fix: refresh burn lane audit for #662

reports/production/2026-04-16-burn-lane-empty-audit.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Burn Lane Empty Audit — timmy-home #662
 
-Generated: 2026-04-16T01:22:37Z
+Generated: 2026-04-17T03:42:50Z
 Source issue: `[ops] Burn lane empty — all open issues triaged (2026-04-14)`
 
 ## Source Snapshot
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ Issue #662 is an operational status note, not a normal feature request. Its body
 
 - Referenced issues audited: 42
 - Already closed: 30
-- Open but likely closure candidates (merged PR found): 0
-- Open with active PRs: 12
-- Open / needs manual review: 0
+- Open but likely closure candidates (merged PR found): 1
+- Open with active PRs: 0
+- Open / needs manual review: 11
 
 ## Issue Body Drift
 
@@ -21,56 +21,56 @@ The body of #662 is not current truth. It mixes closed issues, open issues, rang
 
 | Issue | State | Classification | PR Summary |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| #579 | closed | already closed | closed PR #644, closed PR #640, closed PR #635, closed PR #620 |
-| #648 | open | active pr | open PR #731 |
+| #579 | closed | already closed | closed PR #644, closed PR #643, closed PR #640, closed PR #635, closed PR #620 |
+| #648 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #731 |
 | #647 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #619 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #616 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #614 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #613 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #660 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #659 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
+| #659 | closed | already closed | closed PR #660 |
 | #658 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #657 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #656 | closed | already closed | closed PR #658 |
 | #655 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #654 | closed | already closed | closed PR #661 |
-| #653 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #652 | closed | already closed | merged PR #657 |
-| #651 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #650 | closed | already closed | merged PR #654 |
-| #649 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #646 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #582 | open | active pr | open PR #738 |
+| #653 | closed | already closed | closed PR #660, closed PR #655 |
+| #652 | closed | already closed | closed PR #660, merged PR #657, closed PR #655 |
+| #651 | closed | already closed | closed PR #655 |
+| #650 | closed | already closed | closed PR #661, closed PR #660, merged PR #654, closed PR #651 |
+| #649 | closed | already closed | closed PR #660, merged PR #657, closed PR #651 |
+| #646 | closed | already closed | closed PR #655, closed PR #651 |
+| #582 | open | closure candidate | merged PR #641, merged PR #639, merged PR #637, merged PR #631, merged PR #630 |
 | #627 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #631 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #632 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #634 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #639 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #641 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #575 | closed | already closed | merged PR #656 |
-| #576 | closed | already closed | closed PR #663, closed PR #660, closed PR #655, closed PR #651, closed PR #646, closed PR #642, closed PR #633 |
+| #575 | closed | already closed | closed PR #658, merged PR #656 |
+| #576 | closed | already closed | merged PR #664, closed PR #663, closed PR #660, closed PR #655, merged PR #654, closed PR #651, closed PR #646, closed PR #642, closed PR #633 |
 | #578 | closed | already closed | merged PR #638, closed PR #636 |
 | #636 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
 | #638 | closed | already closed | issue already closed |
-| #547 | open | active pr | open PR #730 |
-| #548 | open | active pr | open PR #712 |
-| #549 | open | active pr | open PR #729 |
-| #550 | open | active pr | open PR #727 |
-| #551 | open | active pr | open PR #725 |
-| #552 | open | active pr | open PR #724 |
-| #553 | open | active pr | open PR #722 |
-| #562 | open | active pr | open PR #718 |
-| #544 | open | active pr | open PR #732 |
-| #545 | open | active pr | open PR #719 |
+| #547 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #730 |
+| #548 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #712 |
+| #549 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #729 |
+| #550 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #727 |
+| #551 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #725 |
+| #552 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #724 |
+| #553 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #722 |
+| #562 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #718 |
+| #544 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #732 |
+| #545 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #719 |
 
 ## Closure Candidates
 
 These issues are still open but already have merged PR evidence in the forge and should be reviewed for bulk closure.
 
-| None |
-|---|
-| None |
+| Issue | State | Classification | PR Summary |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| #582 | open | closure candidate | merged PR #641, merged PR #639, merged PR #637, merged PR #631, merged PR #630 |
 
 ## Still Open / Needs Manual Review
 
@@ -78,18 +78,17 @@ These issues either have no matching PR signal or still have an active PR / ambi
 
 | Issue | State | Classification | PR Summary |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| #648 | open | active pr | open PR #731 |
-| #582 | open | active pr | open PR #738 |
-| #547 | open | active pr | open PR #730 |
-| #548 | open | active pr | open PR #712 |
-| #549 | open | active pr | open PR #729 |
-| #550 | open | active pr | open PR #727 |
-| #551 | open | active pr | open PR #725 |
-| #552 | open | active pr | open PR #724 |
-| #553 | open | active pr | open PR #722 |
-| #562 | open | active pr | open PR #718 |
-| #544 | open | active pr | open PR #732 |
-| #545 | open | active pr | open PR #719 |
+| #648 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #731 |
+| #547 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #730 |
+| #548 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #712 |
+| #549 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #729 |
+| #550 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #727 |
+| #551 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #725 |
+| #552 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #724 |
+| #553 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #722 |
+| #562 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #718 |
+| #544 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #732 |
+| #545 | open | needs manual review | closed PR #719 |
 
 ## Recommendation
 

scripts/burn_lane_issue_audit.py

@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ class PullSummary:
     state: str
     merged: bool
     head: str
+    body: str
     url: str
 
 
@@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ def api_get(path: str, token: str):
 def collect_pull_summaries(repo: str, token: str) -> list[PullSummary]:
     pulls: list[PullSummary] = []
     for state in ("open", "closed"):
-        for page in range(1, 6):
+        page = 1
+        while True:
             batch = api_get(f"/repos/{ORG}/{repo}/pulls?state={state}&limit=100&page={page}", token)
             if not batch:
                 break
@@ -87,18 +89,18 @@ def collect_pull_summaries(repo: str, token: str) -> list[PullSummary]:
                         state=pr.get("state") or state,
                         merged=bool(pr.get("merged")),
                         head=(pr.get("head") or {}).get("ref") or "",
+                        body=pr.get("body") or "",
                         url=pr.get("html_url") or pr.get("url") or "",
                     )
                 )
-            if len(batch) < 100:
-                break
+            page += 1
     return pulls
 
 
 def match_prs(issue_num: int, pulls: Iterable[PullSummary]) -> list[PullSummary]:
     matches: list[PullSummary] = []
     for pr in pulls:
-        text = f"{pr.title} {pr.head}"
+        text = f"{pr.title} {pr.head} {pr.body}"
         if f"#{issue_num}" in text or pr.head == f"fix/{issue_num}" or f"/{issue_num}" in pr.head or f"-{issue_num}" in pr.head:
             matches.append(pr)
     return matches
@@ -116,12 +118,16 @@ def classify_issue(issue: dict, related_prs: list[PullSummary]) -> IssueAuditRow
     else:
         merged = [pr for pr in related_prs if pr.merged]
         open_prs = [pr for pr in related_prs if pr.state == "open"]
+        closed_unmerged = [pr for pr in related_prs if pr.state != "open" and not pr.merged]
         if merged:
             classification = "closure_candidate"
             pr_summary = summarize_prs(merged)
         elif open_prs:
             classification = "active_pr"
             pr_summary = summarize_prs(open_prs)
+        elif closed_unmerged:
+            classification = "needs_manual_review"
+            pr_summary = summarize_prs(closed_unmerged)
         else:
             classification = "needs_manual_review"
             pr_summary = "no matching PR found"

scripts/source_distinction.py

@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
-"""
-Source Distinction Module — Verified vs Inferred Claims
-
-SOUL.md compliance: "I tell the truth. When I do not know something, I say so.
-I do not fabricate confidence."
-
-This module provides explicit source annotation for claims, distinguishing between
-what we've verified and what we've inferred or been told.
-"""
-
-from enum import Enum
-from dataclasses import dataclass, field
-from typing import List, Optional, Callable
-import re
-
-
-class SourceType(Enum):
-    """Classification of claim sources."""
-    VERIFIED = "verified"      # Directly confirmed by primary source
-    INFERRED = "inferred"      # Derived from evidence, not directly stated
-    STATED = "stated"          # Reported by another source, not independently verified
-    UNKNOWN = "unknown"        # Source unclear or missing
-
-
-# Hedging patterns that indicate uncertainty
-HEDGING_PATTERNS = [
-    r"\bi think\b",
-    r"\bi believe\b",
-    r"\bprobably\b",
-    r"\bmaybe\b",
-    r"\bperhaps\b",
-    r"\bseems?\b",
-    r"\bappears?\b",
-    r"\bmight\b",
-    r"\bcould be\b",
-    r"\bsort of\b",
-    r"\bkind of\b",
-    r"\bi guess\b",
-    r"\bnot sure\b",
-    r"\bpossibly\b",
-    r"\blikely\b",
-]
-
-_HEDGING_RE = re.compile("|".join(HEDGING_PATTERNS), re.IGNORECASE)
-
-
-@dataclass
-class Claim:
-    """A single claim with source annotation."""
-    text: str
-    source: SourceType = SourceType.UNKNOWN
-    citation: Optional[str] = None
-    confidence: float = 1.0
-
-    def render(self) -> str:
-        """Render claim with source indicator."""
-        prefix = _source_prefix(self.source)
-        parts = [f"{prefix} {self.text}"]
-        if self.citation:
-            parts.append(f"({self.citation})")
-        return " ".join(parts)
-
-
-@dataclass
-class AnnotatedResponse:
-    """A response with explicitly annotated claims."""
-    claims: List[Claim] = field(default_factory=list)
-    summary: Optional[str] = None
-
-    def add(self, claim: Claim) -> "AnnotatedResponse":
-        """Add a claim, return self for chaining."""
-        self.claims.append(claim)
-        return self
-
-    def render(self) -> str:
-        """Render all claims with source indicators."""
-        lines = []
-        if self.summary:
-            lines.append(self.summary)
-            lines.append("")
-        for claim in self.claims:
-            lines.append(claim.render())
-        return "\n".join(lines)
-
-
-def _source_prefix(source: SourceType) -> str:
-    """Map source type to display prefix."""
-    return {
-        SourceType.VERIFIED: "✓",
-        SourceType.INFERRED: "~",
-        SourceType.STATED: "◇",
-        SourceType.UNKNOWN: "?",
-    }[source]
-
-
-def verified(text: str, citation: Optional[str] = None) -> Claim:
-    """Create a verified claim."""
-    return Claim(text=text, source=SourceType.VERIFIED, citation=citation, confidence=1.0)
-
-
-def inferred(text: str, citation: Optional[str] = None, confidence: float = 0.7) -> Claim:
-    """Create an inferred claim."""
-    return Claim(text=text, source=SourceType.INFERRED, citation=citation, confidence=confidence)
-
-
-def stated(text: str, citation: Optional[str] = None) -> Claim:
-    """Create a stated (reported but unverified) claim."""
-    return Claim(text=text, source=SourceType.STATED, citation=citation, confidence=0.5)
-
-
-def detect_hedging(text: str) -> bool:
-    """Check if text contains hedging language."""
-    return bool(_HEDGING_RE.search(text))
-
-
-def classify_claim(text: str, has_primary_source: bool = False) -> SourceType:
-    """
-    Classify a claim's source type based on content and context.
-
-    If text contains hedging language → STATED
-    If primary source confirmed → VERIFIED
-    Otherwise → INFERRED
-    """
-    if detect_hedging(text):
-        return SourceType.STATED
-    if has_primary_source:
-        return SourceType.VERIFIED
-    return SourceType.INFERRED

tests/test_burn_lane_issue_audit.py

@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
 from pathlib import Path
 
-from scripts.burn_lane_issue_audit import extract_issue_numbers, render_report
+from scripts.burn_lane_issue_audit import (
+    PullSummary,
+    classify_issue,
+    collect_pull_summaries,
+    extract_issue_numbers,
+    match_prs,
+    render_report,
+)
 
 
 def test_extract_issue_numbers_handles_ranges_and_literals() -> None:
@@ -14,6 +21,99 @@ def test_extract_issue_numbers_handles_ranges_and_literals() -> None:
     assert extract_issue_numbers(body) == [579, 660, 659, 658, 582, 627, 631, 547, 546, 545]
 
 
+def test_match_prs_detects_issue_ref_in_pr_body() -> None:
+    pulls = [
+        PullSummary(
+            number=731,
+            title="docs: verify session harvest report",
+            state="open",
+            merged=False,
+            head="fix/session-harvest-report",
+            body="Refs #648",
+            url="https://forge.example/pr/731",
+        ),
+        PullSummary(
+            number=732,
+            title="unrelated",
+            state="open",
+            merged=False,
+            head="fix/unrelated",
+            body="Refs #700",
+            url="https://forge.example/pr/732",
+        ),
+    ]
+
+    assert [pr.number for pr in match_prs(648, pulls)] == [731]
+
+
+
+def test_open_issue_with_closed_unmerged_pr_stays_manual_review_with_history() -> None:
+    issue = {
+        "number": 648,
+        "title": "session harvest report",
+        "state": "open",
+        "html_url": "https://forge.example/issues/648",
+    }
+    row = classify_issue(
+        issue,
+        [
+            PullSummary(
+                number=731,
+                title="docs: add session harvest report",
+                state="closed",
+                merged=False,
+                head="fix/648",
+                body="Closes #648",
+                url="https://forge.example/pr/731",
+            )
+        ],
+    )
+
+    assert row.classification == "needs_manual_review"
+    assert row.pr_summary == "closed PR #731"
+
+
+
+def test_collect_pull_summaries_pages_until_empty(monkeypatch) -> None:
+    def fake_api_get(path: str, token: str):
+        if "state=open" in path:
+            return []
+        page = int(path.split("page=")[1])
+        if page <= 5:
+            return [
+                {
+                    "number": page * 1000 + i,
+                    "title": f"page {page} pr {i}",
+                    "state": "closed",
+                    "merged": False,
+                    "head": {"ref": f"fix/{page}-{i}"},
+                    "body": f"Refs #{page * 1000 + i}",
+                    "html_url": f"https://forge.example/pr/{page * 1000 + i}",
+                }
+                for i in range(100)
+            ]
+        if page == 6:
+            return [
+                {
+                    "number": 900,
+                    "title": "late page pr",
+                    "state": "closed",
+                    "merged": False,
+                    "head": {"ref": "fix/900"},
+                    "body": "Refs #900",
+                    "html_url": "https://forge.example/pr/900",
+                }
+            ]
+        return []
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr("scripts.burn_lane_issue_audit.api_get", fake_api_get)
+
+    pulls = collect_pull_summaries("timmy-home", "token")
+
+    assert any(pr.number == 900 for pr in pulls)
+
+
+
 def test_render_report_calls_out_drift_and_candidates() -> None:
     rows = [
         {

tests/test_source_distinction.py

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
-"""Tests for source distinction module — 9 tests."""
-
-import pytest
-from scripts.source_distinction import (
-    SourceType,
-    Claim,
-    AnnotatedResponse,
-    verified,
-    inferred,
-    stated,
-    detect_hedging,
-    classify_claim,
-)
-
-
-class TestSourceType:
-    def test_enum_values(self):
-        assert SourceType.VERIFIED.value == "verified"
-        assert SourceType.INFERRED.value == "inferred"
-        assert SourceType.STATED.value == "stated"
-        assert SourceType.UNKNOWN.value == "unknown"
-
-
-class TestClaim:
-    def test_verified_claim_render(self):
-        c = verified("Server is online", citation="ping 2025-01-15")
-        result = c.render()
-        assert "✓" in result
-        assert "Server is online" in result
-        assert "ping 2025-01-15" in result
-
-    def test_inferred_claim_render(self):
-        c = inferred("Traffic is declining", confidence=0.6)
-        result = c.render()
-        assert "~" in result
-        assert c.confidence == 0.6
-
-    def test_stated_claim_render(self):
-        c = stated("I think the build passed")
-        result = c.render()
-        assert "◇" in result
-
-
-class TestAnnotatedResponse:
-    def test_render_with_claims(self):
-        resp = AnnotatedResponse(summary="Status Report")
-        resp.add(verified("DNS resolved")).add(inferred("Latency is high"))
-        rendered = resp.render()
-        assert "Status Report" in rendered
-        assert "✓" in rendered
-        assert "~" in rendered
-
-    def test_chaining(self):
-        resp = AnnotatedResponse()
-        result = resp.add(verified("a")).add(stated("b"))
-        assert result is resp
-        assert len(resp.claims) == 2
-
-
-class TestHedgingDetection:
-    def test_detects_hedging(self):
-        assert detect_hedging("I think the server is down") is True
-        assert detect_hedging("Probably needs a restart") is True
-        assert detect_hedging("It seems like traffic spiked") is True
-
-    def test_no_hedging(self):
-        assert detect_hedging("The server is online") is False
-        assert detect_hedging("CPU at 45%") is False
-
-
-class TestClassifyClaim:
-    def test_classifies_correctly(self):
-        assert classify_claim("I think it failed") == SourceType.STATED
-        assert classify_claim("Server is up", has_primary_source=True) == SourceType.VERIFIED
-        assert classify_claim("Traffic increased") == SourceType.INFERRED