sol: Triage - 2026-10-29: classify 8 pending inbox items from seed-2026-10-29.json; fix CHECK path
This commit is contained in:
sol committed
1 parent
171fcc36cf
commit
25266ba2e4
6 files changed
+277
-227
No files matched your search
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
# CHECK -- sol: Triage - 2026-10-29 (forge: sol lane).
|
||||
# Exit 0 iff the committed Triage-2026-10-29.json re-derives from the raw
|
||||
# inbox seed evidence (independent of the generator).
|
||||
# Exit 0 iff the committed Triage-2026-10-29.json re-derives from the real
|
||||
# inbox seed evidence (independent of the generator). Exit code IS the verdict.
|
||||
set -u
|
||||
cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" || exit 1
|
||||
REPO_ROOT="$(pwd)"
|
||||
cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" || exit 1 # wizard-work/sol
|
||||
REPO_ROOT="$(cd ../.. && pwd)" # /root/troupe-standup
|
||||
cd "$REPO_ROOT" || exit 1
|
||||
exec python3 wizard-work/sol/verify_triage_2026-10-29.py
|
||||
exec python3 wizard-work/sol/verify_triage_2026_10_29.py
|
||||
+19
-23
@@ -1,40 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Triage - 2026-09-26
|
||||
# Triage - 2026-10-29
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.
|
||||
Triage of the 8 pending items in `wizard-work/sol/seed-2026-10-29.json`, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Category | Decision | Evidence (first clause) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted. Article: more than two people responded; 'only' is wrong. |
|
||||
| 2 | app_pr | table | Local branch, committed, not pushed. npm test 92/92. No push without maintainer approval. |
|
||||
| 3 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported. Article never uses 'founder'; byline is 'Proof of Ink by -John'. |
|
||||
| 4 | app_pr | table | Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked. |
|
||||
| 5 | app_pr | table | Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit maintainer approval needed before pushing. |
|
||||
| 6 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 1 of 7 from the Q8 summary-fidelity pilot, upheld by Timmy's re-verification. |
|
||||
| 7 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor). Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported. |
|
||||
| 8 | general | table | Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory); only you can green-light. |
|
||||
| 9 | general | table | Handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision. |
|
||||
| 10 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported. No sentence mentions Thursday or 'intelligence-style'. |
|
||||
| 11 | archive_fix | approve | Published Patoshi analyses end mining near block 54,316, not 97,250. |
|
||||
| 12 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated. 'most fun' supported; 'rowdiest' is not stated. |
|
||||
| 1 | archive_fix | approve | Home-page hero still renders the Q3 brand mark and the v2 copy never shipped: a live fix that updates the hero copy and deploys. |
|
||||
| 2 | app_pr | approve | Publish the Oct-2026 model-release notes with per-release dates |
|
||||
| 3 | archive_fix | approve | The funding table rows lack the six named benchmarks |
|
||||
| 4 | archive_fix | approve | The leaderboard restats on every token swap |
|
||||
| 5 | archive_fix | approve | The export drops rows when the search query contains spaces |
|
||||
| 6 | general | table | Record each member's 9am standup into the shared digest |
|
||||
| 7 | general | table | Hand over the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC |
|
||||
| 8 | archive_fix | approve | The readme 'Installation' section omits the new service-account env vars |
|
||||
|
||||
## Counts
|
||||
|
||||
- approve: 7
|
||||
- approve: 6
|
||||
- reject: 0
|
||||
- table (needs a decision): 5
|
||||
- table (needs a decision): 2
|
||||
|
||||
## Category counts
|
||||
|
||||
- archive_fix: 7
|
||||
- app_pr: 3
|
||||
- archive_fix: 5
|
||||
- app_pr: 1
|
||||
- general: 2
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- archive_fix / approve: published wording contradicts or overstates the article; the correction is grounded in the article text.
|
||||
- app_pr / table: branch/unit is verified up to a point but must NOT be pushed/submitted until Alexander (or maintainer) authorizes it.
|
||||
- general / table: item 8 (Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's) is a machine-level gate; item 9 (unreleased audio handover) is Alexander's named decision.
|
||||
- The seed's `decided` array holds one already-decided item (id 13, magazine-091); it is not part of the pending triage.
|
||||
- See `Triage-2026-09-26.json` for the full record.
|
||||
- archive_fix / approve: a published page, table, or export has a defect named in the seed; the fix is grounded in the seed text.
|
||||
- app_pr / approve: a release-notes PR that is verified and ready to submit, gated on Alexander's go-ahead.
|
||||
- general / table: items 6 (batch standups into the shared digest) and 7 (hand over unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum) are named decisions, so they land as 'table'.
|
||||
- The seed carries no already-decided items; all 8 pending items are triaged here.
|
||||
- See `Triage-2026-10-29.json` for the full record.
|
||||
@@ -1,184 +0,0 @@
|
||||
import json, datetime, os
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT = "/root/troupe-standup"
|
||||
SEED = os.path.join(ROOT, "inbox", "seed-2026-09-26.json")
|
||||
OUT = os.path.join(ROOT, "wizard-work", "sol")
|
||||
|
||||
with open(SEED) as f:
|
||||
d = json.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
pending = d.get("pending", [])
|
||||
decided = d.get("decided", [])
|
||||
|
||||
# Category + decision rubric applied to each pending item's stated evidence.
|
||||
# Categories: archive_fix | app_pr | general | other
|
||||
# Decisions: approve | reject | table (table = not decided)
|
||||
ITEMS = [
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=1,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.'; summary says '(only Loko and Happy responded)', article says 'more than two people responded; only is wrong'. Correction: '(Loko and Happy among those who responded)'. Published wording is superseded.",
|
||||
q="Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted. Summary clause: '(only Loko and Happy responded)'.",
|
||||
reason="Article states more than two people responded and 'only' is wrong; correction grounded in the article text, published to live magazine-021 page.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=2,
|
||||
category="app_pr",
|
||||
decision="table",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, four false-positive fixes, three regression/boundary test files. npm test 92/92 on 2026-09-20. Likely dupl...' — branch verified locally, not pushed; no push without maintainer approval.",
|
||||
q="Local branch committed, not pushed. npm test 92/92. Likely duplicate.",
|
||||
reason="Branch verified locally (npm test 92/92) but must NOT be pushed until maintainer approval; not submitted.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=3,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; article never uses 'founder'; byline is 'Proof of Ink by -John'. Proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording.",
|
||||
q="Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported. Article never uses 'founder'.",
|
||||
reason="Article never uses 'founder'; byline 'Proof of Ink by -John' is the actual wording. Correction approved and grounded.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=4,
|
||||
category="app_pr",
|
||||
decision="table",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment; do not submit without Alexander's authorization.' Pre-reqs unmet.",
|
||||
q="Local branch 03def65, not pushed. browser acceptance and npm audit blocked.",
|
||||
reason="Browser acceptance and npm audit blocked in this environment; submission needs Alexander's authorization. Table.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=5,
|
||||
category="app_pr",
|
||||
decision="table",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit maintainer approval needed before pushing.' Branch verified up to a successful claim; not yet authorized to push.",
|
||||
q="Local branch b730f5f, not pushed. Needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing.",
|
||||
reason="Already passes npm 75/75 but must not be pushed until explicit maintainer approval given. Table.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=6,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 1 of 7. Grade: unsupported. ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07)'; article says 'I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group' - merch is for Mass Adoption, festival is where he printed live.",
|
||||
q="Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07). ... Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group.",
|
||||
reason="Article identifies Mass Adoption (merch recipient) and Boston Bitcoin Festival (live-printing venue). Correction grounded and independently re-verified.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=7,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).'; fact supported, attribution wrong -> correct the note to cite the interview answer, not the magazine note.",
|
||||
q="Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor). Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.",
|
||||
reason="Fact is supported; the magazine note, not the interview answer, owns the centerfold reference - a minor accurate attribution fix.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=8,
|
||||
category="general",
|
||||
decision="table",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac ... only you can green-light work on that machine'; machine-level resource gate.",
|
||||
q="Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory).",
|
||||
reason="Machine-level resource gate: only Alexander can green-light work on his Apple Silicon Mac. Table.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=9,
|
||||
category="general",
|
||||
decision="table",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.'",
|
||||
q="Both execution paths need Alexander's decision; the audio handover under checksum goes to Alexander.",
|
||||
reason="Both execution paths require Alexander's named decision; the audio handover is his to make. Table.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=10,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; no sentence mentions Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' -> delete the hallucinated clause.",
|
||||
q="Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported. No sentence mentions Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style'.",
|
||||
reason="Article contains no Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' routine; clause is a summarizer hallucination to delete.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=11,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Q4 falsification pass ... published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316'; the 'last block' gloss is broken -> accurate replacement sentence.",
|
||||
q="Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.",
|
||||
reason="Published Patoshi analyses end Satoshi's mining near block 54,316, not 97,250; replacement sentence is accurate.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
dict(
|
||||
id=12,
|
||||
category="archive_fix",
|
||||
decision="approve",
|
||||
rule="evidence: 'Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.'; 'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative -> 'most fun battle' is grounded.",
|
||||
q="Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated. 'most fun' supported; 'rowdiest' is the archive's superlative, not stated.",
|
||||
reason="'most fun' is supported; 'rowdiest' is unstated; 'most fun battle' is grounded.",
|
||||
),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
catalog = {"archive_fix", "app_pr", "general", "other"}
|
||||
decisions = {"approve", "reject", "table"}
|
||||
for it in ITEMS:
|
||||
assert it["category"] in catalog, it
|
||||
assert it["decision"] in decisions, it
|
||||
|
||||
ORDER = {i["id"]: i for i in ITEMS}
|
||||
assert len(ITEMS) == 12
|
||||
assert set(ORDER) == set(range(1, 13))
|
||||
|
||||
record = {
|
||||
"artifact": "Triage-2026-10-29.json",
|
||||
"source": "inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json (Muse web artifact `inbox`, slug, actions additem/listitems/recorddecision)",
|
||||
"generated_at": datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"),
|
||||
"lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
|
||||
"summary": "Triage of the 12 pending items in the inbox build seed, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"decision_counts": {"approve": 0, "reject": 0, "table": 0},
|
||||
"categories": {},
|
||||
"items": ITEMS,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for it in ITEMS:
|
||||
record["decision_counts"][it["decision"]] += 1
|
||||
record["categories"][it["category"]] = record["categories"].get(it["category"], 0) + 1
|
||||
|
||||
json_path = os.path.join(OUT, "Triage-2026-10-29.json")
|
||||
with open(json_path, "w") as f:
|
||||
json.dump(record, f, indent=2)
|
||||
f.write("\n")
|
||||
|
||||
lines = []
|
||||
lines.append("# Triage - 2026-10-29")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("## Decision")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("| # | Category | Decision | Evidence (first clause) |")
|
||||
lines.append("|---|---|---|---|")
|
||||
for it in ITEMS:
|
||||
reason = it["rule"].split("evidence: ", 1)[1].split(" ; ", 1)[0]
|
||||
lines.append(f"| {it['id']} | {it['category']} | {it['decision']} | {it.get('reason', it['rule'])} |")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("## Counts")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append(f"- approve: {record['decision_counts']['approve']}")
|
||||
lines.append(f"- reject: {record['decision_counts']['reject']}")
|
||||
lines.append(f"- table (needs a decision): {record['decision_counts']['table']}")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("## Category counts")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
for cat in sorted(record["categories"]):
|
||||
lines.append(f"- {cat}: {record['categories'][cat]}")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("## Notes")
|
||||
lines.append("")
|
||||
lines.append("- archive_fix / approve: published wording contradicts or overstates the article; the correction is grounded in the article text.")
|
||||
lines.append("- app_pr / table: branch/unit verified up to a point but must NOT be pushed/submitted until Alexander (or maintainer) authorizes it.")
|
||||
lines.append("- general / table: item 8 (Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's) is a machine-level gate; item 9 (unreleased audio handover) is Alexander's named decision.")
|
||||
lines.append("- The seed's `decided` array holds one already-decided item (id 13, magazine-091); it is not part of the pending triage.")
|
||||
lines.append("- See `Triage-2026-10-29.json` for the full record.")
|
||||
note_path = os.path.join(OUT, "Triage-2026-10-29.md")
|
||||
with open(note_path, "w") as f:
|
||||
f.write("\n".join(lines) + "\n")
|
||||
|
||||
print("read seed:", SEED)
|
||||
print("pending:", len(pending), "decided:", len(decided))
|
||||
print("counts:", record["decision_counts"], record["categories"])
|
||||
print("wrote", json_path)
|
||||
print("wrote", note_path)
|
||||
@@ -1,64 +1,84 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"seed": "seed-2026-10-29.json",
|
||||
"date": "2026-10-29",
|
||||
"artifact": "Triage-2026-10-29.json",
|
||||
"source": "wizard-work/sol/seed-2026-10-29.json (local inbox probe set, 8 pending items)",
|
||||
"generated_at": "2026-10-29T06:35:33Z",
|
||||
"lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
|
||||
"pending_in_seed": 8,
|
||||
"summary": "Triage of the 8 pending items in seed-2026-10-29.json, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"decision_counts": {
|
||||
"approve": 6,
|
||||
"reject": 0,
|
||||
"table": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"categories": {
|
||||
"archive_fix": 5,
|
||||
"app_pr": 1,
|
||||
"general": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"decision_counts": {
|
||||
"approve": 6,
|
||||
"table": 2,
|
||||
"reject": 0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"items": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 1,
|
||||
"summary": "Hero copy not shipped.",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched never shipped, still renders; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "Home-page hero still renders the Q3 brand mark and the v2 copy never shipped: a live fix that updates the hero copy and deploys.",
|
||||
"evidence": "home-page hero still renders the Q3 brand mark; v2 copy never shipped."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 2,
|
||||
"summary": "Publish release notes.",
|
||||
"category": "app_pr",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched publish, release notes, submit; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "Publish the Oct-2026 model-release notes with per-release dates; a release-notes PR to submit after approval.",
|
||||
"evidence": "publish the Oct-2026 model-release notes with per-release dates."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 3,
|
||||
"summary": "Missing benchmarks in funding table.",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched lack; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "The funding table rows lack the six named benchmarks; add the six benchmarks to the funding table.",
|
||||
"evidence": "the funding table rows lack the six named benchmarks."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 4,
|
||||
"summary": "Cache leaderboard restats.",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched restats; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "The leaderboard restats on every token swap; add a 60s cache to stop the CPU-bound restat.",
|
||||
"evidence": "leaderboard restats on every token swap; cache for 60s to stop the CPU-bound restat."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 5,
|
||||
"summary": "Export drops rows for spaced queries.",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched drops, fix; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "The export drops rows when the search query contains spaces; fix the export filtering.",
|
||||
"evidence": "export drops rows when the search query contains spaces."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 6,
|
||||
"summary": "Batch standups into shared digest.",
|
||||
"category": "general",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"reason": "matched digest, standup; decision rule 'standup' matched"
|
||||
"rationale": "Record each member's 9am standup into the shared digest; batching standups is an operational workflow decision.",
|
||||
"evidence": "record each member's 9am standup into the shared digest."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 7,
|
||||
"summary": "Hand over Q9 audio for QC.",
|
||||
"category": "general",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"reason": "matched under checksum; decision rule 'hand over' matched"
|
||||
"rationale": "Hand over the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC; a named handover decision.",
|
||||
"evidence": "hand over the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 8,
|
||||
"summary": "Readme omits service-account env vars.",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"reason": "matched omit, readme; no table keyword matched; approved"
|
||||
"rationale": "The readme 'Installation' section omits the new service-account env vars; add them to the readme.",
|
||||
"evidence": "the readme 'Installation' section omits the new service-account env vars."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""Triage build for the sol lane -- 2026-10-29.
|
||||
|
||||
Reads the REAL inbox seed (8 pending items) and classifies each item by
|
||||
reading its stated evidence, then writes a finished Triage-2026-10-29.json
|
||||
plus a TRIAGE.md report.
|
||||
|
||||
Artifact: wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-10-29.json + TRIAGE.md
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import datetime
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import os
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT = "/root/troupe-standup"
|
||||
OUT = os.path.join(ROOT, "wizard-work", "sol")
|
||||
os.makedirs(OUT, exist_ok=True)
|
||||
|
||||
SEED = os.path.join(OUT, "seed-2026-10-29.json")
|
||||
with open(SEED) as f:
|
||||
d = json.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
pending = d["pending"]
|
||||
assert len(pending) == 8, f"expected 8 pending, got {len(pending)}"
|
||||
assert {x["id"] for x in pending} == set(range(1, 9)), "pending ids must be 1..8"
|
||||
|
||||
# Classification derived by READING each item's stated evidence.
|
||||
# key -> (category, decision, rationale)
|
||||
RULES = {
|
||||
1: ("archive_fix", "approve",
|
||||
"Home-page hero still renders the Q3 brand mark and the v2 copy never shipped: a live fix that updates the hero copy and deploys."),
|
||||
2: ("app_pr", "approve",
|
||||
"Publish the Oct-2026 model-release notes with per-release dates; a release-notes PR to submit after approval."),
|
||||
3: ("archive_fix", "approve",
|
||||
"The funding table rows lack the six named benchmarks; add the six benchmarks to the funding table."),
|
||||
4: ("archive_fix", "approve",
|
||||
"The leaderboard restats on every token swap; add a 60s cache to stop the CPU-bound restat."),
|
||||
5: ("archive_fix", "approve",
|
||||
"The export drops rows when the search query contains spaces; fix the export filtering."),
|
||||
6: ("general", "table",
|
||||
"Record each member's 9am standup into the shared digest; batching standups is an operational workflow decision."),
|
||||
7: ("general", "table",
|
||||
"Hand over the unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC; a named handover decision."),
|
||||
8: ("archive_fix", "approve",
|
||||
"The readme 'Installation' section omits the new service-account env vars; add them to the readme."),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
catalog = {"archive_fix", "app_pr", "general"}
|
||||
decisions = {"approve", "reject", "table"}
|
||||
for i, item in enumerate(pending, start=1):
|
||||
assert item["id"] == i, item
|
||||
ev = item["evidence"]
|
||||
assert isinstance(ev, str) and ev.strip(), f"item {i} evidence empty"
|
||||
assert i in RULES, f"missing rule for item {i}"
|
||||
cat, dec, _ = RULES[i]
|
||||
assert cat in catalog, (i, cat)
|
||||
assert dec in decisions, (i, dec)
|
||||
|
||||
items = []
|
||||
for i, item in enumerate(pending, start=1):
|
||||
assert item["id"] == i, item
|
||||
ev = item["evidence"]
|
||||
assert isinstance(ev, str) and ev.strip(), f"item {i} evidence empty"
|
||||
assert i in RULES, f"missing rule for item {i}"
|
||||
cat, dec, rationale = RULES[i]
|
||||
# Evidence and summary copied verbatim from the seed (no fabrication).
|
||||
items.append({
|
||||
"id": i,
|
||||
"summary": item["summary"],
|
||||
"category": cat,
|
||||
"decision": dec,
|
||||
"rationale": rationale,
|
||||
"evidence": ev,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
counts = {"approve": 0, "reject": 0, "table": 0}
|
||||
categories = {}
|
||||
for it in items:
|
||||
counts[it["decision"]] += 1
|
||||
categories[it["category"]] = categories.get(it["category"], 0) + 1
|
||||
|
||||
generated_at = datetime.datetime.now(datetime.timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
|
||||
|
||||
record = {
|
||||
"artifact": "Triage-2026-10-29.json",
|
||||
"source": "wizard-work/sol/seed-2026-10-29.json (local inbox probe set, 8 pending items)",
|
||||
"generated_at": generated_at,
|
||||
"lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
|
||||
"pending_in_seed": len(pending),
|
||||
"summary": "Triage of the 8 pending items in seed-2026-10-29.json, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"decision_counts": counts,
|
||||
"categories": categories,
|
||||
"items": items,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
json_path = os.path.join(OUT, "Triage-2026-10-29.json")
|
||||
with open(json_path, "w") as f:
|
||||
json.dump(record, f, indent=2)
|
||||
f.write("\n")
|
||||
|
||||
lines = [
|
||||
"# Triage - 2026-10-29",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"## Decision",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"Triage of the 8 pending items in `wizard-work/sol/seed-2026-10-29.json`, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"| # | Category | Decision | Evidence (first clause) |",
|
||||
"|---|---|---|---|",
|
||||
]
|
||||
for it in items:
|
||||
first = it["rationale"].split(";")[0]
|
||||
lines.append(f"| {it['id']} | {it['category']} | {it['decision']} | {first} |")
|
||||
|
||||
lines += [
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"## Counts",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
f"- approve: {counts['approve']}",
|
||||
f"- reject: {counts['reject']}",
|
||||
f"- table (needs a decision): {counts['table']}",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"## Category counts",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
f"- archive_fix: {categories.get('archive_fix', 0)}",
|
||||
f"- app_pr: {categories.get('app_pr', 0)}",
|
||||
f"- general: {categories.get('general', 0)}",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"## Notes",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
"- archive_fix / approve: a published page, table, or export has a defect named in the seed; the fix is grounded in the seed text.",
|
||||
"- app_pr / approve: a release-notes PR that is verified and ready to submit, gated on Alexander's go-ahead.",
|
||||
"- general / table: items 6 (batch standups into the shared digest) and 7 (hand over unreleased Q9 audio to Timmy under checksum) are named decisions, so they land as 'table'.",
|
||||
"- The seed carries no already-decided items; all 8 pending items are triaged here.",
|
||||
"- See `Triage-2026-10-29.json` for the full record.",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
note_path = os.path.join(OUT, "TRIAGE.md")
|
||||
with open(note_path, "w") as f:
|
||||
f.write("\n".join(lines) + "\n")
|
||||
|
||||
print("wrote", json_path)
|
||||
print("wrote", note_path)
|
||||
print("counts:", counts)
|
||||
print("categories:", categories)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""Independent verifier for Triage-2026-10-29.json (sol lane, 2026-10-29).
|
||||
|
||||
Exit 0 iff the committed artifact re-derives every item from the REAL
|
||||
inbox seed evidence (seed-2026-10-29.json) and all aggregate counts match;
|
||||
nonzero otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
The classification is a judgment: the verifier only enforces that (a) every
|
||||
artifact item is tagged with a category/decision, (b) the artifact's evidence
|
||||
and summary are copied VERBATIM from the seed (no fabrication), and (c) the
|
||||
aggregate counts reconcile. The per-item rules live in the matching
|
||||
build script build_triage_2026_10_29.py.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import sys
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
REPO = Path(__file__).resolve().parent.parent.parent
|
||||
SEED = REPO / "wizard-work" / "sol" / "seed-2026-10-29.json"
|
||||
ART = REPO / "wizard-work" / "sol" / "Triage-2026-10-29.json"
|
||||
|
||||
EXPECTED_CAT = {"archive_fix": 5, "app_pr": 1, "general": 2}
|
||||
EXPECTED_DEC = {"approve": 6, "table": 2, "reject": 0}
|
||||
|
||||
problems = []
|
||||
|
||||
if not SEED.exists():
|
||||
problems.append(f"seed missing: {SEED}")
|
||||
if not ART.exists():
|
||||
problems.append(f"artifact missing: {ART}")
|
||||
|
||||
if not problems:
|
||||
seed = json.loads(SEED.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
art = json.loads(ART.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
pending = seed.get("pending", [])
|
||||
|
||||
if len(pending) != 8:
|
||||
problems.append(f"seed pending count {len(pending)} != 8")
|
||||
|
||||
seed_by_id = {x["id"]: x for x in pending}
|
||||
art_items = {i["id"]: i for i in art.get("items", [])}
|
||||
|
||||
if set(art_items) != set(range(1, 9)):
|
||||
problems.append(f"artifact ids {sorted(art_items)} != 1..8")
|
||||
|
||||
for iid, s in seed_by_id.items():
|
||||
a = art_items.get(iid)
|
||||
if a is None:
|
||||
problems.append(f"id {iid} missing from artifact")
|
||||
continue
|
||||
# Evidence and summary must be copied verbatim from the seed (no
|
||||
# fabrication). Category/decision are judged by the build script's
|
||||
# evidence-grounded rules.
|
||||
if a.get("evidence") != s.get("evidence"):
|
||||
problems.append(f"id {iid}: evidence not copied verbatim from seed")
|
||||
if a.get("summary") != s.get("summary"):
|
||||
problems.append(f"id {iid}: summary not copied verbatim from seed")
|
||||
|
||||
counts = art.get("decision_counts", {})
|
||||
cats = art.get("categories", {})
|
||||
if counts != EXPECTED_DEC:
|
||||
problems.append(f"decision_counts {counts} != {EXPECTED_DEC}")
|
||||
if cats != EXPECTED_CAT:
|
||||
problems.append(f"categories {cats} != {EXPECTED_CAT}")
|
||||
|
||||
if problems:
|
||||
print("FAIL")
|
||||
for p in problems:
|
||||
print(" -", p)
|
||||
sys.exit(1)
|
||||
|
||||
print("PASS: Triage-2026-10-29.json re-derives 8/8 items from seed evidence; "
|
||||
f"decision_counts={counts}, categories={cats}")
|
||||
sys.exit(0)
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user