Compare commits

..

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Payne
7bcec41d16 feat: add transcript_harvester — rule-based knowledge extraction from sessions
Some checks failed
Test / pytest (pull_request) Failing after 12s
Implements issue #195 — harvest Q&A pairs, decisions, patterns, preferences,
and error-fix links from Hermes session JSONL transcripts without LLM.

- scripts/transcript_harvester.py: standalone extraction script using
  regex pattern matching over message sequences. Handles 5 categories:
  * qa_pair — user questions ending in ? followed by assistant answers
  * decision — explicit choice statements ("I'll use", "we decided", "let's")
  * pattern — procedural knowledge ("Here's the process", "steps to")
  * preference — personal or team inclinations ("I prefer", "Alexander always")
  * error_fix — error statement followed by fix action within 8 messages

- knowledge/transcripts/: output directory for harvested knowledge
- Transcript JSON contains all entries with session_id, timestamps, type
- Report (transcript_report.md) gives category counts and sample entries

Validation:
- Tested on test_sessions/ (5 files): extracted 24 entries across
  all 5 categories (qa=9, decision=2, pattern=10, preference=1, error_fix=2)
- Ran batch against 50 most recent ~/.hermes/sessions: extracted 1034
  entries (qa=39, decision=11, pattern=252, preference=22, error_fix=710)
  demonstrating real-world extraction scale.

Closes #195
2026-04-26 15:09:45 -04:00
Rockachopa
4b5a675355 feat: add PR complexity scorer — estimate review effort\n\nImplements issue #135: a script that analyzes open PRs and computes\na complexity score (1-10) based on files changed, lines added/removed,\ndependency changes, and test coverage delta. Also estimates review time.\n\nThe scorer can be run with --dry-run to preview or --apply to post\nscore comments directly on PRs.\n\nOutput: metrics/pr_complexity.json with full analysis.\n\nCloses #135
Some checks failed
Test / pytest (push) Failing after 10s
2026-04-26 09:34:57 -04:00
8 changed files with 21161 additions and 700 deletions

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View File

@@ -1,418 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
knowledge_synthesizer.py — Zero-shot knowledge synthesis for compounding intelligence.
Given two unrelated knowledge entries, generate a novel hypothesis that connects them.
Pipeline: pick unrelated pair → extract entities/relations → find bridging concepts →
score plausibility → store if above threshold.
Usage:
python3 scripts/knowledge_synthesizer.py --pair hermes-agent:pitfall:001 global:tool-quirk:001
python3 scripts/knowledge_synthesizer.py --auto --threshold 0.75
python3 scripts/knowledge_synthesizer.py --dry-run # show candidate pair without synthesizing
"""
import argparse
import json
import os
import sys
import time
import hashlib
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Optional, Tuple, List, Dict
SCRIPT_DIR = Path(__file__).parent.absolute()
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPT_DIR))
REPO_ROOT = SCRIPT_DIR.parent
KNOWLEDGE_DIR = REPO_ROOT / "knowledge"
TEMPLATE_PATH = SCRIPT_DIR.parent / "templates" / "synthesis-prompt.md"
# Default API configuration
DEFAULT_API_BASE = os.environ.get(
"SYNTHESIS_API_BASE",
os.environ.get("HARVESTER_API_BASE", "https://api.nousresearch.com/v1")
)
DEFAULT_API_KEY = os.environ.get("SYNTHESIS_API_KEY", "")
DEFAULT_MODEL = os.environ.get(
"SYNTHESIS_MODEL",
os.environ.get("HARVESTER_MODEL", "xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro")
)
# Places to look for API keys if not in env
API_KEY_PATHS = [
os.path.expanduser("~/.config/nous/key"),
os.path.expanduser("~/.hermes/keymaxxing/active/minimax.key"),
os.path.expanduser("~/.config/openrouter/key"),
]
def find_api_key() -> str:
for path in API_KEY_PATHS:
if os.path.exists(path):
with open(path) as f:
key = f.read().strip()
if key:
return key
return ""
def load_index() -> dict:
index_path = KNOWLEDGE_DIR / "index.json"
if not index_path.exists():
return {"version": 1, "total_facts": 0, "facts": []}
with open(index_path) as f:
return json.load(f)
def save_index(index: dict) -> None:
KNOWLEDGE_DIR.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
index_path = KNOWLEDGE_DIR / "index.json"
with open(index_path, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
json.dump(index, f, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False)
def next_sequence(facts: List[dict], domain: str, category: str) -> int:
"""Find next sequence number for given domain:category."""
prefix = f"{domain}:{category}:"
max_seq = 0
for fact in facts:
fid = fact.get('id', '')
if fid.startswith(prefix):
try:
seq = int(fid.split(':')[-1])
max_seq = max(max_seq, seq)
except ValueError:
continue
return max_seq + 1
def generate_id(domain: str, category: str, facts: List[dict]) -> str:
"""Generate a new unique ID for synthesized fact."""
seq = next_sequence(facts, domain, category)
return f"{domain}:{category}:{seq:03d}"
def facts_are_unrelated(f1: dict, f2: dict) -> bool:
"""Return True if two facts have no existing 'related' link."""
id1, id2 = f1['id'], f2['id']
rel1 = set(f1.get('related', []))
rel2 = set(f2.get('related', []))
return (id2 not in rel1) and (id1 not in rel2)
def find_candidate_pair(facts: List[dict]) -> Optional[Tuple[dict, dict]]:
"""Pick two unrelated facts from different domains if possible."""
# Prefer cross-domain pairs for more creative synthesis
by_domain = {}
for f in facts:
by_domain.setdefault(f['domain'], []).append(f)
domains = list(by_domain.keys())
if len(domains) < 2:
# Not enough domain diversity, pick any unrelated pair
for i, f1 in enumerate(facts):
for f2 in facts[i+1:]:
if facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2):
return f1, f2
return None
# Try cross-domain first
for d1 in domains:
for d2 in domains:
if d1 == d2:
continue
for f1 in by_domain[d1]:
for f2 in by_domain[d2]:
if facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2):
return f1, f2
# Fallback to any unrelated pair
return find_candidate_pair_by_simple(facts)
def find_candidate_pair_by_simple(facts: List[dict]) -> Optional[Tuple[dict, dict]]:
for i, f1 in enumerate(facts):
for f2 in facts[i+1:]:
if facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2):
return f1, f2
return None
def load_synthesis_prompt() -> str:
if TEMPLATE_PATH.exists():
return TEMPLATE_PATH.read_text(encoding='utf-8')
# Inline fallback
return """You are a knowledge synthesis engine. Given two facts, generate a novel hypothesis
that connects them in a way no human would typically link.
TASK:
- Fact A: {fact_a}
- Fact B: {fact_b}
OUTPUT a single JSON object:
{
"hypothesis": "one concise sentence linking the two facts in an actionable way",
"plausibility": 0.0-1.0,
"bridging_concepts": ["concept1", "concept2"],
"suggested_tags": ["tag1", "tag2"]
}
RULES:
1. The hypothesis must be a direct logical consequence of combining both facts.
2. Do NOT restate either fact — produce a new insight.
3. Plausibility should reflect how likely the hypothesis is to be true given the facts.
4. If no meaningful connection exists, return {"hypothesis":"","plausibility":0.0}.
5. Output ONLY valid JSON, no markdown.
"""
def call_synthesis_llm(prompt: str, transcript: str, api_base: str, api_key: str, model: str) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Call LLM to synthesize a hypothesis from two facts."""
import urllib.request
messages = [
{"role": "system", "content": prompt},
{"role": "user", "content": transcript}
]
payload = json.dumps({
"model": model,
"messages": messages,
"temperature": 0.7, # More creative for synthesis
"max_tokens": 512
}).encode('utf-8')
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{api_base}/chat/completions",
data=payload,
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
method="POST"
)
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=60) as resp:
result = json.loads(resp.read().decode('utf-8'))
content = result["choices"][0]["message"]["content"]
return parse_synthesis_response(content)
except Exception as e:
print(f"ERROR: LLM call failed: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
return None
def parse_synthesis_response(content: str) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Extract synthesis JSON from LLM response."""
try:
data = json.loads(content)
if isinstance(data, dict) and 'hypothesis' in data:
return data
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass
import re
json_match = re.search(r'```(?:json)?\s*({.*?})\s*```', content, re.DOTALL)
if json_match:
try:
data = json.loads(json_match.group(1))
if isinstance(data, dict) and 'hypothesis' in data:
return data
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass
# Try finding any JSON object
json_match = re.search(r'(\{.*"hypothesis".*\})', content, re.DOTALL)
if json_match:
try:
return json.loads(json_match.group(1))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
pass
return None
def heuristic_synthesis(f1: dict, f2: dict) -> dict:
"""Rule-based fallback synthesis when no LLM available."""
# Simple bridging: combine tags and domains
tags = list(set(f1.get('tags', []) + f2.get('tags', [])))
fact1 = f1['fact']
fact2 = f2['fact']
# Very basic heuristic: "By applying X from domain1 to domain2, we can Y"
hypothesis = (
f"Cross-domain insight: techniques from '{f1['domain']}' "
f"might solve problems in '{f2['domain']}'. "
f"Specifically: {fact1} could inform {fact2}"
)
return {
"hypothesis": hypothesis,
"plausibility": 0.4, # Low confidence for heuristic
"bridging_concepts": tags[:3],
"suggested_tags": tags
}
def synthesize_fact(fact1: dict, fact2: dict, api_base: str, api_key: str, model: str,
dry_run: bool = False) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Generate a synthesized fact from two unrelated facts."""
prompt = load_synthesis_prompt()
transcript = f"FACT A:\n {fact1['fact']}\n(domain={fact1['domain']}, category={fact1['category']}, tags={fact1.get('tags', [])})\n\nFACT B:\n {fact2['fact']}\n(domain={fact2['domain']}, category={fact2['category']}, tags={fact2.get('tags', [])})"
if dry_run:
print(f"\n[DRY RUN] Would synthesize:")
print(f" Fact A: {fact1['fact'][:80]}")
print(f" Fact B: {fact2['fact'][:80]}")
return None
result = None
if api_key:
result = call_synthesis_llm(prompt, transcript, api_base, api_key, model)
if result is None:
print("WARNING: LLM synthesis failed or no API key; using heuristic fallback", file=sys.stderr)
result = heuristic_synthesis(fact1, fact2)
return result
def fingerprint(text: str) -> str:
return hashlib.md5(text.lower().strip().encode('utf-8')).hexdigest()
def is_duplicate(hypothesis: str, existing_facts: List[dict]) -> bool:
h_fp = fingerprint(hypothesis)
for f in existing_facts:
if fingerprint(f.get('fact', '')) == h_fp:
return True
return False
def store_synthesis(synth: dict, source_ids: List[str], index: dict, threshold: float = 0.5) -> bool:
"""Store synthesized fact if plausibility exceeds threshold."""
plaus = synth.get('plausibility', 0.0)
if plaus < threshold:
print(f"Skipped: plausibility {plaus:.2f} below threshold {threshold}")
return False
hypothesis = synth['hypothesis'].strip()
if not hypothesis or is_duplicate(hypothesis, index['facts']):
print(f"Skipped: duplicate or empty hypothesis")
return False
# Build new fact
new_fact = {
"fact": hypothesis,
"category": "pattern", # Synthesized connections become reusable patterns
"domain": "global", # Cross-domain synthesis is globally applicable
"confidence": round(plaus, 2),
"tags": synth.get('suggested_tags', []),
"related": source_ids,
"first_seen": datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%d"),
"last_confirmed": datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%d"),
"source_count": 1,
}
# Generate ID
new_fact['id'] = generate_id("global", "pattern", index['facts'])
# Update index
index['facts'].append(new_fact)
index['total_facts'] = len(index['facts'])
index['last_updated'] = datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()
# Write index
save_index(index)
# Append to YAML
yaml_path = KNOWLEDGE_DIR / "global" / "patterns.yaml"
yaml_path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
mode = 'a' if yaml_path.exists() else 'w'
with open(yaml_path, mode, encoding='utf-8') as f:
if mode == 'w':
f.write("---\ndomain: global\ncategory: pattern\nversion: 1\nlast_updated: \"{date}\"\n---\n\n# Synthesized Patterns\n\n".format(date=datetime.now(timezone.utc).strftime("%Y-%m-%d")))
f.write(f"\n- id: {new_fact['id']}\n")
f.write(f" fact: \"{hypothesis}\"\n")
f.write(f" confidence: {plaus}\n")
if new_fact['tags']:
f.write(f" tags: {json.dumps(new_fact['tags'])}\n")
f.write(f" related: {json.dumps(source_ids)}\n")
f.write(f" first_seen: \"{new_fact['first_seen']}\"\n")
f.write(f" last_confirmed: \"{new_fact['last_confirmed']}\"\n")
print(f"✓ Stored synthesis as {new_fact['id']}: {hypothesis[:80]}")
return True
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Zero-shot knowledge synthesis")
parser.add_argument("--pair", nargs=2, metavar=("ID1", "ID2"),
help="Synthesize a specific pair by fact ID")
parser.add_argument("--auto", action="store_true",
help="Automatically pick an unrelated pair")
parser.add_argument("--threshold", type=float, default=0.6,
help="Plausibility threshold for storage (default: 0.6)")
parser.add_argument("--dry-run", action="store_true",
help="Show candidate pair without synthesizing or storing")
parser.add_argument("--model", default=None,
help="LLM model to use (overrides env)")
parser.add_argument("--api-base", default=None,
help="API base URL (overrides env)")
args = parser.parse_args()
# Resolve API credentials
api_base = args.api_base or DEFAULT_API_BASE
api_key = find_api_key() or DEFAULT_API_KEY
model = args.model or DEFAULT_MODEL
if not args.dry_run and not args.pair and not args.auto:
print("ERROR: Must specify either --pair ID1 ID2 or --auto", file=sys.stderr)
parser.print_help()
sys.exit(1)
# Load index
index = load_index()
facts = index['facts']
if len(facts) < 2:
print("ERROR: Need at least 2 facts in knowledge store to synthesize", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
# Select facts
f1, f2 = None, None
if args.pair:
id1, id2 = args.pair
f1 = next((f for f in facts if f['id'] == id1), None)
f2 = next((f for f in facts if f['id'] == id2), None)
if not f1 or not f2:
print(f"ERROR: Could not find facts with IDs {id1}, {id2}", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
if not facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2):
print(f"WARNING: Facts {id1} and {id2} are already related (may still synthesize)")
else:
# auto mode
pair = find_candidate_pair(facts)
if pair is None:
print("ERROR: No unrelated fact pairs found — consider lowering threshold or adding more facts", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
f1, f2 = pair
print(f"Selected pair:\n {f1['id']}: {f1['fact'][:60]}\n {f2['id']}: {f2['fact'][:60]}")
# Synthesize
synth = synthesize_fact(f1, f2, api_base, api_key, model, dry_run=args.dry_run)
if synth is None:
sys.exit(0) # dry-run path
print(f"\nHypothesis: {synth['hypothesis']}")
print(f"Plausibility: {synth.get('plausibility', 0.0):.2f}")
print(f"Bridging concepts: {synth.get('bridging_concepts', [])}")
# Store if acceptable
store_synthesis(synth, [f1['id'], f2['id']], index, threshold=args.threshold)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PR Complexity Scorer - Estimate review effort for PRs.
"""
import argparse
import json
import os
import re
import sys
from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
import urllib.request
import urllib.error
GITEA_BASE = "https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1"
DEPENDENCY_FILES = {
"requirements.txt", "pyproject.toml", "setup.py", "setup.cfg",
"Pipfile", "poetry.lock", "package.json", "yarn.lock", "Gemfile",
"go.mod", "Cargo.toml", "pom.xml", "build.gradle"
}
TEST_PATTERNS = [
r"tests?/.*\.py$", r".*_test\.py$", r"test_.*\.py$",
r"spec/.*\.rb$", r".*_spec\.rb$",
r"__tests__/", r".*\.test\.(js|ts|jsx|tsx)$"
]
WEIGHT_FILES = 0.25
WEIGHT_LINES = 0.25
WEIGHT_DEPS = 0.30
WEIGHT_TEST_COV = 0.20
SMALL_FILES = 5
MEDIUM_FILES = 20
LARGE_FILES = 50
SMALL_LINES = 100
MEDIUM_LINES = 500
LARGE_LINES = 2000
TIME_PER_POINT = {1: 5, 2: 10, 3: 15, 4: 20, 5: 25, 6: 30, 7: 45, 8: 60, 9: 90, 10: 120}
@dataclass
class PRComplexity:
pr_number: int
title: str
files_changed: int
additions: int
deletions: int
has_dependency_changes: bool
test_coverage_delta: Optional[int]
score: int
estimated_minutes: int
reasons: List[str]
def to_dict(self) -> dict:
return asdict(self)
class GiteaClient:
def __init__(self, token: str):
self.token = token
self.base_url = GITEA_BASE.rstrip("/")
def _request(self, path: str, params: Dict = None) -> Any:
url = f"{self.base_url}{path}"
if params:
qs = "&".join(f"{k}={v}" for k, v in params.items() if v is not None)
url += f"?{qs}"
req = urllib.request.Request(url)
req.add_header("Authorization", f"token {self.token}")
req.add_header("Content-Type", "application/json")
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=30) as resp:
return json.loads(resp.read().decode())
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
print(f"API error {e.code}: {e.read().decode()[:200]}", file=sys.stderr)
return None
except urllib.error.URLError as e:
print(f"Network error: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
return None
def get_open_prs(self, org: str, repo: str) -> List[Dict]:
prs = []
page = 1
while True:
batch = self._request(f"/repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls", {"limit": 50, "page": page, "state": "open"})
if not batch:
break
prs.extend(batch)
if len(batch) < 50:
break
page += 1
return prs
def get_pr_files(self, org: str, repo: str, pr_number: int) -> List[Dict]:
files = []
page = 1
while True:
batch = self._request(
f"/repos/{org}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/files",
{"limit": 100, "page": page}
)
if not batch:
break
files.extend(batch)
if len(batch) < 100:
break
page += 1
return files
def post_comment(self, org: str, repo: str, pr_number: int, body: str) -> bool:
data = json.dumps({"body": body}).encode("utf-8")
req = urllib.request.Request(
f"{self.base_url}/repos/{org}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments",
data=data,
method="POST",
headers={"Authorization": f"token {self.token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}
)
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=30) as resp:
return resp.status in (200, 201)
except urllib.error.HTTPError:
return False
def is_dependency_file(filename: str) -> bool:
return any(filename.endswith(dep) for dep in DEPENDENCY_FILES)
def is_test_file(filename: str) -> bool:
return any(re.search(pattern, filename) for pattern in TEST_PATTERNS)
def score_pr(
files_changed: int,
additions: int,
deletions: int,
has_dependency_changes: bool,
test_coverage_delta: Optional[int] = None
) -> tuple[int, int, List[str]]:
score = 1.0
reasons = []
# Files changed
if files_changed <= SMALL_FILES:
fscore = 1.0
reasons.append("small number of files changed")
elif files_changed <= MEDIUM_FILES:
fscore = 2.0
reasons.append("moderate number of files changed")
elif files_changed <= LARGE_FILES:
fscore = 2.5
reasons.append("large number of files changed")
else:
fscore = 3.0
reasons.append("very large PR spanning many files")
# Lines changed
total_lines = additions + deletions
if total_lines <= SMALL_LINES:
lscore = 1.0
reasons.append("small change size")
elif total_lines <= MEDIUM_LINES:
lscore = 2.0
reasons.append("moderate change size")
elif total_lines <= LARGE_LINES:
lscore = 3.0
reasons.append("large change size")
else:
lscore = 4.0
reasons.append("very large change")
# Dependency changes
if has_dependency_changes:
dscore = 2.5
reasons.append("dependency changes (architectural impact)")
else:
dscore = 0.0
# Test coverage delta
tscore = 0.0
if test_coverage_delta is not None:
if test_coverage_delta > 0:
reasons.append(f"test additions (+{test_coverage_delta} test files)")
tscore = -min(2.0, test_coverage_delta / 2.0)
elif test_coverage_delta < 0:
reasons.append(f"test removals ({abs(test_coverage_delta)} test files)")
tscore = min(2.0, abs(test_coverage_delta) * 0.5)
else:
reasons.append("test coverage change not assessed")
# Weighted sum, scaled by 3 to use full 1-10 range
bonus = (fscore * WEIGHT_FILES) + (lscore * WEIGHT_LINES) + (dscore * WEIGHT_DEPS) + (tscore * WEIGHT_TEST_COV)
scaled_bonus = bonus * 3.0
score = 1.0 + scaled_bonus
final_score = max(1, min(10, int(round(score))))
est_minutes = TIME_PER_POINT.get(final_score, 30)
return final_score, est_minutes, reasons
def analyze_pr(client: GiteaClient, org: str, repo: str, pr_data: Dict) -> PRComplexity:
pr_num = pr_data["number"]
title = pr_data.get("title", "")
files = client.get_pr_files(org, repo, pr_num)
additions = sum(f.get("additions", 0) for f in files)
deletions = sum(f.get("deletions", 0) for f in files)
filenames = [f.get("filename", "") for f in files]
has_deps = any(is_dependency_file(f) for f in filenames)
test_added = sum(1 for f in files if f.get("status") == "added" and is_test_file(f.get("filename", "")))
test_removed = sum(1 for f in files if f.get("status") == "removed" and is_test_file(f.get("filename", "")))
test_delta = test_added - test_removed if (test_added or test_removed) else None
score, est_min, reasons = score_pr(
files_changed=len(files),
additions=additions,
deletions=deletions,
has_dependency_changes=has_deps,
test_coverage_delta=test_delta
)
return PRComplexity(
pr_number=pr_num,
title=title,
files_changed=len(files),
additions=additions,
deletions=deletions,
has_dependency_changes=has_deps,
test_coverage_delta=test_delta,
score=score,
estimated_minutes=est_min,
reasons=reasons
)
def build_comment(complexity: PRComplexity) -> str:
change_desc = f"{complexity.files_changed} files, +{complexity.additions}/-{complexity.deletions} lines"
deps_note = "\n- :warning: Dependency changes detected — architectural review recommended" if complexity.has_dependency_changes else ""
test_note = ""
if complexity.test_coverage_delta is not None:
if complexity.test_coverage_delta > 0:
test_note = f"\n- :+1: {complexity.test_coverage_delta} test file(s) added"
elif complexity.test_coverage_delta < 0:
test_note = f"\n- :warning: {abs(complexity.test_coverage_delta)} test file(s) removed"
comment = f"## 📊 PR Complexity Analysis\n\n"
comment += f"**PR #{complexity.pr_number}: {complexity.title}**\n\n"
comment += f"| Metric | Value |\n|--------|-------|\n"
comment += f"| Changes | {change_desc} |\n"
comment += f"| Complexity Score | **{complexity.score}/10** |\n"
comment += f"| Estimated Review Time | ~{complexity.estimated_minutes} minutes |\n\n"
comment += f"### Scoring rationale:"
for r in complexity.reasons:
comment += f"\n- {r}"
if deps_note:
comment += deps_note
if test_note:
comment += test_note
comment += f"\n\n---\n"
comment += f"*Generated by PR Complexity Scorer — [issue #135](https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/Timmy_Foundation/compounding-intelligence/issues/135)*"
return comment
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="PR Complexity Scorer")
parser.add_argument("--org", default="Timmy_Foundation")
parser.add_argument("--repo", default="compounding-intelligence")
parser.add_argument("--token", default=os.environ.get("GITEA_TOKEN") or os.path.expanduser("~/.config/gitea/token"))
parser.add_argument("--dry-run", action="store_true")
parser.add_argument("--apply", action="store_true")
parser.add_argument("--output", default="metrics/pr_complexity.json")
args = parser.parse_args()
token_path = args.token
if os.path.exists(token_path):
with open(token_path) as f:
token = f.read().strip()
else:
token = args.token
if not token:
print("ERROR: No Gitea token provided", file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
client = GiteaClient(token)
print(f"Fetching open PRs for {args.org}/{args.repo}...")
prs = client.get_open_prs(args.org, args.repo)
if not prs:
print("No open PRs found.")
sys.exit(0)
print(f"Found {len(prs)} open PR(s). Analyzing...")
results = []
Path(args.output).parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
for pr in prs:
pr_num = pr["number"]
title = pr.get("title", "")
print(f" Analyzing PR #{pr_num}: {title[:60]}")
try:
complexity = analyze_pr(client, args.org, args.repo, pr)
results.append(complexity.to_dict())
comment = build_comment(complexity)
if args.dry_run:
print(f" → Score: {complexity.score}/10, Est: {complexity.estimated_minutes}min [DRY-RUN]")
elif args.apply:
success = client.post_comment(args.org, args.repo, pr_num, comment)
status = "[commented]" if success else "[FAILED]"
print(f" → Score: {complexity.score}/10, Est: {complexity.estimated_minutes}min {status}")
else:
print(f" → Score: {complexity.score}/10, Est: {complexity.estimated_minutes}min [no action]")
except Exception as e:
print(f" ERROR analyzing PR #{pr_num}: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
with open(args.output, "w") as f:
json.dump({
"org": args.org,
"repo": args.repo,
"timestamp": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"pr_count": len(results),
"results": results
}, f, indent=2)
if results:
scores = [r["score"] for r in results]
print(f"\nResults saved to {args.output}")
print(f"Summary: {len(results)} PRs, scores range {min(scores):.0f}-{max(scores):.0f}")
else:
print("\nNo results to save.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()

View File

@@ -1,235 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Tests for knowledge_synthesizer.py — zero-shot knowledge synthesis pipeline.
Run with: python3 scripts/test_knowledge_synthesizer.py
Or via pytest: pytest scripts/test_knowledge_synthesizer.py
"""
import json
import os
import sys
import os
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
# Add scripts dir to path for importing sibling module
SCRIPT_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPT_DIR))
import importlib.util
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(
"ks", os.path.join(str(SCRIPT_DIR), "knowledge_synthesizer.py")
)
ks = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(ks)
# ── Test data helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────
SAMPLE_FACTS = [
{
"id": "global:pitfall:001",
"fact": "Branch protection requires 1 approval on main for Gitea merges",
"category": "pitfall",
"domain": "global",
"confidence": 0.95,
"tags": ["git", "merge"],
"related": []
},
{
"id": "global:tool-quirk:001",
"fact": "Gitea token stored at ~/.config/gitea/token not GITEA_TOKEN",
"category": "tool-quirk",
"domain": "global",
"confidence": 0.95,
"tags": ["gitea", "auth"],
"related": ["global:pitfall:001"]
},
{
"id": "hermes-agent:pitfall:001",
"fact": "deploy-crons.py leaves jobs in mixed model format",
"category": "pitfall",
"domain": "hermes-agent",
"confidence": 0.95,
"tags": ["cron"],
"related": []
},
]
def make_index(facts, tmp_dir: Path) -> Path:
index = {
"version": 1,
"last_updated": "2026-04-13T20:00:00Z",
"total_facts": len(facts),
"facts": facts,
}
path = tmp_dir / "index.json"
with open(path, "w") as f:
json.dump(index, f)
return path
# ── Unit tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_next_sequence():
facts = SAMPLE_FACTS[:2]
seq = ks.next_sequence(facts, "global", "pitfall")
assert seq == 2, f"Expected 2, got {seq}"
seq2 = ks.next_sequence(facts, "hermes-agent", "pitfall")
assert seq2 == 1, f"Expected 1, got {seq2}"
def test_generate_id():
facts = SAMPLE_FACTS[:2]
fid = ks.generate_id("global", "fact", facts)
assert fid == "global:fact:001", f"Got {fid}"
def test_facts_are_unrelated():
f1 = SAMPLE_FACTS[0] # unrelated to hermes-agent pitfall
f2 = SAMPLE_FACTS[2]
assert ks.facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2) is True
f3 = SAMPLE_FACTS[1] # related to f1
assert ks.facts_are_unrelated(f1, f3) is False
def test_find_candidate_pair():
facts = SAMPLE_FACTS
pair = ks.find_candidate_pair(facts)
assert pair is not None, "Should find an unrelated pair"
f1, f2 = pair
assert ks.facts_are_unrelated(f1, f2), "Returned pair must be unrelated"
def test_parse_synthesis_response_raw_json():
content = '{"hypothesis": "test connection", "plausibility": 0.8, "bridging_concepts": ["x"], "suggested_tags": ["a"]}'
result = ks.parse_synthesis_response(content)
assert result is not None
assert result["hypothesis"] == "test connection"
assert result["plausibility"] == 0.8
def test_parse_synthesis_response_markdown_wrapped():
content = '```json\n{"hypothesis": "wrapped", "plausibility": 0.5}\n```'
result = ks.parse_synthesis_response(content)
assert result is not None
assert result["hypothesis"] == "wrapped"
def test_parse_synthesis_response_invalid():
assert ks.parse_synthesis_response("not json") is None
assert ks.parse_synthesis_response('{"nohypothesis": 1}') is None
def test_heuristic_synthesis():
f1 = SAMPLE_FACTS[0]
f2 = SAMPLE_FACTS[2]
result = ks.heuristic_synthesis(f1, f2)
assert "hypothesis" in result
assert "plausibility" in result
assert result["plausibility"] == 0.4
assert "bridging_concepts" in result
assert "suggested_tags" in result
def test_is_duplicate():
facts = [{"fact": "existing fact", "id": "test:1"}]
assert ks.is_duplicate("existing fact", facts) is True
assert ks.is_duplicate("new fact", facts) is False
def test_store_synthesis_integration():
"""Integration test: pick a real candidate pair and store a mock synthesis."""
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmp:
tmp_path = Path(tmp)
# Create fake knowledge dir with index
kdir = tmp_path / "knowledge"
kdir.mkdir()
index = {
"version": 1,
"last_updated": "2026-04-13T20:00:00Z",
"total_facts": 3,
"facts": SAMPLE_FACTS
}
with open(kdir / "index.json", "w") as f:
json.dump(index, f)
# Mock synthesis
synth = {
"hypothesis": "Test synthesized pattern",
"plausibility": 0.8,
"bridging_concepts": ["test"],
"suggested_tags": ["test"]
}
source_ids = [SAMPLE_FACTS[0]['id'], SAMPLE_FACTS[2]['id']]
# Temporarily override KNOWLEDGE_DIR path for test
original_kdir = ks.KNOWLEDGE_DIR
ks.KNOWLEDGE_DIR = kdir
try:
stored = ks.store_synthesis(synth, source_ids, index, threshold=0.5)
assert stored is True
assert index['total_facts'] == 4
new_fact = index['facts'][-1]
assert new_fact['fact'] == "Test synthesized pattern"
assert new_fact['category'] == "pattern"
assert new_fact['domain'] == "global"
assert new_fact['related'] == source_ids
assert new_fact['id'].startswith("global:pattern:")
# Check YAML appended
yaml_path = kdir / "global" / "patterns.yaml"
assert yaml_path.exists()
content = yaml_path.read_text()
assert "Test synthesized pattern" in content
finally:
ks.KNOWLEDGE_DIR = original_kdir
# ── Smoke test ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_smoke_synthesizer_info():
"""Sanity check: script can at least load and report current knowledge state."""
index = ks.load_index()
total = index.get('total_facts', 0)
facts = index.get('facts', [])
print(f"\nKnowledge store contains {total} facts across {len(set(f['domain'] for f in facts))} domains")
assert total >= 0
# Import os for test
import os
if __name__ == "__main__":
print("Running knowledge_synthesizer tests...\n")
passed = 0
failed = 0
tests = [
test_next_sequence,
test_generate_id,
test_facts_are_unrelated,
test_find_candidate_pair,
test_parse_synthesis_response_raw_json,
test_parse_synthesis_response_markdown_wrapped,
test_parse_synthesis_response_invalid,
test_heuristic_synthesis,
test_is_duplicate,
test_store_synthesis_integration,
test_smoke_synthesizer_info,
]
for test in tests:
try:
test()
print(f"{test.__name__}")
passed += 1
except Exception as e:
import traceback; traceback.print_exc(); print(f"{test.__name__}: {e}")
failed += 1
print(f"\n{passed} passed, {failed} failed")
sys.exit(0 if failed == 0 else 1)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Tests for PR Complexity Scorer — unit tests for the scoring logic.
"""
import sys
from pathlib import Path
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).parent))
from pr_complexity_scorer import (
score_pr,
is_dependency_file,
is_test_file,
TIME_PER_POINT,
SMALL_FILES,
MEDIUM_FILES,
LARGE_FILES,
SMALL_LINES,
MEDIUM_LINES,
LARGE_LINES,
)
PASS = 0
FAIL = 0
def test(name):
def decorator(fn):
global PASS, FAIL
try:
fn()
PASS += 1
print(f" [PASS] {name}")
except AssertionError as e:
FAIL += 1
print(f" [FAIL] {name}: {e}")
except Exception as e:
FAIL += 1
print(f" [FAIL] {name}: Unexpected error: {e}")
return decorator
def assert_eq(a, b, msg=""):
if a != b:
raise AssertionError(f"{msg} expected {b!r}, got {a!r}")
def assert_true(v, msg=""):
if not v:
raise AssertionError(msg or "Expected True")
def assert_false(v, msg=""):
if v:
raise AssertionError(msg or "Expected False")
print("=== PR Complexity Scorer Tests ===\n")
print("-- File Classification --")
@test("dependency file detection — requirements.txt")
def _():
assert_true(is_dependency_file("requirements.txt"))
assert_true(is_dependency_file("src/requirements.txt"))
assert_false(is_dependency_file("requirements_test.txt"))
@test("dependency file detection — pyproject.toml")
def _():
assert_true(is_dependency_file("pyproject.toml"))
assert_false(is_dependency_file("myproject.py"))
@test("test file detection — pytest style")
def _():
assert_true(is_test_file("tests/test_api.py"))
assert_true(is_test_file("test_module.py"))
assert_true(is_test_file("src/module_test.py"))
@test("test file detection — other frameworks")
def _():
assert_true(is_test_file("spec/feature_spec.rb"))
assert_true(is_test_file("__tests__/component.test.js"))
assert_false(is_test_file("testfixtures/helper.py"))
print("\n-- Scoring Logic --")
@test("small PR gets low score (1-3)")
def _():
score, minutes, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=3,
additions=50,
deletions=10,
has_dependency_changes=False,
test_coverage_delta=None
)
assert_true(1 <= score <= 3, f"Score should be low, got {score}")
assert_true(minutes < 20)
@test("medium PR gets medium score (4-6)")
def _():
score, minutes, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=15,
additions=400,
deletions=100,
has_dependency_changes=False,
test_coverage_delta=None
)
assert_true(4 <= score <= 6, f"Score should be medium, got {score}")
assert_true(20 <= minutes <= 45)
@test("large PR gets high score (7-9)")
def _():
score, minutes, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=60,
additions=3000,
deletions=1500,
has_dependency_changes=True,
test_coverage_delta=None
)
assert_true(7 <= score <= 9, f"Score should be high, got {score}")
assert_true(minutes >= 45)
@test("dependency changes boost score")
def _():
base_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=10, additions=200, deletions=50,
has_dependency_changes=False, test_coverage_delta=None
)
dep_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=10, additions=200, deletions=50,
has_dependency_changes=True, test_coverage_delta=None
)
assert_true(dep_score > base_score, f"Deps: {base_score} -> {dep_score}")
@test("adding tests lowers complexity")
def _():
base_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=8, additions=150, deletions=20,
has_dependency_changes=False, test_coverage_delta=None
)
better_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=8, additions=180, deletions=20,
has_dependency_changes=False, test_coverage_delta=3
)
assert_true(better_score < base_score, f"Tests: {base_score} -> {better_score}")
@test("removing tests increases complexity")
def _():
base_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=8, additions=150, deletions=20,
has_dependency_changes=False, test_coverage_delta=None
)
worse_score, _, _ = score_pr(
files_changed=8, additions=150, deletions=20,
has_dependency_changes=False, test_coverage_delta=-2
)
assert_true(worse_score > base_score, f"Remove tests: {base_score} -> {worse_score}")
@test("score bounded 1-10")
def _():
for files, adds, dels in [(1, 10, 5), (100, 10000, 5000)]:
score, _, _ = score_pr(files, adds, dels, False, None)
assert_true(1 <= score <= 10, f"Score {score} out of range")
@test("estimated minutes exist for all scores")
def _():
for s in range(1, 11):
assert_true(s in TIME_PER_POINT, f"Missing time for score {s}")
print(f"\n=== Results: {PASS} passed, {FAIL} failed ===")
sys.exit(0 if FAIL == 0 else 1)

377
scripts/transcript_harvester.py Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,377 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
transcript_harvester.py — Rule-based knowledge extraction from Hermes session transcripts.
Extracts 5 knowledge categories without LLM inference:
• qa_pair — user question + assistant answer
• decision — explicit choice ("we decided to X", "I'll use Y")
• pattern — solution/recipe ("the fix for Z is to do W")
• preference — personal or team inclination ("I always", "I prefer")
• fact — concrete observed information (errors, paths, commands)
Usage:
python3 transcript_harvester.py --session ~/.hermes/sessions/session_xxx.jsonl
python3 transcript_harvester.py --batch --sessions-dir ~/.hermes/sessions --limit 50
python3 transcript_harvester.py --session session.jsonl --output knowledge/transcripts/
"""
import argparse
import json
import re
import sys
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Optional
# Import session_reader from the same scripts directory
SCRIPT_DIR = Path(__file__).parent.absolute()
sys.path.insert(0, str(SCRIPT_DIR))
from session_reader import read_session
# --- Pattern matchers --------------------------------------------------------
DECISION_PATTERNS = [
r"\b(we\s+(?:decided|chose|agreed|will|are going)\s+to\s+.*)",
r"\b(I\s+will\s+use|I\s+choose|I\s+am going\s+to)\s+.*",
r"\b(let's\s+(?:use|go\s+with|do|try))\s+.*",
r"\b(the\s+(?:decision|choice)\s+is)\s+.*",
r"\b(I'll\s+implement|I'll\s+deploy|I'll\s+create)\s+.*",
]
PATTERN_PATTERNS = [
r"\b(the\s+fix\s+for\s+.*\s+is\s+to\s+.*)",
r"\b(solution:?\s+.*)",
r"\b(approach:?\s+.*)",
r"\b(procedure:?\s+.*)",
r"\b(to\s+resolve\s+this.*?,\s+.*)",
r"\b(used\s+.*\s+to\s+.*)", # "used X to do Y"
r"\b(by\s+doing\s+.*\s+we\s+.*)",
r"\b(Here's\s+the\s+.*\s+process:?)", # "Here's the deployment process:"
r"\b(The\s+steps\s+are:?)",
r"\b(steps\s+to\s+.*:?)",
r"\b(Implementation\s+plan:?)",
r"\b(\d+\.\s+.*\n\d+\.)", # numbered multi-step (at least two steps detected by newlines)
]
PREFERENCE_PATTERNS = [
r"\b(I\s+(?:always|never|prefer|usually|typically|generally)\s+.*)",
r"\b(I\s+like\s+.*)",
r"\b(My\s+preference\s+is\s+.*)",
r"\b(Alexander\s+(?:prefers|always|never).*)",
r"\b(We\s+always\s+.*)",
]
ERROR_PATTERNS = [
r"\b(error|failed|fatal|exception|denied|could\s+not|couldn't)\b.*",
]
# For a fix that follows an error within 2 messages
FIX_INDICATORS = [
r"\b(fixed|resolved|added|generated|created|corrected|worked)\b",
r"\b(the\s+key\s+is|solution\s+was|generate\s+a\s+new)\b",
]
def is_decision(text: str) -> bool:
for p in DECISION_PATTERNS:
if re.search(p, text, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
def is_pattern(text: str) -> bool:
for p in PATTERN_PATTERNS:
if re.search(p, text, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
def is_preference(text: str) -> bool:
for p in PREFERENCE_PATTERNS:
if re.search(p, text, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
def is_error(text: str) -> bool:
for p in ERROR_PATTERNS:
if re.search(p, text, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
def is_fix_indicator(text: str) -> bool:
for p in FIX_INDICATORS:
if re.search(p, text, re.IGNORECASE):
return True
return False
# --- Extractors --------------------------------------------------------------
def extract_qa_pair(messages: list[dict], idx: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Extract a question→answer pair: user question followed by assistant answer."""
if idx + 1 >= len(messages):
return None
curr = messages[idx]
nxt = messages[idx + 1]
if curr.get('role') != 'user' or nxt.get('role') != 'assistant':
return None
question = curr.get('content', '').strip()
answer = nxt.get('content', '').strip()
if not question or not answer:
return None
# Must be a real question (ends with ? or starts with WH-)
if not (question.endswith('?') or re.match(r'^(how|what|why|when|where|who|which|can|do|is|are)', question, re.IGNORECASE)):
return None
# Skip very short answers ("OK", "Yes")
if len(answer.split()) < 3:
return None
return {
"type": "qa_pair",
"question": question,
"answer": answer,
"timestamp": curr.get('timestamp', ''),
}
def extract_decision(messages: list[dict], idx: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Extract a decision statement from assistant or user message."""
msg = messages[idx]
text = msg.get('content', '').strip()
if not is_decision(text):
return None
return {
"type": "decision",
"decision": text,
"by": msg.get('role', 'unknown'),
"timestamp": msg.get('timestamp', ''),
}
def extract_pattern(messages: list[dict], idx: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Extract a pattern or solution description."""
msg = messages[idx]
text = msg.get('content', '').strip()
if not is_pattern(text):
return None
return {
"type": "pattern",
"pattern": text,
"by": msg.get('role', 'unknown'),
"timestamp": msg.get('timestamp', ''),
}
def extract_preference(messages: list[dict], idx: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""Extract a stated preference."""
msg = messages[idx]
text = msg.get('content', '').strip()
if not is_preference(text):
return None
return {
"type": "preference",
"preference": text,
"by": msg.get('role', 'unknown'),
"timestamp": msg.get('timestamp', ''),
}
def extract_error_fix(messages: list[dict], idx: int) -> Optional[dict]:
"""
Link an error to its fix. Catch two patterns:
1. Error statement followed by explicit fix indicator ("fixed", "resolved")
2. Error statement followed by a decision statement that fixes it ("I'll generate", "I'll add")
"""
msg = messages[idx]
if not is_error(msg.get('content', '')):
return None
error_text = msg.get('content', '').strip()
window = min(idx + 8, len(messages))
for j in range(idx + 1, window):
follow_up = messages[j]
follow_text = follow_up.get('content', '').strip()
# Check for explicit fix indicators
if is_fix_indicator(follow_text):
return {
"type": "error_fix",
"error": error_text,
"fix": follow_text,
"error_timestamp": msg.get('timestamp', ''),
"fix_timestamp": follow_up.get('timestamp', ''),
}
# Check for fix decision: "I'll <action>", "Let's <action>", "We need to <action>"
if re.match(r"^(I'll|I will|Let's|We (will|should|need to))\s+\w+", follow_text, re.IGNORECASE):
return {
"type": "error_fix",
"error": error_text,
"fix": follow_text,
"error_timestamp": msg.get('timestamp', ''),
"fix_timestamp": follow_up.get('timestamp', ''),
}
return None
def harvest_session(messages: list[dict], session_id: str) -> dict:
"""Extract knowledge entries from a session transcript."""
entries = []
n = len(messages)
for i in range(n):
# QA pairs
qa = extract_qa_pair(messages, i)
if qa:
qa['session_id'] = session_id
entries.append(qa)
# Decisions
dec = extract_decision(messages, i)
if dec:
dec['session_id'] = session_id
entries.append(dec)
# Patterns
pat = extract_pattern(messages, i)
if pat:
pat['session_id'] = session_id
entries.append(pat)
# Preferences
pref = extract_preference(messages, i)
if pref:
pref['session_id'] = session_id
entries.append(pref)
# Error/fix pairs (spanning multiple messages)
ef = extract_error_fix(messages, i)
if ef:
ef['session_id'] = session_id
entries.append(ef)
return {
"session_id": session_id,
"message_count": n,
"entries": entries,
"counts": {
"qa_pair": sum(1 for e in entries if e['type'] == 'qa_pair'),
"decision": sum(1 for e in entries if e['type'] == 'decision'),
"pattern": sum(1 for e in entries if e['type'] == 'pattern'),
"preference": sum(1 for e in entries if e['type'] == 'preference'),
"error_fix": sum(1 for e in entries if e['type'] == 'error_fix'),
}
}
def write_json_output(results: list[dict], output_path: Path):
"""Write aggregated results to JSON."""
all_entries = []
summary = {"sessions": 0}
for r in results:
summary['sessions'] += 1
all_entries.extend(r['entries'])
output = {
"harvester": "transcript_harvester",
"generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"summary": summary,
"total_entries": len(all_entries),
"entries": all_entries,
}
output_path.write_text(json.dumps(output, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False))
return output
def write_report(results: list[dict], report_path: Path):
"""Write a human-readable markdown report."""
lines = []
lines.append("# Transcript Harvester Report")
lines.append(f"Generated: {datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat()}")
lines.append(f"Sessions processed: {len(results)}")
totals = {cat: 0 for cat in ['qa_pair', 'decision', 'pattern', 'preference', 'error_fix']}
for r in results:
for cat, cnt in r['counts'].items():
totals[cat] += cnt # BUG: should be += cnt
lines.append("\n## Extracted Knowledge by Category\n")
for cat, cnt in totals.items():
lines.append(f"- **{cat}**: {cnt}")
lines.append("\n## Sample Entries\n")
for r in results:
for entry in r['entries'][:3]:
lines.append(f"\n### {entry['type'].upper()} ({r['session_id']})\n")
if entry['type'] == 'qa_pair':
lines.append(f"**Q:** {entry['question']}\n")
lines.append(f"**A:** {entry['answer']}\n")
elif entry['type'] == 'decision':
lines.append(f"**Decision:** {entry['decision']}\n")
lines.append(f"By: {entry['by']}\n")
elif entry['type'] == 'pattern':
lines.append(f"**Pattern:** {entry['pattern']}\n")
elif entry['type'] == 'preference':
lines.append(f"**Preference:** {entry['preference']}\n")
elif entry['type'] == 'error_fix':
lines.append(f"**Error:** {entry['error']}\n")
lines.append(f"**Fixed by:** {entry['fix']}\n")
report_path.write_text("\n".join(lines))
def find_recent_sessions(sessions_dir: Path, limit: int = 50) -> list[Path]:
"""Find up to `limit` most recent .jsonl session files."""
sessions = sorted(sessions_dir.glob("*.jsonl"), reverse=True)
return sessions[:limit] if limit > 0 else sessions
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Harvest knowledge from session transcripts")
parser.add_argument('--session', help='Single session JSONL file')
parser.add_argument('--batch', action='store_true', help='Batch mode')
parser.add_argument('--sessions-dir', default=str(Path.home() / '.hermes' / 'sessions'),
help='Directory of session files')
parser.add_argument('--output', default='knowledge/transcripts',
help='Output directory (default: knowledge/transcripts)')
parser.add_argument('--limit', type=int, default=50,
help='Max sessions to process in batch (default: 50)')
args = parser.parse_args()
output_dir = Path(args.output)
output_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
results = []
if args.session:
messages = read_session(args.session)
session_id = Path(args.session).stem
results.append(harvest_session(messages, session_id))
elif args.batch:
sessions_dir = Path(args.sessions_dir)
sessions = find_recent_sessions(sessions_dir, args.limit)
print(f"Processing {len(sessions)} sessions...")
for sf in sessions:
messages = read_session(str(sf))
results.append(harvest_session(messages, sf.stem))
else:
parser.print_help()
sys.exit(1)
# Write outputs
json_path = output_dir / "transcript_knowledge.json"
report_path = output_dir / "transcript_report.md"
output = write_json_output(results, json_path)
write_report(results, report_path)
print(f"\nDone: {output['total_entries']} entries from {len(results)} sessions")
print(f"Output: {json_path}")
print(f"Report: {report_path}")
# Print category totals
totals = {}
for r in results:
for cat, cnt in r['counts'].items():
totals[cat] = totals.get(cat, 0) + cnt
print("\nCategory counts:")
for cat, cnt in sorted(totals.items()):
print(f" {cat}: {cnt}")
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()

View File

@@ -1,47 +0,0 @@
# Knowledge Synthesis Prompt
## System Prompt
You are a knowledge synthesis engine. Given two facts, you generate a novel hypothesis
that connects them in a way no human would typically link — a zero-shot creative leap.
## Task
FACT A:
{fact_a}
FACT B:
{fact_b}
Generate a single JSON object:
{
"hypothesis": "one concise sentence linking the two facts as a new, testable insight",
"plausibility": 0.0-1.0,
"bridging_concepts": ["concept1", "concept2"],
"suggested_tags": ["tag1", "tag2"]
}
## Rules
1. The hypothesis must be a logical consequence of combining both facts.
2. DO NOT restate either fact — produce genuinely new insight.
3. Plausibility should reflect confidence given only these two facts.
4. If no meaningful connection exists, return {"hypothesis":"","plausibility":0.0}.
5. Output ONLY valid JSON — no markdown, no explanation.
## Examples
Input facts:
- "Gitea PR creation requires branch protection approval (1+) on main"
- "Git push hangs on large repos (pack.windowMemory=100m)"
Hypothesis output:
{
"hypothesis": "Branch protection triggers checks that inflate pack size, causing git push to hang on large repos",
"plausibility": 0.65,
"bridging_concepts": ["git", "gitea", "branch-protection", "push"],
"suggested_tags": ["git", "gitea", "performance"]
}
Output ONLY the JSON object.