sol: triage 2026-09-26 - classify the 12 pending inbox items (7 approve / 0 reject / 5 table)
This commit is contained in:
sol committed
1 parent
8ca7e8cdc0
commit
fa951c1ab2
2 files changed
+47
-59
No files matched your search
+17
-18
@@ -2,22 +2,22 @@
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, read from each item's stated evidence.
|
||||
Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Category | Decision | Evidence (short) |
|
||||
| # | Category | Decision | Evidence (first clause) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.'; article text states 'more than two people responded; only is wrong' -> published 'only Loko and Happy' is wrong; correction grounded in the article. |
|
||||
| 2 | app_pr | table | 'No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules'; push gated on Alexander/maintainer authorization (do not push to the forge on my own authority). |
|
||||
| 3 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; article never uses 'founder'; proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording 'Proof of Ink by -John'. |
|
||||
| 4 | app_pr | table | 'browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment'; 'do not submit without your authorization' - pre-reqs unmet and authorization needed before submitting. |
|
||||
| 5 | app_pr | table | 'needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing'; branch becomes publishable only after that authorization. |
|
||||
| 6 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07)'; article says 'I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group' -> merch is for Mass Adoption, festival is where he printed live. |
|
||||
| 7 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).'; fact supported, attribution wrong -> correct the note to cite the interview answer, not the magazine note. |
|
||||
| 8 | general | table | 'Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac ... only you can green-light work on that machine'; machine-level resource gate. |
|
||||
| 9 | general | table | 'both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.' |
|
||||
| 10 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; no sentence mentions Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' -> delete the hallucinated clause. |
|
||||
| 11 | archive_fix | approve | 'Q4 falsification pass ... published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316'; the 'last block' gloss is broken -> accurate replacement sentence. |
|
||||
| 12 | archive_fix | approve | 'Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.'; 'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative -> 'most fun battle' is grounded. |
|
||||
| 1 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 3 of 7 |
|
||||
| 2 | app_pr | table | Local branch, committed, not pushed |
|
||||
| 3 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 2 of 7 |
|
||||
| 4 | app_pr | table | Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed |
|
||||
| 5 | app_pr | table | Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed |
|
||||
| 6 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 1 of 7 |
|
||||
| 7 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 6 of 7 |
|
||||
| 8 | general | table | Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine |
|
||||
| 9 | general | table | Both ways it becomes executable; both need Alexander's decision, so the audio handover goes to Alexander as a named decision |
|
||||
| 10 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 5 of 7 |
|
||||
| 11 | archive_fix | approve | Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316, not 97,250 |
|
||||
| 12 | archive_fix | approve | Flag 4 of 7 |
|
||||
|
||||
## Counts
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,12 +30,11 @@ Triage of the 12 pending items in `inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json`, read from each i
|
||||
- archive_fix: 7
|
||||
- app_pr: 3
|
||||
- general: 2
|
||||
- other: 0
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- archive_fix / approve: published wording contradicts or overstates the article; the correction is grounded in the article text.
|
||||
- app_pr / table: branch/unit is verified up to a point but must NOT be pushed/submitted until Alexander (or maintainer) authorizes it.
|
||||
- general / table: machine-level gate (id 8: Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's) and an audio-handover decision (id 9) that needs Alexander's named decision.
|
||||
- No live archive re-queried; classification is a reading-triage of the seed's stated evidence.
|
||||
- See `Triage-2026-09-26.json` for the full record.
|
||||
- general / table: machine-level gate (id 8, Timmy's Apple Silicon Mac is Alexander's) and an audio-handover decision (id 9) that needs Alexander's named decision.
|
||||
- The seed's `decided` array holds one already-decided item (id 13, magazine-091); it is not part of the pending triage.
|
||||
- See `wizard-work/sol/Triage-2026-09-26.json` for the full record.
|
||||
@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"artifact": "Triage-2026-09-26.json",
|
||||
"source": "inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json (Muse web artifact `inbox`; actions additem/listitems/recorddecision)",
|
||||
"generated_at": "2026-10-26T08:42:03Z",
|
||||
"lane": "Triage - everyday Q&A and classification",
|
||||
"generated_at": "2026-10-25T22:19:59Z",
|
||||
"summary": "Triage of the 12 pending items in inbox/seed-2026-09-26.json, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"decision_counts": {
|
||||
"decided_in_seed": 1,
|
||||
"pending_in_seed": 12,
|
||||
"summary": "Triage of the 12 pending items in the inbox build seed, classified by reading each item's stated evidence.",
|
||||
"counts": {
|
||||
"approve": 7,
|
||||
"reject": 0,
|
||||
"table": 5
|
||||
@@ -12,116 +14,103 @@
|
||||
"categories": {
|
||||
"archive_fix": 7,
|
||||
"app_pr": 3,
|
||||
"general": 2,
|
||||
"other": 0
|
||||
"general": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"items": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 1,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-021 says only Loko and Happy responded",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.'; article text states 'more than two people responded; only is wrong' -> published 'only Loko and Happy' is wrong; correction grounded in the article.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted ... more than two people responded; only is wrong.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-021 says only Loko and Happy responded",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted. Summary clause: '(only Loko and Happy responded)'. Article: more than two people responded; 'only' is wrong.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 3 of 7. Grade: contradicted.\n\nSummary clause: \"(only Loko and Happy responded)\".\n\nArticle: \"Then after a few minutes I checked the chat. A few positive responses. Some funny shit talking, oh look, Happy even added some lyrics!\" - more than two people responded; \"only\" is wrong.\n\nProposed correction: \"(Loko and Happy among those who responded)\"."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 2,
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/62-symptom-escalation-regression",
|
||||
"category": "app_pr",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules'; push gated on Alexander/maintainer authorization (do not push to the forge on my own authority).",
|
||||
"q": "No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules.",
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/62-symptom-escalation-regression",
|
||||
"rule": "Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, npm test 92/92. No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Local branch, committed, not pushed. Four urgent-phrase escalation fixes, four false-positive fixes, three regression/boundary test files. npm test 92/92 on 2026-09-20. Likely duplicates an existing PR - kept as independent verification unless requested. No push without maintainer approval per your authority rules."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 3,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 calls John the 'founder' of Proof of Ink",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; article never uses 'founder'; proposed fix restores the byline's actual wording 'Proof of Ink by -John'.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported. ... never uses the word founder.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 calls John the 'founder' of Proof of Ink",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported. The article never uses the word 'founder'; byline is 'Proof of Ink by -John'.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 2 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: the IPE calls John \"founder of the Bitcoin-only printing company Proof of Ink\".\n\nThe article never uses the word \"founder\"; byline is \"Proof of Ink by -John\". John's \"it's 100% all me\" establishes sole operation, but \"founder\" is the archive's inference.\n\nProposed correction: \"John of Proof of Ink, the Bitcoin-only printing company he runs solo\"."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 4,
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve submitting the a11y PR from zephyrus/65-a11y-gates",
|
||||
"category": "app_pr",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment'; 'do not submit without your authorization' - pre-reqs unmet and authorization needed before submitting.",
|
||||
"q": "browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization.",
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve submitting the a11y PR from zephyrus/65-a11y-gates",
|
||||
"rule": "Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. No push/submit without your authorization.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Local branch, commit 03def65, not pushed. Accessibility changes plus eight Playwright gates. Unit tests 67/67 on 2026-09-20; browser acceptance and npm audit still blocked in this environment. Likely duplicates existing work - do not submit without your authorization."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 5,
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/67-hard-stool-followup",
|
||||
"category": "app_pr",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing'; branch becomes publishable only after that authorization.",
|
||||
"q": "Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing.",
|
||||
"summary": "Turd app: approve pushing branch zephyrus/67-hard-stool-followup",
|
||||
"rule": "Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. npm test 75/75. Explicit maintainer approval needed before pushing.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Local branch, commit b730f5f, not pushed. Explicit Type 1-2 follow-up question; no image inference. npm test 75/75 on 2026-09-20. Implemented before a successful claim - needs explicit maintainer approval before pushing. Safety boundary respected: AI suggests visible form/color/quality only, never diagnoses."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 6,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 says merch was made for the Boston Bitcoin Festival",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07)'; article says 'I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group' -> merch is for Mass Adoption, festival is where he printed live.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07). ... I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-011 says merch was made for the Boston Bitcoin Festival",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 1 of 7 ... upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07). Article settles it: merch is for Mass Adoption; the festival is where he printed live.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 1 of 7 from the Q8 summary-fidelity pilot (recoveries/summary-fidelity-pilot.md, commit 9cc6879), upheld by Timmy's independent re-verification (reply 07).\n\nSummary clause (overstated): \"merch for Mass Adoption and the Boston Bitcoin Festival\".\n\nArticle sentence that settles it: \"I'm also working with Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group. I make all their merch and I'll be printing live June 24th at The Boston Bitcoin Festival...\"\n\nProposed correction: \"merch for Mass Adoption, the Boston Bitcoin group - printing live at the Boston Bitcoin Festival on June 24th\". The merch is for Mass Adoption; the festival is where he printed live."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 7,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 misattributes the centerfold reference",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).'; fact supported, attribution wrong -> correct the note to cite the interview answer, not the magazine note.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor). ... Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 misattributes the centerfold reference",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor). Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 6 of 7. Grade: overstated (minor).\n\nSummary clause: \"which the magazine note ties to a centerfold in issue 5 (Round 5)\".\n\nThe \"(see centerfold)\" reference is in the interview answer itself; the magazine note covers \"his epic contribution to the mag in issue 5 (Round 5)\". Attribution is wrong though the fact is supported.\n\nProposed correction: attribute the centerfold reference to the interview answer, not the magazine note."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 8,
|
||||
"summary": "Trial by Timmy: send Timmy the local-inference trial brief for your Mac",
|
||||
"category": "general",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac ... only you can green-light work on that machine'; machine-level resource gate.",
|
||||
"q": "Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine.",
|
||||
"summary": "Trial by Timmy: send Timmy the local-inference trial brief for your Mac",
|
||||
"rule": "Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Your standing goal: Timmy running fully local on open-weight models, zero dependence on any company's inference API. The trial brief ('Trial by Timmy', 2026-09-24) is ready: serve a tool-capable open model locally via Ollama or llama.cpp behind an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which Hermes already supports, and benchmark it on Timmy's real workload. Stalled awaiting your go-ahead - Timmy runs on your Apple Silicon Mac (36 GB unified memory), so only you can green-light work on that machine."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 9,
|
||||
"summary": "Q9: hand unreleased audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC",
|
||||
"category": "general",
|
||||
"decision": "table",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.'",
|
||||
"q": "both ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.",
|
||||
"summary": "Q9: hand unreleased audio to Timmy under checksum for independent QC",
|
||||
"rule": "Both ways it becomes executable; both need Alexander's decision, so the audio handover goes to Alexander as a named decision.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Q9 (independent music QC) is not executable as a genuine second opinion from Zephyrus's environment - same host, same tools, and he wrote the item. Timmy's reply 07: the two ways it becomes executable both need Alexander's decision, so the handover of unreleased audio under checksum goes to Alexander as a named decision.\n\nThree wording corrections stay openly logged regardless: <= -0.9 dBFS vs a -1.0 dBTP target; \"the manifest\" is STATE.json; 195.0 s is the FLAC source, MP3 container reads 195.024 s."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 10,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 claims a 'weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence'",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.'; no sentence mentions Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' -> delete the hallucinated clause.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported. ... No sentence in the article text mentions a Thursday, a weekly cadence, or any intelligence-style routine.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-061 claims a 'weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence'",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported. No sentence mentions a Thursday, weekly cadence, or 'intelligence-style' routine.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 5 of 7. Grade: unsupported.\n\nSummary clause: \"why he keeps a weekly Thursday intelligence-style cadence of work\".\n\nNo sentence in the article text mentions a Thursday, a weekly cadence, or any \"intelligence-style\" routine. Looks like a summarizer hallucination (unless it comes from an image, which was not checked).\n\nProposed correction: delete the clause."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 11,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-040 'last block he mined' sentence replacement",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Q4 falsification pass ... published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316'; the 'last block' gloss is broken -> accurate replacement sentence.",
|
||||
"q": "published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-040 'last block he mined' sentence replacement",
|
||||
"rule": "Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316, not 97,250.",
|
||||
"evidence": "From the Q4 falsification pass (recoveries/falsification-pass.md): the archive's gloss implied block 97,250 was the last block Satoshi mined. Published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316 - the gloss is broken.\n\nTimmy's proposed replacement sentence (reply 05):\n\n\"It closes with Satoshi resting on the 97,250th block - the parody's Genesis 2:2 close, the block mined on 2010-12-12, the day of Satoshi's last public post. (Not a claim that 97,250 was his last mined block: published Patoshi analyses end his mining near block 54,316.)\""
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": 12,
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-041 calls it 'Stackchain's rowdiest fork war'",
|
||||
"category": "archive_fix",
|
||||
"decision": "approve",
|
||||
"rule": "evidence: 'Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.'; 'most fun' is supported by the article; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative -> 'most fun battle' is grounded.",
|
||||
"q": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated. ... most fun is supported; rowdiest is the archive's superlative, not stated.",
|
||||
"summary": "Archive fix: magazine-041 calls it 'Stackchain's rowdiest fork war'",
|
||||
"rule": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated. 'most fun' is supported; 'rowdiest' is an unstated superlative.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Flag 4 of 7. Grade: overstated.\n\nSummary clause (IPE): \"Stackchain's rowdiest fork war\".\n\nArticle: \"This may go down as the most fun battle of Stackchain just because of the amount of people involved.\" - \"most fun\" is supported; \"rowdiest\" is the archive's superlative, not stated.\n\nProposed correction: \"Stackchain's most fun battle\"."
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user