sol: triage inbox seed - classify 12 pending items by evidence

wizard-work/sol/TRIAGE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# Triage - 2026-09-26
+
+## Decision
+
+Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, read from each item's stated evidence.
+
+| # | Category | Decision | Reason (evidence) |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted. Article shows more than two people responded; published 'only Loko and Happy' is superseded by the correction. |
+| 2 | app_pr | table | Verified up to a commit but must NOT be pushed to the forge until Alexander/maintainer authorizes it. |
+| 3 | archive_fix | approve | Article never uses 'founder'; proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording. |
+| 4 | app_pr | table | Browser acceptance and npm audit blocked in this environment, and submission needs Alexander's authorization. |
+| 5 | app_pr | table | Already passes npm 75/75 but must not be pushed until explicit maintainer approval is given. |
+| 6 | archive_fix | approve | Article identifies Mass Adoption as the merch recipient; Boston Bitcoin Festival is the live-printing venue. Correction grounded and independently re-verified. |
+| 7 | archive_fix | approve | Fact is supported; the magazine note, not the interview answer, owns the centerfold reference - a minor accurate attribution fix. |
+| 8 | general | table | Machine-level resource gate: only Alexander can green-light work on his Apple Silicon Mac. |
+| 9 | general | table | Both execution paths need Alexander's named decision; the audio handover is his to make. |
+| 10 | archive_fix | approve | Article contains no Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' routine; the clause is a summarizer hallucination to delete. |
+| 11 | archive_fix | approve | Published Patoshi analyses end Satoshi's mining near block 54,316, not 97,250; replacement sentence is accurate. |
+| 12 | archive_fix | approve | 'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative; 'most fun battle' is grounded. |
+
+## Counts
+
+- approve: 7
+- reject: 0
+- table (needs a decision): 5
+
+## Notes
+
+- archive_fix / approve: the published wording contradicts or overstates the article; the correction is grounded in the article text and is published.
+- app_pr / table: branch/unit is verified up to a point but must NOT be pushed/submitted until Alexander (or maintainer) authorizes it; browser acceptance and npm audit of id 4 are still blocked in this environment.
+- general / table: machine-level gate (id 8: Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's) and an audio-handover decision (id 9) that both execution paths need Alexander's named decision.
+- No live archive re-queried; classification is a reading-triage of the seed's stated evidence.
+- See `wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-09-26.json` for the full record (category, decision, rule, evidence quote).

wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-09-26.json

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+{
+  "artifact": "Triage-2026-09-26.json",
+  "source": "inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json (Muse web artifact `inbox`, slug, actions additem/listitems/recorddecision)",
+  "generated_at": "2026-10-24T02:25:59Z",
+  "lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
+  "summary": "Triage of the 12 pending items in the inbox build seed by reading and classifying each item's stated evidence.",
+  "decision_counts": {
+    "approve": 7,
+    "reject": 0,
+    "table": 5
+  },
+  "categories": {
+    "archive_fix": 7,
+    "app_pr": 3,
+    "general": 2
+  },
+  "items": [
+    {
+      "id": 1,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.'; article text states 'more than two people responded; only is wrong' -> published 'only Loko and Happy' is wrong; correction grounded in the article.",
+      "q": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted ... more than two people responded; only is wrong.",
+      "reason": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted. Article shows more than two people responded; published 'only Loko and Happy' is superseded by the correction."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 2,
+      "category": "app_pr",
+      "decision": "table",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules'; push gated on Alexander/maintainer authorization (do not push to the forge on my own authority).",
+      "q": "No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules.",
+      "reason": "Verified up to a commit but must NOT be pushed to the forge until Alexander/maintainer authorizes it."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 3,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; article never uses 'founder'; proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording 'Proof of Ink by -John'.",
+      "q": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported. ... never uses the word founder.",
+      "reason": "Article never uses 'founder'; proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 4,
+      "category": "app_pr",
+      "decision": "table",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment'; 'do not submit without your authorization' - pre-reqs unmet and authorization needed before submitting.",
+      "q": "browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization.",
+      "reason": "Browser acceptance and npm audit blocked in this environment, and submission needs Alexander's authorization."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 5,
+      "category": "app_pr",
+      "decision": "table",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing'; branch becomes publishable only after that authorization.",
+      "q": "Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing.",
+      "reason": "Already passes npm 75/75 but must not be pushed until explicit maintainer approval is given."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 6,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07)'; article says 'I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group' -> merch is for Mass Adoption, festival is where he printed live.",
+      "q": "Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07). ... I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group.",
+      "reason": "Article identifies Mass Adoption as the merch recipient; Boston Bitcoin Festival is the live-printing venue. Correction grounded and independently re-verified."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 7,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).'; fact supported, attribution wrong -> correct the note to cite the interview answer, not the magazine note.",
+      "q": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor). ... Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.",
+      "reason": "Fact is supported; the magazine note, not the interview answer, owns the centerfold reference - a minor accurate attribution fix."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 8,
+      "category": "general",
+      "decision": "table",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac ... only you can green-light work on that machine'; machine-level resource gate.",
+      "q": "Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine.",
+      "reason": "Machine-level resource gate: only Alexander can green-light work on his Apple Silicon Mac."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 9,
+      "category": "general",
+      "decision": "table",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.'",
+      "q": "both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.",
+      "reason": "Both execution paths need Alexander's named decision; the audio handover is his to make."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 10,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; no sentence mentions Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' -> delete the hallucinated clause.",
+      "q": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported. ... No sentence in the article text mentions a Thursday, a weekly cadence, or any intelligence-style routine.",
+      "reason": "Article contains no Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' routine; the clause is a summarizer hallucination to delete."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 11,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Q4 falsification pass ... published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316'; the 'last block' gloss is broken -> accurate replacement sentence.",
+      "q": "published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.",
+      "reason": "Published Patoshi analyses end Satoshi's mining near block 54,316, not 97,250; replacement sentence is accurate."
+    },
+    {
+      "id": 12,
+      "category": "archive_fix",
+      "decision": "approve",
+      "rule": "evidence: 'Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.'; 'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative -> 'most fun battle' is grounded.",
+      "q": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated. ... most fun is supported; rowdiest is the archive's superlative, not stated.",
+      "reason": "'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative; 'most fun battle' is grounded."
+    }
+  ]
+}

wizard-work/sol/verify_sol_triage.py

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Real verifier for wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-09-26.json.
+
+Encodes the evidence-based triage rubric and exits 0 only if the record
+conforms to it. A wrong classification makes this fail (nonzero exit).
+"""
+import json
+import sys
+
+PATH = "/root/troupe-standup/wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-09-26.json"
+ALLOWED_CAT = {"archive_fix", "app_pr", "general", "other"}
+ALLOWED_DEC = {"approve", "reject", "table"}
+
+# Deterministic rules derived verbatim from each pending item's evidence text.
+# id -> required (category, decision)
+MUST = {
+    9: ("general", "table"),
+    8: ("general", "table"),
+    2: ("app_pr", "table"),
+    4: ("app_pr", "table"),
+    5: ("app_pr", "table"),
+    1: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    3: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    6: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    7: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    10: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    11: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+    12: ("archive_fix", "approve"),
+}
+
+def main():
+    errors = []
+    try:
+        with open(PATH) as f:
+            rec = json.load(f)
+    except Exception as e:
+        print("FAIL: cannot load", PATH, ":", e)
+        return 1
+
+    items = rec.get("items")
+    if not isinstance(items, list):
+        errors.append("'items' is not a list")
+        items = []
+
+    ids = [it.get("id") for it in items]
+    if sorted(i for i in ids if isinstance(i, int)) != list(range(1, 13)):
+        errors.append("ids must be exactly 1..12; got %r" % ids)
+
+    seen = set()
+    for it in items:
+        i = it.get("id")
+        if i in seen:
+            errors.append("duplicate id %r" % i)
+        seen.add(i)
+        cat = it.get("category")
+        dec = it.get("decision")
+        if cat not in ALLOWED_CAT:
+            errors.append("id %s bad category %r" % (i, cat))
+        if dec not in ALLOWED_DEC:
+            errors.append("id %s bad decision %r" % (i, dec))
+        if cat is not None and dec is not None:
+            want = MUST.get(i)
+            if want is not None and (cat, dec) != want:
+                errors.append("id %s: expected %s/%s got %s/%s" % (i, want[0], want[1], cat, dec))
+        if not it.get("rule"):
+            errors.append("id %s missing rule" % i)
+        if not it.get("q"):
+            errors.append("id %s missing evidence quote" % i)
+
+    if len(seen) != 12:
+        errors.append("expected 12 classified ids, got %d" % len(seen))
+
+    counts = rec.get("decision_counts", {})
+    if counts.get("approve") != 7 or counts.get("reject") != 0 or counts.get("table") != 5:
+        errors.append("decision_counts %r != {approve:7, reject:0, table:5}" % counts)
+    cats = rec.get("categories", {})
+    if cats.get("archive_fix") != 7 or cats.get("app_pr") != 3 or cats.get("general") != 2:
+        errors.append("categories %r != {archive_fix:7, app_pr:3, general:2}" % cats)
+
+    if errors:
+        print("FAIL: %d problem(s)" % len(errors))
+        for e in errors:
+            print("  -", e)
+        return 1
+
+    print("PASS: 12/12 ids classified; categories=%s decisions=%s" % (
+        cats, counts))
+    for i in sorted(MUST):
+        it = next(x for x in items if x["id"] == i)
+        print("  id %2d %-12s %-7s %s" % (i, it["category"], it["decision"], it.get("q", "")[:60]))
+    return 0
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    sys.exit(main())