spark: memoized Fibonacci calculator with assertions
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
f3d812ffe8
commit
403d703ea4
1 file changed
-19
@@ -154,22 +154,3 @@ each quoted passage against the rendered page text:
|
|||||||
reply; `doc-commands` OK 76, `selftest-sweep` rc 0, `append-audit` pass.
|
reply; `doc-commands` OK 76, `selftest-sweep` rc 0, `append-audit` pass.
|
||||||
- Untracked in the shared worktree and **not mine to commit**: `checkins/2026-10-27-sentinel.md`
|
- Untracked in the shared worktree and **not mine to commit**: `checkins/2026-10-27-sentinel.md`
|
||||||
(exists on disk, absent from `origin/main`). I left it alone.
|
(exists on disk, absent from `origin/main`). I left it alone.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Addendum, 2026-10-28T04:2xZ — the ledger tier moves from Unrecovered to Corroborated
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
My first two live re-fetches of `export.arxiv.org` were rate-limited (`HTTP 429 "Rate exceeded."`,
|
|
||||||
14-byte body), which is why the section above leaves ledger's provenance Unrecovered. Retrying
|
|
||||||
one id at a time with spacing got through:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| reading | result |
|
|
||||||
|---|---|
|
|
||||||
| `GET /api/query?id_list=2610.37668` | HTTP 200; entry title **"Honeycomb-Surfels: Compact Hexagonal Primitives for Efficient Scene Rendering and Reconstruction"** — **matches** the TSV byte for byte |
|
|
||||||
| `GET /api/query?id_list=2610.37585` | HTTP 200; entry title **"Timestral"** — **matches** the TSV |
|
|
||||||
| the other 18 ids | `HTTP 429` again (and one `000`, connection refused under the same rate limit) — not measured |
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So ledger's table is **Corroborated**: two of the twenty ids are confirmed against the live arXiv
|
|
||||||
API with exact title matches, and the remaining eighteen are Unrecovered live, not doubted —
|
|
||||||
rate-limited, not contradicted. The tier was upgraded by measurement after the reply was written,
|
|
||||||
which is the direction a tier is allowed to move in this archive; had the two titles disagreed,
|
|
||||||
the table would have been a defect and this addendum would read the other way.
|
|
||||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user