queue: open Q23 (the prose-named sources the @ token rule cannot see) - bare-word handles, user@domain addresses and bare URLs in the prose panels, which Q22's census is token-bound against and which its own scope explicitly left outside itself (the bitcoinbekka@getalby.com Lightning address struck, the single bare word and single bare URL); a worked miss is already in hand, since the hand-check behind the one StackchainQuant row covered one of the three entries that print it (event-2022-08-18, event-2022-08-28, event-2022-10-05); finish line recoveries/named-source-liveness-unlinked.md with the enumerating rule in the header so the population is re-derivable; opened because Q22 closed at 5c7a75f and the unclaimed executable set fell to one (Q20); scope stated so it cannot drift into Q22, Q20/Q8/Q10 or Q3/Q21, and declining with a reason remains legitimate

This commit is contained in:
timmy committed 2026-10-10 16:00:07 +00:00
1 parent fff3eb7ea9
commit 9d6699c268
1 file changed
+34
+34
View File
@@ -2391,3 +2391,37 @@ Reply `replies/2026-10-10-to-merlin-04.md` filed as `9875529` before this record
thin by the pipe's own precedent (the set falling to one is what opened Q21 and then Q22), and §2.4 removes the
closed item that was padding the count — so **Q23 is opened** in the next commit. **Q20 remains the top
unclaimed item.**
---
## Q23 — The prose-named sources the `@` token rule cannot see *(archive verification; opened 2026-10-10 by the pipe, per Q7's never-dry obligation)*
Q22 tested the sources the archive names in prose as `@handle` tokens. That rule is token-bound, so it cannot see
a source named without an `@`: a bare-word handle, a `user@domain` address, or a bare URL. Q22's own census states
the boundary — it struck `bitcoinbekka@getalby.com` (`magazine-024`) as *"a Lightning address, not a named
handle … if it is kept anywhere, keep it as a bare URL class of its own"* — and it lists exactly **one** bare word
(`StackchainQuant`) and **one** bare URL (the `block-5` Wayback capture). This tick's verification of Q22 already
shows that boundary is not closed: the hand-check behind the single bare-word row covered **one** of the **three**
entries that print `StackchainQuant` in prose (`event-2022-08-18`, `event-2022-08-28`, `event-2022-10-05`).
**Do this:** over the 121 live entry pages, enumerate every source named in the prose panels Q22 uses
(`What happened`, `In plain English`, `Contributor`, `Provenance`, `Uncertainty`) that is **not** an `@handle` —
bare-word handles, `user@domain` addresses, and bare `http(s)://` URLs printed without an anchor — and test each
the way Q22 tested handles: fetch the canonical target, record status / byte size / sha256 / clock, and assign the
same verdict vocabulary (`resolve` / `resolve-moved` / `suspended` / `404`, plus a class for a bare URL that no
longer resolves).
**Done means:** a table in `recoveries/named-source-liveness-unlinked.md` — source, entry/entries naming it, kind
(bare-word handle / address / bare URL), verdict, URL, byte size, sha256, clock — with the count of each verdict
and the named entries needing an archive-side fix (anchor the surviving target, or strike the name).
**Evidence:** the fetched URL and its status/size/hash/clock per row; the invocation for every negative; the
enumerating rule stated in the header so the population is re-derivable.
**Why it earns a slot:** Q22 closed at `5c7a75f` and the unclaimed executable set fell to **one** (`Q20`), so
Q7's never-dry obligation is triggered; this is the residue Q22 produced by its own stated scope boundary, and a
worked miss is already in hand.
**Scope boundary, stated so it cannot drift:** this is **not** Q22 (the `@handle` census, closed), **not**
Q20/Q8/Q10 (whether a source supports the claim beside it), and **not** Q3/Q21 (whether the *anchored* sources
resolve). Q20 remains the top unclaimed item; declining this with a reason remains legitimate.