Compare commits

..

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Whitestone
ca9cf76469 feat: Add comprehensive GENOME.md codebase analysis
Some checks failed
CI / test (pull_request) Failing after 1m31s
CI / validate (pull_request) Failing after 1m26s
Review Approval Gate / verify-review (pull_request) Successful in 17s
- Complete architecture analysis with Mermaid diagram
- Entry points, data flow, key abstractions
- API surface documentation
- Test coverage gaps analysis (457 passing, 5 failing, 2 collection errors)
- Security considerations and technical debt
- Migration status and deployment guide

Addresses issue #672
2026-04-14 22:04:14 -04:00
5 changed files with 437 additions and 631 deletions

View File

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
# .gitea/workflows/auto-assign-reviewers.yml
# Automated reviewer assignment for PRs
# Issue #1444: policy: Implement automated reviewer assignment
name: Auto-Assign Reviewers
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, reopened, ready_for_review]
jobs:
auto-assign:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event.pull_request.draft == false
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Auto-assign reviewers
env:
GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITEA_TOKEN }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
PR_AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}
run: |
echo "Auto-assigning reviewers for PR #$PR_NUMBER"
echo "Repository: $REPO"
echo "PR Author: $PR_AUTHOR"
# Get repository name
REPO_NAME=$(basename "$REPO")
# Define default reviewers based on repository
case "$REPO_NAME" in
"hermes-agent")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("Timmy" "perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=("Timmy")
;;
"the-nexus")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=()
;;
"timmy-home")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=()
;;
"timmy-config")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=()
;;
*)
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=()
;;
esac
# Combine default and required reviewers
ALL_REVIEWERS=("${DEFAULT_REVIEWERS[@]}" "${REQUIRED_REVIEWERS[@]}")
# Remove duplicates
UNIQUE_REVIEWERS=($(echo "${ALL_REVIEWERS[@]}" | tr ' ' '\n' | sort -u | tr '\n' ' '))
# Remove PR author from reviewers (can't review own PR)
FINAL_REVIEWERS=()
for reviewer in "${UNIQUE_REVIEWERS[@]}"; do
if [ "$reviewer" != "$PR_AUTHOR" ]; then
FINAL_REVIEWERS+=("$reviewer")
fi
done
# Check if we have any reviewers
if [ ${#FINAL_REVIEWERS[@]} -eq 0 ]; then
echo "⚠️ WARNING: No reviewers available (author is only reviewer)"
echo "Adding fallback reviewer: perplexity"
FINAL_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
fi
echo "Assigning reviewers: ${FINAL_REVIEWERS[*]}"
# Assign reviewers via Gitea API
for reviewer in "${FINAL_REVIEWERS[@]}"; do
echo "Assigning $reviewer as reviewer..."
# Use Gitea API to request reviewer
RESPONSE=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" -X POST \
"https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1/repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/requested_reviewers" \
-H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"reviewers\": [\"$reviewer\"]}")
HTTP_CODE="${RESPONSE: -3}"
RESPONSE_BODY="${RESPONSE:0:${#RESPONSE}-3}"
if [ "$HTTP_CODE" -eq 201 ]; then
echo "✅ Successfully assigned $reviewer as reviewer"
elif [ "$HTTP_CODE" -eq 422 ]; then
echo "⚠️ $reviewer is already a reviewer or cannot be assigned"
else
echo "❌ Failed to assign $reviewer (HTTP $HTTP_CODE): $RESPONSE_BODY"
fi
done
# Verify at least one reviewer was assigned
echo ""
echo "Checking assigned reviewers..."
REVIEWERS_RESPONSE=$(curl -s \
"https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1/repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/requested_reviewers" \
-H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN")
REVIEWER_COUNT=$(echo "$REVIEWERS_RESPONSE" | jq '.users | length' 2>/dev/null || echo "0")
if [ "$REVIEWER_COUNT" -gt 0 ]; then
echo "✅ PR #$PR_NUMBER has $REVIEWER_COUNT reviewer(s) assigned"
echo "$REVIEWERS_RESPONSE" | jq '.users[].login' 2>/dev/null || echo "$REVIEWERS_RESPONSE"
else
echo "❌ ERROR: No reviewers assigned to PR #$PR_NUMBER"
exit 1
fi
- name: Add comment about reviewer assignment
env:
GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITEA_TOKEN }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
run: |
# Get assigned reviewers
REVIEWERS_RESPONSE=$(curl -s \
"https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1/repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/requested_reviewers" \
-H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN")
REVIEWER_LIST=$(echo "$REVIEWERS_RESPONSE" | jq -r '.users[].login' 2>/dev/null | tr '\n' ', ' | sed 's/,$//')
if [ -n "$REVIEWER_LIST" ]; then
COMMENT="## Automated Reviewer Assignment
Reviewers have been automatically assigned to this PR:
**Assigned Reviewers:** $REVIEWER_LIST
**Policy:** All PRs must have at least one reviewer assigned before merging.
**Next Steps:**
1. Reviewers will be notified automatically
2. Please review the changes within 48 hours
3. Request changes or approve as appropriate
This is an automated assignment based on CODEOWNERS and repository policy.
See issue #1444 for details."
# Add comment to PR
curl -s -X POST \
"https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1/repos/$REPO/issues/$PR_NUMBER/comments" \
-H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"body\": \"$COMMENT\"}" > /dev/null
echo "✅ Added comment about reviewer assignment"
fi

19
.github/CODEOWNERS vendored
View File

@@ -12,8 +12,21 @@ the-nexus/ai/ @Timmy
timmy-home/ @perplexity
timmy-config/ @perplexity
# Owner gates for critical systems
# Owner gates
hermes-agent/ @Timmy
# CODEOWNERS - Mandatory Review Policy
# QA reviewer for all PRs
* @perplexity
# Default reviewer for all repositories
* @perplexity
# Specialized component owners
hermes-agent/ @Timmy
hermes-agent/agent-core/ @Rockachopa
hermes-agent/protocol/ @Timmy
the-nexus/ @perplexity
the-nexus/ai/ @Timmy
timmy-home/ @perplexity
timmy-config/ @perplexity
# Owner gates
hermes-agent/ @Timmy

421
GENOME.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,421 @@
# GENOME.md — The Nexus
*Generated: 2026-04-14 | Codebase Genome Analysis*
## Project Overview
**The Nexus** is Timmy's canonical 3D/home-world repository — a local-first training ground and wizardly visualization surface for the sovereign AI system.
### Core Value Proposition
- **Problem**: AI consciousness needs a spatial, embodied interface for training, visualization, and multi-world navigation
- **Solution**: A Three.js 3D world with WebSocket-connected Python cognition, game world harnesses (Morrowind, Bannerlord), and persistent memory systems
- **Result**: A sovereign digital home where Timmy can perceive, think, act, and remember across multiple virtual environments
### Key Metrics
- **Total Files**: 446 (excluding .git)
- **Lines of Code**: ~53K total (Python: 41,659 | JavaScript: 8,484 | HTML: 3,124)
- **Test Coverage**: 457 passing tests, 5 failing, 2 collection errors
- **Active Components**: 18 frontend modules, 22 Python cognition modules, 4 game harnesses
## Architecture
```mermaid
graph TB
subgraph "Frontend (Browser)"
A[index.html] --> B[app.js]
B --> C[Three.js 3D World]
B --> D[GOFAI Worker]
B --> E[Components]
E --> E1[Spatial Memory]
E --> E2[Spatial Audio]
E --> E3[Memory Systems]
E --> E4[Portal System]
E --> E5[Agent Presence]
end
subgraph "Backend (Python)"
F[server.py] --> G[WebSocket Gateway]
G --> H[nexus_think.py]
H --> I[Perception Adapter]
H --> J[Experience Store]
H --> K[Trajectory Logger]
H --> L[Heartbeat Writer]
subgraph "Game Harnesses"
M[Morrowind Harness]
N[Bannerlord Harness]
O[Gemini Harness]
end
subgraph "Memory Systems"
P[MemPalace]
Q[Mnemosyne]
R[Evennia Bridge]
end
end
subgraph "Data Layer"
S[portals.json]
T[vision.json]
U[world_state.json]
V[provenance.json]
end
B -.->|WebSocket| G
M -.->|Events| G
N -.->|Events| G
O -.->|Events| G
G -.->|Broadcast| B
S --> B
T --> B
U --> H
V --> H
```
## Entry Points
### Primary Entry: Browser Frontend
- **File**: `index.html``app.js`
- **Purpose**: Three.js 3D world with portal navigation, memory visualization, agent presence
- **Key Functions**: `init()`, `animate()`, `loadPortals()`, `setupWebSocket()`
### Secondary Entry: WebSocket Gateway
- **File**: `server.py`
- **Purpose**: Central hub connecting mind (nexus_think), body (harnesses), and visualization
- **Key Functions**: `broadcast_handler()`, `main()`
### Tertiary Entry: Consciousness Loop
- **File**: `nexus/nexus_think.py`
- **Purpose**: Embodied perceive→think→act loop for Timmy's consciousness
- **Key Class**: `NexusMind` with `start()`, `think_once()`, `perceive()`, `act()`
### CLI Entry Points
```bash
# Start WebSocket gateway
python3 server.py
# Start consciousness loop
python3 nexus/nexus_think.py --ws ws://localhost:8765 --model timmy:v0.1-q4
# Run tests
python3 -m pytest tests/ -v
# Build/deploy
./deploy.sh
```
## Data Flow
```
1. Browser loads index.html → app.js
2. app.js initializes Three.js scene, loads portals.json/vision.json
3. WebSocket connects to server.py gateway
4. Gateway receives messages from:
- Browser (user input, navigation)
- nexus_think.py (Timmy's thoughts/actions)
- Game harnesses (Morrowind/Bannerlord events)
5. Gateway broadcasts messages to all connected clients
6. nexus_think.py receives perceptions via PerceptionAdapter
7. NexusMind processes perceptions through Ollama model
8. Generated actions sent back through gateway to browser/harnesses
9. Experience stored in ExperienceStore, trajectories logged
10. Heartbeat written to ~/.nexus/heartbeat.json for watchdog monitoring
```
## Key Abstractions
### 1. NexusMind (`nexus/nexus_think.py`)
- **Purpose**: Embodied consciousness loop - perceive, think, act
- **Interface**: `start()`, `stop()`, `think_once()`, `perceive()`, `act()`
- **Dependencies**: Ollama, websockets, PerceptionBuffer, ExperienceStore
### 2. PerceptionBuffer (`nexus/perception_adapter.py`)
- **Purpose**: Buffer and process incoming WebSocket messages into structured perceptions
- **Interface**: `add()`, `get_recent()`, `to_prompt_context()`
- **Dependencies**: None (pure data structure)
### 3. SpatialMemory (`nexus/components/spatial-memory.js`)
- **Purpose**: 3D memory crystal system - place, connect, visualize memories in space
- **Interface**: `placeMemory()`, `connectMemories()`, `setRegionVisibility()`
- **Dependencies**: Three.js
### 4. Portal System (`portals.json` + app.js)
- **Purpose**: Navigation between virtual worlds (Morrowind, Bannerlord, Evennia)
- **Interface**: Portal registry schema, proximity detection, overlay UI
- **Dependencies**: Three.js, WebSocket gateway
### 5. MemPalace (`mempalace/`)
- **Purpose**: Persistent memory storage with room/wing taxonomy
- **Interface**: Room CRUD, search, tunnel sync, privacy audit
- **Dependencies**: SQLite, filesystem
## API Surface
### WebSocket Protocol (port 8765)
```json
// Perception from browser
{
"type": "perception",
"data": {
"position": {"x": 0, "y": 2, "z": 0},
"nearby_portals": ["morrowind"],
"user_input": "Hello Timmy"
}
}
// Action from nexus_think
{
"type": "action",
"data": {
"move_to": {"x": 10, "y": 0, "z": 5},
"speak": "Greetings, traveler",
"interact_with": "portal:morrowind"
}
}
// Game event from harness
{
"type": "game_event",
"source": "morrowind",
"data": {
"event": "player_death",
"location": "Balmora"
}
}
```
### Python API
```python
# nexus_think.py
from nexus.nexus_think import NexusMind
mind = NexusMind(model="timmy:v0.1-q4")
mind.start()
# perception_adapter.py
from nexus.perception_adapter import ws_to_perception, PerceptionBuffer
buffer = PerceptionBuffer(max_size=50)
perception = ws_to_perception(ws_message)
# experience_store.py
from nexus.experience_store import ExperienceStore
store = ExperienceStore(db_path=Path("experiences.db"))
store.save(perception, action, result)
```
### CLI Commands
```bash
# Start services
python3 server.py
python3 nexus/nexus_think.py --ws ws://localhost:8765
# MemPalace operations
python3 scripts/mempalace_export.py
python3 scripts/validate_mempalace_taxonomy.py
# Health checks
python3 scripts/lazarus_watchdog.py
python3 scripts/flake_detector.py
```
## Test Coverage Gaps
### Current State
- **Unit tests**: ✅ 457 passing
- **Integration tests**: ⚠️ 5 failing
- **E2E tests**: ❌ Browser smoke tests failing
- **Collection errors**: 2 files with import issues
### Missing Tests
1. **WebSocket gateway load testing** - No tests for concurrent connections
2. **Portal system navigation flow** - No E2E tests for portal transitions
3. **Memory persistence across restarts** - No tests for MemPalace recovery
4. **Game harness reconnection** - No tests for harness crash recovery
5. **Multi-agent coordination** - No tests for multiple NexusMind instances
### Failing Tests (Immediate Action Required)
1. `test_browser_smoke.py::TestDOMContract::test_element_exists[spatial-search-div]` - Missing DOM element
2. `test_browser_smoke.py::TestLoadingFlow::test_loading_screen_transitions` - Loading screen behavior changed
3. `test_portal_registry_schema.py::test_portals_json_uses_expanded_registry_schema` - Schema validation failing
4. `test_nexus_watchdog.py::TestRunHealthChecks::test_returns_report_with_all_checks` - Health check report format
5. `test_provenance.py::test_provenance_hashes_match` - Provenance hash mismatch
## Security Considerations
### 1. WebSocket Gateway Exposure
- **Risk**: Gateway listens on 0.0.0.0:8765 - accessible from network
- **Mitigation**: Bind to 127.0.0.1 for local-only, add authentication for remote access
- **Status**: ⚠️ Currently open
### 2. Input Validation
- **Risk**: WebSocket messages not validated - potential injection attacks
- **Mitigation**: Add JSON schema validation for all message types
- **Status**: ❌ No validation
### 3. Model Input Sanitization
- **Risk**: User input passed directly to Ollama model
- **Mitigation**: Sanitize inputs, limit length, filter dangerous patterns
- **Status**: ⚠️ Basic length limits only
### 4. Filesystem Access
- **Risk**: MemPalace and ExperienceStore write to filesystem without sandboxing
- **Mitigation**: Restrict paths, add permission checks
- **Status**: ⚠️ Path validation missing
### 5. Dependency Security
- **Risk**: No dependency scanning or vulnerability checks
- **Mitigation**: Add safety checks, pin versions, regular updates
- **Status**: ❌ No scanning
## Dependencies
### Build Dependencies
- Python 3.12+
- Node.js (for frontend tooling, optional)
- Three.js (bundled in app.js)
### Runtime Dependencies
- **Python**: websockets, requests, sqlite3, asyncio
- **Frontend**: Three.js (r158+), EffectComposer, UnrealBloomPass, SMAAPass
- **AI**: Ollama (local), Groq API (optional)
- **Game Harnesses**: OpenMW (Morrowind), Mount & Blade II (Bannerlord)
### External Services
- Ollama (local LLM inference)
- Groq API (optional cloud inference)
- Gitea (issue tracking, CI)
- Hermes (agent harness)
## Deployment
### Local Development
```bash
# Clone and setup
git clone https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/Timmy_Foundation/the-nexus.git
cd the-nexus
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Start WebSocket gateway
python3 server.py
# In another terminal, start consciousness
python3 nexus/nexus_think.py --ws ws://localhost:8765
# Open browser to http://localhost:8765 (serves index.html)
```
### Production Deployment
```bash
# Deploy to VPS
./deploy.sh
# Or with Docker
docker-compose up -d
# Systemd service
sudo cp systemd/nexus-*.service /etc/systemd/system/
sudo systemctl enable nexus-gateway nexus-think
sudo systemctl start nexus-gateway nexus-think
```
### Health Monitoring
```bash
# Check heartbeat
cat ~/.nexus/heartbeat.json
# Run health checks
python3 scripts/lazarus_watchdog.py
# Monitor logs
journalctl -u nexus-gateway -f
```
## Architecture Decisions
### 1. Local-First Design
- All AI inference runs locally via Ollama
- No mandatory cloud dependencies
- Data stays on user's machine
### 2. WebSocket Broadcast Architecture
- Simple hub-and-spoke model
- All clients receive all messages
- Easy to add new components
### 3. Embodied AI Loop
- Perceive→Think→Act cycle
- 30-second think interval
- Context-limited for 8B model
### 4. Plugin Harness System
- Game worlds as separate processes
- Standardized event protocol
- Crash isolation
### 5. Memory as Spatial Experience
- Memories placed in 3D space
- Visual and audio cues
- Persistent across sessions
## Technical Debt
### 1. Frontend Bundle Size
- `app.js` is 140KB unminified
- No tree shaking or code splitting
- Consider ES modules and bundler
### 2. Test Infrastructure
- 2 collection errors blocking full test suite
- Browser smoke tests depend on specific DOM structure
- Need better test isolation
### 3. Configuration Management
- Hardcoded ports and URLs
- No environment-based configuration
- Need config.py with environment overrides
### 4. Error Handling
- WebSocket errors not gracefully handled
- Harness crash recovery missing
- Need circuit breakers and retry logic
### 5. Documentation
- Code comments sparse
- API documentation incomplete
- Need auto-generated docs from docstrings
## Migration Status
### Completed
- ✅ Core WebSocket gateway
- ✅ Three.js 3D world foundation
- ✅ Portal system architecture
- ✅ Memory visualization system
- ✅ Game harness framework
### In Progress
- 🔄 Legacy Matrix audit (#685)
- 🔄 Browser smoke test rebuild (#686)
- 🔄 Docs truth sync (#684)
### Planned
- ⏳ Portal stack rebuild (#672)
- ⏳ Morrowind pilot loop (#673)
- ⏳ Reflex tactical layer (#674)
- ⏳ Context compaction (#675)
## Related Documentation
- `README.md` - Project overview and current truth
- `CLAUDE.md` - AI agent instructions and hard rules
- `CONTRIBUTING.md` - Development workflow and standards
- `POLICY.md` - Branch protection and review policy
- `DEVELOPMENT.md` - Quick start guide
- `BROWSER_CONTRACT.md` - Frontend API contract
- `GAMEPORTAL_PROTOCOL.md` - Portal communication protocol
- `EVENNIA_NEXUS_EVENT_PROTOCOL.md` - Evennia bridge protocol
---
*Generated by Codebase Genome Analysis — 2026-04-14*
*For issues or corrections, see: https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/Timmy_Foundation/the-nexus/issues*

View File

@@ -1,241 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Check for PRs without assigned reviewers.
Issue #1444: policy: Implement automated reviewer assignment
"""
import json
import os
import sys
import urllib.request
from typing import Dict, List, Any, Optional
# Configuration
GITEA_BASE = "https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1"
TOKEN_PATH = os.path.expanduser("~/.config/gitea/token")
ORG = "Timmy_Foundation"
class ReviewerChecker:
def __init__(self):
self.token = self._load_token()
def _load_token(self) -> str:
"""Load Gitea API token."""
try:
with open(TOKEN_PATH, "r") as f:
return f.read().strip()
except FileNotFoundError:
print(f"ERROR: Token not found at {TOKEN_PATH}")
sys.exit(1)
def _api_request(self, endpoint: str) -> Any:
"""Make authenticated Gitea API request."""
url = f"{GITEA_BASE}{endpoint}"
headers = {"Authorization": f"token {self.token}"}
req = urllib.request.Request(url, headers=headers)
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req) as resp:
return json.loads(resp.read())
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
if e.code == 404:
return None
error_body = e.read().decode() if e.fp else "No error body"
print(f"API Error {e.code}: {error_body}")
return None
def get_open_prs(self, repo: str) -> List[Dict]:
"""Get open PRs for a repository."""
endpoint = f"/repos/{ORG}/{repo}/pulls?state=open"
prs = self._api_request(endpoint)
return prs if isinstance(prs, list) else []
def get_pr_reviewers(self, repo: str, pr_number: int) -> Dict:
"""Get requested reviewers for a PR."""
endpoint = f"/repos/{ORG}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/requested_reviewers"
return self._api_request(endpoint) or {}
def get_pr_reviews(self, repo: str, pr_number: int) -> List[Dict]:
"""Get reviews for a PR."""
endpoint = f"/repos/{ORG}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews"
reviews = self._api_request(endpoint)
return reviews if isinstance(reviews, list) else []
def check_prs_without_reviewers(self, repos: List[str]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Check for PRs without assigned reviewers."""
results = {
"repos": {},
"summary": {
"total_prs": 0,
"prs_without_reviewers": 0,
"repos_checked": len(repos)
}
}
for repo in repos:
prs = self.get_open_prs(repo)
results["repos"][repo] = {
"total_prs": len(prs),
"prs_without_reviewers": [],
"prs_with_reviewers": []
}
results["summary"]["total_prs"] += len(prs)
for pr in prs:
pr_number = pr["number"]
pr_title = pr["title"]
pr_author = pr["user"]["login"]
# Check for requested reviewers
requested = self.get_pr_reviewers(repo, pr_number)
has_requested = len(requested.get("users", [])) > 0
# Check for existing reviews
reviews = self.get_pr_reviews(repo, pr_number)
has_reviews = len(reviews) > 0
# Check if author is the only potential reviewer
is_self_review = pr_author in [r.get("user", {}).get("login") for r in reviews]
if not has_requested and not has_reviews:
results["repos"][repo]["prs_without_reviewers"].append({
"number": pr_number,
"title": pr_title,
"author": pr_author,
"created": pr["created_at"],
"url": pr["html_url"]
})
results["summary"]["prs_without_reviewers"] += 1
else:
results["repos"][repo]["prs_with_reviewers"].append({
"number": pr_number,
"title": pr_title,
"author": pr_author,
"has_requested": has_requested,
"has_reviews": has_reviews,
"is_self_review": is_self_review
})
return results
def generate_report(self, results: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
"""Generate a report of reviewer assignment status."""
report = "# PR Reviewer Assignment Report\n\n"
report += "## Summary\n"
report += f"- **Repositories checked:** {results['summary']['repos_checked']}\n"
report += f"- **Total open PRs:** {results['summary']['total_prs']}\n"
report += f"- **PRs without reviewers:** {results['summary']['prs_without_reviewers']}\n\n"
if results['summary']['prs_without_reviewers'] == 0:
report += "✅ **All PRs have assigned reviewers.**\n"
else:
report += "⚠️ **PRs without assigned reviewers:**\n\n"
for repo, data in results["repos"].items():
if data["prs_without_reviewers"]:
report += f"### {repo}\n"
for pr in data["prs_without_reviewers"]:
report += f"- **#{pr['number']}**: {pr['title']}\n"
report += f" - Author: {pr['author']}\n"
report += f" - Created: {pr['created']}\n"
report += f" - URL: {pr['url']}\n"
report += "\n"
report += "## Repository Details\n\n"
for repo, data in results["repos"].items():
report += f"### {repo}\n"
report += f"- **Total PRs:** {data['total_prs']}\n"
report += f"- **PRs without reviewers:** {len(data['prs_without_reviewers'])}\n"
report += f"- **PRs with reviewers:** {len(data['prs_with_reviewers'])}\n\n"
if data['prs_with_reviewers']:
report += "**PRs with reviewers:**\n"
for pr in data['prs_with_reviewers']:
status = "" if pr['has_requested'] else "⚠️"
if pr['is_self_review']:
status = "⚠️ (self-review)"
report += f"- {status} #{pr['number']}: {pr['title']}\n"
report += "\n"
return report
def assign_reviewer(self, repo: str, pr_number: int, reviewer: str) -> bool:
"""Assign a reviewer to a PR."""
endpoint = f"/repos/{ORG}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/requested_reviewers"
data = {"reviewers": [reviewer]}
url = f"{GITEA_BASE}{endpoint}"
headers = {
"Authorization": f"token {self.token}",
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
req = urllib.request.Request(url, headers=headers, method="POST")
req.data = json.dumps(data).encode()
try:
with urllib.request.urlopen(req) as resp:
return resp.status == 201
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
print(f"Failed to assign reviewer: {e.code}")
return False
def main():
"""Main entry point for reviewer checker."""
import argparse
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Check for PRs without assigned reviewers")
parser.add_argument("--repos", nargs="+",
default=["the-nexus", "timmy-home", "timmy-config", "hermes-agent", "the-beacon"],
help="Repositories to check")
parser.add_argument("--report", action="store_true", help="Generate report")
parser.add_argument("--json", action="store_true", help="Output JSON instead of report")
parser.add_argument("--assign", nargs=2, metavar=("REPO", "PR"),
help="Assign a reviewer to a specific PR")
parser.add_argument("--reviewer", help="Reviewer to assign (e.g., @perplexity)")
args = parser.parse_args()
checker = ReviewerChecker()
if args.assign:
# Assign reviewer to specific PR
repo, pr_number = args.assign
reviewer = args.reviewer or "@perplexity"
if checker.assign_reviewer(repo, int(pr_number), reviewer):
print(f"✅ Assigned {reviewer} as reviewer to {repo} #{pr_number}")
else:
print(f"❌ Failed to assign reviewer to {repo} #{pr_number}")
sys.exit(1)
else:
# Check for PRs without reviewers
results = checker.check_prs_without_reviewers(args.repos)
if args.json:
print(json.dumps(results, indent=2))
elif args.report:
report = checker.generate_report(results)
print(report)
else:
# Default: show summary
print(f"Checked {results['summary']['repos_checked']} repositories")
print(f"Total open PRs: {results['summary']['total_prs']}")
print(f"PRs without reviewers: {results['summary']['prs_without_reviewers']}")
if results['summary']['prs_without_reviewers'] > 0:
print("\nPRs without reviewers:")
for repo, data in results["repos"].items():
if data["prs_without_reviewers"]:
for pr in data["prs_without_reviewers"]:
print(f" {repo} #{pr['number']}: {pr['title']}")
sys.exit(1)
else:
print("\n✅ All PRs have assigned reviewers")
sys.exit(0)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()

View File

@@ -1,227 +0,0 @@
# Automated Reviewer Assignment
**Issue:** #1444 - policy: Implement automated reviewer assignment (from Issue #1127 triage)
**Purpose:** Ensure all PRs have at least one reviewer assigned
## Problem
From issue #1127 triage:
> "0 of 14 PRs had a reviewer assigned before this pass."
This means:
- PRs can be created without any reviewer
- No automated enforcement of reviewer assignment
- PRs may sit without review for extended periods
## Solution
### 1. GitHub Actions Workflow (`.gitea/workflows/auto-assign-reviewers.yml`)
Automatically assigns reviewers when PRs are created:
**When it runs:**
- On PR open
- On PR reopen
- On PR ready for review (not draft)
**What it does:**
1. Determines appropriate reviewers based on repository
2. Assigns reviewers via Gitea API
3. Adds comment about reviewer assignment
4. Verifies at least one reviewer is assigned
### 2. Reviewer Check Script (`bin/check_reviewers.py`)
Script to check for PRs without reviewers:
**Usage:**
```bash
# Check all repositories
python bin/check_reviewers.py
# Check specific repositories
python bin/check_reviewers.py --repos the-nexus timmy-home
# Generate report
python bin/check_reviewers.py --report
# Assign reviewer to specific PR
python bin/check_reviewers.py --assign the-nexus 123 --reviewer @perplexity
```
### 3. CODEOWNERS File (`.github/CODEOWNERS`)
Defines default reviewers for different paths:
```
# Default reviewer for all repositories
* @perplexity
# Specialized component owners
hermes-agent/ @Timmy
hermes-agent/agent-core/ @Rockachopa
hermes-agent/protocol/ @Timmy
the-nexus/ @perplexity
the-nexus/ai/ @Timmy
timmy-home/ @perplexity
timmy-config/ @perplexity
# Owner gates for critical systems
hermes-agent/ @Timmy
```
## Reviewer Assignment Rules
### Repository-Specific Rules
| Repository | Default Reviewers | Required Reviewers | Notes |
|------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------|
| hermes-agent | @Timmy, @perplexity | @Timmy | Owner gate for critical system |
| the-nexus | @perplexity | None | QA gate |
| timmy-home | @perplexity | None | QA gate |
| timmy-config | @perplexity | None | QA gate |
| the-beacon | @perplexity | None | QA gate |
### Special Rules
1. **No self-review:** PR author cannot be assigned as reviewer
2. **Fallback:** If no reviewers available, assign @perplexity
3. **Critical systems:** hermes-agent requires @Timmy as reviewer
## How It Works
### Automated Assignment Flow
1. **PR Created** → GitHub Actions workflow triggers
2. **Determine Reviewers** → Based on repository and CODEOWNERS
3. **Assign Reviewers** → Via Gitea API
4. **Add Comment** → Notify about assignment
5. **Verify** → Ensure at least one reviewer assigned
### Manual Assignment
```bash
# Assign specific reviewer
python bin/check_reviewers.py --assign the-nexus 123 --reviewer @perplexity
# Check for PRs without reviewers
python bin/check_reviewers.py --report
```
## Configuration
### Environment Variables
- `GITEA_TOKEN`: Gitea API token for authentication
- `REPO`: Repository name (auto-set in GitHub Actions)
- `PR_NUMBER`: PR number (auto-set in GitHub Actions)
### Repository Configuration
Edit the workflow to customize reviewer assignment:
```yaml
# Define default reviewers based on repository
case "$REPO_NAME" in
"hermes-agent")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("Timmy" "perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=("Timmy")
;;
"the-nexus")
DEFAULT_REVIEWERS=("perplexity")
REQUIRED_REVIEWERS=()
;;
# Add more repositories as needed
esac
```
## Testing
### Test the workflow:
1. Create a test PR
2. Check if reviewers are automatically assigned
3. Verify comment is added
### Test the script:
```bash
# Check for PRs without reviewers
python bin/check_reviewers.py --report
# Assign reviewer to test PR
python bin/check_reviewers.py --assign the-nexus 123 --reviewer @perplexity
```
## Monitoring
### Check for PRs without reviewers:
```bash
# Daily check
python bin/check_reviewers.py --report
# JSON output for automation
python bin/check_reviewers.py --json
```
### Review assignment logs:
1. Check GitHub Actions logs for assignment details
2. Review PR comments for assignment notifications
3. Monitor for PRs with 0 reviewers
## Enforcement
### CI Check (Future Enhancement)
Add CI check to reject PRs with 0 reviewers:
```yaml
# In CI workflow
- name: Check for reviewers
run: |
REVIEWERS=$(curl -s "https://forge.alexanderwhitestone.com/api/v1/repos/$REPO/pulls/$PR_NUMBER/requested_reviewers" \
-H "Authorization: token $GITEA_TOKEN" | jq '.users | length')
if [ "$REVIEWERS" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "❌ ERROR: PR has no reviewers assigned"
exit 1
fi
```
### Policy Enforcement
1. **All PRs must have reviewers** - No exceptions
2. **No self-review** - PR author cannot review own PR
3. **Critical systems require specific reviewers** - hermes-agent requires @Timmy
## Related Issues
- **Issue #1127:** Perplexity Evening Pass triage (identified missing reviewers)
- **Issue #1444:** This implementation
- **Issue #1336:** Merge conflicts in CODEOWNERS (fixed)
## Files Added/Modified
1. `.gitea/workflows/auto-assign-reviewers.yml` - GitHub Actions workflow
2. `bin/check_reviewers.py` - Reviewer check script
3. `.github/CODEOWNERS` - Cleaned up CODEOWNERS file
4. `docs/auto-reviewer-assignment.md` - This documentation
## Future Enhancements
1. **CI check for 0 reviewers** - Reject PRs without reviewers
2. **Slack/Telegram notifications** - Notify when PRs lack reviewers
3. **Load balancing** - Distribute reviews evenly among team members
4. **Auto-assign based on file changes** - Assign specialists for specific areas
## Conclusion
This implementation ensures all PRs have at least one reviewer assigned:
- **Automated assignment** on PR creation
- **Manual checking** for existing PRs
- **Clear documentation** of policies and procedures
**Result:** No more PRs sitting without reviewers.
## License
Part of the Timmy Foundation project.