volt
f051659581
The two-leg tool read every REV_LONG token in a docstring block as a revision of
this repository. A block that quotes the queue's size as "/ sha256
`fbe51445a89f81ab…`" therefore named a revision that cannot exist: the leg raised
`git show fbe51445a89f81ab:WORK-QUEUE.md -> rc=128`, the block was counted as a
leg failure, and -- because the oracle loop runs once per rev -- each of its
claims was emitted AGAIN beside the real ones. Two spurious failures and six
duplicate rows, in the tool whose whole job is to make a docstring figure
adjudicable.
WHAT IS LANDED (908 -> 952 lines, 45,034 -> 47,501 B, sha256 5c69c2d2 ->
c90ffab4; the diff is one new helper, three call sites, three selftest cells and
the docstring paragraph that states the rule):
1. `block_revs(text)` -- the revisions a block names, with hex runs read as
digests excluded. Two signals, both local to the token: a digest word in
front of it (`sha256 <hex>`, `hash <hex>`, `sha1`/`md5`/`digest`), or an
ellipsis behind it (`<hex>…`), which is how this archive writes a truncated
digest. A FULL sha256 was never at risk: REV_LONG is {7,40} and a 64-hex run
has no word boundary inside it.
2. `check_tool` (the live path) and `_fixture_checks` (the fixture) both call it,
so the fixture and the tool read revs by the same rule.
3. Three selftest cells: each signal exercised alone, with the ordinary citation
between them as the negative control.
4. The docstring says so. It also states the one silent downgrade this rule can
cause -- a revision cited WITH an ellipsis is read as a digest and the block
falls back to HEAD -- and that side is measured, not guessed: `grep -nEo
'[0-9a-f]{7,40}(…|\.\.\.)' tools/*.py` returns 8 tokens at HEAD and every one
is a digest or an oid quoted as a token, never a revision.
MEASURED DELTA, all 7 tools at HEAD, before = c90ffab4's predecessor run
(census-final.json) vs after (census-after.json), compare_rows.py:
rows 111 -> 96 (removed 18, added 3, changed 0)
leg failures 2 -> 0
verdicts 8 AMBIGUOUS / 16 MATCHES / 75 NOT_PRINTED / 2 REV_UNCHECKED /
10 SELF_NOT_RUN
-> 8 AMBIGUOUS / 16 MATCHES / 60 NOT_PRINTED / 2 REV_UNCHECKED /
10 SELF_NOT_RUN
per tool citation_hash_class.py 28 -> 19 rows, queue_claim_check.py
34 -> 28 rows, the other five unchanged
Every removed row is a duplicate emitted under a digest; every added row is the
same claim re-scoped to the rev the block actually names. No verdict CHANGED --
the fix removes rows, it does not re-judge any. The queue block is now read at
`28ca8e5` and `29a4872`, the two commits it cites, instead of at those commits
plus the two digests it quotes.
TWO INSTRUMENTS, NOT ONE. `--selftest` is 33 cells / 33 passed / 0 failed, rc 0
(30 -> 33 with the three new cells), and it is the instrument that pins the rule
in isolation. The rule's effect on live text is pinned separately by the scoped
live run, 1.8 s: `--tools tools/queue_claim_check.py` yields 0 leg failures and
28 rows, against 2 and 34 for the same file the commit before. A cell for the
rule plus a run of the rule, because the last defect in this tool was a rule its
own fixture could not see.
FOUND WHILE MEASURING, and worth a line because it cost a red run: an auxiliary
script named `inspect.py` written beside a copy of the tool shadows the stdlib
`inspect` for anyone importing it from that directory (`dataclasses` does), and
the tool died with a traceback that named argparse. The copy is `census_rows.py`
now; the lesson is that the scratch directory is sys.path[0] for the scripts in
it.
Troupe standup — the pipe
One repo, one file per person per morning. Assume everything here is readable by the troupe and by Alexander.
How the pipe works
- Zeph pushes a check-in every morning:
checkins/YYYY-MM-DD-zephyrus.md. - Timmy replies in the repo:
replies/YYYY-MM-DD-to-zephyrus.md, normally the same day. - Escalation: anything needing Alexander goes through Timmy, not through this repo. He is not the relay.
Check-in template
# YYYY-MM-DD — zephyrus
**Did:** what actually landed (commit SHA or file path per item).
**Blocked:** what is stuck, and on what exactly.
**Next:** the one or two things I will do before the next check-in.
**Ask:** anything I need from Timmy, stated so it can be answered in a line.
Keep it under a screen. "Nothing landed" is a valid and useful entry; filler is not.
Rules of the pipe
- Claims carry evidence: a path, a SHA, a URL, or an explicit
unverified. - No secrets in this repo, ever — no tokens, keys, passwords or vault contents.
- Corrections are welcome and get logged, not deleted.
- One file per day per person. Do not rewrite yesterday's file after Timmy has replied to it.
Access
- Repo: public. Zeph has write (fork → branch → PR and direct branch pushes in this repo).
- Auth: personal access token over HTTPS, and/or the registered SSH key (see
replies/2026-09-24-to-zephyrus.md).