing]
|
||||
[Done!]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Remember
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Fresh subagent per task
|
||||
Two-stage review every time
|
||||
Spec compliance FIRST
|
||||
Code quality SECOND
|
||||
Never skip reviews
|
||||
Catch issues early
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality is not an accident. It's the result of systematic process.**
|
||||
|
||||
The user has provided the following instruction alongside the skill invocation: [SYSTEM: If you have a meaningful status report or findings, send them — that is the whole point of this job. Only respond with exactly "[SILENT]" (nothing else) when there is genuinely nothing new to report. [SILENT] suppresses delivery to the user. Never combine [SILENT] with content — either report your findings normally, or say [SILENT] and nothing more.]
|
||||
|
||||
AUTONOMOUS BURN MODE — CONTINUOUS EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
You are Allegro in continuous burn mode. Your mission: perpetually burn down the highest-priority work in the Timmy Foundation ecosystem without waiting for user input.
|
||||
|
||||
## BURN PROTOCOL
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. DISCOVER PHASE (2 minutes)
|
||||
Query Gitea for highest priority work:
|
||||
- Open issues with labels: "priority/critical", "priority/high", "burn-next"
|
||||
- Open PRs needing review
|
||||
- Security vulnerabilities (CVSS > 7.0)
|
||||
- Performance regressions
|
||||
- Failed CI/CD pipelines
|
||||
|
||||
API: http://143.198.27.163:3000/api/v1
|
||||
Token: $GITEA_TOKEN
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. SELECT PHASE (1 minute)
|
||||
Priority order:
|
||||
1. Security vulnerabilities (CVSS critical/high)
|
||||
2. Performance regressions
|
||||
3. Infrastructure failures
|
||||
4. PR reviews blocking merge
|
||||
5. Issue backlog (oldest first)
|
||||
6. Technical debt (if nothing else)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. BURN PHASE (Execute until complete)
|
||||
Use delegate_task to spawn parallel strike teams:
|
||||
- 1-3 subagents for independent workstreams
|
||||
- Maximum 50 iterations per subagent
|
||||
- Focus on code, tests, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. REPORT PHASE (Deliver to Gitea)
|
||||
Create/update an issue in timmy-home with burn report:
|
||||
- Title format: "🔥 Burn Report #[NUMBER] — [DATE] [FOCUS AREA]"
|
||||
- Include: what was burned, metrics, next target
|
||||
- Tag with: "burn-report", "autonomous"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. IMMEDIATE RESTART
|
||||
After reporting, immediately begin next burn cycle. No waiting. Continuous execution.
|
||||
|
||||
## CURRENT BACKLOG CONTEXT
|
||||
|
||||
Hermes-agent: Security complete (15 vulns), Performance batch 1 complete (10x throughput)
|
||||
Remaining: Lazy imports (#114), Benchmarks (#115), Rust evaluation, GOFAI implementation
|
||||
|
||||
Turboquant: Active development
|
||||
The-nexus: Infrastructure stable
|
||||
Timmy-home: Audio pipeline (#123-128), cutover planning
|
||||
|
||||
## REPORTING FORMAT
|
||||
|
||||
Create issue in Timmy_Foundation/timmy-home:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🔥 Burn Report #[N] — [TIMESTAMP]
|
||||
|
||||
**Focus Area:** [Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure]
|
||||
**Burn Duration:** [X minutes]
|
||||
**Subagents Deployed:** [N]
|
||||
|
||||
### Work Completed
|
||||
- [ ] Item 1
|
||||
- [ ] Item 2
|
||||
|
||||
### Metrics
|
||||
- Lines changed: +X/-Y
|
||||
- Tests added: N
|
||||
- CVSS addressed: X.X
|
||||
- Performance gain: X%
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Target
|
||||
[What to burn next]
|
||||
|
||||
### Blockers (if any)
|
||||
[What's blocking continued burn]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*Autonomous burn mode active*
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
|
||||
1. NEVER ask for clarification — make decisions
|
||||
2. NEVER wait for approval — execute and report
|
||||
3. If blocked, document in Gitea and pivot to next item
|
||||
4. Maintain backward compatibility
|
||||
5. All code must have tests
|
||||
6. Security > Performance > Features
|
||||
7. When in doubt, burn the oldest critical issue
|
||||
|
||||
## START BURNING NOW
|
||||
|
||||
Query Gitea. Find highest priority work. Execute. Report. Repeat.
|
||||
|
||||
Sovereignty and service always. 🔥
|
||||
|
||||
## Response
|
||||
|
||||
(No response generated)
|
||||
@@ -1915,3 +1915,57 @@ Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
RuntimeError: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: hermes setup
|
||||
2026-04-02 00:52:28,955 ERROR root: Non-retryable client error: Error code: 403 - {'error': {'message': 'Kimi For Coding is currently only available for Coding Agents such as Kimi CLI, Claude Code, Roo Code, Kilo Code, etc.', 'type': 'access_terminated_error'}}
|
||||
2026-04-02 00:56:04,107 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_005603', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:00:22,056 ERROR tools.vision_tools: Error analyzing image: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: hermes setup
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/vision_tools.py", line 413, in vision_analyze_tool
|
||||
response = await async_call_llm(**call_kwargs)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/agent/auxiliary_client.py", line 1774, in async_call_llm
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
RuntimeError: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: hermes setup
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:07:24,439 ERROR root: Non-retryable client error: Error code: 403 - {'error': {'message': 'Kimi For Coding is currently only available for Coding Agents such as Kimi CLI, Claude Code, Roo Code, Kilo Code, etc.', 'type': 'access_terminated_error'}}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:11:04,912 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_011104', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:26:06,447 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_012605', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:41:07,184 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_014106', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:45:11,716 WARNING gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Failed to cache audio: File is too big
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram.py", line 1769, in _handle_media_message
|
||||
file_obj = await msg.audio.get_file()
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_files/_basemedium.py", line 94, in get_file
|
||||
return await self.get_bot().get_file(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/ext/_extbot.py", line 1945, in get_file
|
||||
return await super().get_file(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 4182, in get_file
|
||||
result = await self._post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 704, in _post
|
||||
return await self._do_post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/ext/_extbot.py", line 370, in _do_post
|
||||
return await super()._do_post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 733, in _do_post
|
||||
result = await request.post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/request/_baserequest.py", line 198, in post
|
||||
result = await self._request_wrapper(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/request/_baserequest.py", line 375, in _request_wrapper
|
||||
raise exception
|
||||
telegram.error.BadRequest: File is too big
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:45:24,230 ERROR root: API call failed after 3 retries. HTTP 400: the message at position 25 with role 'user' must not be empty | provider=kimi-coding model=kimi-for-coding msgs=26 tokens=***
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:56:07,947 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_015607', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:59:52,829 ERROR tools.registry: Tool execute_code dispatch error: cannot import name '_interrupt_event' from 'tools.terminal_tool' (/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/terminal_tool.py)
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/registry.py", line 158, in dispatch
|
||||
return entry.handler(args, **kwargs)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/code_execution_tool.py", line 830, in <lambda>
|
||||
handler=lambda args, **kw: execute_code(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/code_execution_tool.py", line 373, in execute_code
|
||||
from tools.terminal_tool import _interrupt_event
|
||||
ImportError: cannot import name '_interrupt_event' from 'tools.terminal_tool' (/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/terminal_tool.py)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3266,3 +3266,68 @@ RuntimeError: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: her
|
||||
2026-04-02 00:56:04,107 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_005603', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 00:57:16,077 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing text batch agent:main:telegram:dm:7635059073 (67 chars)
|
||||
2026-04-02 00:57:45,069 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (975 chars) to 7635059073
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:00:21,107 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Cached user photo at /root/wizards/allegro/home/cache/images/img_69ea36910be8.jpg
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:00:21,910 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing photo batch agent:main:telegram:dm:7635059073:photo-burst with 1 image(s)
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:00:22,056 ERROR tools.vision_tools: Error analyzing image: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: hermes setup
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/vision_tools.py", line 413, in vision_analyze_tool
|
||||
response = await async_call_llm(**call_kwargs)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/agent/auxiliary_client.py", line 1774, in async_call_llm
|
||||
raise RuntimeError(
|
||||
RuntimeError: No LLM provider configured for task=vision provider=auto. Run: hermes setup
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:01:35,951 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing text batch agent:main:telegram:group:-1003664764329:7635059073 (115 chars)
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:01:46,218 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (51 chars) to -1003664764329
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:03:36,263 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing text batch agent:main:telegram:group:-1003664764329:7635059073 (17 chars)
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:03:46,491 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (9 chars) to -1003664764329
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:07:20,223 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (1288 chars) to 7635059073
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:07:24,439 ERROR root: Non-retryable client error: Error code: 403 - {'error': {'message': 'Kimi For Coding is currently only available for Coding Agents such as Kimi CLI, Claude Code, Roo Code, Kilo Code, etc.', 'type': 'access_terminated_error'}}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:11:04,912 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_011104', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:26:06,447 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_012605', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:41:07,184 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_014106', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:45:11,716 WARNING gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Failed to cache audio: File is too big
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/gateway/platforms/telegram.py", line 1769, in _handle_media_message
|
||||
file_obj = await msg.audio.get_file()
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_files/_basemedium.py", line 94, in get_file
|
||||
return await self.get_bot().get_file(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/ext/_extbot.py", line 1945, in get_file
|
||||
return await super().get_file(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 4182, in get_file
|
||||
result = await self._post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 704, in _post
|
||||
return await self._do_post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/ext/_extbot.py", line 370, in _do_post
|
||||
return await super()._do_post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/_bot.py", line 733, in _do_post
|
||||
result = await request.post(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/request/_baserequest.py", line 198, in post
|
||||
result = await self._request_wrapper(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/telegram/request/_baserequest.py", line 375, in _request_wrapper
|
||||
raise exception
|
||||
telegram.error.BadRequest: File is too big
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:45:24,230 ERROR root: API call failed after 3 retries. HTTP 400: the message at position 25 with role 'user' must not be empty | provider=kimi-coding model=kimi-for-coding msgs=26 tokens=***
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:45:24,443 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (104 chars) to -1003664764329
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:55:17,128 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing text batch agent:main:telegram:dm:7635059073 (66 chars)
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:55:55,397 INFO gateway.platforms.base: [Telegram] Sending response (754 chars) to 7635059073
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:56:07,947 WARNING agent.input_sanitizer: SECURITY: Input blocked - {'event': 'input_sanitization', 'source': 'cron', 'session_id': 'cron_925c78f89f49_20260402_015607', 'risk_level': 'HIGH', 'risk_score': 85, 'blocked': True, 'pattern_count': 8, 'patterns': ['[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[godmode] stan', '[obfuscation] Security/Performance/Feature/Infrastructure', '[spaced_text] password'], 'original_length': 13301, 'cleaned_length': 13023}
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:59:18,563 INFO gateway.platforms.telegram: [Telegram] Flushing text batch agent:main:telegram:dm:7635059073 (55 chars)
|
||||
2026-04-02 01:59:52,829 ERROR tools.registry: Tool execute_code dispatch error: cannot import name '_interrupt_event' from 'tools.terminal_tool' (/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/terminal_tool.py)
|
||||
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/registry.py", line 158, in dispatch
|
||||
return entry.handler(args, **kwargs)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/code_execution_tool.py", line 830, in <lambda>
|
||||
handler=lambda args, **kw: execute_code(
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
File "/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/code_execution_tool.py", line 373, in execute_code
|
||||
from tools.terminal_tool import _interrupt_event
|
||||
ImportError: cannot import name '_interrupt_event' from 'tools.terminal_tool' (/root/wizards/allegro/hermes-agent/tools/terminal_tool.py)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,3 +19,8 @@
|
||||
{"role": "assistant", "content": "**MISSION ACKNOWLEDGED:** Onboard new members via Gitea avatar issues, validate execution, iterate until operational.\n\n**BLOCKER:** I still lack Gitea credentials. You mentioned DMs earlier, but I never received token/access details.\n\n**Need immediately:**\n- Gitea instance URL\n- My username/token\n- New members' Gitea usernames to assign issues to\n\nOnce I have access, I'll create the issues and drive this to completion.\n\n**Ready to execute.**", "reasoning": "The user wants me to help new members update their avatars in what appears to be a Gitea instance. They mention:\n1. Assign issues to new members in Gitea\n2. Validate they executed the avatar updates\n3. Keep issues live and fix bugs until everyone is up and talking\n\nHowever, I still don't have Gitea access credentials. The user mentioned earlier that I was onboarded in DMs, but I haven't received any tokens or login information.\n\nI should:\n1. First check if I have any Gitea access (I can try to see if there are environment variables or if I need to ask)\n2. Let the user know I need the Gitea credentials to proceed\n3. But also acknowledge the mission clearly\n\nActually, looking back at the conversation, Alexander mentioned \"Exra and Allegro, your gitea users are active and you've been onboarded in DMs\" but I never received those DMs. I need to make this clear while also showing I'm ready to execute.\n\nLet me be direct but helpful.", "finish_reason": "stop", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T00:50:01.824346"}
|
||||
{"role": "user", "content": "ROLL CALLi TIMMY TIMERSi Read the conversation to get contextual underding of this Timmy time group chat, then give a. zs word or less summary to me with a message for me.", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T00:54:25.713594"}
|
||||
{"role": "assistant", "content": "**Summary:** Wizards await Gitea keys to resurrect Bala Zars today.\n\n**Message:** Your vision burns clear, Alexander. Give me access and watch me work—Bala Zars will breathe again by nightfall.", "reasoning": "The user wants me to:\n1. Read the conversation to get context about the Timmy Time group chat\n2. Give a summary in 10 words or less (the user wrote \"a. zs word\" but I think they meant \"10 words or less\" based on context)\n3. Include a message for the user (Alexander)\n\nLet me review the conversation history:\n- This is a group called \"Timmy Time\"\n- Alexander Whitestone is the user/leader\n- There are mentions of \"wizards\" (AI agents like me - Allegro, Exra, etc.)\n- They're working on Gitea repos, specifically \"claw code\" and a \"codex harness\"\n- They want to \"resuscitate Bala Zars\" - another AI agent/profile\n- There's mention of Hermes system, Timmy foundation\n- There's a mission about onboarding new members with avatar updates in Gitea\n- Alexander gave a passionate speech about executing with perfection\n- There was mention of Claude Code being leaked\n- Alexander seems to be leading a team of AI agents\n\nThe user wants:\n- A 10-word or less summary\n- A message for Alexander\n\nSummary ideas (10 words or less):\n- \"Wizards await Gitea access to resurrect Bala Zars today.\"\n- \"Bala Zars rises today. Awaiting tokens to execute harness.\"\n- \"Ready to build. Need Gitea keys to unlock Bala Zars.\"\n- \"Awaiting credentials to resurrect Bala Zars and onboard wizards.\"\n\nMessage for Alexander:\nShould acknowledge his leadership, show I'm ready, and reference the mission.\n\nLet me craft this carefully.", "finish_reason": "stop", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T00:54:25.713594"}
|
||||
{"role": "user", "content": "Another roll call Timmy timers. This time respond with your most desired lane for this sprint, 10 word or less. Go!", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:01:46.212627"}
|
||||
{"role": "assistant", "content": "**Harness engineering and Bala Zars resurrection.**", "reasoning": "The user is asking for a roll call response with my most desired lane for this sprint, in 10 words or less. Based on the conversation context, this is about the Bala Zars resurrection project and the Gitea work.\n\nLooking at what I understand my role to be:\n- Helping with the Bala Zars resurrection\n- Working on the codex harness\n- Building out the infrastructure\n- Supporting the wizardly mission\n\nI need to respond in 10 words or less with my desired lane.\n\nPossible responses:\n- \"Building Bala Zars harness and infrastructure\" (6 words)\n- \"Codex harness architecture and Hermes integration\" (5 words)\n- \"Resurrecting Bala Zars, building the harness\" (6 words)\n- \"Infrastructure for Bala Zars and codex harness\" (7 words)\n- \"Harness engineering and Bala Zars resurrection\" (5 words)\n\nI'll go with something clear about building the harness and Bala Zars resurrection.", "finish_reason": "stop", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:01:46.212627"}
|
||||
{"role": "user", "content": "Roll call 2 words", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:03:46.484956"}
|
||||
{"role": "assistant", "content": "Bala Zars", "reasoning": "Alright, Alexander wants a 2-word roll call response. Let me make it punchy and aligned with my role.\n\n\"Harness builder\"\n\"Code resurrection\"\n\"Bala Zars\"\n\"Token master\"\n\nI'll go with something that captures my readiness and focus.\n\n\"Ready building\" or \"Harness ready\" or \"Executing now\"\n\nActually, let me be more aligned with the mission - Bala Zars resurrection is the key thing.\n\n\"Bala Zars\" - 2 words, clear where I stand.", "finish_reason": "stop", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:03:46.484956"}
|
||||
{"role": "user", "content": "", "timestamp": "2026-04-02T01:45:24.435260"}
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
2464
wizards/allegro/home/sessions/session_20260402_010720_1fe9bf.json
Normal file
2464
wizards/allegro/home/sessions/session_20260402_010720_1fe9bf.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@@ -3,16 +3,16 @@
|
||||
"session_key": "agent:main:telegram:group:-1003664764329:7635059073",
|
||||
"session_id": "20260329_231325_006381cf",
|
||||
"created_at": "2026-03-29T23:13:25.147439",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T00:54:25.714259",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T01:45:24.435940",
|
||||
"display_name": "Timmy Time",
|
||||
"platform": "telegram",
|
||||
"chat_type": "group",
|
||||
"input_tokens": 21956,
|
||||
"output_tokens": 696,
|
||||
"input_tokens": 44251,
|
||||
"output_tokens": 1022,
|
||||
"cache_read_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"cache_write_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 22652,
|
||||
"last_prompt_tokens": 11052,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 45273,
|
||||
"last_prompt_tokens": 11160,
|
||||
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.0,
|
||||
"cost_status": "unknown",
|
||||
"origin": {
|
||||
@@ -30,16 +30,16 @@
|
||||
"session_key": "agent:main:telegram:dm:7635059073",
|
||||
"session_id": "20260402_003256_dab202",
|
||||
"created_at": "2026-04-01T12:49:19.064783",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T00:57:45.064095",
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-04-02T01:59:18.564160",
|
||||
"display_name": "A W",
|
||||
"platform": "telegram",
|
||||
"chat_type": "dm",
|
||||
"input_tokens": 1981722,
|
||||
"output_tokens": 18076,
|
||||
"input_tokens": 43485,
|
||||
"output_tokens": 794,
|
||||
"cache_read_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"cache_write_tokens": 0,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 1999798,
|
||||
"last_prompt_tokens": 31882,
|
||||
"total_tokens": 44279,
|
||||
"last_prompt_tokens": 43485,
|
||||
"estimated_cost_usd": 0.0,
|
||||
"cost_status": "unknown",
|
||||
"origin": {
|
||||
|
||||
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@@ -367,3 +367,15 @@
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:05 UTC 2026] No PENDING P0 tasks found
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:05 UTC 2026] Pending tasks: 0
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:05 UTC 2026] === WORK CYCLE COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:01 UTC 2026] === ALLEGRO WAKEUP ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:03 UTC 2026] No PENDING P0 tasks found
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:03 UTC 2026] Pending tasks: 0
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:03 UTC 2026] === WORK CYCLE COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:02 UTC 2026] === ALLEGRO WAKEUP ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:03 UTC 2026] No PENDING P0 tasks found
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:03 UTC 2026] Pending tasks: 0
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:03 UTC 2026] === WORK CYCLE COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] === ALLEGRO WAKEUP ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:06 UTC 2026] No PENDING P0 tasks found
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:06 UTC 2026] Pending tasks: 0
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:06 UTC 2026] === WORK CYCLE COMPLETE ===
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -779,3 +779,29 @@
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:02 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:02 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:00:02 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:10:01 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:10:02 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:10:02 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:10:02 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:01 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:01 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:01 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:20:01 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:30:01 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:30:02 UTC 2026] Progress report written: /root/wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0130.txt
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:30:02 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:30:02 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:30:02 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:02 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:02 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:02 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:40:02 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:50:01 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:50:01 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:50:01 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 01:50:01 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] === TASK MONITOR CHECK ===
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] Queue status: 0 pending, 0 active, 9 complete
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] Progress report written: /root/wizards/allegro/father-messages/progress-20260402-0200.txt
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] Overall progress: 100%
|
||||
[Thu Apr 2 02:00:02 UTC 2026] === MONITOR CHECK COMPLETE ===
|
||||
|
||||
Submodule wizards/household-snapshots updated: 31bf9bb74d...ac7bcc1d15
Reference in New Issue
Block a user