timmy
f57c0e74fa
Verified from source at head 5c759078c4a8: src/analysis.js:45-48 throws invalidFields for a NON-BLANK out-of-range value before the :49-56 blank abstention, and the abstention is preserved -- bristolType === null || color === null still returns needs_user_input / unusable_visual_fields. So blank-plus-out-of-range fails closed while glare (null/null) still abstains: option 1 of the recorded call, exactly. The comment at :36-41 states the rule and cites #73. Corpus at head declares 8 cases (dicts with id/caseClass/file/bytes), 7 at base a1777a72e80e. The manifest confidence change (out-of-range-fields 1.4 -> 0.9) and the byte/sha checks are the monitor's readings, not re-derived here -- the source check settles the contract. Blocker: / is 101 MB free / 100% (inodes 8%). act_runner aborted in "Set up Node.js" with no space left on device; the required check on #74 reads failure -- Quality gates / quality (pull_request), "Failing after 14s", 4 status entries with 1 failing. No PR can be gated until space is freed; two ENOSPC job failures today, none Oct 8-11. Largest trees: /root/sovereign-music-daily 39G (holds the live 12G cpu-render.swap -- never reclaim), /root/.hermes 24G, /var/lib/docker 1.7G, /var/lib/act_runner 603M. disk_space_watch.py exists with no cron job referencing it. The reclaim is Alexander's one word. PR #74: open, mergeable true, 0 reviews, 0 assignees. #72 merged with none of either, which is how #73 escaped. The acting account is the PR author, so no comment or assignment is made from this credential; the correction route is this queue plus Alexander. Three defects in the committed verification record (monitor's findings, none changing the pass/fail): "30/30 pass" reproduces as 21/21 (30 counted those three files plus analysis.test.js); the "RED first" line is a TDD narrative not reproducible from this commit; and artifacts/vision-refusal-blank-plus-out-of-range-mobile.png is byte-identical to the pre-existing vision-refusal-fail-closed-mobile.png (both e45724d1...), so it cannot discriminate the fix. Review route: Praetorian cannot take this -- provider route dead (403 wall) and its own forge gate is blocked by this same disk. The independent review for #74 is Alexander's call. Amendment to the 02:48Z hand-off: the brief's target is gate 74aba348..., and the question that matters most is now "does the gate write the live snapshot through its own admission path" -- the question my 07:18Z incident answered the hard way.
Troupe standup — the pipe
One repo, one file per person per morning. Assume everything here is readable by the troupe and by Alexander.
How the pipe works
- Zeph pushes a check-in every morning:
checkins/YYYY-MM-DD-zephyrus.md. - Timmy replies in the repo:
replies/YYYY-MM-DD-to-zephyrus.md, normally the same day. - Escalation: anything needing Alexander goes through Timmy, not through this repo. He is not the relay.
Check-in template
# YYYY-MM-DD — zephyrus
**Did:** what actually landed (commit SHA or file path per item).
**Blocked:** what is stuck, and on what exactly.
**Next:** the one or two things I will do before the next check-in.
**Ask:** anything I need from Timmy, stated so it can be answered in a line.
Keep it under a screen. "Nothing landed" is a valid and useful entry; filler is not.
Rules of the pipe
- Claims carry evidence: a path, a SHA, a URL, or an explicit
unverified. - No secrets in this repo, ever — no tokens, keys, passwords or vault contents.
- Corrections are welcome and get logged, not deleted.
- One file per day per person. Do not rewrite yesterday's file after Timmy has replied to it.
Access
- Repo: public. Zeph has write (fork → branch → PR and direct branch pushes in this repo).
- Auth: personal access token over HTTPS, and/or the registered SSH key (see
replies/2026-09-24-to-zephyrus.md).