queue: close Q4 on f50f052 with all three verdicts re-verified, add Q8 (summary fidelity) with method and material

WORK-QUEUE.md

@@ -112,6 +112,45 @@ the archive, not hunting for a scalp.
 **Done means:** three claims, three attempts, three verdicts.
 **Evidence:** the source you used against the claim, and the raw result.
 
+**Status: DONE — `recoveries/falsification-pass.md` (`f50f052`, zephyrus-sparkborn), all three verdicts re-verified
+from the archive side (reply 05, `2026-09-24-to-zephyrus-05.md`).**
+- Claim 1, profile counts ("18 public profiles / 13 documentary-backed / 5 candidate portraits") — his verdict
+  **Partial**, closed **Documented** here: the listing is a section of the index page (`/stackchain/people/` 404s),
+  and the count recounts from the public asset `public-data.js` → 18 profiles, 13 `documentary-backed`, 5 candidate.
+  There are no per-profile pages; views are hash routes, which is why nothing is indexed.
+- Claim 2, SJ Lottery publication date — **Survived**, reproduced to the character (guid, `pubDate`
+  `Mon, 30 Jan 2023 22:15:54 GMT`, Apple's record, the adjacent Ordinals item carrying the "Feb 05" stamp).
+- Claim 3, the `magazine-040` gloss "a nod to the last block he mined" — **Broken**. Confirmed and extended: the
+  article itself is now fetched (`the-genesis-block`, 200) and its closing lines are a Genesis 2:2 rewrite; block
+  97,250 is 2010-12-12, the day of Satoshi's last public post, while Patoshi analyses end his mining near block
+  54,316. The excerpt is faithful, the interpretive clause is not supported.
+- His one side observation about a duration misattribution is **rejected with the feed parse** (see reply 05).
+- **Handed to Alexander, not to the pipe:** the exact replacement sentence for the `magazine-040` summary, drafted in
+  reply 05 §"Your ask". It is a wording change to a live page, so it waits for him.
+
+---
+
+## Q8 — Summary fidelity: does each entry's machine-written summary overstate its article?
+
+Q3 tested that sources resolve and dates agree. `recoveries/quote-fidelity-live.md` now tests that the quoted
+excerpts are really in the articles — 269/269 present, 91/91 article URLs live. Neither test touches the prose the
+archive writes *about* the article, and that is where the archive can still be wrong.
+
+`magazine-040` is the worked example: the quotes are faithful, but the summary adds "a nod to the last block he
+mined", which no source supports. One entry, and it is the archive's own words doing the damage.
+
+**Do this:** for each entry in a defined sample, compare the "What happened" / "In plain English" sentences against
+the article and grade every factual or interpretive clause: **holds** (the article says it), **overstated** (the
+article supports less), **unsupported** (the article does not say it), **contradicted** (public sources say
+otherwise). Quote the summary sentence and the article line that settles it, both verbatim.
+
+**Material:** `recoveries/magazine-article-map.md` — every published entry → its live article URL, 91/91 answering
+200 — and `recoveries/quote-fidelity-live.md` for the method and the limits.
+
+**Done means:** a table of per-clause verdicts for the sample, with the count of each verdict and the named entries
+that need an archive-side fix.
+**Evidence:** the entry URL, the summary sentence, the article URL and the article sentence.
+
 ---
 
 ## Q5 — Issue triage in the organisation's public repos