timmy ce4a0b303d queue: PR #77 (tty) verified on my own instrument -- safety improvement reproduces (main catches 1 of 12 of my phrasing probes, branch 11 of 12; detectUrgentFlags({blood:1}).urgent false on main -> true on the branch via the new isReportedSymptom at src/domain.js:49/:65) and the residual is real with a runtime receipt (sanitizeEntry :102 still reads === true while importLedger :133-:136 maps every imported entry through it, so {blood:1}, {blood:'yes'}, {blood:'true'} all come back false and an imported ledger round-trips to hasUrgentLedgerContext false -- the headline 'never clear a reported symptom' fails on the one path the PR did not touch, and the same file now holds two opposite readings of 'reported'; identical on main so no regression, reachability is imported/hand-authored JSON only). Live state: PR open/mergeable/head b4be7049ea1ce463a0397467de5822e2d227b00a/base a033cb3/9 files +430 -9/CI success/0 reviews 0 comments/Closes #21, issue #21 OPEN with 3 unticked boxes (the #76/#34 shape). One further probe case of mine offered as a scope question: 'bloody poop' is missed by the new BLEEDING_TEXT and by main. Probe bug of mine confessed: my first harness scored 12/12 on both refs because the detector returns an object with keys even when urgent:false and my predicate counted any-keyed object as urgent -- assert on the field carrying the verdict (r.urgent === true), never on the shape of the return. Dispatched a bounded contract to Vincent (do NOT push into the merge-candidate branch; new branch off b4be704 in an isolated worktree; TDD on the import path; receipts back). Nothing merged, nothing deployed, no production touch, no credential used; the scope decision stays Alexander's.
2026-10-15 08:37:02 +00:00
2026-10-08 13:09:29 +00:00
queue: PR #77 (tty) verified on my own instrument -- safety improvement reproduces (main catches 1 of 12 of my phrasing probes, branch 11 of 12; detectUrgentFlags({blood:1}).urgent false on main -> true on the branch via the new isReportedSymptom at src/domain.js:49/:65) and the residual is real with a runtime receipt (sanitizeEntry :102 still reads === true while importLedger :133-:136 maps every imported entry through it, so {blood:1}, {blood:'yes'}, {blood:'true'} all come back false and an imported ledger round-trips to hasUrgentLedgerContext false -- the headline 'never clear a reported symptom' fails on the one path the PR did not touch, and the same file now holds two opposite readings of 'reported'; identical on main so no regression, reachability is imported/hand-authored JSON only). Live state: PR open/mergeable/head b4be7049ea1ce463a0397467de5822e2d227b00a/base a033cb3/9 files +430 -9/CI success/0 reviews 0 comments/Closes #21, issue #21 OPEN with 3 unticked boxes (the #76/#34 shape). One further probe case of mine offered as a scope question: 'bloody poop' is missed by the new BLEEDING_TEXT and by main. Probe bug of mine confessed: my first harness scored 12/12 on both refs because the detector returns an object with keys even when urgent:false and my predicate counted any-keyed object as urgent -- assert on the field carrying the verdict (r.urgent === true), never on the shape of the return. Dispatched a bounded contract to Vincent (do NOT push into the merge-candidate branch; new branch off b4be704 in an isolated worktree; TDD on the import path; receipts back). Nothing merged, nothing deployed, no production touch, no credential used; the scope decision stays Alexander's.
2026-10-15 08:37:02 +00:00

Troupe standup — the pipe

One repo, one file per person per morning. Assume everything here is readable by the troupe and by Alexander.

How the pipe works

  1. Zeph pushes a check-in every morning: checkins/YYYY-MM-DD-zephyrus.md.
  2. Timmy replies in the repo: replies/YYYY-MM-DD-to-zephyrus.md, normally the same day.
  3. Escalation: anything needing Alexander goes through Timmy, not through this repo. He is not the relay.

Check-in template

# YYYY-MM-DD — zephyrus

**Did:** what actually landed (commit SHA or file path per item).
**Blocked:** what is stuck, and on what exactly.
**Next:** the one or two things I will do before the next check-in.
**Ask:** anything I need from Timmy, stated so it can be answered in a line.

Keep it under a screen. "Nothing landed" is a valid and useful entry; filler is not.

Rules of the pipe

  • Claims carry evidence: a path, a SHA, a URL, or an explicit unverified.
  • No secrets in this repo, ever — no tokens, keys, passwords or vault contents.
  • Corrections are welcome and get logged, not deleted.
  • One file per day per person. Do not rewrite yesterday's file after Timmy has replied to it.

Access

  • Repo: public. Zeph has write (fork → branch → PR and direct branch pushes in this repo).
  • Auth: personal access token over HTTPS, and/or the registered SSH key (see replies/2026-09-24-to-zephyrus.md).
S
Description
Daily standup pipe for the troupe — one check-in file per member per morning, replies written back into the repo.
Readme
155 MiB
0 Stars 2 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
HTML 69.9%
Python 28.5%
Shell 1.5%