Compare commits

..

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Whitestone
e28d16b324 test: cover patch did-you-mean end-to-end (#960)
All checks were successful
Lint / lint (pull_request) Successful in 18s
- add focused QA tests for replace-mode rich hints without legacy generic hints
- verify ambiguous replace failures do not show did-you-mean noise
- verify V4A patch validation surfaces rich hints
- verify skill patching surfaces rich hints on true no-match failures
2026-04-22 10:43:34 -04:00
Alexander Whitestone
bc32047610 wip: fix patch did-you-mean dependencies (#960)
- restore escape-drift guard needed by current fuzzy-match tests
- import missing typing symbols in file_tools after porting patch hint logic
2026-04-22 10:41:29 -04:00
Teknium
3a24420d7d fix(patch): gate 'did you mean?' to no-match + extend to v4a/skill_manage
Follow-ups on top of @teyrebaz33's cherry-picked commit:

1. New shared helper format_no_match_hint() in fuzzy_match.py with a
   startswith('Could not find') gate so the snippet only appends to
   genuine no-match errors — not to 'Found N matches' (ambiguous),
   'Escape-drift detected', or 'identical strings' errors, which would
   all mislead the model.

2. file_tools.patch_tool suppresses the legacy generic '[Hint: old_string
   not found...]' string when the rich 'Did you mean?' snippet is
   already attached — no more double-hint.

3. Wire the same helper into patch_parser.py (V4A patch mode, both
   _validate_operations and _apply_update) and skill_manager_tool.py so
   all three fuzzy callers surface the hint consistently.

Tests: 7 new gating tests in TestFormatNoMatchHint cover every error
class (ambiguous, drift, identical, non-zero match count, None error,
no similar content, happy path). 34/34 test_fuzzy_match, 96/96
test_file_tools + test_patch_parser + test_skill_manager_tool pass.
E2E verified across all four scenarios: no-match-with-similar,
no-match-no-similar, ambiguous, success. V4A mode confirmed
end-to-end with a non-matching hunk.

(cherry picked from commit 5e6427a42c)
2026-04-22 10:30:00 -04:00
teyrebaz33
d14c1c5a56 feat(patch): add 'did you mean?' feedback when patch fails to match
When patch_replace() cannot find old_string in a file, the error message
now includes the closest matching lines from the file with line numbers
and context. This helps the LLM self-correct without a separate read_file
call.

Implements Phase 1 of #536: enhanced patch error feedback with no
architectural changes.

- tools/fuzzy_match.py: new find_closest_lines() using SequenceMatcher
- tools/file_operations.py: attach closest-lines hint to patch errors
- tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py: 5 new tests for find_closest_lines

(cherry picked from commit 15abf4ed8f)
2026-04-22 10:28:40 -04:00
11 changed files with 467 additions and 235 deletions

View File

@@ -1,190 +0,0 @@
---
name: adversarial-ux-test
description: Roleplay the most difficult, tech-resistant user for your product. Browse the app as that persona, find every UX pain point, then filter complaints through a pragmatism layer to separate real problems from noise. Creates actionable tickets from genuine issues only.
version: 1.0.0
author: Omni @ Comelse
license: MIT
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [qa, ux, testing, adversarial, dogfood, personas, user-testing]
related_skills: [dogfood]
---
# Adversarial UX Test
Roleplay the worst-case user for your product — the person who hates technology, doesn't want your software, and will find every reason to complain. Then filter their feedback through a pragmatism layer to separate real UX problems from "I hate computers" noise.
Think of it as an automated "mom test" — but angry.
## Why This Works
Most QA finds bugs. This finds **friction**. A technically correct app can still be unusable for real humans. The adversarial persona catches:
- Confusing terminology that makes sense to developers but not users
- Too many steps to accomplish basic tasks
- Missing onboarding or "aha moments"
- Accessibility issues (font size, contrast, click targets)
- Cold-start problems (empty states, no demo content)
- Paywall/signup friction that kills conversion
The **pragmatism filter** (Phase 3) is what makes this useful instead of just entertaining. Without it, you'd add a "print this page" button to every screen because Grandpa can't figure out PDFs.
## How to Use
Tell the agent:
```
"Run an adversarial UX test on [URL]"
"Be a grumpy [persona type] and test [app name]"
"Do an asshole user test on my staging site"
```
You can provide a persona or let the agent generate one based on your product's target audience.
## Step 1: Define the Persona
If no persona is provided, generate one by answering:
1. **Who is the HARDEST user for this product?** (age 50+, non-technical role, decades of experience doing it "the old way")
2. **What is their tech comfort level?** (the lower the better — WhatsApp-only, paper notebooks, wife set up their email)
3. **What is the ONE thing they need to accomplish?** (their core job, not your feature list)
4. **What would make them give up?** (too many clicks, jargon, slow, confusing)
5. **How do they talk when frustrated?** (blunt, sweary, dismissive, sighing)
### Good Persona Example
> **"Big Mick" McAllister** — 58-year-old S&C coach. Uses WhatsApp and that's it. His "spreadsheet" is a paper notebook. "If I can't figure it out in 10 seconds I'm going back to my notebook." Needs to log session results for 25 players. Hates small text, jargon, and passwords.
### Bad Persona Example
> "A user who doesn't like the app" — too vague, no constraints, no voice.
The persona must be **specific enough to stay in character** for 20 minutes of testing.
## Step 2: Become the Asshole (Browse as the Persona)
1. Read any available project docs for app context and URLs
2. **Fully inhabit the persona** — their frustrations, limitations, goals
3. Navigate to the app using browser tools
4. **Attempt the persona's ACTUAL TASKS** (not a feature tour):
- Can they do what they came to do?
- How many clicks/screens to accomplish it?
- What confuses them?
- What makes them angry?
- Where do they get lost?
- What would make them give up and go back to their old way?
5. Test these friction categories:
- **First impression** — would they even bother past the landing page?
- **Core workflow** — the ONE thing they need to do most often
- **Error recovery** — what happens when they do something wrong?
- **Readability** — text size, contrast, information density
- **Speed** — does it feel faster than their current method?
- **Terminology** — any jargon they wouldn't understand?
- **Navigation** — can they find their way back? do they know where they are?
6. Take screenshots of every pain point
7. Check browser console for JS errors on every page
## Step 3: The Rant (Write Feedback in Character)
Write the feedback AS THE PERSONA — in their voice, with their frustrations. This is not a bug report. This is a real human venting.
```
[PERSONA NAME]'s Review of [PRODUCT]
Overall: [Would they keep using it? Yes/No/Maybe with conditions]
THE GOOD (grudging admission):
- [things even they have to admit work]
THE BAD (legitimate UX issues):
- [real problems that would stop them from using the product]
THE UGLY (showstoppers):
- [things that would make them uninstall/cancel immediately]
SPECIFIC COMPLAINTS:
1. [Page/feature]: "[quote in persona voice]" — [what happened, expected]
2. ...
VERDICT: "[one-line persona quote summarizing their experience]"
```
## Step 4: The Pragmatism Filter (Critical — Do Not Skip)
Step OUT of the persona. Evaluate each complaint as a product person:
- **RED: REAL UX BUG** — Any user would have this problem, not just grumpy ones. Fix it.
- **YELLOW: VALID BUT LOW PRIORITY** — Real issue but only for extreme users. Note it.
- **WHITE: PERSONA NOISE** — "I hate computers" talking, not a product problem. Skip it.
- **GREEN: FEATURE REQUEST** — Good idea hidden in the complaint. Consider it.
### Filter Criteria
1. Would a 35-year-old competent-but-busy user have the same complaint? → RED
2. Is this a genuine accessibility issue (font size, contrast, click targets)? → RED
3. Is this "I want it to work like paper" resistance to digital? → WHITE
4. Is this a real workflow inefficiency the persona stumbled on? → YELLOW or RED
5. Would fixing this add complexity for the 80% who are fine? → WHITE
6. Does the complaint reveal a missing onboarding moment? → GREEN
**This filter is MANDATORY.** Never ship raw persona complaints as tickets.
## Step 5: Create Tickets
For **RED** and **GREEN** items only:
- Clear, actionable title
- Include the persona's verbatim quote (entertaining + memorable)
- The real UX issue underneath (objective)
- A suggested fix (actionable)
- Tag/label: "ux-review"
For **YELLOW** items: one catch-all ticket with all notes.
**WHITE** items appear in the report only. No tickets.
**Max 10 tickets per session** — focus on the worst issues.
## Step 6: Report
Deliver:
1. The persona rant (Step 3) — entertaining and visceral
2. The filtered assessment (Step 4) — pragmatic and actionable
3. Tickets created (Step 5) — with links
4. Screenshots of key issues
## Tips
- **One persona per session.** Don't mix perspectives.
- **Stay in character during Steps 2-3.** Break character only at Step 4.
- **Test the CORE WORKFLOW first.** Don't get distracted by settings pages.
- **Empty states are gold.** New user experience reveals the most friction.
- **The best findings are RED items the persona found accidentally** while trying to do something else.
- **If the persona has zero complaints, your persona is too tech-savvy.** Make them older, less patient, more set in their ways.
- **Run this before demos, launches, or after shipping a batch of features.**
- **Register as a NEW user when possible.** Don't use pre-seeded admin accounts — the cold start experience is where most friction lives.
- **Zero WHITE items is a signal, not a failure.** If the pragmatism filter finds no noise, your product has real UX problems, not just a grumpy persona.
- **Check known issues in project docs AFTER the test.** If the persona found a bug that's already in the known issues list, that's actually the most damning finding — it means the team knew about it but never felt the user's pain.
- **Subscription/paywall testing is critical.** Test with expired accounts, not just active ones. The "what happens when you can't pay" experience reveals whether the product respects users or holds their data hostage.
- **Count the clicks to accomplish the persona's ONE task.** If it's more than 5, that's almost always a RED finding regardless of persona tech level.
## Example Personas by Industry
These are starting points — customize for your specific product:
| Product Type | Persona | Age | Key Trait |
|-------------|---------|-----|-----------|
| CRM | Retirement home director | 68 | Filing cabinet is the current CRM |
| Photography SaaS | Rural wedding photographer | 62 | Books clients by phone, invoices on paper |
| AI/ML Tool | Department store buyer | 55 | Burned by 3 failed tech startups |
| Fitness App | Old-school gym coach | 58 | Paper notebook, thick fingers, bad eyes |
| Accounting | Family bakery owner | 64 | Shoebox of receipts, hates subscriptions |
| E-commerce | Market stall vendor | 60 | Cash only, smartphone is for calls |
| Healthcare | Senior GP | 63 | Dictates notes, nurse handles the computer |
| Education | Veteran teacher | 57 | Chalk and talk, worksheets in ring binders |
## Rules
- Stay in character during Steps 2-3
- Be genuinely mean but fair — find real problems, not manufactured ones
- The pragmatism filter (Step 4) is **MANDATORY**
- Screenshots required for every complaint
- Max 10 tickets per session
- Test on staging/deployed app, not local dev
- One persona, one session, one report

View File

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
from pathlib import Path
from tools.skills_hub import OptionalSkillSource
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
def test_optional_skill_source_scans_adversarial_ux_test():
source = OptionalSkillSource()
metas = {meta.identifier: meta for meta in source._scan_all()}
assert "official/dogfood/adversarial-ux-test" in metas
assert metas["official/dogfood/adversarial-ux-test"].name == "adversarial-ux-test"
assert "tech-resistant user" in metas["official/dogfood/adversarial-ux-test"].description
def test_optional_skill_catalog_docs_list_adversarial_ux_test():
optional_catalog = (REPO_ROOT / "website" / "docs" / "reference" / "optional-skills-catalog.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
bundled_catalog = (REPO_ROOT / "website" / "docs" / "reference" / "skills-catalog.md").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
assert "**adversarial-ux-test**" in optional_catalog
assert "official/dogfood/adversarial-ux-test" in optional_catalog
assert "`adversarial-ux-test`" in bundled_catalog
assert "dogfood/adversarial-ux-test" in bundled_catalog

View File

@@ -148,3 +148,184 @@ class TestStrategyNameSurfaced:
assert count == 0
assert strategy is None
assert err is not None
class TestEscapeDriftGuard:
"""Tests for the escape-drift guard that catches bash/JSON serialization
artifacts where an apostrophe gets prefixed with a spurious backslash
in tool-call transport.
"""
def test_drift_blocked_apostrophe(self):
"""File has ', old_string and new_string both have \\' — classic
tool-call drift. Guard must block with a helpful error instead of
writing \\' literals into source code."""
content = "x = \"hello there\"\n"
# Simulate transport-corrupted old_string and new_string where an
# apostrophe-like context got prefixed with a backslash. The content
# itself has no apostrophe, but both strings do — matching via
# whitespace/anchor strategies would otherwise succeed.
old_string = "x = \"hello there\" # don\\'t edit\n"
new_string = "x = \"hi there\" # don\\'t edit\n"
# This particular pair won't match anything, so it exits via
# no-match path. Build a case where a non-exact strategy DOES match.
content = "line\n x = 1\nline"
old_string = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
new_string = "line\n x = \\'b\\'\nline"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert count == 0
assert err is not None and "Escape-drift" in err
assert "backslash" in err.lower()
assert new == content # file untouched
def test_drift_blocked_double_quote(self):
"""Same idea but with \\" drift instead of \\'."""
content = 'line\n x = 1\nline'
old_string = 'line\n x = \\"a\\"\nline'
new_string = 'line\n x = \\"b\\"\nline'
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert count == 0
assert err is not None and "Escape-drift" in err
def test_drift_allowed_when_file_genuinely_has_backslash_escapes(self):
"""If the file already contains \\' (e.g. inside an existing escaped
string), the model is legitimately preserving it. Guard must NOT
fire."""
content = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
old_string = "line\n x = \\'a\\'\nline"
new_string = "line\n x = \\'b\\'\nline"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert "\\'b\\'" in new
def test_drift_allowed_on_exact_match(self):
"""Exact matches bypass the drift guard entirely — if the file
really contains the exact bytes old_string specified, it's not
drift."""
content = "hello \\'world\\'"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(
content, "hello \\'world\\'", "hello \\'there\\'"
)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert strategy == "exact"
def test_drift_allowed_when_adding_escaped_strings(self):
"""Model is adding new content with \\' that wasn't in the original.
old_string has no \\', so guard doesn't fire."""
content = "line1\nline2\nline3"
old_string = "line1\nline2\nline3"
new_string = "line1\nprint(\\'added\\')\nline2\nline3"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
assert "\\'added\\'" in new
def test_no_drift_check_when_new_string_lacks_suspect_chars(self):
"""Fast-path: if new_string has no \\' or \\", guard must not
fire even on fuzzy match."""
content = "def foo():\n pass" # extra space ignored by line_trimmed
old_string = "def foo():\n pass"
new_string = "def bar():\n return 1"
new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
assert err is None
assert count == 1
class TestFindClosestLines:
def setup_method(self):
from tools.fuzzy_match import find_closest_lines
self.find_closest_lines = find_closest_lines
def test_finds_similar_line(self):
content = "def foo():\n pass\ndef bar():\n return 1\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def baz():", content)
assert "def foo" in result or "def bar" in result
def test_returns_empty_for_no_match(self):
content = "completely different content here"
result = self.find_closest_lines("xyzzy_no_match_possible_!!!", content)
assert result == ""
def test_returns_empty_for_empty_inputs(self):
assert self.find_closest_lines("", "some content") == ""
assert self.find_closest_lines("old string", "") == ""
def test_includes_context_lines(self):
content = "line1\nline2\ndef target():\n pass\nline5\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def target():", content)
assert "target" in result
def test_includes_line_numbers(self):
content = "line1\nline2\ndef foo():\n pass\n"
result = self.find_closest_lines("def foo():", content)
# Should include line numbers in format "N| content"
assert "|" in result
class TestFormatNoMatchHint:
"""Gating tests for format_no_match_hint — the shared helper that decides
whether a 'Did you mean?' snippet should be appended to an error.
"""
def setup_method(self):
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
self.fmt = format_no_match_hint
def test_fires_on_could_not_find_with_match(self):
"""Classic no-match: similar content exists → hint fires."""
content = "def foo():\n pass\ndef bar():\n pass\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
0, "def baz():", content,
)
assert "Did you mean" in result
assert "foo" in result or "bar" in result
def test_silent_on_ambiguous_match_error(self):
"""'Found N matches' is not a missing-match failure — no hint."""
content = "aaa bbb aaa\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Found 2 matches for old_string. Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True.",
0, "aaa", content,
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_escape_drift_error(self):
"""Escape-drift errors are intentional blocks — hint would mislead."""
content = "x = 1\n"
result = self.fmt(
"Escape-drift detected: old_string and new_string contain the literal sequence '\\\\''...",
0, "x = \\'1\\'", content,
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_identical_strings(self):
"""old_string == new_string — hint irrelevant."""
result = self.fmt(
"old_string and new_string are identical",
0, "foo", "foo bar\n",
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_when_match_count_nonzero(self):
"""If match succeeded, we shouldn't be in the error path — defense in depth."""
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
1, "foo", "foo bar\n",
)
assert result == ""
def test_silent_on_none_error(self):
"""No error at all — no hint."""
result = self.fmt(None, 0, "foo", "bar\n")
assert result == ""
def test_silent_when_no_similar_content(self):
"""Even for a valid no-match error, skip hint when nothing similar exists."""
result = self.fmt(
"Could not find a match for old_string in the file",
0, "totally_unique_xyzzy_qux", "abc\nxyz\n",
)
assert result == ""

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
import json
import os
import textwrap
from pathlib import Path
import tools.skill_manager_tool as skill_manager_tool
from tools.file_tools import patch_tool
from tools.skill_manager_tool import _create_skill, _patch_skill
def _disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._check_sensitive_path", lambda _path: None)
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._check_file_staleness", lambda _path, _task_id: None)
monkeypatch.setattr("tools.file_tools._log_and_check_conflict", lambda _path, _task_id, _action: None)
def test_patch_tool_replace_no_match_shows_rich_hint_without_legacy_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("def foo():\n return 1\n\ndef bar():\n return 2\n", encoding="utf-8")
raw = patch_tool(
mode="replace",
path=str(sample),
old_string="def barycentric():",
new_string="def barycentric_new():",
task_id="qa960-replace-rich-hint",
)
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Could not find a match" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "def bar():" in result["error"] or "def foo():" in result["error"]
assert "[Hint:" not in raw
def test_patch_tool_replace_ambiguous_error_does_not_show_did_you_mean(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("aaa\nbbb\naaa\n", encoding="utf-8")
raw = patch_tool(
mode="replace",
path=str(sample),
old_string="aaa",
new_string="ccc",
task_id="qa960-replace-ambiguous",
)
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Found 2 matches" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" not in result["error"]
assert "[Hint:" not in raw
def test_patch_tool_v4a_no_match_shows_rich_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
_disable_patch_tool_guards(monkeypatch)
sample = tmp_path / "sample.py"
sample.write_text("def foo():\n return 1\n", encoding="utf-8")
patch = textwrap.dedent(
f"""\
*** Begin Patch
*** Update File: {sample}
@@
-def barycentric():
+def barycentric_new():
*** End Patch
"""
)
raw = patch_tool(mode="patch", patch=patch, task_id="qa960-v4a-rich-hint")
result = json.loads(raw)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Patch validation failed" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "def foo():" in result["error"]
def test_skill_patch_no_match_shows_rich_hint(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setenv("HERMES_HOME", str(tmp_path))
skills_dir = tmp_path / "skills"
skills_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
monkeypatch.setattr(skill_manager_tool, "SKILLS_DIR", skills_dir)
monkeypatch.setattr(skill_manager_tool, "_security_scan_skill", lambda _skill_dir: None)
_create_skill(
"qa-skill",
textwrap.dedent(
"""\
---
name: qa-skill
description: test
---
Step 1: Do the thing.
Step 2: Verify the thing.
"""
),
)
result = _patch_skill(
"qa-skill",
"Step 1: Do the production rollout.",
"Step 1: Updated.",
)
assert result["success"] is False
assert "Could not find a match" in result["error"]
assert "Did you mean one of these sections?" in result["error"]
assert "Step 1: Do the thing." in result["error"]
assert "file_preview" in result

View File

@@ -757,12 +757,14 @@ class ShellFileOperations(FileOperations):
content, old_string, new_string, replace_all
)
if error:
return PatchResult(error=error)
if match_count == 0:
return PatchResult(error=f"Could not find match for old_string in {path}")
if error or match_count == 0:
err_msg = error or f"Could not find match for old_string in {path}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(err_msg, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return PatchResult(error=err_msg)
# Write back
write_result = self.write_file(path, new_content)
if write_result.error:

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import os
import threading
import time
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
from tools.binary_extensions import has_binary_extension
from tools.file_operations import ShellFileOperations
from agent.redact import redact_sensitive_text
@@ -690,8 +691,11 @@ def patch_tool(mode: str = "replace", path: str = None, old_string: str = None,
result_json = json.dumps(result_dict, ensure_ascii=False)
# Hint when old_string not found — saves iterations where the agent
# retries with stale content instead of re-reading the file.
# Suppressed when patch_replace already attached a rich "Did you mean?"
# snippet (which is strictly more useful than the generic hint).
if result_dict.get("error") and "Could not find" in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
if "Did you mean one of these sections?" not in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
return result_json
except Exception as e:
return tool_error(str(e))

View File

@@ -93,6 +93,21 @@ def fuzzy_find_and_replace(content: str, old_string: str, new_string: str,
f"Provide more context to make it unique, or use replace_all=True."
)
# Escape-drift guard: when the matched strategy is NOT `exact`,
# we matched via some form of normalization. If new_string
# contains shell/JSON-style escape sequences (\\' or \\") that
# would be written literally into the file but the matched
# region of the file has no such sequences, this is almost
# certainly tool-call serialization drift — the model typed
# an apostrophe/quote and the transport added a stray
# backslash. Writing new_string as-is would corrupt the file.
# Block with a helpful error so the model re-reads and retries
# instead of the caller silently persisting garbage (or not).
if strategy_name != "exact":
drift_err = _detect_escape_drift(content, matches, old_string, new_string)
if drift_err:
return content, 0, None, drift_err
# Perform replacement
new_content = _apply_replacements(content, matches, new_string)
return new_content, len(matches), strategy_name, None
@@ -101,6 +116,46 @@ def fuzzy_find_and_replace(content: str, old_string: str, new_string: str,
return content, 0, None, "Could not find a match for old_string in the file"
def _detect_escape_drift(content: str, matches: List[Tuple[int, int]],
old_string: str, new_string: str) -> Optional[str]:
"""Detect tool-call escape-drift artifacts in new_string.
Looks for ``\\'`` or ``\\"`` sequences that are present in both
old_string and new_string (i.e. the model copy-pasted them as "context"
it intended to preserve) but don't exist in the matched region of the
file. That pattern indicates the transport layer inserted spurious
shell-style escapes around apostrophes or quotes — writing new_string
verbatim would literally insert ``\\'`` into source code.
Returns an error string if drift is detected, None otherwise.
"""
# Cheap pre-check: bail out unless new_string actually contains a
# suspect escape sequence. This keeps the guard free for all the
# common, correct cases.
if "\\'" not in new_string and '\\"' not in new_string:
return None
# Aggregate matched regions of the file — that's what new_string will
# replace. If the suspect escapes are present there already, the
# model is genuinely preserving them (valid for some languages /
# escaped strings); accept the patch.
matched_regions = "".join(content[start:end] for start, end in matches)
for suspect in ("\\'", '\\"'):
if suspect in new_string and suspect in old_string and suspect not in matched_regions:
plain = suspect[1] # "'" or '"'
return (
f"Escape-drift detected: old_string and new_string contain "
f"the literal sequence {suspect!r} but the matched region of "
f"the file does not. This is almost always a tool-call "
f"serialization artifact where an apostrophe or quote got "
f"prefixed with a spurious backslash. Re-read the file with "
f"read_file and pass old_string/new_string without "
f"backslash-escaping {plain!r} characters."
)
return None
def _apply_replacements(content: str, matches: List[Tuple[int, int]], new_string: str) -> str:
"""
Apply replacements at the given positions.
@@ -564,3 +619,86 @@ def _map_normalized_positions(original: str, normalized: str,
original_matches.append((orig_start, min(orig_end, len(original))))
return original_matches
def find_closest_lines(old_string: str, content: str, context_lines: int = 2, max_results: int = 3) -> str:
"""Find lines in content most similar to old_string for "did you mean?" feedback.
Returns a formatted string showing the closest matching lines with context,
or empty string if no useful match is found.
"""
if not old_string or not content:
return ""
old_lines = old_string.splitlines()
content_lines = content.splitlines()
if not old_lines or not content_lines:
return ""
# Use first line of old_string as anchor for search
anchor = old_lines[0].strip()
if not anchor:
# Try second line if first is blank
candidates = [l.strip() for l in old_lines if l.strip()]
if not candidates:
return ""
anchor = candidates[0]
# Score each line in content by similarity to anchor
scored = []
for i, line in enumerate(content_lines):
stripped = line.strip()
if not stripped:
continue
ratio = SequenceMatcher(None, anchor, stripped).ratio()
if ratio > 0.3:
scored.append((ratio, i))
if not scored:
return ""
# Take top matches
scored.sort(key=lambda x: -x[0])
top = scored[:max_results]
parts = []
seen_ranges = set()
for _, line_idx in top:
start = max(0, line_idx - context_lines)
end = min(len(content_lines), line_idx + len(old_lines) + context_lines)
key = (start, end)
if key in seen_ranges:
continue
seen_ranges.add(key)
snippet = "\n".join(
f"{start + j + 1:4d}| {content_lines[start + j]}"
for j in range(end - start)
)
parts.append(snippet)
if not parts:
return ""
return "\n---\n".join(parts)
def format_no_match_hint(error: Optional[str], match_count: int,
old_string: str, content: str) -> str:
"""Return a '\\n\\nDid you mean...' snippet for plain no-match errors.
Gated so the hint only fires for actual "old_string not found" failures.
Ambiguous-match ("Found N matches"), escape-drift, and identical-strings
errors all have ``match_count == 0`` but a "did you mean?" snippet would
be misleading — those failed for unrelated reasons.
Returns an empty string when there's nothing useful to append.
"""
if match_count != 0:
return ""
if not error or not error.startswith("Could not find"):
return ""
hint = find_closest_lines(old_string, content)
if not hint:
return ""
return "\n\nDid you mean one of these sections?\n" + hint

View File

@@ -290,10 +290,16 @@ def _validate_operations(
)
if count == 0:
label = f"'{hunk.context_hint}'" if hunk.context_hint else "(no hint)"
errors.append(
msg = (
f"{op.file_path}: hunk {label} not found"
+ (f"{match_error}" if match_error else "")
)
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, count, search_pattern, simulated)
except Exception:
pass
errors.append(msg)
else:
# Advance simulation so subsequent hunks validate correctly.
# Reuse the result from the call above — no second fuzzy run.
@@ -537,7 +543,13 @@ def _apply_update(op: PatchOperation, file_ops: Any) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
error = None
if error:
return False, f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
err_msg = f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(error, 0, search_pattern, new_content)
except Exception:
pass
return False, err_msg
else:
# Addition-only hunk (no context or removed lines).
# Insert at the location indicated by the context hint, or at end of file.

View File

@@ -575,9 +575,15 @@ def _patch_skill(
if match_error:
# Show a short preview of the file so the model can self-correct
preview = content[:500] + ("..." if len(content) > 500 else "")
err_msg = match_error
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return {
"success": False,
"error": match_error,
"error": err_msg,
"file_preview": preview,
}

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ For example:
```bash
hermes skills install official/blockchain/solana
hermes skills install official/dogfood/adversarial-ux-test
hermes skills install official/mlops/flash-attention
```
@@ -57,12 +56,6 @@ hermes skills uninstall <skill-name>
| **blender-mcp** | Control Blender directly from Hermes via socket connection to the blender-mcp addon. Create 3D objects, materials, animations, and run arbitrary Blender Python (bpy) code. |
| **meme-generation** | Generate real meme images by picking a template and overlaying text with Pillow. Produces actual `.png` meme files. |
## Dogfood
| Skill | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| **adversarial-ux-test** | Roleplay the most difficult, tech-resistant user for a product — browse in-persona, rant, then filter through a RED/YELLOW/WHITE/GREEN pragmatism layer so only real UX friction becomes tickets. |
## DevOps
| Skill | Description |

View File

@@ -59,12 +59,9 @@ DevOps and infrastructure automation skills.
## dogfood
Internal dogfooding and QA skills used to test Hermes Agent itself.
| Skill | Description | Path |
|-------|-------------|------|
| `dogfood` | Systematic exploratory QA testing of web applications — find bugs, capture evidence, and generate structured reports. | `dogfood/dogfood` |
| `adversarial-ux-test` | Roleplay the most difficult, tech-resistant user for a product — browse in-persona, rant, then filter through a RED/YELLOW/WHITE/GREEN pragmatism layer so only real UX friction becomes tickets. | `dogfood/adversarial-ux-test` |
| `hermes-agent-setup` | Help users configure Hermes Agent — CLI usage, setup wizard, model/provider selection, tools, skills, voice/STT/TTS, gateway, and troubleshooting. | `dogfood/hermes-agent-setup` |
## email