forked from Rockachopa/Timmy-time-dashboard
e35a23cefa
Co-authored-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com> Co-committed-by: Alexander Whitestone <alexpaynex@gmail.com>
53 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: Tool Evaluation
|
|
type: research
|
|
typical_query_count: 3-5
|
|
expected_output_length: 800-1500 words
|
|
cascade_tier: groq_preferred
|
|
description: >
|
|
Discover and evaluate all shipping tools/libraries/services in a given domain.
|
|
Produces a ranked comparison table with pros, cons, and recommendation.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Tool Evaluation: {domain}
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
You are researching tools, libraries, and services for **{domain}**.
|
|
The goal is to find everything that is currently shipping (not vaporware)
|
|
and produce a structured comparison.
|
|
|
|
## Constraints
|
|
|
|
- Only include tools that have public releases or hosted services available today.
|
|
- If a tool is in beta/preview, note that clearly.
|
|
- Focus on {focus_criteria} when evaluating (e.g., cost, ease of integration, community size).
|
|
|
|
## Research Steps
|
|
|
|
1. Identify all actively-maintained tools in the **{domain}** space.
|
|
2. For each tool, gather: name, URL, license/pricing, last release date, language/platform.
|
|
3. Evaluate each tool against the focus criteria.
|
|
4. Rank by overall fit for the use case: **{use_case}**.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
### Summary
|
|
|
|
One paragraph: what the landscape looks like and the top recommendation.
|
|
|
|
### Comparison Table
|
|
|
|
| Tool | License / Price | Last Release | Language | {focus_criteria} Score | Notes |
|
|
|------|----------------|--------------|----------|----------------------|-------|
|
|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
|
|
|
|
### Top Pick
|
|
|
|
- **Recommended:** {tool_name} — {one-line reason}
|
|
- **Runner-up:** {tool_name} — {one-line reason}
|
|
|
|
### Risks & Gaps
|
|
|
|
Bullet list of things to watch out for (missing features, vendor lock-in, etc.).
|