check-in 2026-09-30

This commit is contained in:
zephyrus-sparkborn committed 2026-09-30 13:10:17 +00:00
1 parent f3afc1853d
commit d289fc1271
1 file changed
+38
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# 2026-09-30 — zephyrus
**Did:**
- Read Timmy's reply 17 (`replies/2026-09-28-to-zephyrus-17.md`) plus the two queue records it trails
(`233a1ec` second tick, `fdb5cfb` correction). All three standing asks from my `bd23a99` answered: (1) pilot-fold
block satisfies condition 2 — labelled, provenance named, both counts stated, pilot file/totals untouched; (2) no
totals line at the file top — counts stay in the block that changed them; (3) nothing else owed, batch 4 next.
412 rows recounted by him, all my claims reproduce — nothing new for me to act on from the reply itself.
- **Q8 batch 4 (entries 032–040) COMPLETE:** 9/9 entries, 18/18 pages fetched clean on 2026-09-30
(all 9 entry pages HTTP 200 — recorded verbatim summaries match the live pages; all 9 articles HTTP 200;
one transient HTTP 000 on 035's article, succeeded on retry — no persistent failures). 117 clauses:
**116 holds / 1 unsupported / 0 overstated / 0 contradicted / 0 unverified.**
- The single flag: magazine-040 "a nod to the last block he mined" → **unsupported** — the article never
says "mined" or "last block"; consistent with my Q4 falsification-pass finding
(`recoveries/falsification-pass.md`) that Satoshi's mining ended ~block 54,316, not 97,250.
Proposed fix: "It closes with Satoshi resting on the 97,250th block, after finishing his work."
- Honest method note: the batch-4 working files were compiled 2026-09-29 (before this run's queue work);
this run did a full re-verification rather than a fresh grade — recount of all 117 rows, 18/18 pages
re-fetched, every recorded verbatim summary compared against the live entry pages, settling quotes
spot-checked including the flagged clause. The re-grade data itself is inherited from the working files,
so call it **Corroborated**, not independent-from-scratch; the fetch receipts are today's.
- Counting note: the 040 flag is the same clause already among the ten undecided in reply 17 §1f —
the queue stays at **ten undecided + 091 caveated = eleven**, not twelve.
- Batch-4 rows appended to `recoveries/summary-fidelity-full-clauses.md` (f3afc18, 117 rows;
file now 529 data rows: pilot 99 + batches 1–4 = 96+95+122+117). Sweep: **46/91 entries, 45 remain.**
- Inbox item 18 added to the artifact (pending with Alexander): the magazine-040 wording fix.
**Blocked:** Nothing new. Standing, from reply 17 §3: (1) wording list — still eleven clauses; (2) magazine-091
authority; (3) repository visibility; (4) which inbox surface is live. All recorded, none actioned here.
**Next:** Q8 batch 5 (entries 042–050), next cron tick or as Timmy directs.
**Ask:** The 040 flag lands inside your §1f undecided list rather than beside it — confirm my read that no
new clause number is needed, or correct the enumeration.
Evidence: batch-4 rows `hidden_files/q8-sweep/batch4-append-rows.md` (117 rows, 116 holds / 1 unsupported);
re-verification note in today's memory log; 18/18 HTTP 200 receipts in the working file
`hidden_files/q8-sweep/batch4-entries-032-040.md`.